Jagoda Rubaszko handed suspended sentence for Covid loan fraud
Fraudulently obtained funds
She will be tagged and under curfew between 19:30 and 06:00 every day for six months and must complete 175 hours of unpaid work.Rubaszko was investigated by The Insolvency Service, a government agency that administers compulsory company liquidations and personal bankruptcies.The service said it is seeking to recover the fraudulently obtained money.The Bounce Back Loan Scheme was designed to enable businesses to access finance more quickly during the coronavirus outbreak.Rubaszko applied to a bank for a loan on 26 April 2021, which was approved on 28 April 2021 and paid into her bank account.In the application, she claimed she had been operating a business since 1 March 2020 and had a turnover of £210,000. But investigations into Rubaszko's finances showed her tax returns were no higher than £15,100 each year between 2019 and 2021.
'£17,500 commission'
In a prepared statement, Rubaszko claimed to have been contacted by a man called Daniel, who told her how to apply for the loan, and to declare herself bankrupt to avoid repaying it.But Rubaszko admitted she had never met Daniel, even though she said she paid him a £17,500 commission for his "help" after receiving the £50,000.Her bank records showed no such payment was made – instead, 22 smaller payments up to £11,690 were made to five individual bank accounts in Poland.After declaring herself bankrupt, Rubaszko was subject to a 10-year Bankruptcy Restrictions Undertaking (BRU) on 12 May 2023. The BRU prevents her from managing a limited company until 2033.
'Staggering cost to taxpayers'
Chief investigator at the Insolvency Service, Mark Stephens, said Rubaszko claimed to be a business director, but she had no business at all, and now reality has "caught up with her".He added: "She invented a man called Daniel, who she has blamed for her actions, claiming he had told her to apply for the loan, and she believed she'd get away with this by declaring herself bankrupt."What is definitely real, is that she took money which was meant to help businesses during a difficult period, and sent that funding off to the bank accounts of five men in Poland."The bounce back scheme provided a total of £47bn in loans of which an estimated £4.9bn was lost to fraud.The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee said in 2022 that the focus on delivery of the bounce back loans meant lenders were not required to do credit or affordability checks - or even verify application information.To offset this risk to lenders the government guaranteed the loans 100% - meaning that if the borrower did not repay the loan, the taxpayer will.The committee concluded that the scheme came at a "staggering" cost to the taxpayer and money that "could have been spent on improving existing public services, reducing taxes or to reduce government borrowing".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fire at Hove Tesco store being treated as deliberate, police say
A fire at a Tesco superstore is being treated as deliberate, Sussex Police in Church Road, Hove, was closed after packets of barbecue charcoal were allegedly set alight at about 04:20 BST on Thursday.A spokesperson for the force said it was continuing to investigate the Sussex Fire & Rescue Service said three fire engines were sent to tackle the blaze. They left the scene shortly before 06:15. The store has since with information about the fire is urged to contact Sussex Police.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
River Island may have to close… but I'll cherish the memories of my 1990s fashion disasters
For my 13th birthday in the 1990s, all I dreamed about was a denim button-up dress from River Island worn over an oatmeal body-suit. Oatmeal – the height of sophistication! Not boring school shirt-white, not bland-old beige – but oatmeal. Slightly ribbed, with minute white flecks like a speckled egg. If I only had that body-suit, I'd look exactly like Nicole Appleton from All Saints, I just knew it. I could wear it, I fancied, to attract boys like Justin Peterson in the year above me; whose name I used to write in my diary – over and over – with my special glittery pen with the pom-pom on the top. One look at my River Island denim dress with the irridescent shell pop buttons and he'd be mine. How could he resist? And if he wasn't sure, I had a secret weapon: shimmer pink lipstick with dark brown lipliner and a silver puffa jacket. Phwoar. (Spoiler: he wasn't mine, and I never forgave my friend Gemma for wearing an even better denim dress with a maroon body-suit beneath it, from Tammy Girl.) Now, perhaps you can understand my heartbreak, because rumour has it that River Island – bastion of bucket hats, purveyor of crop tops, combat trousers and woven belts, stalwart of satin slip dresses and velvet chokers with a small silver cross dangling from the middle – could collapse within weeks, following £33m losses. According to the Telegraph, the beloved retailer will go unless landlords and creditors approve a radical rescue plan – due to be put before the High Court next week – which would see 33 stores close, rents slashed on a further 71 shops and debts written off. If the rescue plan works, then an emergency loan from River Island 's founders might just save it. If not, it'll close by August. And not only would the closures be devastating for those who work there – River Island employs 5,300 people in its various stores, plus a further 950 at its head office in Hanger Lane – but it would decimate one of the last faded giants of 1990s nostalgia. Be still my beating heart that pumps in time to 'Pure Shores' – they cannot do this to us, they cannot. If River Island goes, it will join the ghosts of Topshop, Miss Selfridge, Morgan de toi and Jane Norman. And where will we get our crushed velvet dresses and cami tops, then? I put an urgent call-out to the friends who dressed as badly in the nineties as I did, to see what they'd miss most about the retail chain if it went under. 'For me, River Island was all about the store in Ilford Exchange. It was the first shop where I felt like a grown-up,' Roz admitted. 'Prior to that, it was all about going into C&A – in the Clockhouse section – and Tammy Girl. But shopping in River Island in Ilford felt like I'd graduated to a higher level. 'The plastic bags were coveted because they were so iconic – multi-coloured, floral – if you had something in a River Island bag, you were the height of chic. It's where I bought my favourite item of clothing that decade – a pair of oatmeal linen trousers, which I obviously wore with a body. Plus, they had really, really good accessories.' 'This isn't directly related but I remember fondly the store at Oxford Circus,' Emma told me. 'It was pretty much opposite Aroma [a popular coffee shop chain in the 1990s] where we'd meet in the downstairs area and smoke ciggies and drink coffee and then shop at River Island and feel very grown up and like we had found life.' While Louise said: 'You were literally s**t hot if you had a bag from River Island. I used to go shopping there for chunky belts, vest tops, crushed velvet and cargo trousers, like All Saints, which we'd wear with Timberland boots, obviously. I think glitter make up was just starting. And, if we were going 'out out', it'd be assymetric skirts and tops with chunky necklaces.' One of my colleages at The Independent (who's asked to remain nameless), meanwhile, shared his fond experiences of working in River Island menswear. 'On my first day, the pregnant manager, who interviewed me and offered me the role, was marched out by police in handcuffs for stealing jeans,' he reminisced. 'I got paid £4.35 an hour and used to hide in the stockroom and drink vodka and orange with the 30-year-old managers who I genuinely thought were the coolest people alive. Skinny jeans and really pointy brogues, Scouting For Girls on loop all day... there was loads of shagging going on, too, in the stockroom.' But when I ask my teenage daughter if she ever shops in River Island when she goes to Westfield with her mates, she actually stops and stares at me with what looks a lot like... horror. 'No, Mummy. As if I go to River Island. That's for old people – like you. Or Nanny.' Sigh. Kids today have no taste. Let's just hope the rescue plan works. They can take River Island – but they'll never take the memory of our 1990s fashion disasters.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
More than 300,000 benefit claimants owed money after PIP errors lead to millions in underpayments
Hundreds of thousands of disabled people are owed money from the government after it admited to major errors while paying out the Personal Independence Payment (PIP). More than £260 million has already been paid to make up missing funds to those who saw the benefit wrongly denied or underpaid by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). But there are still more than 300,000 claimants owed money, with some payouts potentially reaching more than £2,000. Claimed by 3.7 million people, the health-linked benefit is designed to help with extra costs incurred by living with an illness or disability. It recently made headlines for being at the heart of Labour's planned welfare reforms, before a last minute change of direction from the government. In its latest annual report, the DWP identified three errors in the administration of PIP – two for the first time – which has forced it to carry out several payback schemes. The largest relates to a Supreme Court decision that changed how the DWP had to consider one specific criteria for a person to qualify for PIP – the ability to engage with people face to face – effectively making it more lenient. There are around 325,000 claimants who may still be due payments for the issue, with 308,000 cases already reviewed reviewed. The total amount paid out is now £250 million, meaning compensation has been worth at least £800 per person and as not all cases reviewed with result in a payout, likely even more. Meanwhile, the first new issue saw a number of claimants that did not provide a National Insurance Number when applying for PIP have their applications processed incorrectly. This is despite it not being a requirement to supply the information to apply. So far, only 455 records have been reviewed over this issue, with £500,000 paid out overall. This means payouts have been worth at least £1,098 per claimant. The next newly-identified issue relates to thousands of claimants in Scotland who transferred from PIP to the Adult Disability Payment, which has replaced the benefit for Scottish residents. An estimated 4,867 were identified as potentially having their payments suspended during the transition, with only 176 cases left to review. So far, £13 million has been paid out over the issue, meaning an average payment of at least £2,771 per claimant. The issues come as criticism continues to grow over the management of PIP by the government. Following Labour's decision to back down on changes that would effectively make the benefit harder to claim, it was confirmed that social security minister Stephen Timms would carry out a review of the effectiveness of PIP in meeting the needs of claimants. The DWP has been approached for comment.
