logo
Cartier watch 'bribe' over seaside tower dispute

Cartier watch 'bribe' over seaside tower dispute

Yahoo2 days ago
A dispute over a landmark seaside tower led to a "likely" bribe attempt involving a Cartier watch and secret recordings, according to court papers.
The High Court heard one of the parties in the case even blocked the entrance to a care home with his car to induce his rival to talk to him.
The case centred on the ownership and financial arrangements relating to the Atlantis Tower in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk.
The man named in civil court as the individual who offered the Cartier watch, Sotiris Christophi, said: "The suggestion that this was a bribe or had any improper purpose is completely at odds with my understanding and intention."
The court heard how Mr Christophi, an accountant, and Dr Sanjay Kaushal, a care home owner, fell out after they jointly funded the purchase and redevelopment of the tower in November 2021.
They did this through a company called RP Design and Construction Limited (RPD).
Mr Christophi brought the case, arguing he and Dr Kaushal had agreed to split the ownership of the company equally in an oral agreement.
Dr Kaushal denied this and said Mr Christophi's financial contribution had been a loan not an investment.
Deputy High Court Judge Saira Salimi rejected Mr Christophi's claim.
The Atlantis Tower has stood as a landmark on the Great Yarmouth seafront since its construction in the 1960s.
The intention was to convert the upper floors into 18 residential flats and then sell them.
This section of the property previously been used as a hotel.
'Blocking entrance'
By early 2023 Dr Kausal and his former friend, Mr Christophi, were in serious disagreement over the project.
Mr Christophi had began to behave "aggressively and unreasonably", Dr Kausal said, and that he felt intimidated.
There had been heated meetings and phone calls recorded secretly by Mr Christophi, he told the court.
It was alleged that at one point this included Mr Christophi posting negative reviews of a care home owned by Dr Kausal and even blocking its entrance with a car.
This latter incident was a pressure tactic to make Dr Kaushal talk to him, the court heard.
Dr Kausal also alleged he had even been physically prevented from leaving a room during a meeting between the pair.
Mr Christophi told the BBC: "I absolutely reject any suggestion that I intended to intimidate or act unreasonably"
"I sought dialogue, nothing more, and when that dialogue was repeatedly refused, I did what I believed was necessary to be heard" he added.
In April 2023, Mr Christophi gave a Cartier watch to the owner of the company brought in to refurbish the property, Besnik Ademaj, and transferred £50,000 to Mr Ademaj's firm.
It was alleged by Dr Kausal this was to induce Mr Ademaj to transfer his shares in RPD.
Mr Christophi claimed the watch and money were a gesture of trust and friendship, meant to show goodwill during their discussions about transferring shares.
The watch and money were subsequently returned, according to the judgement.
Judge Salimi said it was "on the balance of probabilities" an attempt at a bribe "which did not result in success".
Mr Christophi, 53, also known as Steve, is linked to a Norwich company at the centre of tax fraud allegations.
The BBC revealed last year how Green Jellyfish had been raided by officers from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and a number of arrests made.
Internal company documents described Mr Christophi as a stakeholder in the firm, which is currently being wound up.
Companies House data shows an overlap between Mr Christophi's businesses and Green Jellyfish, including shared premises.
Mr Christophi said he had always conducted himself "lawfully and with integrity".
"I respect the rule of law, and I respect the judgment, even where I may feel that parts of my side of the story remain untold" he added.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
More on this story
Companies raided over tax relief fraud allegations
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK police arrest 55 at parliament rally for banned Palestine Action group
UK police arrest 55 at parliament rally for banned Palestine Action group

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK police arrest 55 at parliament rally for banned Palestine Action group

UK police arrest 55 at parliament rally for banned Palestine Action group LONDON (Reuters) -Fifty-five people were arrested at a rally for the banned Palestine Action group outside Britain's parliament on Saturday, London's Metropolitan Police said. The crowd in Parliament Square had been waving placards supporting the group that was banned this month under anti-terrorism legislation, the force said in a post on X. People from the rally, some wearing black and white Palestinian scarves, were taken away in police vans. British lawmakers proscribed the group earlier this month after some of its members broke into a Royal Air Force base and damaged planes in protest against Britain's support for Israel. Membership of Palestine Action now carries a prison sentence of up to 14 years. The group has called the decision "authoritarian", and a challenge to the ban will be heard at London's High Court on Monday. Palestine Action is among groups that have regularly targeted defence firms and other companies in Britain linked to Israel since the start of the conflict in Gaza. Police have arrested scores of the group's supporters at rallies across Britain since the ban came in

Off-duty officers in Pride event told not to wear items linking them to police
Off-duty officers in Pride event told not to wear items linking them to police

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Off-duty officers in Pride event told not to wear items linking them to police

Off-duty Northumbria Police officers who choose to take part in a Pride event this weekend have been told they must not wear clothing linking them to the force. The decision by Northumbria Police comes after a court ruled that the force acted unlawfully by allowing its officers to take part in a Pride event last year. High Court judge Mr Justice Linden said his ruling on Wednesday related only to the 2024 event and that it was up to the force to decide how it approaches Saturday's parade. Northumbria Police has now confirmed uniformed officers will not be permitted to take part and said any of those who are off-duty and do participate must not visibly identify themselves as being officers or members of the force through clothing, flags, or accessories. In an update on Friday, the force also said any participating off-duty officers must not 'express support for political aims (e.g. changes to law or policy) or opposition to other lawful views'. On-duty attendance 'is only permitted where it forms part of the official policing response', the force said. In a statement it said the approach was 'designed to maintain public confidence in our impartiality, while also respecting our employees' individual rights under the European Convention on Human Rights'. It added: 'This guidance is not about limiting personal expression, but about ensuring that when our people represent Northumbria Police, they do so in a way that is fair, balanced, and impartial to all communities.' Lindsey Smith, who describes herself as a 'gender critical' lesbian, took legal action against Northumbria Police over its decision to allow officers to participate in the Newcastle Pride in the City event last July, in which she also participated. Lawyers for Ms Smith told the High Court that the officers' involvement breached impartiality rules, and that the decision to allow them to take part was unlawful, although barristers for the force opposed the challenge, claiming the decision, made by Chief Constable Vanessa Jardine, was within her 'discretion'. In his judgment, Mr Justice Linden said Ms Smith is opposed to 'gender ideology', which she believes is 'wrong and dangerous' but has been 'embraced' by the organisers of the event, Northern Pride. While Ms Smith agreed that the event should be policed, she objected to officers 'associating themselves with the views of supporters of gender ideology and transgender activists by actively participating', the judge said. Last year's event saw uniformed officers march with some carrying flags which included Pride colours alongside police insignia, and others wearing uniforms with the word 'Police' in Pride colours. There was also a 'static display' staffed by uniformed officers, which displayed a Progressive Pride flag, which includes representation of transgender and non-binary people, people of marginalised ethnicities and those living with Aids, the judge said. A police van with the colours of the transgender Pride flag painted on its sides was also present, the court was told. Northumbria Police said it will have a community engagement display at Northern Pride this weekend, adding that it believed a complete withdrawal of police engagement from such events 'would be a retrograde step and damage trust and confidence amongst members of LGBTQ+ community'. The force added: 'We want to ensure everyone knows that we are absolutely here for them when they need us.' The LGB Alliance charity called on the rest of the UK's police forces to follow suit on the withdrawal of uniformed officers from such events and to put in place measures around the participation of off-duty officers. The charity's chief executive Kate Barker said: 'Since our founding, LGB Alliance has been working with police and crime commissioners to raise our supporters' concerns about partisan policing that favours gender activists over LGB people. 'We will continue this work until the UK's remaining 42 forces follow the lead of their colleagues in Northumbria, and stop endorsing a movement they do not understand.'

Cartier watch 'bribe' over seaside tower dispute
Cartier watch 'bribe' over seaside tower dispute

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Cartier watch 'bribe' over seaside tower dispute

A dispute over a landmark seaside tower led to a "likely" bribe attempt involving a Cartier watch and secret recordings, according to court papers. The High Court heard one of the parties in the case even blocked the entrance to a care home with his car to induce his rival to talk to him. The case centred on the ownership and financial arrangements relating to the Atlantis Tower in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk. The man named in civil court as the individual who offered the Cartier watch, Sotiris Christophi, said: "The suggestion that this was a bribe or had any improper purpose is completely at odds with my understanding and intention." The court heard how Mr Christophi, an accountant, and Dr Sanjay Kaushal, a care home owner, fell out after they jointly funded the purchase and redevelopment of the tower in November 2021. They did this through a company called RP Design and Construction Limited (RPD). Mr Christophi brought the case, arguing he and Dr Kaushal had agreed to split the ownership of the company equally in an oral agreement. Dr Kaushal denied this and said Mr Christophi's financial contribution had been a loan not an investment. Deputy High Court Judge Saira Salimi rejected Mr Christophi's claim. The Atlantis Tower has stood as a landmark on the Great Yarmouth seafront since its construction in the 1960s. The intention was to convert the upper floors into 18 residential flats and then sell them. This section of the property previously been used as a hotel. 'Blocking entrance' By early 2023 Dr Kausal and his former friend, Mr Christophi, were in serious disagreement over the project. Mr Christophi had began to behave "aggressively and unreasonably", Dr Kausal said, and that he felt intimidated. There had been heated meetings and phone calls recorded secretly by Mr Christophi, he told the court. It was alleged that at one point this included Mr Christophi posting negative reviews of a care home owned by Dr Kausal and even blocking its entrance with a car. This latter incident was a pressure tactic to make Dr Kaushal talk to him, the court heard. Dr Kausal also alleged he had even been physically prevented from leaving a room during a meeting between the pair. Mr Christophi told the BBC: "I absolutely reject any suggestion that I intended to intimidate or act unreasonably" "I sought dialogue, nothing more, and when that dialogue was repeatedly refused, I did what I believed was necessary to be heard" he added. In April 2023, Mr Christophi gave a Cartier watch to the owner of the company brought in to refurbish the property, Besnik Ademaj, and transferred £50,000 to Mr Ademaj's firm. It was alleged by Dr Kausal this was to induce Mr Ademaj to transfer his shares in RPD. Mr Christophi claimed the watch and money were a gesture of trust and friendship, meant to show goodwill during their discussions about transferring shares. The watch and money were subsequently returned, according to the judgement. Judge Salimi said it was "on the balance of probabilities" an attempt at a bribe "which did not result in success". Mr Christophi, 53, also known as Steve, is linked to a Norwich company at the centre of tax fraud allegations. The BBC revealed last year how Green Jellyfish had been raided by officers from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and a number of arrests made. Internal company documents described Mr Christophi as a stakeholder in the firm, which is currently being wound up. Companies House data shows an overlap between Mr Christophi's businesses and Green Jellyfish, including shared premises. Mr Christophi said he had always conducted himself "lawfully and with integrity". "I respect the rule of law, and I respect the judgment, even where I may feel that parts of my side of the story remain untold" he added. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. More on this story Companies raided over tax relief fraud allegations Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store