logo
SNP veteran quits party amid rebellion against leader

SNP veteran quits party amid rebellion against leader

Telegraph20-06-2025
John Swinney, the Scottish First Minister, has been dealt a blow to his leadership after an SNP veteran quit the party.
Fergus Ewing, who has represented the Inverness and Nairn constituency since 1999, will stand as an independent candidate at next year's Holyrood elections.
The 67-year-old accused the SNP of having 'deserted many of the people whose causes we used to champion' amid rumours of a wider revolt.
SNP rebels are said to be plotting to oust Mr Swinney following the party's disastrous defeat at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. That contest saw Scottish Labour take the seat from the SNP, while Nigel Farage's Reform UK came third.
The rebels are also reportedly concerned that Mr Swinney has failed to advance the cause for Scottish independence, and have not ruled out a leadership challenge at the party's October conference.
On Friday, opposition politicians claimed Mr Ewing's decision was a hammer blow to Mr Swinney's credibility.
'It speaks volumes about John Swinney and the SNP's appalling failures in government that even nationalist royalty is prepared to twist the knife in this way,' said Edward Mountain, the Conservative Highlands and Islands MSP.
'By standing as an independent, Fergus Ewing has made it clear he simply cannot defend his party's record to voters while out on the campaign trail.'
Mr Ewing said he had taken the decision to abandon the SNP 'because I love the people of Inverness and Nairn and the people of Scotland more than my party, which I have been in for more than half a century'.
He had been increasingly at odds with the SNP over gender recognition reform and net zero, also raising issues over the deposit return scheme and marine protected areas.
Mr Ewing said Holyrood was more fractious and tribal than ever before and accused the SNP of having 'lost its way'. He also said devolution was 'letting Scotland's people down'.
He added: 'Too much power rests unchecked in the hands of party leaders, free to choose candidates who will slavishly support them, rather than stand up for the people who sent them to Holyrood. Choosing the pliant over the talented.'
'Faithful servant'
Mr Ewing first hinted in March that he could stand as an independent at next year's election. At the time, Mr Swinney said that he was sorry to learn of the possibility, describing him as a 'faithful servant' of his constituents who had contributed much to the Scottish Parliament.
Mr Ewing is the son of Winnie Ewing, whose 1967 by-election victory in Hamilton was a historic breakthrough for the SNP, and is the brother of Annabelle Ewing, the Cowdenbeath MSP.
He was first elected to the Scottish Parliament when it was re-established in 1999 and held a ministerial portfolio for 14 years in the governments of both Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon.
Mr Ewing added: 'It's time for Holyrood to live up to the high expectations people rightly held for it, when my mother, Winnie, reconvened our own Parliament in 1999. It came of age some years ago – surely now it's time for it to grow up.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump accused of ‘running scared' over Epstein files as he peddles Obama-Russia ‘hoax': Live
Trump accused of ‘running scared' over Epstein files as he peddles Obama-Russia ‘hoax': Live

The Independent

time9 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump accused of ‘running scared' over Epstein files as he peddles Obama-Russia ‘hoax': Live

Donald Trump has been accused of 'running scared' over the Jeffrey Epstein case as the Democrats ramp up their demands for the president to release the files tied to the convicted sex offender. The president has been accused of attempting to distract from the Epstein scandal by peddling a conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama orchestrated the Russia investigation into Trump's 2016 campaign. Late Monday, Trump said that there was 'irrefutable evidence' that ' Obama himself manufactured the Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX.' Refuting the president's claim of a 'Democratic-led conspiracy theory,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters: 'Why do we think President Joe Biden or President Barack Obama 's names are being invoked? Because Donald Trump is running scared.' Earlier Monday, the Trump administration also released more than 6,000 files on the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr, which saw the daughter of the slain civil rights activist, Bernice King, tweet: 'Now, do the Epstein files.' The White House also removed a Wall Street Journal reporter from joining Trump on his visit to Scotland this week, following the newspaper's damning accusations that the president sent a bawdy 50th birthday card to Epstein. Trump and Epstein allegedly engaged in 'locker room talk' about teenage girl in financier's office Jeffrey Epstein accuser Maria Farmer alleged that Donald Trump and the financier engaged in 'locker room talk' in the sex offender's office in 1995. Farmer, who on Sunday said she twice told the FBI about Trump's ties to Epstein, spoke to CNN's Erin Burnett on Monday after the White House denied the president had ever visited Epstein's office. The woman, who was 25 years old at the time, accused Trump of standing over her, smirking, in a 'very imposing way' inside the office. Farmer told Burnett that Epstein told Trump, 'She's not here for you, follow me.' Farmer said that Trump then made a 'vulgar' comment that she speculated may be 'locker room talk in the 1990s.' 'He made a joke to Epstein: 'I thought she was 16,'' she added. James Liddell22 July 2025 11:00 Stephen Colbert tells Trump 'go f*** yourself' after Late Show cancellation Stephen Colbert had a very blunt message for President Donald Trump after the president celebrated CBS's cancellation of The Late Show. In his Monday monologue, Colbert brought up a Truth Social post Trump made on Friday, where he had written: 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings.' Responding to his post, Colbert said: 'How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism?' Looking into the 'Eloquence Cam,' the talk show host did not pull his punches, telling the president: 'Go f*** yourself.' Shahana Yasmin has more: Colbert tells Trump 'go f*** yourself' as he warns gloves are off after cancellation The US president posted on social media saying Colbert's 'talent was even less than his ratings' James Liddell22 July 2025 10:30 The Epstein List: Who has been named? After years of peddling conspiracy theories about the Jeffrey Epstein files, President Donald Trump is now attempting to shift focus away from the case and his relationship with the convicted sex offender. The Trump administration continues to face backlash after a Department of Justice and FBI memo released last week stated that there was no evidence that the disgraced financier, who socialised with royalty and celebrities and was accused of running a large network of underage girls for sex, had a 'client list.' While judges, court staff, and legal representatives have been excluded, The Independent has listed some of the names that appear in the legal records connected to Epstein: The Epstein List: Full list of names revealed in unsealed court records Donald Trump, Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton are among the names included in court documents James Liddell22 July 2025 10:00 Former congressman makes dig at Trump amid Epstein files drama Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger made a dig at President Donald Trump Monday night as the administration faces backlash over its handling of files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'Trump releases MLK Jr files…. Didn't limit it to 'pertinent' and 'grand jury.' So do the same for Epstein,' Kinzinger, who has been a vocal critic of Trump, wrote on X. Kinzinger was referring to the Trump administration's push to release federal documents on famous assassinations like civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.'s death, while limiting the information disclosed in Epstein's case. The feds released more than 230,000 pages of documents related to King's shooting on Monday. The Trump administration has faced backlash, including from its own base, after it said earlier this month there was never any so-called Epstein client list, which people suspected had the names of powerful people who may have partaken in the wealthy financier's crimes. President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social last week, 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche filed a motion with a federal court to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein's case the next day. Rachel Dobkin22 July 2025 09:29 Trump 'running scared' over Epstein with Obama Russia 'hoax' theory Trump been accused of attempting to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein case by peddling a conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama 'manufactured' allegations of Russian interference into Trump's 2016 campaign. Late Monday, Trump said that there was 'irrefutable evidence' that 'Obama himself manufactured the Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX.' Refuting the president's claim of a 'Democratic-led conspiracy theory,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters: 'Why do we think President Joe Biden or President Barack Obama's names are being invoked? Because Donald Trump is running scared.' James Liddell22 July 2025 09:06 After Trump unseals MLK files, Bernice King demands Epstein release On Monday, the Trump administration released more than 6,000 files on the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr, which saw the daughter of the slain civil rights activist, Bernice King, tweet: 'Now, do the Epstein files.' James Liddell22 July 2025 09:00 The rise of the QAnon conspiracy and why the Epstein files matter The Justice Department asked a federal court on July 18, 2025, to unseal grand jury transcripts in Jeffrey Epstein's case. The direction from President Donald Trump came after weeks of frustration among some far-right groups over his administration's refusal to release the complete and unredacted 'Epstein files.' Epstein's 2019 arrest and death became a central focus for QAnon followers, who saw them as proof of a hidden global elite engaged in child trafficking and protected by powerful institutions. The release – or withholding – of the Epstein files is often cited within QAnon movement circles as evidence of a broader cover-up by the so-called 'deep state.' Some followers of the MAGA – Make America Great Again – movement and the Republican Party believe in the false claim that the United States is secretly controlled by a cabal of elites who are paedophiles, sex traffickers and satanists. Over time, what started as a baseless conspiracy on obscure platforms has migrated into the mainstream. It has influenced rhetoric and policy debates, and even reshaped the American political landscape. The rise of the QAnon conspiracy and why the Epstein files matter Epstein's arrest and death became a central focus for QAnon followers, who saw this as alleged proof of a hidden global elite engaged in child trafficking Rachel Dobkin22 July 2025 08:00 Thomas Massie on Epstein files: 'I don't think this is going to go away' Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, said Monday night, 'I don't think this is going to go away,' referring to the drama surrounding the release of files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Trump administration has faced backlash, including from its own base, after it said earlier this month there was never any so-called Epstein client list, which people suspected had the names of powerful people who may have partaken in the wealthy financier's crimes. Massie has been working with Democrats and some other Republicans to push for the release of all of the Epstein files. He told CNN's Manu Raju, 'I think momentum will build for transparency' over Congress' August recess. 'I don't think this is going to go away. And I think when we return in September, we'll get phase two of the Epstein files,' he said. President Donald Trump announced last Thursday he had asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to release certain Epstein files, 'subject to court approval.' Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche filed a motion with a federal court to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein's case the next day. Rachel Dobkin22 July 2025 07:00 Trump calls Thomas Massie a 'loser' and calls for opponent he can 'vigorously campaign for' amid Epstein files drama President Donald Trump has called Representative Thomas Massie a 'loser' and called for an opponent he can 'vigorously campaign for' as the Kentucky Republican pushes for the release of all files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'Thomas Massie, the worst Republican Congressman, and an almost guaranteed NO VOTE each and every time, is an Embarrassment to Kentucky. He's lazy, slow moving, and totally disingenuous - A real loser! Never has anything positive to add. Looking for someone good to run against this guy, someone I can Endorse and vigorously campaign for!' Trump wrote on Truth Social Monday night. The Trump administration has faced backlash, including from its own base, after it said there was never any so-called client list, which people suspected had the names of powerful people who may have partaken in Epstein's crimes. Rachel Dobkin22 July 2025 06:00 Flashback: Fox News asks Trump if he'll declassify the Epstein Files in 2024 In a 2024 interview with Fox News, President Donald Trump said he would declassify files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But he said he would declassify them 'less so' than other federal documents 'because you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there.' 22 July 2025 04:45

Why won't Anas Sarwar champion Sandie Peggie?
Why won't Anas Sarwar champion Sandie Peggie?

Spectator

time19 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Why won't Anas Sarwar champion Sandie Peggie?

When nurse Sandie Peggie complained about the presence of a trans-identifying man in the women's changing room at Falkirk's Victoria Hospital, she was treated as a dangerous bigot. A witch-hunt saw her suspended from the job to which she had devoted thirty years of her life and she faced horrifying allegations of placing patients in danger. Today, Peggie is not only a household name in Scotland, she's fast becoming a national hero. An industrial tribunal called by the nurse – started in February, paused, then resumed last week – has heard how doctors and management turned on her while rallying round Dr Beth Upton, a man who claims to be a biological woman. Whether Peggie wins her claims of sexual discrimination against her employers, NHS Fife, and Upton remains to be seen, but it is already clear that public sympathy lies firmly with the working-class nurse rather than the middle-class doctor. This is a truth not only revealed in polling – a recent YouGov survey found more than 60 per cent of people backed the Supreme Court ruling that womanhood is a matter of biology – but also in focus groups commissioned by political parties. Gender ideology may remain popular among self-identifying 'progressive' politicians but voters from across the political spectrum have had more than enough of the 'trans women are women' hooey so enthusiastically pushed by the SNP and others at Holyrood over recent years. When the Scottish parliament voted in 2022 in favour of reforming the Gender Recognition Act (GRA), allowing anyone to self-identify into the sex of their choosing, Scottish Labour's Anas Sarwar whipped his MSPs into supporting the proposal. Back then, having swallowed the be-kind Kool-Aid, he showed no sign of recognising the irreconcilable conflict between the rights of women and the demands of militant trans activists. But, in February, as Peggie's case began making headlines, Sarwar saw (or chose to see) sense. Not only did he support the nurse's case, but he also expressed his regret over backing former first minister Nicola Sturgeon's plan to reform the GRA. If, said the Scottish Labour leader, he had known in December 2022 what he now knew, he'd never have voted in favour of changing the law. Fortunately for the women and girls of Scotland, then Conservative Scottish secretary Alister Jack blocked the new legislation in January 2023 on the grounds that it would conflict with the UK-wide Equality Act, which protects the sex-based rights of women. The backlash against reform of the GRA contributed to Nicola Sturgeon's decision to step down as First Minister. Her successors – both the hapless Humza Yousaf and the bland John Swinney – remain committed to the proposal (in theory, anyway,) even as public opposition to gender reform mounts. This baffling support for a discredited ideology left Swinney looking especially foolish as Peggie's tribunal resumed. The First Minister declared his complete confidence in NHS Fife, placing him on the opposite side of this high-profile battle to the majority of voters. Swinney missed his opportunity to free himself from the gender politics swamp. Anas Sarwar has been every bit as politically inept. When Scottish Labour's leader U-turned on gender reform, he managed to upset both those in favour of self-ID and those opposed. To the former – forever now lost to him – he was a traitor; to the latter, he was a cowardly opportunist. Every working day until next Wednesday, crowds of supporters will gather outside the tribunal hearing in Dundee to cheer Sandie Peggie as she arrives. Recording these moments will be camera crews from all major broadcasters. Why, then, isn't Anas Sarwar there, each morning? In common with other party leaders, Sarwar has seen the focus group results and private polling which show the majority of voters believe a woman is an adult human female, not a magical kind of man. The Scottish Labour leader – having made a fool of himself in February – should turn up in Dundee, brace himself for a spot of heckling, and brave it out. 'I know I'm late,' he should tell Peggie's supporters, 'But I'm here, now.' We're bang in the middle of 'silly season', when summer holidays and parliamentary recesses leave the news agenda rather bare. This being so, the already gripping case of Sandie Peggie is receiving blanket coverage across Scottish media (with the exception, of course, of the SNP's court comic, The National, which – as is always the case when things look embarrassing for the separatists – maintains a 'nothing to see here' position). There is a space, right now, for Sarwar to position his party as champions of women's rights. While Labour and the SNP (and, of course, the cranks of the Scottish Greens and Liberal Democrats) continue to fail women, this issue represents a free kick for the insurgent Reform UK, which will stand candidates in next May's Holyrood election. Nigel Farage's party is on course to devour much of the Scottish Tory vote but parties of the centre-left are also vulnerable when it comes to the issue of women's rights. Senior SNP and Labour figures privately conceded that Farage's party can take votes from them on the regional lists from which 56 of Holyrood's 129 MSPs are elected. John Swinney has set his course on this matter and he's heading away from voters. But, instead of capitalising on this foolishness, Scottish Labour's leader remains bafflingly unwilling to seize ownership of the issue. Anas Sarwar's past betrayal of women's rights was morally indefensible. His failure to attend Sandie Peggie's tribunal and declare Labour her champions is politically inept.

The economic cure for populism
The economic cure for populism

New Statesman​

time21 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

The economic cure for populism

Photo by Stefan Rousseau/Getty If there is one theme that has featured most heavily in these columns over the last four years, it has been the dangers of right-wing populism. The destructiveness of Brexit, the dishonesty of Boris Johnson, the recklessness of Liz Truss, and the authoritarianism of Donald Trump have all been familiar themes. It has to be said, however, that populism seems to be surviving my weekly onslaught. Reform UK leads in the opinion polls. The Conservative Party is led by someone who is half-tempted to turn her party into a fully-fledged populist party and who will likely soon be replaced by someone who will not hesitate in turning his party into a fully-fledged populist party. To the extent that President Trump is running into political difficulties, it is for being insufficiently committed to isolationism and conspiracy theories. The public is angry, dissatisfied with the status quo. There is a market for politicians who can articulate that anger, identity something to blame, and promise simple answers to complex problems. And it cannot be a coincidence that the rise of this type of politics has occurred during a period of economic stagnation. There is much more to populism than this; it is at least as much a cultural phenomenon as an economic one. But it is also surely the case that the attraction of populism in the UK would diminish if, by the time we got to the next general election, living standards were rising and expected to continue to rise. It is, therefore, an option for the Government to focus relentlessly on delivering economic growth as a means of achieving re-election (not to mention the more than incidental benefits to the country). Of course, many factors determine economic growth. Some of them can only be delivered in the long term; some – such as Trump's obsession with tariffs – are largely beyond the Government's control; some come at a very high political cost. Let us, for a moment, assume that the Government is willing to risk these high political costs to deliver higher economic growth. What could it do? Before making a few suggestions, what is not an option is an expanded borrow-to-invest strategy. Our current fiscal rules are already loose, in part to fund higher levels of capital spending. That is no bad thing, but remarkably little of that higher capital spending is going into the most economically beneficial areas, like transport or scientific research. The markets are already nervous about our fiscal sustainability and we have the third-highest debt interest costs of any developed country. If the interest rates on our government debt were at the same levels as Germany, we would be paying £50bn a year less than we do. Rather than borrowing more, a credible plan for fiscal credibility is necessary to get those costs down. Contrary to the fashionable view that austerity is bad for growth, it is the loss of control of the public finances that is the real danger. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This does mean reducing the costs of government both in the short term (the disability benefit bill cannot be allowed to grow at the current rate) and in the long run. For a start, a plan should be announced to get us off the pensions triple lock. Even with spending control, taxes will have to go up. The challenge is that the least unpopular taxes are the most economically damaging. Focusing on the rich goes down well with most of the public but drives away the mobile wealthy. At least a partial retreat on non-doms is necessary, and the idea of a wealth tax should be dismissed. If we need more revenue (and we do), use the main taxes for a broad-based increase. The Government has made some progress on planning but even on this has recently retreated on environmental requirements. The real benefits of planning reform come from increasing the population of the highly productive parts of the country. This requires a substantial expansion of housebuilding in London (where next to no houses are being built) and the Ox-Cam corridor (where we should be massively ambitious), with spending on transport infrastructure focused there too. Ignore the complaints about the Treasury Green Book; we should invest where we get the best return. Economic growth should be prioritised ahead of reducing regional inequality. And while I am being provocatively right wing (at least for a New Statesman column), we should also drop the onerous tax we place on developers that reduces housebuilding, namely the requirement to build large numbers of affordable homes. Just build more homes. Planning is one area where regulations have become too onerous. Rachel Reeves was right to highlight in her Mansion House speech last week that excessive regulation is stifling growth. Her rhetoric needs to be matched by implementation – including in the context of employment rights. Returning to centrist dad mode, what about Brexit? Reduced access to our biggest trading market has proven to be a substantial drag anchor on our economy, predictably enough. The bolder and more ambitious the plans to restore a sensible relationship with the EU, the better. The economic gains will be worth upsetting a vociferous but shrinking minority. Taken together, it would be an agenda that maximises our chances of delivery economic growth and, in the long term, defeating populism. Is it an agenda that a government, especially this Government, could deliver politically? Probably not. It reminds me that, as I conclude the last of these regular New Statesman columns, that it is a lot easier to write about politics than to be a practising politician. [See also: Why is Boris Johnson so scared of Emmanuel Macron?] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store