When Selling Your Home in a Divorce, Who Pays Capital Gains Tax?
Chief among them is the capital gains tax, which can apply when a home is sold for more than its original purchase price.
Luckily, understanding how capital gains exclusions work, how the timing of a sale affects taxes, and who's responsible if one spouse keeps the home can help divorcing couples avoid costly surprises.
What the capital gains tax exclusion means—and why timing matters in divorce
When you sell your primary home for more than you originally paid, the profit—known as a capital gain on real estate—might be subject to taxes. How much you owe is based on the gain.
However, most homeowners qualify for a capital gains exclusion, which can reduce or eliminate the amount they owe. To qualify, though, you must live in the home as your primary residence and have lived in it for at least two of the past five years. Plus, you can claim the exclusion only once every two years.
Individuals can exclude up to $250,000.
Married couples filing jointly can exclude up to $500,000.
In a divorce, the timing of the home sale can make a big difference. Depending on when you sell the home, and who meets the ownership and residency requirements, will determine if and how much of an exclusion you can claim.
This is why it's important for divorcing couples to consider their timetables as part of the broader financial strategy. Selling too late could result in a larger tax bill, especially in areas where home values have appreciated significantly.
There's been ongoing debate among lawmakers about potential changes to capital gains rules, particularly in response to the housing affordability crisis, so staying informed about tax policy changes is also wise.
If the home is sold before the divorce is finalized
From a tax perspective, selling the home before your divorce is finalized is often the most efficient route, since married couples can take advantage of the full exclusion amount ($500,000). You just need to file a joint return and meet the other requirements.
The IRS does not take divorce pending proceedings into account. What matters is your marital status at the time of the sale.
As long as you are legally married when you sell the home, the full exclusion will apply. This can result in substantial tax savings when your home has appreciated significantly in value.
While the proceeds from the sale will still need to be divided as part of the divorce settlement, the tax treatment of those proceeds is generally more favorable when the sale happens before the split is official.
So whether your divorce is amicable, mediated, or somewhere in between, it's worth having a conversation about timing the sale strategically since selling the home earlier in the process could reduce your joint tax liability—and leave more money on the table for both parties to divide.
If the home is sold after the divorce is finalized
Once the divorce is final, the couple no longer qualifies for the $500,000 exclusion as a unit. Instead, each spouse may individually qualify for the $250,000 exclusion—but only if they meet the ownership and residence test individually.
There are other potential problems when selling postdivorce. One spouse might not qualify if they moved out of the house years before the sale, which might commonly happen when a couple splits up.
Another issue arises when the title to the home changes after the divorce. If the home is transferred into the name of one spouse only, and that person sells it later, the entire capital gain might be attributed solely to them (even if both spouses shared in the home's appreciation during their tenure there). That could lead to a much higher tax bill.
For example, let's say the home increased in value by $600,000 after it was purchased. If only one spouse is on the title and only that spouse qualifies for the $250,000 exclusion, they could be taxed on the remaining $350,000 in gains—a potentially significant financial hit.
If one spouse keeps the house after divorce
In this case, the capital gains tax doesn't apply right away since there was no sale. Instead, taxes will come into play down the road whenever the spouse eventually sells.
Here's why this matters: Unless the home's cost basis (the original purchase price, plus any major improvements) is adjusted during the divorce settlement, the person who keeps the house inherits the original cost basis. That means if the home increases significantly in value over time, they could be hit with a larger tax bill—especially if they only qualify for the individual rather than the exclusion available to married couples.
Another common arrangement is where one spouse keeps the house and the other receives different assets, like retirement accounts or investment portfolios. While this can be a fair exchange at the time of divorce, it might lead to uneven tax consequences later. The spouse who keeps the house could face a larger tax burden in the long run, depending on how much the property appreciates.
Because of these complexities, it's wise for divorcing homeowners to consult a CPA or a divorce-focused financial planner before finalizing any agreement involving the home. What seems like a clean trade at the moment could result in a costly surprise down the line if the capital gains on real estate aren't properly accounted for.
Related Articles
Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt Announce They're Pregnant With Their First Child—Just Months After They Moved in Together
36.1% of Homeowners in Tennessee Will Face a Hidden Home Equity Tax If They Sell
Every Smart Buyer Does This Before Closing — If Your Agent Says Skip It, Think Twice
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alabama farmer sees new interest within days of Trump's tomato tariff — and says former trade deal ‘never worked' for US
With President Trump's latest tariff announcement, the price of tomatoes could soon be going up in the U.S. On July 14, the Trump Administration announced a 17% tariff on tomatoes imported from Mexico, ending a decades-long trade deal that kept the price of importing tomatoes down in the U.S. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it 'Mexico remains one of our greatest allies, but for far too long our farmers have been crushed by unfair trade practices that undercut pricing on produce like tomatoes,' said U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in the press release. 'That ends today.' And while some Americans may not be in support of additional tariffs levied against America's international trade partners, several U.S. farmers stand in strong support of Trump's latest trade move. 'Been two days now and we've actually had a lot more calls' For decades, U.S. and Mexican tomato operations worked under a trade agreement that allowed for relatively easy importation of Mexican tomatoes into U.S. markets. The deal was meant to protect American tomato farmers, but many believe the old trade agreement didn't do enough. 'There's been loopholes that the Mexican tomato producers have taken advantage of and continue to price dump, or lower the prices below the cost of production here in the United States and in Alabama," Blake Thaxton, executive director of the Alabama Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association, told WVTM 13 News. Chad Smith of Smith Tomato Farms in St. Clair County, Alabama echoed Thaxton's concerns with the old trade deal with Mexico. 'If they send the tomatoes over and it's supposed to be a set price and they need to move tomatoes, well, they may just give a load of bell peppers for free for them to take the tomatoes. So, it's never really worked,' said Smith. American tomato farmers had long felt as if they were hard-pressed to compete with the imports from Mexico, but several of them now see better times ahead with Trump's latest tariff news. 'It's only been two days now and we've actually had a lot more calls from people who have an interest in doing business," said Smith. 'And the price hasn't even changed.' As for Thaxton, he believes the potential of a sustainable future for U.S. tomato farmers is important. 'Food security is national security, and we need to be able to produce our own food here in the United States,' said Thaxton. Read more: Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can How the new tariff may affect your wallet While some American farmers are hopeful that the tomato tariff will impact their bottom line in a positive way, there's a concern that the changing policy will lead to higher prices at the grocery store. After all, the costs of producing tomatoes are higher in the U.S., thanks in part to American farms paying their workers up to 10 times more per hour than farm workers in Mexico. Thaxton believes the rising tomato costs won't be too dramatic, but other experts appear to be more concerned. In fact, some predict the new tomato tariff could push prices up by 10%. Since American farms face significantly higher production costs than Mexican growers — this includes wages, land, regulation, insurance, property taxes and equipment — these costs may be passed along to American consumers at the grocery store. At this moment, it's tough to predict the exact outcome that the tariff will have on the U.S. tomato market. While it looks like the tariff could help American farmers, it's unclear whether or not it will help American wallets. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oppenheimer Trims Amazon (AMZN) Price Target to $245 — AI Growth Still a Bright Spot
Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is one of the On August 1, Oppenheimer analyst Jason Helfstein lowered the price target on the stock to $245.00 (from $250.00) while maintaining an 'Outperform' rating. The rating affirmation comes amid frustrated investors over a lack of positive second half 2025 AWS commentary. This is because capacity issues are anticipated to persist until at least year-end. Nevertheless, CEO Jassy has reiterated that artificial intelligence is the 'the biggest technology transformation for a lifetime.' This is already evident considering AWS AI revenue is continuing to grow triple-digits year-over-year and its usage is still early within AWS. The firm doesn't see any consumer weakness despite tariff impacts remaining. Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is an American technology company offering e-commerce, cloud computing, and other services, including digital streaming and artificial intelligence solutions. While we acknowledge the potential of AMZN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Must-Watch AI Stocks on Wall Street and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FDA recalls more than 64,000 pounds of butter over undeclared milk
More than 64,000 pounds of butter have been recalled due to potential undeclared milk allergens, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Food ingredient company Bunge North America recalled 1,800 cases of its NH European Style Butter Blend that were distributed at 12 centers located across the United States and one in Dominican Republic, a July 14 FDA alert reported. The FDA classified the recall under its second-highest risk warning on July 31 warning that consumption could pose temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences. USA TODAY has reached out to Bunge North America for comment. Based in Chesterfield, Missouri, Bunge North America is an agribusiness that produces and markets multiple food ingredients including corn, wheat, rice, soybeans and feed peas. Which butter products are recalled? The FDA has issued a recall for 64,800 pounds of Bunge North America's NH European Style Butter Blend with: UPC code: 1 00 78684 73961 2 Lot code: 5064036503 The product was packaged in white paperboard cases each containing 36 blocks. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: FDA recalls more than 64,000 pounds of butter over undeclared milk