Columbia University to pay $200 mn in clash with Trump
In a sweeping deal that will restore the prestigious New York institution's federal monies, Columbia has pledged to obey rules that bar it from taking race into consideration in admissions or hiring, among other concessions.
"Columbia University has reached an agreement with the United States government to resolve multiple federal agency investigations into alleged violations of federal anti-discrimination laws," a statement said, adding that the $200 million would be paid over three years.
The university will also pay $21 million to settle investigations brought by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, it said.
"Under today's agreement, a vast majority of the federal grants which were terminated or paused in March 2025 will be reinstated and Columbia's access to billions of dollars in current and future grants will be restored," the statement said.
The promise of the federal funding spigot reopening offers relief for the university, which was under growing financial pressure, despite a comfortable endowment and a reputation it can bank on.
The agreement also represents a victory for Trump, who has repeatedly claimed elite universities brainwash students against his nationalist ideas with left-wing bias.
Thanking Columbia for "agreeing to do what is right," Trump warned in a social media post that "numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust... are upcoming."
The centuries-old Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is also in a fight with the administration over Trump's threats to rip away federal funding, and Wednesday's carefully worded agreement -- in which Columbia admitted no wrongdoing -- could offer a framework for future deals.
"This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty," Columbia's acting president Claire Shipman said.
"The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track.
"Importantly, it safeguards our independence, a critical condition for academic excellence and scholarly exploration, work that is vital to the public interest."
- Disciplinary actions -
Under the settlement, Columbia will maintain a security force to prevent demonstrations in academic spaces, such as those that rocked the campus last year when pro-Palestinian protestors clashed with law enforcement and occupied university buildings.
The school also agreed to "promptly provide" federal authorities with any requested information on "disciplinary actions involving student visa-holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions, and arrest records that Columbia is aware of for criminal activity, including trespass or other violation of law."
Columbia found itself at the center of a firestorm last year over claims of anti-Semitism triggered by campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza.
Some Jewish students claimed they were intimidated and that authorities did not act to protect them.
The school announced a wave of various student punishments on Tuesday, including expulsions and degree revocations, against nearly 80 students involved in the pro-Palestinian protest movement that has called on the university to divest from Israel.
"Our institution must focus on delivering on its academic mission for our community," Columbia said in a statement about student protests on its campus.
"Disruptions to academic activities are in violation of University policies and rules, and such violations will necessarily generate consequences."
While the university appears to be acquiescing to the Trump administration's demands to quash student protest, one of the most prominent leaders of the US pro-Palestinian campus protests is still raising his voice.
Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate active in campus demonstrations, has sued the Trump administration for $20 million over his arrest and detention by immigration agents.
Khalil, a legal permanent resident of the United States who is married to a US citizen, missed the birth of his son while being held in a federal immigration detention center in Louisiana.
He called the lawsuit a "first step towards accountability."
hg/sla/jgc/aks
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Threat or a thought bubble, Trump's new tariff idea spells trouble for Australia
It could be a throw-away line or a massive blow to the Australian economy delivered by US President Donald Trump. Australia thought it was relatively safe from Trump's tariff war. It turns out we could have been wrong. Once again, the US president seemed to be confirming a shift in his trade policy as an aside in a larger press conference. Trump loves to boast about his freewheeling speaking style — his so-called "weave," where he jumps from topic to topic in a way that might make someone think he's lost his train of thought, though he insists it's always clear in the end. He was holding court at his Turnberry Golf Course in Scotland. He was visiting a foreign country — the UK — but it was him playing host to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and setting the terms of the interaction. There were plenty of awkward moments for Sir Keir, who had to politely listen to Trump rail against the scourge of wind farms, which he claimed were ruining the views from his golf course, and how damaging he believed illegal immigration had been to Britain. But the hardest part for the Australian prime minister to hear was likely when Trump began talking about the next stage of his one-man tariff offensive against the world. Fresh off claiming an agreement had been reached with the European Union — although details remain elusive — Trump acknowledged that doing individual trade deals with other countries was quite time-consuming. Who would've thought? Once again, he remarked with seemingly genuine shock at how many countries exist in the world: "You have 200 countries — more. People don't get that." Even though he'd previously boasted that countries were desperate to do deals with him, he now seemed resigned to the fact that he couldn't get them individually ticked off. So, he has a more efficient idea: "We're going to be setting a tariff for essentially the rest of the world. And that's what they're going to pay if they want to do business in the United States. Because you can't sit down and make 200 deals." Sound familiar? Back in April, during his "Liberation Day" announcement, Trump said almost all countries would be hit with a 10 per cent "baseline" tariff. Many were also slapped with higher "reciprocal" rates, though most of those were subsequently put on hold. They're due to come into effect this week for countries that haven't struck deals with the US. Australia only received the baseline rate, largely because it buys more from the US than it sells. But Trump clearly doesn't think that baseline rate cuts it anymore. He said it would likely be lifted to "somewhere in the 15 to 20 per cent range", an idea he had first floated during a phone interview with NBC earlier this month. If this comes to pass — and it's a big "if", given Trump's tendency to announce policy one day and backtrack the next — it would be a massive economic blow to Australian businesses that export to the US. While the current 10 per cent impost makes Australian products more expensive for US consumers and less competitive relative to American goods, it was thought to give Australian businesses a leg up compared to countries hit with reciprocal tariffs. It had looked like 10 per cent was the floor rate, and no other country would receive a more favourable arrangement. It also gave Australia little incentive to negotiate a better deal with the US, since the Trump administration didn't seem willing to go lower than 10 per cent or drop it entirely. But if Trump now imposes a 20 per cent baseline tariff, Australia will be disadvantaged compared to countries that have already struck better deals — or at least "frameworks" of deals. The UK, Japan, and now the EU have all said they've secured deals where their exports to the US are hit with a 15 per cent duty. So, from being the least badly treated friend, Australia might now be getting worse treatment than many large economies. It would also seem, on face value, to be clearly unfair, even based on Trump's own questionable tariff logic. Australia had a lower rate because the administration said it was allowing better access for US goods. But now it may well face a higher tariff than the EU, which Trump has previously bashed as one of the most egregious blockers of American trade ambitions. Six months into his second term, it's difficult to know when Trump is clearly stating a new policy or just thinking out loud in front of the world's media. But his words seem pretty clear on this occasion: he's planning to raise the baseline tariff, and that's going to hurt Australian businesses. Trump's Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, said last week that Trump wasn't planning to hike the baseline. But in the Trump administration, the only word that seems to matter is his. Perhaps it's a negotiating tactic, though countries only facing the baseline tariff weren't even sent the recent letters Trump fired off, imploring leaders to do a deal. Even if this is just a thought bubble, Australia's leaders will need to take it seriously — because when it comes to Trump, thought bubbles can be highly consequential.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Aren't that flash': Poll shows Australians increasingly cold on Trump
Sky News host Paul Murray has analysed a new poll in The Sydney Morning Herald, which reveals Australians' opinion on the US election outcome and whether Australia should be independent from the US or not. 'I know the reality that in Australia, the majority of Australians aren't that flash when it comes to Donald Trump,' he said.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘They take no prisoners': South Park creators ‘couldn't care less' about outrage over Trump episode
Sky News host Paul Murray has reacted to a clip from an episode of South Park which pokes fun at the US President and Paramount's settlement with Donald Trump. 'As a person who likes Donald Trump, who understands how he won, who understands how he lost and then understands how he won again – the South Park thing was hilarious. Was really funny,' he said. 'One of the best ways that you can always have a crack at the powerful is to take the piss, is to laugh, and that's what they decided to do.' Mr Murray claims the South Park creators 'couldn't care less' about the outrage over the episode. 'They take no prisoners ... that's their kind of humour and long may it reign,' he said.
