
Why There's No Substitute For The Power Of In-Person Networking
Many professionals now use LinkedIn or other online resources as their primary networking method, whether they are joining industry groups, looking for jobs or reaching out to potential collaborators.
While such resources have definitely opened up new opportunities and connections for many, they are still no substitute for in-person networking. Quite frankly, in-person networking has key advantages that can never be fully replicated in a virtual space.
Online networking events have certainly come a long way, but they still tend to focus on efficiency rather than true opportunities for connection.
As Aneta Pawlik, marketing communications manager at Female Founders, writes, 'Online events are organized to accommodate presentations and question time – and they tend to strip the social parts because, historically, it has been very difficult to connect with other people during webinars or live streams. And let's be honest; we have all been part of events where other attendees are happily not turning their cameras on and staying silent in the chat. This attitude makes it difficult to truly build relationships with other participants or speakers compared to in-person interaction.'
As a result, online networking events often result in one-way communication rather than true connections. Networking through social media can take time due to delayed responses. On the other hand, in-person events allow for more spontaneous and natural conversation. Body language, tone and other factors enable more natural conversation that build rapport and make interactions more meaningful and memorable.
Because of this, in-person networking lets you demonstrate your authentic personality and expertise. Your demeanor during these conversations can create a lasting impression that builds trust and connection much quicker than if you were to connect exclusively online. Even if you don't immediately start doing business with someone, that in-person connection will help you remain in their memory for when they need to consider business partners in the future.
Another advantage of in-person networking events is that they often provide unexpected opportunities to connect with people you wouldn't have met otherwise. These unplanned interactions can sometimes lead to the most important partnerships and connections — whereas online, you are generally limited to connecting with the people you originally planned to connect with.
For example, Caribbean event-planning agency Mystique highlighted the power of in-person events through its work on the Jamaican premiere of the Paramount Pictures film 'Bob Marley: One Love.' The event brought together 900 VIP guests, including the Prime Minister of Jamaica, Ziggy Marley, Rita Marley and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. For the guests of this premiere, attending an in-person event provided the opportunity to meet actual royalty.
While you probably won't encounter royalty at your next industry-specific event, in-person networking opportunities can still provide chances to meet with similarly important people in your niche. You might bump into a presenter and get the chance to ask more in-depth questions about their area of expertise. You might meet a manager for a different company who is looking to partner with someone with your own skill set.
These spontaneous meetings can often be more worthwhile than planned activities and meet-ups, leading to lasting partnerships. On the other hand, simply attending an online webinar with little to no opportunity for interacting with other attendees will completely eliminate these kinds of opportunities. In that case, you aren't really networking at all, and potential partners may never even learn you exist.
Perhaps the most powerful advantage of in-person networking is that it is generally more likely to serve as a breeding ground for collaborating with others. As you connect with other businesses and individuals in a natural, in-person setting, these conversations that build rapport can also help you and others recognize common goals and interests.
Having time to talk together in-person can lead to more in-depth discussions where you share ideas and ways you can collaborate to make different projects a reality. And with in-person networking, it is much easier to find ways to continue the conversation even after the official portion of the event is over.
This isn't to say that online networking can't help you discover these opportunities as well. However, the inefficiencies of online networking can make it much harder to get to this point. Case in point: A study from the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology found that making a request in person is 34 times more successful than making that same request via email — largely due to the emotions conveyed during in-person conversation.
Better communication is foundational for stronger collaboration, and in-person networking can lay the groundwork for these partnerships.
Digital networking opportunities are undeniably powerful, allowing collaborators who are geographically distant to work together effectively. But don't neglect in-person networking. Meeting and networking in-person can help you build rapport and trust, while also creating unexpected opportunities that wouldn't have been available through a digital event.
By strategically using in-person networking, you can create new connections that lead to even more powerful collaborations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
Destiny 2's Power Leveling And Loot System Is The Worst It's Ever Been
Accuse me of being overly negative about the state of Destiny 2 if you want, but there have been so many backward and baffling decisions in The Edge of Fate that it actively makes me upset, given how long I've played and loved this game. Right now, the combination of how power level and loot farming interact in Destiny 2 is the worst I've ever seen. Sure, actual loot itself has been much worse (remember fixed roll days?), but how you power and get loot is simply inexcusable, and I have no idea how this system was designed. The longer this expansion goes, the more clear it becomes. Destiny 2 is now nothing more than a slow crawl through 450 levels of power with loot being a side-effect of hitting those marks, rather than a true chase. Right now, attempting to get high-tier gear does not have anything to do with beating challenging content. It has to do with these arbitrary power cut-offs. Get to 300+ rank, you will instantly start drowning in T3s. Get to 400, T4s. And now, the very few no-lifers that have reached 450 will see boatloads of Tier 5 loot, not for achieving some great in-game feat, but just…a Crucible game, as 450 hauler Diffizzle has demonstrated: FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Simply being these numbers and then playing any content at all near that level is what gets you the new Tier. And the entire game turning into an arduous light level slog, light level being something that most players were glad to see almost entirely left behind the last few years, is exhausting. This has raised additional debates about the 'efficient' way to get this high, namely running ultra-fast Portal missions like Caldera in Solo Ops or Starcrossed in Pinnacle Ops to get random gear to upgrade your slots. Random gear you will not care about, since your goal is to get to higher and higher tiers. There's the idea that 'well, you can play whatever you want and get there' rather than boring grinding the same few things. That's true! However, if your main goal is to reach these higher tiers, playing something that takes four times as long for the same amount of power upgrades for 'fun' is not 'fun' when it's severely delaying the actual gear farming you want to do. The current system requires at least dozens upon dozens of grinding to reach even the start of the farm you want to pursue. And once you get there, it rains Tier 5s like you've won the lottery. So then that chase can be over practically as soon as it started given that T5 guns now have a million perks and it won't be hard to find what you want. You can say that you don't really even need anything more than T2, but I mean, this is a loot game. If five Tiers exist, the goal is to get those high Tiers, because of course it is. This is all completely backward. This has resulted in things like the raid giving out bottom-tier loot, or Kepler public events giving out multiple Tier 5s instantly. The only thing that truly matters is your power number, which does not even make you powerful at all, given activity difficulty deltas that cap you. It does not take any remote amount of skill to clear these missions endlessly for these upgrades, it just takes way, way too much time, so much time that I cannot imagine 95% of players will believe it's worth the investment. There are things that can be done. Bonus loot can be handed out to other activities at certain times to encourage diversity of play, for instance. But it's the entire system that's broken. Grinding to simply hit a cutoff threshold that is the single barrier between you and the loot you want feels awful. This concept needs a complete overhaul if it doesn't want to burn out the vast majority of the playerbase a month into launch. It's that urgent. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.


Newsweek
12 hours ago
- Newsweek
Fury as Writer's Mom Decides To Become an 'Author'—but There's a Twist
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Reddit post has ignited fierce debate online after a user expressed frustration that their mother wrote an entire book using AI—and is now calling herself an "author." The post, made by /u/Royal-Average8115 in the subreddit "Mildly Infuriating," quickly gained traction with more than 7,700 upvotes. According to the poster, it all began when their mom started using ChatGPT to write polished posts for her LinkedIn profile. "At first it was just for her LinkedIn and she posted it there," they wrote. "It got thousands of views, people are commenting and reposting and they're all talking about how insightful the posts are but really the words are not her own not in the slightest, not even the idea is hers." Newsweek has contacted to /u/Royal-Average8115 for comment via Reddit. We could not verify the details of the case. At first, the poster tolerated it, believing someone would eventually call it out. According to the poster, only one person did, and their mother chose to ignore it. Things escalated when she decided to publish an AI-written eBook on Amazon. The poster wrote that their mom justified the decision by saying "everyone uses AI" and insisting that it was perfectly acceptable. "Now she's calling herself an author," the poster added. "You can't be author if AI is the writer!!" What especially rankled the poster was that their mother planned to continue using AI to generate more content for future books, seeking to build a self-sustaining writing business. As a lifelong writer, the poster described the situation as deeply frustrating. They recounted their own creative struggles—such as pacing a room to perfect character dialogue or losing pages of hard-won inspiration—and found it disheartening that their mother could simply prompt a chatbot and claim the title of "author" without putting in the same effort. The situation has sparked a broader discussion about AI's role in publishing and whether using tools such as ChatGPT undermines the integrity of authorship. A stock image of someone typing on a laptop. A stock image of someone typing on a laptop. Antonio_Diaz/iStock / Getty Images Plus Author Chris Mannino weighed in with Newsweek, saying the flood of AI-generated books "saturates and dilutes an already heavily oversaturated market and cheapens the work of those of us who put in hours and years of effort." "That said, I do use AI as a tool in my fundraising job, and I also use AI as a tool for marketing my books. Trying to pretend AI doesn't exist is foolish, but there are definite lines," he said. Maryann Karinch, a co-author of How to Spot a Liar and publisher at Armin Lear Press, also voiced concern. "I see AI as a great help in organizing material and exploring alternate ways of phrasing something—not 'creating.' As long as the material is identified as AI generated, I have no problem with it being available for sale, but my company would never publish it," she told Newsweek. Karinch said she ran submissions through AI and plagiarism detectors. In one case, she returned a section of a manuscript to an author after discovering 74 percent of it was AI-generated. The author admitted that the section had come from an AI tool. Colin Cooper, an AI and education strategist, offered a more nuanced take. Cooper, who works globally with schools and startups and also runs a personalized children's book company, drew a comparison between AI and ghostwriting. He argued that if someone has genuine expertise and uses AI as a productivity enhancer—like a calculator or an editor—they shouldn't be discredited. "The ethical dilemma arises not from the use of AI but from its misuse," Cooper told Newsweek. The real concern, he added, lies with "overnight experts" who pump out AI-generated content on topics they barely understand while posing as authorities. In his view, authorship in the AI era should be defined by "expertise, intent, and transparency—not just keystrokes." Meanwhile, commenters across Reddit were equally outraged. "I see c**p like this all the time on LinkedIn," one user wrote. "People posting these long, clearly AI-written commentaries. What annoys me even more is that the people commenting on them seem like bots too?" Another added: "Jokes aside, I really dislike what AI is doing to art. The same thing is happening with music. There was a case with a moderately popular rock band (~1M monthly listeners on Spotify) that was AI generated." One user shared their own workplace experience, writing: "AI is being used where I work, in accounting, to make some tasks easier by suggesting options." They went on to say they believed AI-generated work should come with clear labeling. "I think there should be an 'AI generated' label on everything that is published that way," the user wrote, adding, "There need to be a lot more regulations." Do you have any viral videos or pictures that you want to share? We want to see the best ones! Send them in to life@ and they could appear on our site.


Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
World's Largest Building Site Eyes Thousands of Layoffs
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Saudi Arabia's Neom megaproject, home to the world's largest construction site, could soon layoff thousands of workers. Consulting firms were brought in by the Public Investment Fund to assess the project's feasibility as officials grappled with economic headwinds that may force significant downsizing at the site. Newsweek contacted the Public Investment Fund and Neom for comment by email. Why It Matters The Neom project, particularly its centerpiece "the Line"—a planned 105-mile linear city—has served as a cornerstone of Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 economic diversification agenda. Designed to house 9 million people in an ultramodern, zero-emission environment, the project was intended to reduce the kingdom's reliance on oil. However, escalating costs, reduced oil revenues and slower-than-expected construction progress have put the project's scale in jeopardy. The review process initiated by the Public Investment Fund could affect not only Neom's workforce but also the ambitions of Saudi Arabia to reinvent its economy and global image. What To Know In July, the kingdom's Public Investment Fund, which manages all Vision 2030 projects, engaged external consulting firms to assess the Neom's feasibility. Semafor later reported that sources inside Neom were considering cutting its workforce and relocating more than 1,000 employees to Riyadh to control costs. Currently, workers live on the construction site, where custom-built accommodation has been placed to make sure employees don't have to commute daily into the desert. As of April, about 2,800 workers were housed at the site, Neom's website said. An image of the building site of the Line in Saudi Arabia. An image of the building site of the Line in Saudi Arabia. NEOM In response to the report, Neom spokesperson Sahar Al-Anbar wrote on LinkedIn: "Change can be challenging, but firstly, let us establish that Neom is more than just a development project, it represents an ambitious national vision that is a key part of Saudi Arabia's development strategy. "It's natural for a project of this scale to go through periods of review and adjustment. These actions are actually reassuring and reflect responsible management. By reassessing resource allocation, Neom takes a proactive approach to stay in line with its ambitious long-term objectives." Neom has been plagued by allegations of worker mistreatment. In October, an ITV documentary said that about 21,000 foreign workers had died and 100,000 more had gone missing since 2017 while working on several projects as part of Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiative. What People Are Saying Sahar Al-Anbar, a spokesperson for Neom, wrote on LinkedIn: "Handling challenges in large-scale projects require flexibility and a readiness to adapt. The ability to make strategic adjustments is a critical aspect of successful project delivery. It's encouraging to see Neom prioritize thoughtful planning and responsiveness, which are essential in bringing this visionary concept to life! "Lastly, it's important to note that meals, schools, housekeeping service, etc, are provided as part of the remote-site allowance policy and are not standard benefits. Employees will still receive their current pay packages when moving to Riyadh." What Happens Next The ongoing review by consulting firms is set to guide the Saudi Public Investment Fund's final decisions regarding Neom's scale, workforce and timeline. The results are expected to determine whether the city will come close to its original 2030 completion goal or face further restructuring and delays.