
Cold blood, warm attachments
The human psyche has always been an interesting subject, one that allows us to question what we are supposed to understand about ourselves. While reading Truman Capote's In Cold Blood might leave one in shock and disgust at the human psyche, but perhaps what is even more shocking is Capote's thought process while he was writing this novel and his connection to the murderers. The book in itself was a 'grand literary experiment' but a closer analysis allows us to explore the various themes in this book such as Capote's views, the book's themes, its structure, and the portrayal of characters.
In his 1968 interview about his book, Capote confesses he knew the murderers 'better than they knew themselves' and that he wanted 'the film to be shot in the Clutter home.' This depicts Capote's connection with the two killers because of his interactions with them and his emotional attachment with Perry which was truly fascinating, because it makes me realise that Capote wrote the novel as an omniscient narrator, but was never really objective while writing. It was only after watching the interview, did I come to the realisation that Capote might have been an unreliable narrator. While he did follow a traditional journalistic style when it came to reporting the facts of the case and offered deep insights into the characters' lives, the fact that he interviewed the killers and was somehow associated with them depicts that he himself might have been emotionally or mentally troubled.
This was quite interesting because I wasn't just interested in psycho-analysing Dick and Perry, I was also interested in psycho-analysing Capote because I started to notice that maybe he's presenting certain personal qualities — like having a traumatic childhood or being emotionally sensitive — through Perry's character and other themes in the novel.
Reading this book felt like following a thriller movie that follows a typical storyline where you start off with the perfect American family and the American dream, how that is suddenly shattered, and then you have the entire investigation process. As someone who loves to watch psychological thrillers, this was a great piece of nonfiction for me because it is something that I enjoyed reading (while ignoring the chilling fact that Capote is closely attached to the killers) and it followed a proper structure that evokes emotions in the readers.
The book is structured in such a way that it builds suspense as you read through it and this is done through the use of dramatic irony (the fact that the readers know that the Clutters are about to die), the pacing of the book (alternating facts and extended scenes in the first two chapters), and the use of descriptive words and imagery. Before I elaborate upon this, just the fact that Capote does not directly begin with the killer's plan and rather paints this cozy image of the Clutters, allows the readers to empathise with the family and portrays them as people rather than mere victims of a crime.
Moreover, as a reader you are already familiar with the tragic inevitability right from the beginning because Capote uses phrases such as 'unaware that it would be his last,' and the title of his first chapter is literally 'The Last To See Them Alive'. This creates a constant atmosphere of tension and suspense where you are waiting for the tragic event to unfold. Capote's writing style was something that appealed to me because he incorporates various forms of descriptive and creative imagery in his pieces. Right from the beginning of the novel, he uses words such as 'aimless,' 'haphazard,' 'stark,' 'falling-apart post office' and the 'depot with peeling sulphur-coloured paint' and 'flaking' to describe various elements of the town. This parallelism between nature and the setting with the events in the book, has been a great technique when it comes to writing.
While reading this piece, I instantly remembered Shakespeare's Macbeth and how nature started to revolt against Macbeth when he was going to commit the murders with the winds howling and the weather changing to something terrible. This idea of nature somehow responding to one's criminal activities is fascinating and reflected in Capote's description of the town. Capote does begin the novel with words such as "the hard-blue skies,' and 'desert-clear air,' which later contrasts with the physical description of the town. Additionally, the physical decay of the town also mirrors the moral decay that is going to happen as the story proceeds and this depicts the idea of how nature or the setting closely follows the events that happen in a literary piece.
The book focuses on certain themes such as the American dream (appearance vs reality), trauma, relationship dynamics, murder, and justice which are depicted through the characters and their interactions with each other. Analysing the idea of the American dream as presented in the book, the readers are introduced to this perfect American family and it seems like the family they introduce in American movies as we can tell by Capote's description, 'whereupon Nancy had behaved like one; curtsying in her hoop-skirted costume, she had asked if she might drive into Garden City. The State Theatre was having a special, eleven-thirty, Friday-the-thirteenth "Spook Show," and all her friends were going. In other circumstances Mr Clutter would have refused. His laws were laws, and one of them was: Nancy and Kenyon too must be home by ten on week nights, by twelve on Saturdays. But weakened by the genial events of the evening, he had consented' (Capote 8). As a reader, one can tell that the Clutter's life deeply contrasts with Dick and Perry's past and present life. It could be said that Capote is trying to shed light upon a systematic issue regarding class differences in America and might be criticising the concept of the American dream.
While America is the 'land of opportunity and freedom' and the American dream stands for equality, that is not the reality as depicted through Dick and Perry's lives. Belonging to low income households and suffering from different traumas, Capote depicts how negative experiences and lack of opportunities shape a person's future in America and questions the credibility of the American dream.
Moreover, Capote presents Dick and Perry's relationship as a complicated one and the progression of their relationship throughout the book was interesting to analyse. As readers, we are aware that Perry has had a rough past and seems to be a bit more emotional than Dick as observed through his actions and his constant anxiety after committing the murders. In comparison, Dick is presented as a macho man who does not appear to exhibit any emotion and often looks down upon Perry by referring to him using nicknames such as 'baby' and 'sugar'. While reading their interactions and noticing Dick's use of these nicknames towards a grown man, it constantly felt like Dick was more dominant and assertive and would be condescending towards Perry. And throughout all of this, it seemed as if Perry simply ignored or accepted Dick's attitude towards him because he might have been slightly attached to Perry. However, we also observe Dick's blatant disregard for Perry when he claims that Perry was the one who committed the killings. As a reader, I sympathised with Perry at that moment. Additionally, there were other instances in the book where I realised that I did sympathise with Perry and was channeling all of my anger at Dick because maybe Capote presented the characters in this way. It led me to question whether Capote did this on purpose and did try to paint a less evil version of Perry.
This book was a very different kind of read. Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn, John Hersey's Hiroshima, and other pieces of non-fiction that I enjoyed reading as much as this, because they don't incorporate that element of suspense and thrill that Capote manages to create. While these other texts focus on different themes and ideas, Capote's blending of traditional journalism with creative writing and nonfiction makes this novel interesting and something that one enjoys reading.
Syeda Fizza Jafri is a media student and freelance writer.
All facts and information are the sole responsibility of the writer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Cate Blanchett shocks fans with Squid Game season 3 cameo
Cate Blanchett makes a surprise cameo in the final moments of Squid Game Season 3, which was released globally on June 27, 2025. She plays a mysterious recruiter in what appears to be a US based extension of the deadly game. The scene is set in Los Angeles, where Blanchett's character engages in a game of ddakji with a man on the street mirroring the original recruitment method from Season 1. After delivering a slap and handing over the familiar invitation card, she walks away, while the Front Man observes the interaction from a distance. The brief yet impactful appearance has led to immediate speculation about a potential American spin-off of the series. Show creator Hwang Dong-hyuk confirmed Blanchett's involvement was kept under wraps and praised her for filming the scene in a single take. He noted her charisma and precision made her an ideal fit for the teaser-style role. Though Netflix has not officially confirmed an American version of Squid Game, industry reports suggest development discussions are underway. Blanchett's cameo is being interpreted by fans and critics as a strategic setup for a global franchise expansion. Season 3 continued Seong Gi-hun's journey and expanded on the international scope of the Squid Game operations. Reviews have been mostly positive, praising the show's sustained tension, thematic complexity, and the unexpected twist in its closing moments. Blanchett's role, brief but symbolically loaded adds a new layer to the series' evolving universe, possibly positioning her as a central figure in future installments beyond South Korea.


Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Lavish Bezos wedding kicks off in Venice
Amazon tycoon Jeff Bezos, 61, and his fiancee Lauren Sanchez, 55, kicked off a three-day wedding celebration with guests including Kim and Khloe Kardashian, and Oprah Winfrey, reported AFP. The sumptuous, secluded ceremony attended by celebrity friends on an island in Venice's lagoon, comes amid local criticism over its extravagance and ecological impact. Venice, home to the oldest film festival in the world, is used to VIPs whizzing around in speed boats, and happily hosted the star-studded nuptials of Hollywood actor George Clooney in 2014. But Bezos – one of the world's richest men and founder of a company regularly scrutinised for how it treats its workers – is different. And the festivities have sparked protests from environmentalists and locals who accuse authorities of pandering to the super rich while the city drowns under tourists. Wedding guests snapped by paparazzi as they hopped into boats included Jordan's Queen Rania, US football player Tom Brady, American fashion designer Spencer Antle, singer Usher, and Ivanka Trump – the daughter of US President Donald Trump. The celebrations are set to end on Saturday with a party likely at the Arsenale, a vast shipyard complex dating back to when the city was a naval powerhouse. Bezos and Sanchez are donating three million euros ($3.5 million) to the city, according to Veneto's regional president Luca Zaia, and are employing historic Venetian artisans. Venice's oldest pastry maker Rosa Salva is baking 19th-century "fishermen's biscuits" for party bags which will also contain something by Laguna B, renowned for its handblown Murano glass. Trump and her family visited a glass-blowing workshop on the small island of Murano on Wednesday, according to the owner. Some locals say the A-list guests and their entourages bring good business but critics have accused billionaire Bezos of using the UNESCO site as his personal playground. And environmental activists have also pointed to the carbon footprint of the mega yachts and dozens of private jets bringing the rich and famous to the canal city.


Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Wintour steps down from 'US Vogue'
In a seismic event in the global fashion industry, US Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour, instantly recognisable with her iconic bob haircut and signature sunglasses, gave up the reins after 37 years at the helm. As per AFP, Wintour, 75, was famous for making Vogue's front covers an authoritative statement on contemporary fashion, and for her total control over the glamorous pages inside. The British born fashion magnate will no longer run day-to-day editing of the fashion bible, but magazine group owner Conde Nast was quick to scotch suggestions of retirement. She will continue to hold senior roles at the group and remain Vogue's global editorial director. Ushering in news of her departure, Wintour announced at a staff meeting in New York that US Vogue would seek a new head of editorial content. In remarks reported by the New York Times, she called it a "pivotal decision" but stressed she would not be moving out of her office. "I'll be turning all my attention to global leadership and working with our team of brilliant editors around the world." Fashion flagship Wintour was made a British dame in 2017 and in February this year became a companion of honour - an elite recognition. At the ceremony in London in February, Wintour removed her trademark sunglasses to receive the award and said she had told King Charles III that she had no plans to stop working. Wintour, who was raised in the UK by a British father and an American mother, reigned over Vogue in the heyday of glossy magazines. US Vogue was a staid title when she took it over in 1988 and transformed it into a powerhouse that set trends — and often make or break designers, celebrities and brands. Wintour took the title to a global audience, with huge budgets to spend on models, design, photographs and journalism funded by lavish advertisements and high subscription rates. Vogue remains fashion's flagship magazine but, like many print publications, has struggled to adapt to the digital era. Wintour has for many years also run the Met Gala, an extravagant Manhattan charity event that attracts an A-list of dressed-up stars from the worlds of fashion, film, politics and sports. She is a fanatical tennis player and fan — frequently appearing at Grand Slam finals — and a major fundraiser for Democrat politicians, including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Joe Biden awarded her the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the top US honour, before leaving office in January. As Conde Nast's chief content officer, she will continue to oversee publications including Vogue, Wired, Vanity Fair, GQ, Conde Nast Traveler and Glamour. Wintour's frosty image Across her glittering yet rock-solid career in the fashion industry, Wintour's legacy has morphed into more than just an ice-queen magazine editor; to those who understand fashion, she has become an icon in her own right. "Across more than three decades' worth of issues of Vogue and its spinoffs, she has defined not only fashion but also beauty standards, telling millions of people what to buy, how to look, and who to care about," wrote fashion journalist Amy Odell in Anna: The Biography. But as per ABC News, even Odell, who interviewed hundreds of people about Wintour, was taken aback at the complexity of her subject. "People couldn't agree on many things about her, including whether she's an introvert or an extrovert, ruthless or just very demanding," Odell added on reflection. As per the publication, when Wintour took over as Vogue editor she replaced multiple staff members and exerted more control than any of her predecessors. A 2015 documentary The September Issue about the monthly magazine featured her ice queen image and steely ambition but also revealed a warmer human side. Nevertheless, her decisive leadership earned her the nickname "Nuclear Wintour", although the editor defended herself in a rare interview with 60 Minutes. "If I'm such a b**** then they must really be a glutton for punishment, because they're still here," she remarked. "If one comes across as sometimes being cold or brusque, it's simply because I'm striving for the best." Does the Devil wear Prada? Those who do not follow fashion news may still be aware of the effect Wintour has had on the industry thanks to the 2003 book The Devil Wears Prada and its subsequent 2006 film. Wintour's legendary fictional persona took the form of Meryl Streep's tyrannical magazine editor Miranda Priestly, whose ice-cold cutting observations ("Tales of your incompetence do not interest me") remain fixed in the minds of fashion-fiction-obsessed film fans. The role earned Streep an Oscar nomination. For many years, Wintour declined to comment on The Devil Wears Prada, which was written by one of her former assistants, Lauren Weisberger. Just how similar the fictional Priestly is to Wintour has been the subject of debate ever since Streep brought the role to life in the film. But when it was turned into a musical and opened in London in 2024, Wintour told the BBC that it was "for the audience and for the people I work with to decide if there are any similarities between me and Miranda Priestly." One way in which Wintour categorically differs from Priestly is her long-standing devotion to sunglasses – and she finally offered an enigmatic explanation for trademark shades in conversation with the outlet last year. "They help me see and they help me not see," she said. "They help me be seen and not be seen. They are a prop, I would say."