logo
Birkenstock sandals are pieces of design, not art, court finds

Birkenstock sandals are pieces of design, not art, court finds

Reuters20-02-2025
KARLSRUHE, Germany, Feb 20 (Reuters) - Birkenstock (BIRK.N), opens new tab sandals, which have evolved from a symbol of counterculture to a trendy fashion item, do not qualify as art and are therefore not protected by copyright, Germany's highest civil court ruled on Thursday.
The Federal Court of Justice dismissed a lawsuit brought by the German company, which had sought to prevent competitors, such as Germany's Tchibo, from selling similar models.
"The claims are unfounded because they (the sandals) are not copyright-protected works of applied art," presiding judge Thomas Koch said.
Under German law, copyright protection is valid for 70 years after the creator's death, while design protection hinges on the product's lifespan and ends after 25 years.
The legal distinction between design and art in German law lies in a product's purpose. Design serves a practical function while works of applied art require a discernible level of individual artistic creativity.
Shoemaker and Birkenstock dynasty member Karl Birkenstock, born in 1936, is alive. However, since he crafted his initial designs in the 1970s, some sandals no longer enjoy design protection.
As a result lawyers asked the court to classify the shoes as art.
Konstantin Wegner, Birkenstock's lawyer, said the sandals had an "iconic design" and announced further litigation after the decision was announced. "We want to add arguments in these pending proceedings", said Wegner without elaborating.
Once popular with hippies, tech enthusiasts and medical professionals, Birkenstock gained widespread attention after Australian actress Margot Robbie wore a pair of pink Birkenstocks in the final scene of the 2023 hit movie "Barbie".
Founded in 1774, Birkenstock was run by the namesake family for six generations until it sold a majority stake to L Catterton, a U.S. private equity firm backed by French billionaire Bernard Arnault and his luxury goods empire LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab.
L Catterton remained Birkenstock's biggest shareholder after the company went public in 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikTok will go dark in US without Chinese approval of sale deal, Lutnick says
TikTok will go dark in US without Chinese approval of sale deal, Lutnick says

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

TikTok will go dark in US without Chinese approval of sale deal, Lutnick says

July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday that TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Chinese-owned short video app that is used by some 170 million Americans. Lutnick, speaking on CNBC, also said the United States must control the algorithm that makes the social media platform work. Last month, President Donald Trump extended by 90 days to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets of TikTok. Trump's action took place despite a 2024 law that mandated a sale or shutdown by January 19 this year if there had not been significant progress. "China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm," Lutnick said. "If that deal gets approved, by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon." TikTok did not immediately comment. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's U.S. operations into a new U.S.-based firm, majority-owned and operated by U.S. investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods.

Liverpool handed clear run at Alexander Isak transfer as Arsenal and Chelsea stance emerges
Liverpool handed clear run at Alexander Isak transfer as Arsenal and Chelsea stance emerges

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Liverpool handed clear run at Alexander Isak transfer as Arsenal and Chelsea stance emerges

Alexander Isak has open the door to a Newcastle United exit after he was left behind for the club's pre-season tour of Singapore Alexander Isak has opened the door to a sensational British-record transfer to Liverpool after informing Newcastle that he wants to explore a move away from St James' Park. Isak did not travel with the Magpies to Singapore yesterday for their pre-season tour, though the club insist his omission was due to a thigh issue. ‌ However, it's understood the Swede asked to be left behind after also missing Saturday's 4-0 friendly defeat at Celtic. Liverpool retain an interest and will now consider a fresh approach after their initial enquiry was knocked back around 10 days ago. ‌ The big-spending Reds, who have already splashed just shy of £300m on new arrivals after pipping Newcastle to Hugo Ekitike, will likely require sales to present a formal bid. ‌ Luis Diaz is wanted by Bayern Munich and is keen to join the German giants while Darwin Nunez, Harvey Elliott, Federico Chiesa and Tyler Morton remain possible departures before next month's transfer deadline. PIF-owned Saudi Pro League side Al-Hilal are also courting Isak, who has rejected the chance to sign a new deal with Newcastle, and would be willing to offer the 25-year-old an eye-watering contract worth up to £500,000 per week including bonuses. Earlier in the year, Arsenal initially had Isak top of their summer wish-list but the Gunners - much like other suitors - did not feel he was attainable after Newcastle secured Champions League qualification and they began to lay the groundwork on other targets, instead. Mikel Arteta's side are now in the process of finalising a £63.7m deal for Sporting CP's Viktor Gyokeres, who is finally expected to undergo a medical in the coming days after agreeing a five-year contract at the Emirates. Manchester United have also ruled out a swoop for Isak while Chelsea, who made an enquiry last summer, are currently prioritising the arrivals of RB Leipzig attacking midfielder Xavi Simons and Ajax defender Jorrel Hato after landing Liam Delap and Joao Pedro. ‌ Sources at Stamford Bridge have poured cold water on the prospect of a swoop for the Sweden international despite appreciation for the player. Newcastle remain determined to keep Isak, though his bombshell power play could now force their hand. The Magpies value the ex-Real Sociedad striker at around £150m. Meanwhile, Eddie Howe's side remain in talks with Brentford over a swoop for £40m-rated Yoane Wissa. Eddie Howe's interest in Wissa is unrelated to Isak's future and Newcastle have already had an opening offer worth in the region of £25m rejected for the DR Congo international. It's believed Newcastle are now already exploring other forward targets in anticipation that Isak could depart.

Amazon faces UK lawsuits worth up to $5.4 bln from retailers, consumers
Amazon faces UK lawsuits worth up to $5.4 bln from retailers, consumers

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Amazon faces UK lawsuits worth up to $5.4 bln from retailers, consumers

LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab faces two mass lawsuits from retailers and consumers worth up to 4 billion pounds ($5.4 billion) for allegedly abusing its dominant position, after a London tribunal on Thursday certified the cases could proceed. Andreas Stephan, a competition law academic, is bringing one of the cases on behalf of over 200,000 third-party retailers, worth up to 2.7 billion pounds. His lawyers allege that Amazon manipulates the "Buy Box" feature on its website to its own advantage and favours products that use Amazon's own logistics centres and delivery network. Consumer advocate Robert Hammond is separately bringing a case valued at up to 1.3 billion pounds on behalf of millions of Amazon customers for similar alleged abuses of dominance. Amazon argued that the Competition Appeal Tribunal should certify the cases to proceed, an early step in the proceedings, including because the economic methodology for proving the cases was flawed. But the tribunal certified both cases on an opt-out basis, meaning members of the claimant class will be part of the case unless they decide otherwise. An Amazon spokesperson said: "These claims are without merit and we're confident that will become clear through the legal process. "Amazon has always focused on supporting the 100,000 businesses that sell their products on our UK store, and more than half of all physical product sales on our UK store are from independent selling partners."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store