Thousands Of Kiwi Kids Harmed Online, And No One Is Accountable
More than 2,000 children have been recorded as victims of harmful digital communications since it was introduced in 2015, according to data released to B416 under the Official Information Act. Three out of four victims are girls.
Nearly 900 children were recorded as offenders under the Harmful Digital Communications Act (HDCA), but very few cases make it to court. The majority are handled informally, often through warnings or alternative action.
The HDCA covers serious online harm, including emotional abuse, privacy breaches and sharing intimate images without consent.
B416 spokesperson Dr Samantha Marsh, from the University of Auckland, says the figures reflect a system failing to keep pace with the scale of harm.
'This data backs up what we are hearing every week from schools, health professionals and those working in law enforcement: children are being harmed online, and the guardrails that should protect them are missing,' says Dr Marsh.
'We don't let 12-year-olds into nightclubs. Why are we letting them into algorithm-driven digital environments that are designed to manipulate and addict?'
She says the majority of cases never make it to court not because the harm isn't real, but because the current laws are not fit for purpose.
B416 is calling for a minimum age of 16 for access to social media, alongside stronger enforcement, platform accountability, and education.
The campaign is encouraging those on the frontlines of this issue, including parents, teachers, health professionals, and young people themselves, to share their experiences as part of the current Parliamentary inquiry into social media and youth mental health. Submissions close on 30 July.
'Online harm is often hidden and there is shame for many around this. And this inquiry is a chance for families and young people to let lawmakers know how harmful things are for young people,' Dr Marsh said.
Submit here: https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/committees-press-releases/have-your-say-on-harms-youth-encounter-online-and-what-the-government-business-and-society-should-do-to-tackle-these/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
4 hours ago
- Newsroom
Online harm law is gameable and needs reform, ex-head says
The former head of New Zealand's online safety agency says the time is right for a review of cyberbullying legislation, with two recent cases against journalists showing how the system can be manipulated. Calls for a review are also supported by a senior editor at New Zealand's largest media outlet, who says Parliament should reconsider exempting journalists from the Harmful Digital Communications Act.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Strong evidence to act': Calls grow for social media age limit
File photo: Getty Images A University of Auckland senior research fellow is calling for social media platforms to introduce enforced age limits, to help protect young people from harm. A briefing from the Public Health Communication Centre has outlined growing evidence social media use is linked to a range of mental and physical health problems. It highlights policy options for addressing these harms, including restricting access to social media for those under 16. Currently, the age limit to join the majority of platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat is 13, but it is not enforced. "Introducing an age restriction is the only comprehensive measure that addresses the full range of social media-related harms to young people," said author Dr Samantha Marsh. "It also empowers parents to set boundaries and shift social norms in a positive direction." Marsh said while social media may offer some benefits for some young people, such as helping connect with peers and find support, she warned these must be weighed carefully against mounting evidence of harm. "There's a huge imbalance. The weight of evidence showing that these platforms can negatively affect youth mental health has become too great to ignore," she said. "We now have years of consistent findings: young people who spend more time on social media are more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and disrupted sleep. "These findings come not only from surveys, but also from longitudinal studies, randomised trials, and robust systematic reviews." Marsh said any changes to social media access should be accompanied by a coordinated effort to provide on and offline support for vulnerable youth, as well as empowering communication campaigns. The briefing's release coincides with the government's inquiry into online harms experienced by young people, which is currently open for public consultation, with submissions closing on 30 July. Marsh said the inquiry was a vital opportunity to build healthier digital environments. "Political decision-makers now have a strong enough evidence base to act. Delaying access to social media and supporting youth and whānau through a coordinated public health response is the path forward."
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Waikato med school business case beats Auckland and Otago
Option 2 was a specialist medical training programme focused on rural health run by those two universities and was estimated to cost $10.2b, while option 3, the new medical school at Waikato, was estimated to cost $9.1b, making it the cheapest overall – although the University of Auckland has criticised the assumptions behind this costing. Director-General of Health Dr Diana Sarfati and University of Waikato vice-chancellor Professor Neil Quigley, watched by Health Minister at the time, Shane Reti, and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, signing the Memorandum of Understanding for a third medical school in 2024. Photo / Mark Mitchell The Waikato medical school was also estimated to deliver greater benefits, leading to a benefit-cost ratio of 1.99, meaning each dollar spent on the school produced $1.99 in benefit. Option 1 and 2 had a ratio of 1.5 and 1.8 – placing them only narrowly behind Waikato. Health Minister Simeon Brown told the Herald the school was a 'game-changer for the long-term growth of our medical workforce in New Zealand'. 'Cabinet agreed to this proposal following the Ministry of Health undertaking a business case and a cost-benefit analysis which demonstrated this proposal would be the most effective at building this critical health workforce for New Zealand,' he said. The University of Auckland's Dean of Medical and Health Sciences Professor Warwick Bagg told the Herald he was 'deeply concerned' by the business case, which seemed to have a predetermined outcome: to favour the Waikato medical school the National Party took to the last election. He said the assumptions of the report were flawed. The capital cost for the new school at Waikato of $232 million was far greater than the other two options, which had costs of $49m and $81.5m respectively. The ongoing operational costs racked up over the years 2026 to 2042 were higher for the first two options, at $513.6m and $508m compared with $361.6m at Waikato. Bagg said this modelling made unfair and inaccurate assumptions about the existing two medical schools that put them at a disadvantage. For example, the business case said that it is 'more certain that Option 3, the Waikato school, has a lower operating cost … simply due to it being a shorter programme'. While it is correct that the Waikato Medical School is a shorter programme, tailored to just graduates, the students admitted the school will still have to offer an undergraduate programme somewhere, probably in New Zealand, which the Government will have to subsidise. Bagg said the cost of turning Waikato's students into graduates who can be admitted into the school isn't reflected in the business case. Lifting those costs out of the business case made Waikato look better overall. 'They are focused on the four-year graduate programme … they haven't focused on the three years that they'll have to do to get into that medical school,' he said. He said another way the high capital costs for Waikato have been 'offset' is the business case has found 'more benefits for the Waikato medical school'. The business case is particularly reliant on the assumption that far more Waikato graduates will go on to be GPs – and GPs who work rurally – than graduates of other schools. The business case found increasing capacity at the existing medical schools would result in just 23% of those graduates staying on to become GPs, while the joint rural training programme would result in 33% of its graduates becoming GPs. In the Waikato medical school's case, 38% of its graduates would become GPs. The business case notes that having a higher number of GPs in the community increases people's health. The fact the Waikato school provides the greatest number of GPs therefore weighs heavily in its favour. Benefits and costs of the three options analysed. Table / Ministry of Health Bagg said Sapere, who provided cost-benefit analysis for the business case, 'haven't used the data we provided them' to calculate the GP figure for the option of increasing capacity at Auckland And Otago. He said 'about 35%' of graduates from Auckland and Otago medical schools are working as GPs eight years after graduating – a far higher figure than the 23% quoted in the business case. He said this lower figure came from a survey of graduates' intentions when they graduated, not what they actually ended up doing. 'We told Sapere this assumption was incorrect,' he said. The assumptions for the number of GPs graduating from Waikato were based on figures from Australia's University of Wollongong Graduate School of Medicine, which will be a model for the Waikato school. Brown defended the modelling behind the business case. He said the school will 'offer a post-graduate medical qualification based on similar successful programmes in Australia'. 'These programmes include a year-long primary care placement and encourage students to work in primary care settings following graduation. The selection criteria of students alongside their long-term placements in primary care will both support a higher degree of these medical students to work in primary care after graduation,' he said. No expectation of ratepayer funding for med school – Brown Brown poured cold water on concerns councils could be asked to stump up for the new school. Brown's Cabinet paper suggested territorial authorities – local councils – are being lined up for a contribution to the school. A paragraph from the Cabinet paper progressing the school, which will be joint-funded by the Crown, the university and philanthropists, noted, '[t]he University of Waikato has identified $151.859 million which they will ... contribute towards the new medical school costs'. 'This contribution shows significant support for a new medical school from a range of stakeholders from private trusts and foundations, individuals, and territorial authorities'. But Brown told the Herald, 'as Minister of Health, I have no expectation that councils will financially contribute to the new Waikato Medical School'. University of Waikato vice-chancellor Neil Quigley told the Herald earlier this week about half of the university's $150m share of the school could come from donations. 'At the moment, we're well on the way to the 50% of donations just with a relatively small number of large trusts and very wealthy individuals so we don't see that as particularly challenging,' he said. Brown defends information release Labour's health spokeswoman Ayesha Verrall called for the business case to be published on Monday to show the assumptions underlying Cabinet's decision to proceed with the school. 'Treasury has raised concerns about this project. Decisions about the future of NZ's medical workforce are critical and must be transparent. The Government needs to release the costings quickly,' Verrall said. The business case was published by the Ministry of Health about 6pm on Friday, a time often associated with the Government trying to bury information because people are enjoying their weekend. Brown defended the timing of the release, saying: 'Cabinet made the decision to progress with the third medical school on Monday with officials tasked with preparing material for proactive release following this decision. 'Normally Cabinet decisions and supporting information are required to be proactively released 30 days following a decision, however due to the significant interest in this decision, this was sped up to ensure the information could be made available as quickly as possible.'
