Haitians call for reparations from France on 200th anniversary of independence ‘ransom'
The renewed call for reparations comes on the bicentenary of an agreement to pay 150m francs to France in 1825 to compensate slave-owning colonists after the Haitian Revolution.
Though the figure was later reduced to 90m, Fritz Deshommes, president of the Haitian National Committee on Restitution and Reparations (HNCRR), estimates the converted value of the payment today could be between $38bn and $135bn, depending on how the sum is calculated and whether it reflects lost customs revenue and economic stagnation.
Once France's most important colony in the Caribbean, Haiti received hundreds of thousands of Africans who had been kidnapped, forcibly transported across the Atlantic and sold into slavery.
Related: Battered statue bears witness to Haiti's tragedy, resilience and flickering hope
After a bloody struggle between self-liberated slaves and French, Spanish and British forces, it became the first Caribbean nation to gain its independence from colonial rule in 1804.
But, under threat of military action, France later demanded what HNCRR member Jean Mozart Feron described as an unjust and exorbitant ransom, supposedly to provide compensation for former enslavers.
The enormous payments, Feron said, crippled the fledgling nation. 'This ransom plunged Haiti into a spiral of economic dependency from which it has never fully recovered and … strangled the young nation, stifling its development and diverting precious resources that could have been invested in education and infrastructure,' he said.
The debt not only created deep structural poverty, social inequality and weak institutions, but also affected 'the way Haiti is perceived and treated on the international stage without due consideration for this history of economic exploitation', he said.
Monique Clesca, spokesperson for the Kolektif Ayisyen Afwodesandan, a civil society organisation that has been campaigning for reparations for Haiti, said the 'monstrous debt' created by the ransom prevented the country from 'moving forward at the rhythm that we should have been moving forward'.
'Politically this meant that we almost became a neocolony, totally indebted to France, not only in terms of economics, but symbolically and politically, we were tied. So there are serious repercussions and consequences to this continuous debt that you can't undo,' she said.
The campaigners are calling for France to repay the ransom and offer restitution for the harm caused by slavery and colonisation.
The HNCRR is working in alignment with the Caribbean Community (Caricom), which has a 10-point plan for reparatory justice.
Speaking at the opening of the UN's Permanent Forum on People of African Descent on Monday, Caricom secretary-general, Dr Carla Barnett, joined the calls for reparations for Haiti.
'The negative economic and social effects of this historical injustice are painfully clear, with arguable links to the situation in Haiti today. This anniversary presents an opportunity to bring global attention and a deeper understanding of the situation in Haiti and serves as a call to action to address the ongoing security, humanitarian and governance crises in the country,' she said.
Appealing for global support for Haiti's reparations claim, Heron said: 'Haitian citizens do not hold French people responsible for the decision made in 1825 by the French state. However, we believe that the French people have a moral responsibility and a duty to stand in solidarity with the Haitian people in this initiative.'
HNCRR, he said, is of the view that France and Haiti could reach an agreement about the 'types of expertise and technical assistance valued within the framework of restitution'. But Haiti, he added, must ultimately decide how to use the reparations.
Related: Haitians fear the imminent fall of Port-au-Prince to rebel gangs: 'We will die standing'
Haiti has been gripped by crisis since the 2021 assassination of president Jovenel Moïse, and a subsequent gang insurgency which forced Ariel Henry, who led the country as an unelected prime minister after Moïse's death, out of office in March 2024. Since then, support from the international community has failed to restore stable, democratic governance and curb the spiralling violence, which has killed thousands and displaced tens of thousands.
Feron dismissed arguments that the current crisis could prevent the country from effectively managing any reparation payments, arguing that the state of the country is a consequence of its history.
He added: 'Our committee intends to work closely with the civil society to clearly advise the Haitian state on how this money should be used or could be used and how it should be managed with total transparency in a responsible manner.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
What Starmer's plan for the UK to recognize a Palestinian state means
LONDON (AP) — Britain has announced that it will recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, stops building settlements in the West Bank and commits to a two-state solution. The U.K. followed France, which declared last week that it will recognize Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly in September. More than 140 countries have already taken that step, but France and Britain are significant as members of the Group of Seven and the U.N. Security Council. The two countries hope their bold – if largely symbolic – diplomatic moves will help add pressure on Israel to ease a catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza and breathe life into a moribund peace process. What Starmer said Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that Britain will recognize a Palestinian state in September, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.' He said that included 'allowing the U.N. to restart the supply of aid, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank.″ Starmer also said Hamas must release all the hostages it holds, agree to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza' — though he did not make that a condition for recognition. Britain says that's because Hamas has no role in a two-state solution. Britain felt it was now or never Britain has for decades supported an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, but insisted recognition must come as part of a peace plan to achieve a two-state solution. U.K. officials increasingly worry that such a solution is becoming all but impossible – not only because of the razing of Gaza and displacement of most of its population during 22 months of war, but because Israel's government is aggressively expanding settlements in the West Bank, land Palestinians want for their future state. Much of the world regards Israel's occupation of the West Bank as illegal. 'The moment to act is now,' Cabinet minister Heidi Alexander told Times Radio. 'There's the effective annexation of the West Bank happening.' Starmer is also under mounting domestic pressure to do something as horror spreads at the scenes of hunger in Gaza. More than 250 of the 650 lawmakers in the House of Commons signed a letter in recent days urging the British government to recognize a Palestinian state. Opinion polls suggest far more Britons support recognition than oppose it, though a large number are undecided. Reaction is polarized Israel quickly condemned the British move. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds, said Starmer's announcement 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims.' The families of Israelis taken hostage by Hamas were also critical. 'Recognizing a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism,' said the Hostages Family Forum, which represents many hostages' relatives. Emily Damari, a British-Israeli national who was held captive for more than a year, called Starmer's stance 'a moral failure.' The British statement was welcomed by the Palestinian Authority, which Britain views as a legitimate representative of Palestinians. It has limited autonomy in pockets of the occupied West Bank. Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian Authority's envoy in London, said Britain's statement 'is a corrective to over a century of dispossession, during which the Palestinian people have been deprived of our land, liberty and lives.' Limited influence, historical weight In practice, Britain's influence on Israel is limited. The U.K. government has suspended free trade talks and halted some arms shipments to Israel over its conduct of the war, but is not a major economic or military partner. History has, however, given Britain a particular interest and role in the Middle East. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said Britain bears a 'special burden of responsibility' as the former governing power of what was then Palestine and author of the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which backed the establishment of a Jewish homeland, but also pledged to protect the rights of the Palestinian population. 'This has not been upheld, and it is a historical injustice which continues to unfold,' Lammy said at the U.N. on Tuesday. Most of Britain's main political parties support a two-state solution. But the right-of-center opposition Conservatives said Starmer's announcement was premature. 'Recognition of a Palestinian state is only meaningful if it is part of a formal peace process and cannot happen while hostages are still being held in terrorist captivity and while Hamas' reign of terror continues,' said Priti Patel, the party's foreign affairs spokeswoman. Ed Davey, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, welcomed Starmer's statement as a step forward but said the prime minister should not use Palestinian statehood as 'a bargaining chip.' The move may spark diplomatic momentum Britain and France hope other countries will follow their move. On Tuesday, European Union member Malta said it, too, would recognize a Palestinian state in September. Germany, a major European power and strong ally of Israel, remains a holdout. Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated his country's position that recognition of a Palestinian state 'can be one of the last steps on the road to realizing a two-state solution,' but that Berlin has no plans for recognition 'in the short term.' Real clout rests with the U.S., and Starmer's cautious approach may be designed to persuade President Donald Trump to take a tougher line with his ally Netanyahu. The prospects are uncertain, to say the least. Asked about Britain's stance on Tuesday, Trump said: 'We have no view on that.' Yossi Mekelberg, a Middle East expert at international affairs think tank Chatham House, said there is 'no doubt' that a global majority supports Palestinian statehood, but that's not enough to make it a reality. 'British recognition or French recognition doesn't make it internationally recognized,' he said. 'You need the (U.N.) Security Council — and that is not going to happen because of a certain person in the White House.'


Hamilton Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What Starmer's plan for the UK to recognize a Palestinian state means
LONDON (AP) — Britain has announced that it will recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, stops building settlements in the West Bank and commits to a two-state solution. The U.K. followed France, which declared last week that it will recognize Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly in September. More than 140 countries have already taken that step, but France and Britain are significant as members of the Group of Seven and the U.N. Security Council. The two countries hope their bold – if largely symbolic – diplomatic moves will help add pressure on Israel to ease a catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza and breathe life into a moribund peace process. What Starmer said Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that Britain will recognize a Palestinian state in September, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.' He said that included 'allowing the U.N. to restart the supply of aid, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank .″ Starmer also said Hamas must release all the hostages it holds, agree to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza' — though he did not make that a condition for recognition. Britain says that's because Hamas has no role in a two-state solution. Britain felt it was now or never Britain has for decades supported an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, but insisted recognition must come as part of a peace plan to achieve a two-state solution. U.K. officials increasingly worry that such a solution is becoming all but impossible – not only because of the razing of Gaza and displacement of most of its population during 22 months of war, but because Israel's government is aggressively expanding settlements in the West Bank , land Palestinians want for their future state. Much of the world regards Israel's occupation of the West Bank as illegal. 'The moment to act is now,' Cabinet minister Heidi Alexander told Times Radio. 'There's the effective annexation of the West Bank happening.' Starmer is also under mounting domestic pressure to do something as horror spreads at the scenes of hunger in Gaza . More than 250 of the 650 lawmakers in the House of Commons signed a letter in recent days urging the British government to recognize a Palestinian state. Opinion polls suggest far more Britons support recognition than oppose it, though a large number are undecided. Reaction is polarized Israel quickly condemned the British move. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds, said Starmer's announcement 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims.' The families of Israelis taken hostage by Hamas were also critical. 'Recognizing a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism,' said the Hostages Family Forum, which represents many hostages' relatives. Emily Damari, a British-Israeli national who was held captive for more than a year, called Starmer's stance 'a moral failure.' The British statement was welcomed by the Palestinian Authority, which Britain views as a legitimate representative of Palestinians. It has limited autonomy in pockets of the occupied West Bank. Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian Authority's envoy in London, said Britain's statement 'is a corrective to over a century of dispossession, during which the Palestinian people have been deprived of our land, liberty and lives.' Limited influence, historical weight In practice, Britain's influence on Israel is limited. The U.K. government has suspended free trade talks and halted some arms shipments to Israel over its conduct of the war, but is not a major economic or military partner. History has, however, given Britain a particular interest and role in the Middle East. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said Britain bears a 'special burden of responsibility' as the former governing power of what was then Palestine and author of the 1917 Balfour Declaration , which backed the establishment of a Jewish homeland, but also pledged to protect the rights of the Palestinian population. 'This has not been upheld, and it is a historical injustice which continues to unfold,' Lammy said at the U.N. on Tuesday. Most of Britain's main political parties support a two-state solution. But the right-of-center opposition Conservatives said Starmer's announcement was premature. 'Recognition of a Palestinian state is only meaningful if it is part of a formal peace process and cannot happen while hostages are still being held in terrorist captivity and while Hamas' reign of terror continues,' said Priti Patel, the party's foreign affairs spokeswoman. Ed Davey, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, welcomed Starmer's statement as a step forward but said the prime minister should not use Palestinian statehood as 'a bargaining chip.' The move may spark diplomatic momentum Britain and France hope other countries will follow their move. On Tuesday, European Union member Malta said it, too, would recognize a Palestinian state in September. Germany, a major European power and strong ally of Israel, remains a holdout. Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated his country's position that recognition of a Palestinian state 'can be one of the last steps on the road to realizing a two-state solution,' but that Berlin has no plans for recognition 'in the short term.' Real clout rests with the U.S., and Starmer's cautious approach may be designed to persuade President Donald Trump to take a tougher line with his ally Netanyahu. The prospects are uncertain, to say the least. Asked about Britain's stance on Tuesday, Trump said: 'We have no view on that.' Yossi Mekelberg, a Middle East expert at international affairs think tank Chatham House, said there is 'no doubt' that a global majority supports Palestinian statehood, but that's not enough to make it a reality. 'British recognition or French recognition doesn't make it internationally recognized,' he said. 'You need the (U.N.) Security Council — and that is not going to happen because of a certain person in the White House.' ___ Associated Press writer Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this story. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Anti-ICE activists help illegal migrant escape detention in LA: ‘Out of control'
Anti-ICE protesters helped an illegal migrant escape from a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles Tuesday, The Post has learned. The British migrant was shackled as contractors walked him and several others into the ICE detention center for processing when he snuck away with the help of the activists, Homeland Security sources said. The escape artist detainee was then loaded into a van with the help of the protesters. 4 Protesters blocking the garage entrance of the Los Angeles Federal Building react as Law enforcement officers fire pepper spray at them following multiple detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in downtown Los Angeles onJune 6, 2025. REUTERS 4 A demonstrator kicks a canister of tear gas during a protest Saturday, June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. AP 4 Protesters confront law enforcement outside an ICE building in LA. Getty Images 4 A woman waves up to prisoners in the Metropolitan Detention Center in LA. DAVID SWANSON/EPA/Shutterstock 'This is getting out of control,' one source fumed of the anti-ICE activists dominating the streets around the detention center. A manhunt is now underway for the illegal immigrant, who has not been identified. A spokesperson for ICE didn't immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.