Annual meeting of the Montreal Port Authority - Results from 2024 operations: at the core of a resilient economy Français
The results show stable volumes compared to 2023, $143 million in operating results and $22.6 million in net earnings. The year was characterized by several major port infrastructure projects, milestones in the energy transition and many high points in community engagement.
Cargo traffic
With 35.41 million tonnes of goods handled at the Port of Montreal in 2024, overall tonnage rose slightly by 0.2% compared to the previous year. This result, despite the uncertainty and turbulence faced throughout 2024, including the labour dispute and geopolitical issues around the world, substantiates the resilience of stakeholders in the shipping industry and the Port of Montreal's importance in North America's supply chain.
- 12.58 million tonnes of containerized goods were handled, down 3.8% from 2023. In terms of TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units), this represents 1,464,320 TEUs, a 4.8% decrease over one year.
- The liquid bulk sector handled 13.67 million tonnes, a year-on-year dip of 1.5%.
- Dry bulk posted a 9.3% upturn to reach 9.16 million tonnes, driven by strong performance in the grain sector.
- With 65,136 passengers and crew members across 41 stopovers, the 2024 cruise season dipped by 3% from 2023.
Financial results and infrastructure investments
Operating revenues were $143 million in 2024 compared with $138 million in 2023, a 3.8% increase.
Expenses totalled $129.5 million, including $94.1 million excluding amortization.
Capital investments for 2024 totalled $74.8 million.
With investment income factored in, net income was $11 million.
Accordingly, the Port of Montreal has sound financial results and maintains an excellent Global S&P rating and outlook of AA/negative, reaffirmed in January 2025. The MPA also maintains a solid debt service coverage ratio.
"In a global economic context marked by uncertainty and upheaval, the Montreal Port Authority showed incredible resilience in 2024. With the strength of our model, the commitment of our teams and the diversity of our markets, we stayed the course, strengthened our strategic role in Canadian trade and kept steering toward sustainable growth. Even though 2025 is expected to be a tough year, our sights remain set on the future with promising projects like the Contrecœur expansion and a firm commitment to actively contribute to our country's economic sovereignty."
— Julie Gascon, President and CEO, Montreal Port Authority
Readying the Port of Montreal's future
Among the major projects underway in 2024, the Port of Montreal's Contrecœur expansion project achieved many milestones, including an agreement signed with the consortium Constructeurs Terminal de Contrecœur Grand Projet (CTCGP), formed by Pomerleau and Aecon, to design the in-water works using a collaborative design-build (collaborative DB) approach. Several other initiatives that were launched, such as redeveloping the CanEst terminal, rehabilitating the Pie-IX railway bridge and optimizing the railway network, not only aimed to enhance operational efficiency and safety, but also prepare the Port to meet the demands of a growing market. Lastly, rehabilitation projects, such as repairing Berth 28 and the Grand Quay parking lot as well as modernizing railway equipment and water supply networks, help maintain the facilities' longevity while optimizing their long-term operation.
The MPA's Annual Report 2024 can be consulted at: port-montreal.com/en/annual-report-2024
Sustainable development
On the environmental front, the Port of Montreal's GHG footprint stood at 3,030 tonnes of Scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions, down 13% compared to 2023 and 37% since 2007. Initiatives such as shore power, supplying renewable natural, and better energy performance in MPA buildings further advance the MPA's energy transition objectives. The MPA also strengthened its role in the community by supporting 54 community-building projects, finding more ways to connect with residents, and deepening its commitment to First Nations. Also noteworthy, the Port welcomed more than 10,000 visitors during its Port Day and continued to work toward its goal to smoothly integrate with the city by developing the Bickerdike Promenade and taking tangible steps to reduce light pollution and environmental impacts. Over the course of the year, the flagship project in Contrecœur also included reforestation, holding open houses and taking a transparent approach to accountability.
The MPA's Summary Report of Achievements in Sustainable Development 2024 can be viewed on our website here.
On an even keel for 2025
The year 2025 will be marked by decisive steps in the Port of Montreal's Contrecœur expansion project, which is becoming ever more urgent in the unstable political and economic context caused by the tariff war instigated by the United States. As a lever for Canada's growth and economic sovereignty, over the course of the year this project is heading to its official launch and first shovel in the ground.
Operated by the Montreal Port Authority (MPA), the Port of Montreal is the largest container port in Eastern Canada and a diversified transshipment centre that handles all types of goods: containerized and non-containerized cargo, liquid bulk and dry bulk. The only container port in Quebec, it is a destination port served by the largest shipping lines in the world. It is also an intermodal hub with a service offering that is unique in North America, featuring its own rail network directly dockside connected to Canada's two national rail networks. The MPA also operates a Cruise Terminal.
The MPA factors economic, social and environmental components into its corporate initiatives. This commitment is governed by a sustainable development policy whose guiding principles focus on involvement, cooperation and accountability. Port activity in Canada supports some 590,000 jobs and generates $93.5 billion in economic activity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
3 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline
Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Global News
5 hours ago
- Global News
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Story continues below advertisement Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. Story continues below advertisement George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Story continues below advertisement Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties.
Toronto Star
7 hours ago
- Toronto Star
A private Toronto college abruptly closed — and left these students out thousands of dollars, with no diplomas
Students are accusing a private advertising college in Toronto of broken promises after it allegedly failed to deliver on internships or even a functioning campus before abruptly shutting down — leaving them thousands of dollars in debt and without diplomas. The group of nine say they were drawn to Miami Ad School Toronto by guarantees of hands-on experience, professional instruction and vital connections in the advertising industry. That the American-based college also boasted global awards and graduates who ended up at Ogilvy & Mather, BBDO, Droga5 and Canadian firm Rethink, among others, added to the appeal.
