5.56 vs .223: What's the Real Difference Between These Popular Cartridges?
Two of the most popular cartridges today are nearly identical and sometimes considered transposable, but when looking at 5.56 vs .223, there are some key differences. The .223 Remington started as a military cartridge in 1957 — adapted from the .222 Rem. — but has been a popular hunting, sporting, and target cartridge ever since. The 5.56mm NATO cartridge was derived from the .223 as a dedicated service rifle cartridge by FN about 20 years later. Today, it's common to see rifles chambered for both cartridges, especially AR-15 variants and ammunition in both chamberings sitting next to each other on store shelves. Here's how they are different and what you need to know on 5.56 vs .223.
Bullet Diameter: 0.224 inches
Case Length: 1.76 inches
Overall Length: 2.26 inches
Parent Case: .222 Remington
Case Capacity: 28.8 grains H2O
SAAMI Spec Freebore Distance: .025 inches
SAAMI Chamber Pressure: 55,000 psi
Bullet Diameter: 0.224 inches
Case Length: 1.76 inches
Overall Length: 2.26 inches
Parent Case: .223 Remington
Case Capacity: 28.5 grains H2O
SAAMI Spec Freebore Distance: .050 inches
SAAMI Chamber Pressure: 61,000 psi
Though the 5.56mm NATO and .223 Remington cartridges are essentially identical externally, there are two key differences. First, the 5.56mm NATO is loaded to higher chamber pressures — 61,000 psi vs 55,000 psi. The second difference isn't in the cartridge itself, but in the chamber specs. The standard 5.56mm chamber has .025-inch longer freebore distance than the .223 Remington. This is the distance from the case neck to the beginning of the leade — the gentle cone that funnels the projectile into the rifling. A shorter freebore with the higher-pressure loads can sometimes cause pressure to spike beyond the 61,000 psi standard or, in other words, create higher pressures than the 5.56 NATO is supposed to produce. In standard chambers or modern production firearms, this usually isn't a problem. But freebore distances among chamber reamers can vary wildly so it's always best to use caution or avoid shooting 5.56mm NATO in .223 Rem..
Remington Arms officially submitted the .223 Remington cartridge design to SAAMI in 1962 after several years of research and development in conjunction with the U.S. Continental Army Command, Fairchild Industries, and Eugene Stoner of Armalite. The work with Stoner was significant due to his primary role in the invention and implementation of the AR-10 platform. Their shared goal was to create a lightweight cartridge and rifle combination that provided acceptable terminal ballistics at extended distances on a more nimble platform compared to the AR-10 chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO.
The end result was the launch of Armalite's AR-15 rifle, chambered in .223 Remington, propelling a 55-grain bullet at 3,250 fps. Two years after its submission to SAAMI, the U.S. Army adopted Armalite's AR-15 rifle, dubbed the M16. The M16 first saw combat in the Vietnam war and went on to become the standard military issued service rifle in 1969. Since then, the .223 Remington cartridge has expanded to nearly every shooting endeavor from hunting to competitive shooting and everything in between. The success of the .223 Remington also expands beyond its AR-15 roots and it is commonly chambered in a wide variety of rifle configurations.
Following the success of the .223 Rem., NATO signed an agreement in 1977 to begin the selection process of replacing the 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge. FN Herstal answered the call, developing the 5.56 NATO cartridge, which only slightly differentiated itself from the .223 Rem. That difference between the two cartridges came in the form of thicker walled brass which created a slightly smaller case capacity for the 5.56 NATO cartridge. This reduction in case capacity creates higher pressures and increased velocity from similar charge weights.
For comparing 5.56 vs .223, the 5.56 NATO has a maximum of 61,000 PSI of chamber pressure while the SAAMI approved chamber pressure for the .223 Rem. is 55,000 PSI.
By late 1980, NATO officially adopted and standardized the 5.56 NATO cartridge. Fast forward 40 years and the 5.56 NATO continues to be one of, if not the most, used cartridge amongst military forces worldwide. That fact alone speaks volumes to the validity and effectiveness of the cartridge.
As a standard, 5.56mm NATO and .223 Rem. rifles have different twist rates, and are intended to shoot different weight bullets. That has changed in the past couple decades, but more on that in a second. The .223 Remington was designed around shooting 55-grain bullets and utilized a twist rate of 1:12 — 1 revolution per 12 inches of barrel. This is ideal for those bullets, but limits the cartridge to lighter projectiles. Even today, reloading manuals such as Hornady's top out at 62-grain bullets for .223 Rem. In 1980, a dramatically faster 1:7 twist rate was adopted for the 5.56mm to handle heavier, longer projectiles. A 1:7-twist barrel works well with even 80- and 90-grain bullets that are too long to fit in a standard AR-15 magazine.
As AR-15 rifles began taking over in service rifle competition, shooters began adopting tighter 1:8- and 1:7-twist barrels to take advantage of ballistically superior bullets. This is a reason why heavier-bullet load data for the .223 is listed under a separate service rifle section in some reloading manuals. Though some sporting .223 Rem. production rifles still have slow-twist barrels, most gun makers have adopted 1:7 or 1:8 to accommodate a wider variety of bullets.
Lots of 5.56 NATO ammunition is commercially available, and as a universal solution to the discrepancy between 5.56 and .223 chambers, several rifle manufacturers began chambering rifles in .223 Wylde, which was developed by Bill Wylde. The Wylde slightly altered the chamber dimensions to accommodate the pressures created by both 5.56 NATO and .223 Rem. ammunition. Also, despite the warnings, many shooters freely shoot 5.56 NATO ammunition out of their .223 Rem. chambered rifles without issue. OL Staff Writer, Tyler Freel, discusses this in his extensive review of the best 5.56 ammo and .223 ammo test. If you want to fire 5.56 NATO ammo through your .223 chamber, proceed carefully and watch for any excessive pressure signs. If you're buying a new gun or barrel, you can eliminate any potential ammo and pressure issues by purchasing a .223 Wylde or 5.56 NATO. An example of a fine .223 Wylde-chambered rifle is the NULA Model 20S, reviewed by Freel.
Comparing ballistics between the 5.56 vs .223 reveals only small differences. To compare apples to apples, I selected two factory loads from Winchester, both of which are loaded with a 55-grain FMJ projectile.
Muzzle Velocity: 3240 fps
Energy @ 300 yards: 552 ft-lbs.
Drop @ 300 yards: 11.4 inches (with 100-yard zero)
Muzzle Velocity: 3270 fps
Energy @ 300 yards: 612 ft-lbs.
Drop @ 300 yards: 10.7 inches (with 100-yard zero)
However, muzzle velocity and downrange energy will vary depending on your bullet selection. Projectile weights vary from 35 grains on up to 85 grains with 55- to- 62-grain bullets being the most popular. For comparison, I selected ammunition loaded with light, mid-weight, and heavy bullets to highlight differences in ballistics and the versatility of the two cartridges.
Muzzle Velocity: 4,000 fps
Energy @ 300 yards: 411 ft-lbs.
Drop @ 300 yards: 5.3 inches (with 200-yard zero)
Muzzle Velocity: 3,100 fps
Energy @ 300 yards: 533 ft-lbs.
Drop @ 300 yards: 7.7 inches (with 200-yard zero)
Muzzle Velocity: 2,600 fps
Energy @ 300 yards: 745 ft-lbs.
Drop @ 300 yards: 11.5 inches (with 200-yard zero)
These three ammunition offerings paint a valuable picture for understanding the differences in muzzle velocity and downrange energy that is obtainable with the .223 Rem. and 5.56 NATO cartridges.
Recoil, or the lack thereof, from these two cartridges is one of their biggest selling points and tremendously aids their popularity. The vast majority of 5.56×45 ammunition produces between 5 and 6 ft-lbs. of recoil. In simple terms, the recoil produced from these two cartridges is negligible. This allows shooters to stay on target, watch bullet impact and make quick follow-up shots if necessary.
Both the .223 Rem. and the 5.56 NATO are easy to shoot and capable of delivering exceptional accuracy. With that said, accuracy with these two cartridges can and will vary depending upon your rifle and ammunition selection. Pay attention to the twist rate of your barrel and match it with appropriate-weight bullets as described above.
The 5.56mm NATO, .223 Rem., and .223 Wylde are all capable of great accuracy, but there are various myths about all three. The biggest myth is that you will see worse accuracy when firing .223 Rem. ammo through a 5.56mm NATO chamber because of the longer freebore. While this can be true in some cases, it probably has more to do with the barrel quality and/or chambering job. There are many examples of 5.56mm NATO rifles shooting .223 Remington ammo just as accurately as 5.56mm ammo from the same gun — or with better accuracy. One example is the Savage M110 Trail Hunter Lite that Freel reviewed, which is chambered in 5.56mm. It showed better accuracy with .223 factory (and .223-pressure handloads) with 52-, 55-, and 77-grain bullets than with 5.56mm NAT0 factory (and 5.56mm NATO pressure handloads) using 77-, 80-, and 85-grain bullets. The previously mentioned NULA 20S, which has a .223 Wylde chamber and 1:8-twist barrel shot .223 Rem. loads more accurately than 5.56mm NATO loads — even with the same bullets.
When it comes to evaluating the 5.56 vs .223, both pack plenty punch to deliver adequate terminal performance in a variety of hunting pursuits. However, given the small diameter and bullet weights, hunters must be conscious of the cartridge's limitations in hunting scenarios. With a well-constructed bullet, such as Hornady's 50-grain monolithic CX bullet or Nosler's 70-grain Accubond, hunters can confidently take down deer-sized game at reasonable ranges with the .223 Rem. and 5.56 NATO. Shot placement is key, especially when shooting small projectiles. Effective options for hand loaders are Sierra's 77-grain TMK and Hornady's 80-grain ELD-X. These cartridge and bullet combinations are ideal for recoil shy and first-time hunters.
While the .223 Rem. and 5.56 NATO are plenty capable in the deer woods, they really shine in the varmint hunting world. Unlike the bullets necessary for taking down a deer, the majority of varmint hunting projectiles are designed to penetrate the thin skin of a coyote or fox and inflict massive amounts of internal trauma. The result is dead-on-impact hits that rarely require a tracking job.
Ammunition availability for the .223 Rem. and 5.56 NATO has been hit and miss over the past several years, but now manufacturers produce copious amounts of ammunition for these two cartridges. At least at the moment, 5.56 and .223 ammo is readily available both online and in most sporting goods stores.
The cost of .223 Rem. and 5.56 NATO ammunition varies depending on your intended use. If you are just looking to plink steel at the range, cheap M193 full metal jacket ammunition can be purchased for as little as $13.00 per box of 20. On the flip side, ammunition loaded with premium hunting and match bullets can run upward of $60.00 per box of 20.
Unlike many other cartridges, 5.56 and .223 ammo is often available in bulk. Most major ammunition companies package 5.56 ammo that can be purchased in case quantities of 200, 500, or 1,000 rounds. Buying in bulk typically saves you money in the long run.
Read Next:
Yes, but with a caveat. It's fine to shoot .223 in a 5.56mm chamber, but not advised to shoot 5.56mm NATO in .223 chambers because there is a chance it will produce dangerous pressures.
Yes, externally, the two cartridges have the same dimensions, so a 5.56mm magazine will work for .223 and vice versa.
Many AR-15 rifles shoot 5.56, but many also shoot .223. It all depends on the barrel. Some which have a .223 Wylde chamber will safely handle both.
The United States military used to use .223, but uses 5.56mm NATO now.
While the .223 Rem and 5.56 Nato are similar, it is important for gun owners to educate themselves on the nuances of both cartridges and at least be aware of the difference in chamber pressures between the two. If you choose to shoot 5.56 NATO ammunition through a .223 Rem. chambered rifle, you must vigilantly watch for any and all signs of excess pressure. Regardless of your shooting pursuits, everyone should own a rifle chambered in one (or both) of these cartridges. They are practical and capable of everything from hunting to personal defense. Plus, they are downright fun to shoot.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
19-07-2025
- Buzz Feed
War Preparation Advice That's Eerily Familiar
On the always loaded-with-inquiries subreddt r/NoStupidQuestions, Reddit user u/smilingspectre37 asked what they are supposed to do if a war actually starts. Here's what people had to say: "As someone who lived through the last 20-year war we were in [in the US], nothing really changes for us. For many of us, it will be far away and distant. We will complain about gas prices going up, or inflation skyrocketing, but until our friends and family come home under a flag, it won't feel real enough to care about." "If you're in America, keep going about your day. If you're in Jordan, get out quick." "I was running a Blockbuster Video on 9/11. I live on the West Coast, so everything had already happened by 10 a.m. Pacific time. I wasn't sure if the world was going to end or not. Called my district manager and asked, 'What are we doing?' He said, 'Open the store. Business as usual. So, that's probably your answer. Business as usual." "Imagine being one of the people in a city that actually has missiles being fired at it. American civilians have no point of reference for what it's like to actually live in a war zone. I say that as an American citizen with no point of reference at all. With that said, I'm still planning to have a lazy Sunday and go to work on Monday and get pissed off at the traffic." "Gas will go up, and it will be blamed on Biden." "You hide under a wooden desk in your classroom." "You do realize that we were at war for 20 years after 9/11. You grew up in a country at war, depending on your age." "Unless you're in the military, there is nothing for you to do but to keep living your normal routine. Unless there's an immediate threat to your area or an order to evacuate, life must go on. Everyone has to do their part to keep society running so that the soldiers have something to come home to." "You fire up Call of Duty and defend Burger Town." "I guess it really depends on where you live. I heard Israel is closing schools and businesses. I imagine tomorrow will be normal for most US citizens. I think COVID taught us that we don't really know how we'll handle a massive disruption and will figure it out along the way." "If you're in a NATO country, do the same thing you did during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars." "The number of people who have no idea that the mainland US is pretty much unreachable by any country except Russia and maybe China is really surprising." "America's surrounded by two oceans, and there will never be boots on the ground here. Just go on about your day, the soldiers will handle everything. You won't even know a war is happening if you don't watch the news." "Iran won't attack Americans directly, but you may suffer more 9/11 type strikes. And you have alienated all of your allies who helped you last time. Good luck." "Completely depends how bad things get." "On September 12, 2001, I went to school and then to work." "I'm from Ukraine. When the war started, my university didn't even stop lectures at first. And my uncle, with his girlfriend, was still working for their American company remotely (they had given them fewer working hours because of air alarms). Later, when attacks became more intensive, everyone's life went on hold for a certain period. However, when the situation in non-destroyed and occupied regions became more stable, everything returned to its working rhythm, albeit under the constant threat of bombs, drones, and repetitive air alarms. And this was the moment when I realized how humans survived many wars — they just never gave up. Now I'm not in my home country, but my friends and some relatives still are, and they got used to this sick rhythm of life." "What do you mean by 'if?' When a sovereign nation is being blown up by another, it's a war, no matter which more palatable words politicians are slinging." "Depends. Let's say it's a major war in the Middle East with Iran. You're American? You get to complain about prices going up. You're European? You experience very high inflation and a strain on the welfare system due to a huge influx of refugees. You're Iranian? You get bombed." "Love that Americans are finally thinking about what it might be like to live in an active warzone. Hate that y'all never considered that while you spent the last century causing it in other countries." "If you have the means to avoid dense areas, then yes, you would do so. If war were to occur in my country, my family would likely relocate to my sister's farm. While we live on the outskirts of our major city, we are close enough to a regional small plane airport, which would likely be used for supply runs. Hopefully, we'll have enough time to build another house on the land before we move, but we have access to a caravan." "First time?" "Whatever you do, please don't go out and buy all the toilet paper. That is so annoying." "Live your life and stay off of social media as much as possible." "People in Kyiv, Ukraine are still going to work. Do with that information what you will." Do you have any advice or general comments on what to do if your country is at war? Comment below.


UPI
19-07-2025
- UPI
On This Day, July 19: Sainthia, India, train collision kills dozens
1 of 5 | Members of the emergency services work at the site of a train accident near Sainthia station in India on July 19 2010. File Photo by Piyal Adhikary/EPA July 19 (UPI) -- On this date in history: In 1848, "bloomers," a radical departure in women's clothing, were introduced to the first women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, N.Y. They were named after Amelia Jenks Bloomer. In 1911, Pennsylvania became the first U.S. state to pass laws censoring movies. In 1943, U.S. planes bombed key railway, steel factory and airport targets in Rome, killing thousands of civilians as part of World War II. In 1946, Marilyn Monroe was given her first screen test at Twentieth Century-Fox Studios. Even without sound, the test was enough to earn Monroe her first contract. She divorced her first husband, James Dougherty, he told UPI, because of a no-marriage clause in the contract. In 1969, John Fairfax of Britain arrived at Fort Lauderdale, Fla., to become the first person to row across the Atlantic alone. In 1989, a crippled DC-10 jetliner crash-landed in a cornfield in Sioux City, Iowa. One-hundred-eighty-five of the 296 people aboard survived. In 1991, boxer Mike Tyson raped a contestant in the Miss Black America pageant in Indianapolis. He pleaded not guilty to the charge, but was convicted in 1992. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI In 1993, President Bill Clinton announced its "don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue" policy toward homosexuals in the U.S. military. The policy was lifted in 2011. In 1996, the Summer Olympics opened in Atlanta with a record 197 countries taking part. In 1997, the IRA declared a cease-fire in its long war to force Britain out of Northern Ireland. In 2005, U.S. Appeals Court Judge John Roberts was nominated by President George W. Bush to the U.S. Supreme Court, replacing Sandra Day O'Connor, who resigned. After the death of William Rehnquist, Roberts' nomination was changed to make him chief justice. File Photo by Roger L. Wollenberg/UPI In 2010, a speeding express train slammed into the rear of a train preparing to leave a West Bengal station in India, killing more than 60 people and injuring about 100 others. In 2012, the U.S. Defense Department said military personnel would be permitted to march in uniform in a San Diego Gay Pride Parade. In 2018, Israel passed a law declaring the country a Jewish nation-state, giving only Jewish people self-determination. A month later, tens of thousands protested the controversial law in Tel Aviv, calling it a form of apartheid. In 2024, an error caused by a CrowdStrike cybersecurity software update crippled emergency services, air travel, television and public infrastructure worldwide. File Photo by Tolga Bozoglu/EPA-EFE


Newsweek
18-07-2025
- Newsweek
China Reveals Encounter With Western Aircraft Carrier in Contested Waters
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Chinese military reported encountering a foreign aircraft carrier in the South China Sea, where the East Asian power maintains sweeping sovereignty claims over most of the waters. Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense Ministry for further comment via email. Why It Matters China and neighboring countries—including the Philippines, a United States mutual defense treaty ally—are involved in ongoing territorial disputes over maritime features in the energy-rich South China Sea, often leading to standoffs and clashes between rival maritime forces. Encounters between Chinese and foreign military aircraft and vessels are not uncommon as Beijing has accused foreign militaries of conducting "close-in" operations by approaching its territorial airspace and waters, both of which extend 13.8 miles from the country's coastline. What To Know The Chinese military—officially known as the People's Liberation Army (PLA)—published a news story on Thursday about flight operations aboard the aircraft carrier CNS Shandong. While the article focused on the Shandong's fighter jets launching from and landing on the flight deck, it also said that during an unspecified summer in the South China Sea, a foreign aircraft carrier was spotted approaching the Shandong and its naval task group. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet during the open event of the aircraft carrier CNS Shandong in Hong Kong on July 4. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet during the open event of the aircraft carrier CNS Shandong in Hong Kong on July 4. Dai Menglan/China News Service/VCG via AP It further said that the unidentified foreign aircraft carrier frequently launched aircraft that flew toward the Chinese carrier at high speed, prompting the Shandong to enter what it described as "combat status" and launch J-15 fighter jets armed with weapons in response. According to the article, the Chinese fighter aircraft "successfully drove away" the foreign aircraft after dogfighting—a term that refers to close-range maneuvers between two aircraft. This was the second encounter between Chinese and foreign aircraft carriers publicized by China this year. In April, Chinese media aired footage showing a J-15 fighter jet flying close to a fighter aircraft that appears to be an F/A-18, operated by the U.S. Navy's aircraft carrier fleet. In early July, both the U.S. and China deployed aircraft carriers in the South China Sea—USS George Washington and the Shandong, respectively. The former was operating in the Timor Sea, north of Australia, as of Tuesday, according to photos released by the U.S. Navy. Open-source satellite imagery spotted the Shandong at its home port on China's southern island of Hainan—north of the South China Sea—on Thursday. The warship was one of two Chinese aircraft carriers simultaneously deployed in the broader western Pacific in June. 🔍 🇨🇳PLAN Naval Watch: Recent imagery shows the bulk of the South Sea Amphibious Fleet back in port at Zhanjiang. However, the activity doesn't stop there! We're tracking a Type 075 LHD inbound to Longpo/Yulin, alongside a flurry of movements just outside Longpo/Yulin… — MT Anderson (@MT_Anderson) July 18, 2025 What People Are Saying The U.S. Pacific Fleet told Newsweek in April: "We don't have a comment on specific operations, engagements, or training, but we routinely operate in the vicinity of foreign aircraft and ships in international waters and airspace in the Indo-Pacific." Mao Ning, a spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry, said in May 2023: "[T]he U.S. side has frequently sent aircraft and vessels to conduct close-in reconnaissance on China, seriously threatening China's sovereignty and security. Such provocative and dangerous moves are the root cause for maritime security issues." What Happens Next It is likely that close encounters between Chinese and foreign forces—particularly those of the U.S.—will continue as both sides maintain their presence in the western Pacific.