CIPFA welcomes Fair Funding Review 2.0
It has expressed cautious optimism about the government's commitment to reforming local government finance.
CIPFA director of Public Financial Management Iain Murray said: "We welcome the Government's recognition that local government finance needs reform. The commitment to address long-standing disparities in funding allocations and simplify the complex patchwork of grants is a positive step toward greater fairness and transparency.'
Murray emphasised on the need for careful implementation and 'robust data' to support the transition.
The institute has acknowledged the government's efforts but warns that structural challenges persist, particularly in the allocation and redistribution of funds.
The proposed reforms, including a return to a multi-year settlement and the consolidation of funding pots, have been well-received by finance professionals for providing a clearer basis for planning and accountability.
However, CIPFA has raised concerns that the government has yet to address fundamental pressures, such as the statutory override for SEND (special educational needs and disabilities) high-need deficits, which has been extended to 2028 without serving its intended purpose of facilitating reform.
Murray added: "Without urgent solutions to both existing and future SEND deficits, those councils grappling with unsustainable high needs costs and rapidly growing cumulative deficits may, at best, be forced to make further reductions in essential services, and at worst, risk declaring themselves effectively bankrupt."
Recently, CIPFA has issued a warning in response to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report on local government financial sustainability., which indicates a looming financial crisis for councils across the UK.
"CIPFA welcomes Fair Funding Review 2.0" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
‘I would be homeless': 4,100+ disabled Miamians could lose housing under Trump budget
Blessed. That's how David Murray described himself as he hobbled around his crowded living room, jabbing his cane at the healthy collections of stuffed animals and constructed Lego figurines he keeps around for his dozen-plus grandkids. Their pictures — some framed, others taped bare — adorn the walls of his rent-subsidized apartment in Miami. It's one of Miami-Dade County's more than 4,100 units of permanent supportive housing — mostly federally funded dwellings that provide rental assistance and support services to once-homeless people with disabilities. Thousands of Miamians live in such housing. Without it, many of them would be homeless again. And they might soon be without it. Per the Trump administration's 2026 budget blueprint, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which funds many of the country's homelessness service providers, could see its budget nearly halved at a time when homelessness in America is at a record high. The proposal represents a stark departure from decades of federal housing and homelessness policy, advocates say. It plans to defund permanent supportive housing, the keystone of a widely held and data-supported theory that argues the best way to keep people out of homelessness is to quickly place them in stable housing and give them access to support services. More than 300,000 people live in permanent supportive housing across the U.S. All of them are disabled and had been chronically homeless. That theory, called Housing First, offers services to people with substance abuse or mental health issues but doesn't require them to resolve those problems before receiving permanent housing. The White House considers that model enabling. Instead, the Trump administration wants to fund short-term, time-bound housing solutions, like shelters, where people experiencing homelessness must first deal with whatever underlying issues they face before being eligible for long-term housing support. While the White House purports that its plan is best poised to 'eliminate street homelessness,' advocates are sounding the alarm. Just under 900 people sleep on Miami-Dade's streets, according to the county government. But if the federal budget is implemented on Oct. 1 as it's currently written, the thousands of people with disabilities living in permanent supportive housing — many of whom are seniors or veterans or, like Murray, both — could lose their homes and fall back into homelessness, threatening an explosion in the number of people sleeping on the county's streets. If he loses his apartment, Murray, 67, fears he could be one of them. At one point, he was. It was the late 1990s, and Murray, a welder, tore his meniscus. He blamed the injury on lingering knee damage sustained during Air Force basic training that never quite healed and on his physically taxing job. Unable to walk properly, Murray was fired. 'I lost my career,' he recalled. In its definition of 'homeless,' Congress includes those who sleep in places 'not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings.' That includes places like the unventilated garage that Murray moved into with his oldest son. They shared it, through sweltering heat waves and punishing hurricanes, for more than a decade as Murray, unable to work, grappled with chronic pain and depression. 'I got so frustrated. I couldn't pay for anything,' he said, squeezing his cane. 'I couldn't take my kids out on the weekend. We couldn't do anything.' It was only 12 years ago that Murray again had his own place — a two-bedroom apartment in Little Haiti that he shares with his wife and one of his sons and for which he pays $618 a month. Murray's apartment is subsidized by permanent supportive housing dollars. 'I'm so grateful, so thankful to be in this building,' he said, admiring through the living room window the treetops that shade Little Haiti. 'I love it here, my family loves it here.' The barebones budget In his 2026 federal budget request, Trump proposed nearly $33 billion in cuts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development — roughly 45% of the agency's resources. As part of that reduction, it seeks to eliminate the $3.7 billion 'Continuum of Care' initiative that funds local service provider networks — in Miami-Dade's case, the Homeless Trust. Those continuums often include some combination of local government, businesses, nonprofit service providers like shelters, and even religious organizations. The idea was that diverse groups of stakeholders could better account for a community's homelessness needs than, say, state or local governments alone. Per the budget proposal, the Continuum program's funding will merge with that of a program providing housing for people with AIDS and be rolled under the umbrella of a short- to medium-term housing initiative known as the Emergency Solutions Grant. That pays for crisis interventions — taking people off the streets and putting them in shelters, funding those shelters and placing homeless people in temporary housing that's capped at two years. What the Emergency Solutions Grant explicitly does not fund: permanent supportive housing. Those changes might seem largely administrative, but they're representative of a major shift in homelessness policy, said Ned Murray (no relation to David Murray), who focuses on affordable housing in South Florida as associate director of Florida International University's Metropolitan Institute. Housing First vs. treatment first Homeless services providers have long held to Housing First as the most effective method for keeping people off the streets. 'The evidence is overwhelming' that the model is successful, said Ann Oliva, CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness. Such housing programs, Oliva said, have never received sufficient funding to end homelessness in America, which is at an all-time high. So scrapping Housing First on the argument that it's ineffective 'is very much like saying people keep getting sick, so the emergency room doesn't work,' she quipped. The Trump administration has instead adopted an approach that requires homeless people to deal with whatever substance or mental health issues they may be facing before entering stable, long-term housing. Vicki Mallette, executive director of Miami-Dade County Homeless Trust, is skeptical of such a policy's efficacy. 'If we wait for people [sleeping] on bus stops and street corners to solve problems that may have lasted decades, we're not going to reduce' homelessness, she said at a recent Trust board meeting. 'We're going to be trying to make perfect people,' she added, and working against 'what it is we really want: fewer people experiencing homelessness.' Homeless Trust Chairman Ron Book put it more bluntly: 'Doing away with Housing First is ridiculous. It's a terrible idea.' The Homeless Trust reports that between 97% and 99% of people it places in permanent supportive housing remain there stably for at least two years. Under the proposed budget, those who do enter medium-term housing will have no more than two years to figure out a more permanent living situation for themselves. But for someone coming out of chronic homelessness, especially someone who's disabled, that's often not enough time to become self-sufficient, said Stephanie Berman-Eisenberg, president of Carrfour Supportive Housing, which develops and manages permanent supportive housing projects in Miami-Dade, including the one Kim Miller lives in. Miller, 68, left her 30-year career as a pharmacy tech to care for her mother, who was succumbing to dementia. That was 13 years ago. Since then, Miller emptied her retirement savings to cover her late mother's medical costs and moved out of her house into a shared apartment — which she and her roommate had to leave after they couldn't keep up with rising rent. But Miller got lucky. Before ending up on the streets, she was placed in a Carrfour-operated building for permanent supportive housing, where she pays $500 a month in rent. 'I think it's the best thing in the world that happened to me,' she reflected. The building's coordinator, Kenneshia Sparks, thinks many of her residents would 'absolutely' fall back into homelessness if their stays were limited to two years. 'We can't put a timing on mental health,' she said, noting that some people require years of assistance to reach stability. But under the Trump administration's budget proposal, those who can't hold down a steady job and live without support services after that two-year cap could be on their own — potentially back out on the streets, said Berman-Eisenberg. And that's expensive. Financing the repeated, short-term interventions that accompany higher levels of street homelessness is far more costly than simply getting people into stable housing and caring for them there, said Leeanne Sacino, executive director of the Florida Coalition to End Homelessness. And while Housing First programs benefit from the federal government's purchasing power, the relatively high cost of short-term interventions falls squarely on local communities, whose hospital and criminal justice systems will shoulder much of the burden at local taxpayers' expense. To keep someone jailed in Miami-Dade runs the county about $300 per inmate per day — nearly $105,000 per year. For them to stay overnight in the hospital costs even more — at least $2,200 per day, the Homeless Trust estimates. And, upon leaving either, 'they're still homeless,' Sacino pointed out, 'so I really don't get it.' By contrast, the Homeless Trust reports that it spends roughly $80 a day per permanent supportive housing unit, many of which house multiple people, including the 14% of units that lodge families with children. But it's a hard financial — and political — lift for the local government to fill the $50 million federal funding gap for permanent supportive housing. 'For so long, the federal government has been the main source of support,' said U.S. Rep. Frederica Wilson, a Democrat who represents the northern parts of Miami-Dade County. 'With that funding disappearing and no one stepping in to fill the gap, I fear we're headed for a real crisis.' None of the county's Republican representatives in the U.S. House responded to the Herald's multiple requests for comment. Should the Miamians in the 4,000-plus federally funded homes lose their housing subsidies, it's unclear where they'll go. 'I'm on overload,' said Book. 'My shelters are full.' Though the Homeless Trust is working to stand up additional emergency beds and housing units, they won't be enough to accommodate all those in permanent supportive housing. Asked if he thought the number of people sleeping on Miami-Dade's streets would increase if this version of the budget is implemented, Book answered: 'I would be extremely concerned about what our community will look like should things get adopted as proposed.' That concern is all too real for Murray, Miller and the thousands of other disabled Miamians who might be returned to homelessness. 'What would I do if [housing provider Carrfour] didn't help me? Where would I go?' Murray wondered aloud. 'I would be homeless again,' he figured, his eyes settling on something in the middle distance. 'I would be homeless again.' This story was produced with financial support from supporters including The Green Family Foundation Trust and Ken O'Keefe, in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. The Miami Herald maintains full editorial control of this work.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
FinWise Bancorp to Host Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast on Thursday, July 24, 2025
MURRAY, Utah, July 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- FinWise Bancorp (NASDAQ: FINW) ('FinWise' or the 'Company'), the parent company of FinWise Bank, today announced that it will report its second quarter 2025 results and host a conference call and webcast after the market close on Thursday, July 24, 2025. Conference Call Information The conference call will be held at 5:00 p.m. ET to discuss financial results for the second quarter of 2025. The dial-in number is 1-877-423-9813 (toll-free) or 1-201-689-8573 (international). The conference ID is 13754178. Please dial the number 10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time. Webcast Information The webcast will be available on the Company's website at FinWise Earnings Call Live Webcast and a replay of the call will be available at Investor Relations | FinWise Bancorp ( for six months following the call. Submission of Conference Call Questions In addition to questions asked live by analysts during the call, the Company will also accept for consideration questions submitted via email prior to 5:00 p.m. ET on Thursday, July 24, 2025. Please email questions to investors@ About FinWise Bancorp FinWise provides Banking and Payments solutions to fintech brands. Its existing Strategic Program Lending business, conducted through scalable API-driven infrastructure, powers deposit, lending and payments programs for leading fintech brands. As part of Strategic Program Lending, FinWise also provides a Credit Enhanced Balance Sheet Program, which addresses the challenges that lending and card programs face diversifying their funding sources and managing capital efficiency. In addition, FinWise manages other Lending programs such as SBA 7(a), Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate, and Leasing, which provide flexibility for disciplined balance sheet growth. FinWise is also expanding and diversifying its business model by incorporating Payments (MoneyRails™) and BIN Sponsorship offerings. Through its compliance oversight and risk management-first culture, FinWise is well positioned to guide fintechs through a rigorous process to facilitate regulatory compliance. For more information on FinWise Bank, visit Contacts:investors@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
4 days ago
- The Hill
Collins, Murkowski vote for motion to help strike defunding of Planned Parenthood from GOP megabill
Republican Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) voted Monday afternoon for a motion to waive a budget point of order against an amendment that would strike a section of the GOP megabill to bar Planned Parenthood health centers from receiving Medicaid funding for services provided to low-income women across the country. Collins and Murkowski were the only two Republicans to vote for the motion, which was sponsored by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee. Democrats warned that cutting off Medicaid funding would put 200 health centers across the country at risk of closing. Murray hoped to offer an amendment to strip the Planned Parenthood-related provision from the bill but she first needed to overcome a procedural objection to the bill. Republicans blocked her motion in a 51-49 vote. She needed 60 votes to overcome the objection. 'It will take another step towards enacting Republicans' plan for a Backdoor Nationwide Abortion Ban. How does it do this? By defunding Planned Parenthood,' Murray said. 'This is a long-sought goal of anti-choice extremists—no surprise, it is overwhelmingly unpopular with the American people,' she added. Senate Republicans added the provision, Section 7115, back into the bill after the Senate parliamentarian initially ruled it violated the Senate's Byrd Rule, which determines what legislation is eligible to pass with a simple-majority vote under budget reconciliation. Republicans changed the timing of the 'defunding' from 10 years to one year to meet the parliamentarian's requirements. Nathan Weixel contributed.
