logo
Number of Brits who see US as a global threat doubles since Donald Trump came to power

Number of Brits who see US as a global threat doubles since Donald Trump came to power

Independent25-06-2025
The number of Britons who see the US as a serious threat to global security has skyrocketed since Donald Trump entered the White House in January, new research shows.
Even before the president bombed Iran at the weekend, almost three quarters of those asked — 72 per cent — named the US as a threat to world peace in the next decade.
Researchers said the figure, which has doubled since last autumn, when it was just 36 per cent, was an 'all time high'.
And it rivals China, on 69 per cent, Israel, on 73 per cent, and North Korea, on 77 per cent, although the highest was Russia on 90 per cent.
In recent months, Trump has alarmed the international community on a number of occassions, including when he raised doubts about his willingness to defend European countries and when held a televised showdown with Ukrainian President Zelensky in the Oval Office.
The latest British Social Attitudes (BSA) report, by the National Centre for Social Research, shows fears over the US' role in the world is split along political party lines.
Labour and Green supporters are more likely — by 81 and 96 per cent — than those who back the Conservatives or Reform UK — 68 and 41 per cent — to consider the US a serious threat.
The survey also shows that increased public concern over potential threats has led to a significant increase in support for defence spending.
Almost one in ten — 9 per cent — believe defence should be the top priority for extra government spending, the highest figure ever recorded in the survey.
Again, however, there are marked differences by party, with Conservative and Reform supporters more likely to be in favour than those who back Labour or the Greens.
Gianfranco Addario, research director at the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), told The Independent the research did not go into the reasons why those who took part believe the US to be a significant threat, but said 'that would be very interesting to explore'.
He added: 'The escalation of recent international conflicts is clearly reflected in the attitudes of the British population, who have never been so supportive of military spending and so concerned about serious security threats since the British Social Attitudes survey first addressed the subject in 1985.
'Perception of the US as a security threat has increased since the 2024 presidential elections and the first 100 days of the Trump administration, reaching an all-time high.
'The Labour government's approach to addressing these concerns, particularly in navigating internal party divisions while aligning with public sentiment, will be crucial in determining its success in managing the country's security and defence policies.'
The British Social Attitudes survey has been conducted every year since 1983.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Children accessing 'vile porn' on social media, warns safeguarding chief
Children accessing 'vile porn' on social media, warns safeguarding chief

BBC News

time29 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Children accessing 'vile porn' on social media, warns safeguarding chief

Children are gaining access to "vile" pornography through social media platforms, the head of Northern Ireland's child safeguarding organisation has told McNally said the problem was "just beyond belief" and called for greater intervention in schools and local chair of the Safeguarding Board for Northern Ireland was speaking at the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee as MPs held an evidence session on tackling violence against women and said their research suggested "kids as young as nine" were accessing pornography, and its availability had been "normalised" by some social media platforms. The committee was also told that many women surveyed in Northern Ireland have withdrawn from public participation in online spaces as a result of "online violence".Olga Jurasz, a professor of law at the Open University and director of the Centre for Protecting Women Online, told MPs that those silencing effects are particularly deeply felt for women in Northern said the issue of violence against women and girls has been "amplified through technology"."Misogyny in particular has been popularised - we witness it every day - and it has also been monetised. Quite simply, it is for profit," she added. 'Some is down to influencers' BBC News NI has contacted X, Snapchat, TikTok and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, for comment on Bernie McNally's remarks. Snapchat guidelines prohibit users from sharing, promoting or distributing sexually explicit content, including Ms McNally told the committee that "some kids in school are asking their teacher how do you choke a woman".She said that girls between the ages of 16 and 18 who are sexually active were "all reporting being choked during sex"."So something has changed to normalise this and for young people, and some of it can be down to influencers," she added. Alliance Party MP Sorcha Eastwood raised the case of Alexander McCartney, a man from Northern Ireland who was jailed for extreme online sexual abuse of children and the manslaughter of a 12-year-old girl. She told the committee that during a meeting with representatives of social media companies before Christmas, "not a single one" had heard of the McCartney case."And we are expected to believe that these platforms can keep our children safe online," she Smith, from the broadcast and internet regulator Ofcom, responded: "Well, that's absolutely shocking that they hadn't heard of the case. I'm astounded by that."

'New option' being explored for larger Nottingham boundary
'New option' being explored for larger Nottingham boundary

BBC News

time34 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'New option' being explored for larger Nottingham boundary

A "new option" for an expanded boundary for Nottingham is being explored, a council leader has government announced last year it wanted to merge some local authorities in an attempt to streamline services, and three potential options for Nottinghamshire were published in Borough Council leader Milan Radulovic, however, told a public meeting on Tuesday that a fresh proposal was being looked into which would see the city of Nottingham combine with some of the surrounding suburbs rather than entire boroughs."I'm sure you're all aware of the city's new option which is an enlarged city taking in West Bridgford, Beeston, Hucknall, Arnold and Carlton," he said. The city council says these areas have not been officially proposed and no decisions have been made.A council spokesperson said: "Nottingham is a significantly under-bounded local authority, covering a population of 328,000 at the centre of a built-up area of well over 750,000 (and a wider county population of 1.17m)."We are responsible for delivering the services expected in a core city, but many of the people who work in the city, and use council services, currently live in the suburbs, meaning they can't vote in city elections, and pay council tax elsewhere. We need to address that imbalance through LGR."Government guidance states existing district boundaries should be considered the "building blocks" for proposals, but more complex boundary changes have not been ruled have also said any new authorities should have a population of 500,000 or more. City councillors have previously complained that the authority raises relatively little through council tax because about 80% of the city's properties are in bands A and Neghat Khan has previously endorsed the so-called "Nottingham +2" model, where the city would combine with any two of Broxtowe Borough Council, Gedling Borough Council, and Rushcliffe Borough BBC understands the latest suggestion to cut across existing boundaries was dubbed the "wiggly line option" at a recent source said it was "all about getting Band D properties into Nottingham".The government has set a deadline of 28 November for councils to submit final have been calls for the plans to be paused, however, and some councillors have suggested the proposals should be put to a local at the cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Radulovic said: "We seem to be in a difficult situation at the moment on forming any sort of consensus across Nottinghamshire".

Norwich City Council owned housing firm recorded losses of £5m
Norwich City Council owned housing firm recorded losses of £5m

BBC News

time34 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Norwich City Council owned housing firm recorded losses of £5m

A council-owned housing developer which lost millions of pounds will be closed down and liquidated.A report to Norwich City Council's Labour cabinet blamed changes to the housing market and economy for making its social and affordable housing arm, Lion Homes, show the company made £5m in losses in five years, while homes in one development it built were sold for less than what they cost to councillor Alex Catt said the company had been a poorly-run "disaster" which had made "an enormous loss". The company, which is wholly owned by the council, was founded as Norwich Regeneration Limited in 2015 in the hope of delivering more affordable the venture has faced strong criticism, particularly after the Eastern Daily Press reported in 2020 that the company had lost £6m when homes in Bowthorpe were sold at a loss and the council was council also invested £3.5m in the company and loaned it a further £6.1m to keep it no accounts have been filed for Lion since 2023, Companies House records show it made losses of £5m in the previous five years. Catt, who leads the council's Green group, said "the lack of openness displayed by the Labour councillors who have overseen this disaster that has led to this enormous loss for the public has been striking"."There needs to be a full and public investigation into how this was allowed to happen, and a plan from the council for how it will deliver housing for Norwich at value for money after this failure," he said. 'No impact' Carli Harper, Labour's cabinet member for finance and major projects, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that liquidating the company was "a strategic decision that makes sense for the long-term".Rather than using a private company to borrow money to fund developments, she argued the council could get better deals on loans from the government."It means we deliver more homes at better value for money for the taxpayer if we do it ourselves," she said the closure of the company would have "no impact" on a planned development of 200 houses at the former Mile Cross depot – while the council was "exploring options" for continuing another development in Bowthorpe, where a total of 1,000 homes are expected to be added the council hoped to get back some of the £6.1m loaned to Lion by recovering assets owned by the company including "a significant plot of land". The council's cabinet will be asked to consider voluntary liquidation of the company at a meeting next week in light of a recommendation received from its shareholder states the council will explore "alternative routes" to invest in housing development that are "less risky" and provide "better prospects". Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store