logo
Corbyn and Sultana's party launch gets off to the worst possible start

Corbyn and Sultana's party launch gets off to the worst possible start

Spectator04-07-2025
There could be no more deliciously appropriate start to the new party supposedly co-led by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, than the news that the ex-Labour leader is said to be 'furious and bewildered' that it was launched without him even knowing that he is a member of the party, let alone that he is its leader. Although I'm not sure it is really news that Jeremy Corbyn – who has yet to comment on the new party – is either furious or bewildered, since he has spent his entire career being both.
Sultana, whose brief career as a Labour MP was only made possible when her not-at-this-moment-co-leader-of-the-new-party Corbyn was sole leader of the Labour party, had the Labour whip suspended within days of Keir Starmer's election win last July. Reports suggest she was on the verge of expulsion after tweeting 'We are all Palestine Action' last month. She should never have been even considered as a possible Labour candidate, let alone selected, and it is entirely right that she is no longer involved in the party.
I am assuming she will now demand that her constituents be allowed to set up a recall petition to remove her as an MP, having voted in 2020 that MPs who voluntarily change their party affiliation should be subject to such a petition. She wouldn't want to be accused of hypocrisy, I'm sure.
The new party does not yet have a name. One wag has suggested that with its two leaders (two, one? who knows? who cares?) both so obsessed with Israel it might be the New Anti-Zionist Independent party. I will let you work that one out…
Meanwhile, it's good to see the new party start as it will surely go on. Speaking to Robert Peston this week, Corbyn suggested that there would soon be a new group which brought together the many disparate factions which have spun off from Labour after he led the party to its worst result since the 1930s. 'That grouping [of Independents] will come together, there will be an alternative,' he said.
In this context, one must turn as always to the most insightful analysis of the left ever penned: Monty Python's Life of Brian. Is this new party the Judean People's Front, or is it the People's Front of Judea? Already George Galloway, who has been a one-man hard left party splitter since being expelled from Labour, is angry. He is, apparently, leader of the Workers Party. Because, yes, there are even more hard left splinter parties as there are former Labour MPs leading them. And the upstart splitters have behaved very badly. Very, very badly.
'There has been no contact with us about this,' he fumes on social media. 'We can't join it due to significant differences on the issues of…' blah, blah, blah. Splitters gonna split and the rest of us gonna grab our beer and popcorn and enjoy the spectacle.
But what, you ask, of John McDonnell? The former shadow chancellor, the Mikhail Suslov of the tankies, is the only one of this rabble with a functioning brain. He has presumably realised that even being a Labour member who has had the whip suspended is more worthwhile than throwing in his lot with the Judean People's Front (look, it's all relative). He has said he is 'dreadfully sorry to lose Zarah from the Labour Party.'
None of those involved in the new party, whether they eventually include Corbyn or not, ever had any business in a mainstream left of centre party, so Labour is better off without them. As for their relevance: there is clearly a space for opposition to Labour from the left. The problem is that in election after election voters have made clear that space is small and of almost no psephological importance. Where Labour is vulnerable – and has already lost seats in 2024 – is to sectarian Muslim voting. That is where the real story is.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The worst wreckers of Birmingham? The judges
The worst wreckers of Birmingham? The judges

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The worst wreckers of Birmingham? The judges

Forty years after the defeat of the miners saw mass picketing discredited and disowned by the union movement itself, it has returned to the streets of Britain. It came in support of the ongoing strike by refuse collectors in Birmingham, with the aim of ensuring that residents' nightmare conditions, living just yards away from filthy, rat-infested piles of uncollected waste, will not end without victory for the unions. 'Mass picketing is back. The trade union movement has shown it is at its most powerful when it acts together. Workers supporting workers,' said Henry Fowler, co-founder of the Strike Map Group, which organised the 'Five sites, one day' picket involving 26 organisations from across the trade union movement, including the RMT, ASLEF, NEU, NASUWT, and the BMA. The strike is, of course, being supported by Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader and now leader of a new hard-Left party that has yet to be named. Last week he was in Birmingham to address protesters outside Atlas Depot in Tyseley, where the gates were shut due to the demonstration. There are so many villains in the tale of how Birmingham, second city of the Empire, became such an eyesore and modern embarrassment to the country. The strike by refuse workers is in its fifth month and has resulted in a plague of rats and maggots across the city as an estimated 17,000 tons of domestic waste go uncollected. So the trade union Unite and its members must take at least some responsibility. Then there is the city council itself, whose incompetent handling of Birmingham's finances – an example of which was last year's revelation that it wasted £90m on a botched IT system – has been painful to watch. And then of course there is the UK Labour government which is only too keen to blame everything that's going wrong in Birmingham, not on the city's own leadership and certainly not on those hard-working Unite members who also happen to contribute part of their salaries to the Labour Party, but to '14 years of Tory austerity'. But the main culprit in all of this, the central villain, is none other than our misinformed and meddling judges. The reason the council has been left with a potential £760m liability, which it is now striving to manage with unpopular changes to refuse collectors' staffing and conditions, is that the courts made an absurd ruling last year that the jobs of teaching assistant, cleaner and bin collector are all 'similar'. And according to Britain's employment law, work done by men and women in 'similar' posts cannot be paid different salaries. The problem is that teaching assistants and cleaners tend to be women and refuse collectors men, and historically, the men who emptied the bins were paid more. Perhaps if a judge were to consider which of those jobs was the most unpleasant, which one he or she would rather not do if they found themselves turfed off the bench tomorrow, then they might have drawn a different conclusion. Unpleasant though essential jobs tend to come with higher financial compensation in order to attract enough recruits. How any judge can conclude that refuse collection and teaching assistance are similar is a mystery that may remain unsolved. The legal ramifications, however, are much clearer than their honours' logic and the only way the council can make ends meet is to start cutting costs. And that includes its budget for refuse collection. With so many culprits responsible for the national embarrassment that has consumed Birmingham, it should be no surprise that none of them is actually willing to take any blame whatsoever.

Labour's cruelty towards grieving parents is totally unforgivable
Labour's cruelty towards grieving parents is totally unforgivable

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Labour's cruelty towards grieving parents is totally unforgivable

How can the British state be so generous towards foreigners but so mean towards its own citizens? The cost of housing migrants has tripled to £4m a day as Channel crossings continue to soar. On top of this, we are giving asylum-seekers taxpayer-funded payment cards for buying essentials such as food – which this week we learnt some were using for gambling. A Freedom of Information request found that more than 6,500 payments in gambling settings were attempted by those with Aspen cards, given by the Home Office to those awaiting an asylum decision to allow them to buy basic items, with small weekly top-ups. So we've got migrants attempting to squander our hard-earned cash – and then when British taxpayers need help from the state, they're abandoned. This week, Labour lords blocked a move to give parents of critically ill children workplace rights and financial support. Currently, only parents of newborn babies who become unwell within the first 28 days of life are entitled to paid leave and job protection to be by their child's bedside. But if their child is diagnosed with cancer at 29 days old, the parents get no help beyond unpaid Carer's Leave, capped at a week a year. On Sunday, I spoke to Ceri Menai-Davis on my GB News show. He and his wife, Frances, lost their six-year-old son to cancer in 2021 and are campaigning through their charity, It's Never You, for Hugh's Law, which would give parents 12 weeks statutory paid leave if their child is diagnosed with a critical or terminal illness, up to the age of 16. But Labour peers blocked it, despite it costing a minimal amount due to the mercifully small number of parents affected (around 4,000 a year). Surely this is a no-brainer? Your child is dying, you have to be at their bedside, you need help to pay the bills. If this isn't what the welfare state was built for then what is? It certainly wasn't designed for illegal migrants to try to place state-subsidised bets.

Monday briefing: How ​automatic ​voter ​registration ​could ​redraw Britain's ​political ​map
Monday briefing: How ​automatic ​voter ​registration ​could ​redraw Britain's ​political ​map

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Monday briefing: How ​automatic ​voter ​registration ​could ​redraw Britain's ​political ​map

Good morning. A 12-year-old today will be able to vote in the next general election, unless it's called early. When I first heard that, I laughed. No wonder there's so much focus on Labour's plan to lower the voting age to 16. But it's another reform that could have a far greater impact on who votes – and who wins. The government has announced plans to introduce automatic voter registration, or AVR, where people are added to the electoral roll using existing government data, such as tax or passport records. Right now, voters in the UK have to register themselves. It's a clunky and outdated system. One study recently the most difficult registration processes in any liberal democracy. The result is that millions of people fall through the cracks. In 2023, about 8 million UK adults weren't correctly registered to vote, according to the Electoral Commission. So what could AVR mean politically? How does it shift power in a significant way, for parties both on the right and the left? I spoke to Luke Tryl, director of the nonprofit organisation More in Common, to find out. Euro 2025 | In a stunning comeback, England won the Euros on penalties, beating Spain 3-1 in extra time. They were scored by Chloe Kelly, Niamh Charles and Alex Greenwood. Trade | Donald Trump and Ursula von der Leyen announced a US/EU trade deal after a meeting on Trump's golf course in Scotland. The deal involves a 15% baseline tariff for most EU exports to the US. Gaza | Keir Starmer will recall his cabinet for an emergency meeting on the Gaza crisis, as cross-party MPs warned his talks with Donald Trump provided a critical juncture in helping to resolve the conflict. Thailand and Cambodia | The leaders of Thailand and Cambodia will meet in Malaysia today for talks to end a border conflict that has led to deadly military clashes and the displacement of 150,000 people. Health | Demand for weight loss drugs is becoming so 'unsustainable' that demand may soon outstrip supply, pharmacists have said, warning supply problems could encourage people to turn to unregulated online sources, despite the risks. The core case for automatic voter registration, beyond party politics, is simple: it expands the franchise. It ensures that as many eligible people as possible are actually able to vote. Tryl pointed out that certain groups are much less likely to be registered, which in turn deepens existing inequalities. Those most likely to be missing are younger people, renters, lower-income families, settled migrants, students and people from minority ethnic backgrounds. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) recently found a stark 19 percentage-point turnout gap between homeowners and renters. 'Those groups end up having a disproportionately lower electoral voice because they're not registered, and that has a real impact on policy,' he said. It's not just about democratic engagement. Who is in the voter pool clearly influences what decisions get made and who is ultimately elected, Tryl explained. He added that people in poorer communities often face a range of barriers, from time poverty and low awareness to disconnection from the political system and a lack of stable housing. Students, he said, may struggle with dual registration, while some migrants may not realise they're eligible to vote, or may not feel entitled to take part. How will it shift power? One of the biggest potential political impacts is on boundary changes. Registration rates vary between seats, Tryl said, so some MPs, especially in under-registered urban areas, are effectively representing far more people than others. And that's because constituency boundaries are based on the number of registered voters, not the number of eligible people. 'The difference in some seats can be tens of thousands of people,' he said. So where does this under-registration happen? 'It's mostly cities; places like Liverpool, Leeds, Bristol, London. MPs in these inner-city areas are representing larger populations, but that's not reflected in boundary calculations. If legislation goes through and we assume more eligible voters are registered, those people will finally be counted,' he added. Simply put, Tryl explained, this would mean more representation, and more parliamentary seats in urban and student-heavy areas. But with the total number of seats in parliament fixed at 650, that shift would inevitably come at the expense of rural, more affluent constituencies. 'It's hard to argue against the principle of automatic registration, but the boundary changes could make rural constituencies, some of which are already geographically large, even bigger,' Tryl said. Who is set to benefit? The most obvious party set to benefit is Labour, which tends to perform better in urban and student-heavy areas. But Tryl tells me that others are also likely to gain from this change. 'The Greens tend to perform better in inner cities and student areas. Some of the inner-city areas that we're talking about are where the independents have done very well, in parts of Birmingham and potentially in parts of London,' Tryl said. 'The big losers are likely to be the Conservatives, who tend to represent more affluent, high-registration areas, and the Liberal Democrats, who've made gains in the so-called Blue walls – former Tory, leafy, affluent strongholds.' Last week, Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana formally launched a new political party, targeting the very inner-city seats likely to gain from automatic voter registration. Polling suggests the party could capture about 10% of the vote, potentially eating into Labour and Green support. Zack Polanski, who is running to be the next Green party leader, has already said he is open to working with any party willing to challenge Reform. This emerging 'Green-left' alliance could be pivotal in shaping the electoral map. On Friday, the group We Deserve Better, backed by the Guardian columnist Owen Jones, launched a campaign calling for a formal electoral pact between Corbyn and Sultana's party and the Greens. As for Reform UK, it's difficult to draw firm conclusions for now, Tryl said. But previous research (pdf) suggests the party's base is made up largely of older, non‑graduate, culturally conservative voters, many disillusioned with the Conservatives or drawn from the Brexit camp. Will this increase voter turnout? While this reform could have a far bigger effect on the electorate than extending the vote to 16- and 17-year-olds – there are about 1.5 million of them in the UK compared with an estimated eight million eligible voters who aren't registered – it is unlikely to lead to a dramatic surge in turnout, Tryl said. Voter turnout in UK general elections used to be consistently high, staying above 70% from 1945 right up until 1997, and even topping 80% in 1950 and 1951. But it had plunged to just 59.4% by the time Tony Blair secured his second term in 2001. Turnout did climb again between 2010 and 2019, yet it has never returned to 70%. In the most recent election in 2024, it slipped again, landing at 59.7%. 'I think that represents a wider democratic disillusionment and disengagement,' Tryl said, but added that there was public support for AVR. 'Forty-five per cent said they supported it, just 21% opposed. So it is more popular than allowing 16- and 17-year-olds to vote. But clearly that needs to go and sit alongside wider democratic engagement in a nonpartisan way.' People need to feel that voting matters. And, Tryl added: 'The fundamental challenge is too many people do not think that government is either willing, because they think politicians are only in it for themselves, and the system is rigged, or capable … to take on Britain's big challenges to bring about the change the country needs. When seven in 10 people say the country is getting worse, and the top word used to describe Britain is 'broken,' you've got overlapping crises: of trust, of exhaustion, of people feeling like they've lost control and agency. That is driving disengagement far more than the specifics of the democratic system.' The task for every party across the political spectrum in the coming years, Tryl said, is to prove that 'government can work and that it can be a force for good'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Four years ago, the Conservative MP David Amess was stabbed to death in his surgery by an Islamic State sympathiser. In a searing interview by Anna Moore, his daughter Katie (pictured above) expresses her pain at his violent death, and the government's refusal to hold an inquiry. Alex Needham, acting head of newsletters The University of Edinburgh played an 'outsized' role in the creation of racist scientific theories and greatly profited from transatlantic slavery. Brilliant reporting by my colleagues of a landmark inquiry into the university's history. Aamna Films and TV shows might be eschewing sex scenes, but literary fiction is going in the other direction, with Sally Rooney, Miranda July, Yael van der Wouden and others all writing recent novels that explicitly explore the sex lives of their protagonists. Why? Because sex, writes Lara Feigel, opens 'selfhood to otherness with extravagant force'. Alex Labour MP Chris Hinchliff was suspended for what No 10 called 'persistent knobheadery'. His crime? Pushing stronger environmental protections. He told the Guardian this language reflects 'a certain set of people … for whom it's all a personality thing, it's all a game'. Aamna In a piece of great tenderness and beauty, Poppy Noor writes about her son Mo Ibrahim Lingwood-Noor, who died in childbirth, and how she moved through the aftermath of this devastating event. Alex Cricket | India drew in the fourth test against England after Ravindra Jadeja (pictured above) and Washington Sundar both completed centuries. England lead the series 2-1. Cycling | Tadej Pogacar has sealed his fourth Tour de France victory in Paris after the final stage from Mantes-la-Ville to the Champs Élysées. The 26-year-old beat his closest rival, Jonas Vingegaard, by almost four and half minute Formula One | Oscar Piastri comfortably won the Belgium Grand Prix as rain lashed down on to the track. The 24-year-old Australian saw off his McLaren teammate Lando Norris. England's Euro victory dominates the front pages – with the Guardian labelling them 'Queens of Europe'. The Mirror has 'LionYESses', while the i also goes with 'Queens of Europe!' The Sun focuses on goalie Hannah Hampton with 'The Hann of God'. Elsewhere, the Times has 'Starmer to press Trump on Gaza'. The Financial Times reports 'Brussels accepts 15% US tariffs to fix 'unfair' trade relations, says Trump', and the Telegraph says 'Trump: Wind power is a 'con-job''. Finally, the Mail focuses on protests in Epping, with 'Now shut migrant protest hotel'. The hunt for the next Dalai Lama The Guardian's south Asia correspondent, Hannah Ellis-Petersen, and the Tibet activist Lhadon Tethong discuss the battle between Buddhist monks and the Chinese state over the successor to the Dalai Lama (pictured above). A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Despite not making the Belgium squad, footballer Yana Daniëls (pictured above) is making her own contribution to Euro 2025, handcrafting boxes for every player-of-the-match trophy in a converted Wirral garage, using locally sourced wood from Arrowe Park. After suffering from a career-threatening injury a decade ago, Daniëls was forced to plan ahead. She said, 'When you get older you start to realise: 'How long will I play on for? Will I need to find a normal job?' Daniëls' interest in carpentry developed through DIY requests from fellow teammates for the Liverpool changing rooms, including a table and a personalised shoe rack. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store