
Survey reveals shocking number of UK women have experienced economic abuse
However, two-fifths of those did not speak to anyone about their experience, according to a report from the charity Surviving Economic Abuse (SEA).
The charity commissioned Ipsos UK to survey over 2,800 women across the UK in October and November 2024. The research was developed by SEA with input from victim-survivors and academic advisers.
SEA also found that many women were also unaware of economic abuse. Some 55 per cent know nothing about this form of domestic abuse, and a third (33 per cent) know "a little" about it.
Economic abuse is a dangerous and prevalent form of domestic abuse that takes many forms. SEA said it could include a current or ex-partner restricting access to money or bank accounts, damaging property or possessions, taking out loans or building up debt in a victim-survivor's name.
The report, Counting The Cost: The Scale And Impact Of Economic Abuse In The UK, indicated that women from ethnic minority backgrounds, disabled women and younger women (aged 18 to 24) were particularly likely to say they had experienced at least one form of economic abuse.
Meanwhile, 28 per cent of women with children in the household had experienced economic abuse, compared with 10 per cent of UK women without children, the research indicated.
The report also found that victim-survivors who had heard the term 'economic abuse' and knew something about it were more likely to seek help.
Those who had heard the term were also more likely to speak to a domestic abuse charity or a bank.
'Awareness is critical because those who are aware are more likely to get the help they need,' Sam Smethers, chief executive of Surviving Economic Abuse, said.
'Many are trapped in dangerous situations with an abuser or left with mountains of debt, homeless and experiencing this form of coercive control long after the relationship has ended.'
She said economic abuse is devastating for all victim-survivors, but the charity's data 'shows the impact of this abuse is felt particularly strongly by younger women, mothers, black and minoritised women and disabled women'.
The charity quoted one woman saying of her former partner: 'He used money as a weapon – even after the relationship ended. I had to sell our home, live with the consequences of the bad credit he'd forced me into, and over 20 years later, I'm still in housing insecurity.
'Knowing this was economic abuse would have made such a difference. It's not just 'what happens' after divorce – it's abuse, and people need to know that. That's why I tell anyone going through this to contact SEA, and to speak to their bank – there is help, and you're not alone.'
Jess Phillips, the minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, said: 'No woman should ever be trapped in an abusive relationship because of the suffering they will face if they try to leave, whether that is the threat of physical violence or the prospect of being plunged into poverty and homelessness.
'Tackling economic abuse – a true hidden crime – will be integral to achieving our ambition of halving violence against women and girls in a decade.'
The charity said 'systemic change' must be driven across the public and private sectors, turning good practice into common practice, to transform the lives of victim-survivors.
It is also calling for the public to join its mission to raise awareness of economic abuse, to help people spot the signs and access support.
Surviving Economic Abuse highlighted some potential signs of economic abuse people can look out for:
1. Are they short of money or unable to buy inexpensive items even if they work? Have they asked to borrow money to pay bills or for essential items?
2. Do they say their partner deals with all money matters? Are their wages or benefits paid directly into their partner's account? Are they counting the pennies, or seeking their partner's permission before making any purchases?
3. Have they left their work when they liked their job?
4. Do they make excuses not to join friends for coffee and meals out?
5. Do they wear ill-fitting or worn-out clothing? Do they not have the money to go to the hairdresser or buy personal items?
The charity said people can support victim-survivors of economic abuse by telling them help is available and they are not alone.
It said people can also offer practical support, such as by offering a spare room or providing essential items such as food, clothing, and toiletries, as well as having information about domestic abuse services to hand.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
14 minutes ago
- Finextra
Sainsbury's sells travel money business to Fexco
UK supermarket group Sainsbury's is offloading its travel money business to Ireland's Fexco. Financial terms were not disclosed. 0 Fexco will take over all operations of Sainsbury's Travel Money, including digital platforms and more than 220 bureaux within the supermarket's stores. Services will continue to operate under the Sainsbury's brand with the company receiving an ongoing share of revenue and rental income. The deal increases Fexco's UK retail footprint to more than 460 locations, making it a top five player in the sector. Bláthnaid Bergin, CFO, Sainsbury's, says: With specialist expertise and a strong track record in foreign exchange, Fexco Group is a strong fit for our business. I'm also pleased to confirm that there will be no immediate changes, and customers can expect the same high level of service they know and trust.' Sainsburys has been withdrawing from financial services in the last two years, selling its retail banking operations to NatWest, offloading is mortgage book to Co-operative Bank, and handing over its ATM business to NoteMachine.


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ofwat chief executive David Black to stand down
The chief executive of Ofwat is to step down as the embattled water regulator prepares to be abolished. David Black will leave the role at the end of August and an interim chief executive will be appointed in due course. The Government last month announced the regulator would be axed in a regulatory shake-up that comes as part of its response to public outrage over rising bills, sewage pollution and large bonuses for bosses. Ofwat may not be formally axed until at least 2027, with the process to overhaul the current system likely to be complex. The regulator said Mr Black, who took over as chief executive in 2021 and had worked in various roles at Ofwat since 2012, had decided the time is right for him to pursue new opportunities. In a statement on Tuesday, he said: 'I have been privileged to be able to lead Ofwat over the last four years, during which time we have achieved a huge amount together as a team for customers and the environment. 'I wish the team every success as they continue their important work.' The four bodies responsible for regulating the sector have faced intense criticism for overseeing companies during the years where they paid out to shareholders and accrued large debts – while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Currently, Ofwat oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, the Drinking Water Inspectorate ensures that public water supplies are safe, while the Environment Agency and Natural England have regulatory functions to monitor the industry's impact on nature. Under Government plans, measures will be rolled out to merge their regulatory responsibilities into a 'single, powerful' regulator – one for England and another for Wales. The move was recommended by an independent review into the sector, which was commissioned by ministers to answer public fury over the ailing state of the water sector. Led by former Bank of England governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, the review advised far-reaching changes to the way the water system is regulated as one of 88 measures to tackle problems in industry. As part of its own response to the crisis, Ofwat said it would allow firms to raise average bills from 2025 to 2030 to help finance a £104 billion upgrade for the sector as part of its so-called price review, published in December. In his statement on Tuesday, Mr Black said: 'The 2024 price review backed an investment programme of £104 billion, along with a further £50 billion investment in major new water resources, which will improve service, environmental outcomes and resilience in the years to come.' Consumer groups at the time warned that the increases were 'more than what many people can afford', with companies able to raise average bills by £157 in total over the next five years to £597 to help finance the £104 billion. Ofwat chairman Iain Coucher said: 'David has worked, tirelessly, to bring about transformational change in the water sector. 'He has sought new regulatory powers and resources to hold companies to account, taken major enforcement action and provided funding and incentive packages that drive continual improvements for customers. 'On behalf of the board and everyone at Ofwat, I would like to thank David for his leadership and his service over the last 13 years and to wish him every success in the future.'


Glasgow Times
31 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Manchester United fans announce opening day protest and say ‘Jim Can't Fix This'
The 1958 have organised numerous demonstrations in recent years calling for a change in ownership and will march to Old Trafford on August 17, with new banners being produced reading 'Jim Can't Fix This'. Ratcliffe owns a 28.94 per cent stake in United and has overseen wide, often unpopular, changes since taking over day-to-day operational control from the Glazers in February 2024. Avram Glazer and Sir Jim Ratcliffe speak to Manchester United chief executive Omar Berrada at the Europa League final (Andrew Milligan/PA) A spokesman for The 1958 said: 'It's a new season but the same old ownership issues. Twenty years of the Glazers and their debt mountain is 20 years too long. Enough is enough. 'We won't allow some natural optimism and a couple of shiny new signings to deflect from the bigger off-field picture. 'Jim Ratcliffe chose to get into bed with the Glazers and in our opinion is helping keep them in charge. 'So on 17th August, we protest not just against the Glazers, but now also against Jim Ratcliffe – a man once seen by many, including ourselves, as a possible saviour, a beacon of hope but now revealed as complicit in the ongoing erosion of everything that makes our club what it is. 'This is no longer just about ownership; this is about survival – the survival of our identity, our community, and our values.' The 1958 spokesman said the protest is for 'every fan who has been silenced, evicted, priced out and disregarded', adding 'this is about the future of football'. The group representative added: 'Jim Ratcliffe, you have chosen your side and it is not ours. You now stand shoulder to shoulder with the Glazers. The mask has slipped. You are no saviour. You're like a (red) devil in disguise.' Ratcliffe suggested in March that he would walk away from United if he ever suffered abuse on the level of that directed at the Glazer family. Sir Jim Ratcliffe has been hands-on since being Manchester United co-owner (Lucy North/PA) 'It can be unpleasant,' Ratcliffe said in the Times. 'And I've probably failed on the having fun front. 'I can put up with it for a while. I don't mind being unpopular because I get that nobody likes seeing Manchester United down where they are, and nobody likes the decisions we're having to make. 'Eventually, if it reached the extent that the Glazer family have been abused, then I'd have to say, 'look, that's enough guys, let somebody else do this'.' United finished 15th in the Premier League last season – their lowest top-flight finish since 1974 – and missed out on European qualification after losing the Europa League final to Tottenham.