
Enhancing economic resilience crucial in trying times
Within three days of the announcement, global stock markets lost over $9.5 trillion in market capitalization, and volatility intensified significantly across bond, foreign exchange and commodity markets. In the United States, stocks, bonds and the dollar all fell simultaneously. The yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds also posted its biggest weekly gain since the Sept 11, 2001 attacks.
The shockwaves from the tariff moves continue to ripple across the world, with escalating confrontations on all sides. Faced with the Trump administration's high tariffs and erratic behavior, China must resolutely implement countermeasures. Any concession would only lead to further pressure from the other side. Only through firm resistance can space for negotiation and cooperation be created.
On April 25, a high-level meeting for the first time proposed coordinating domestic economic work and international economic and trade struggles, aiming to use the certainty of high-quality development to cope with the uncertainty of dramatic changes in the external environment.
On May 7, the People's Bank of China, the China Securities Regulatory Commission and other government authorities jointly introduced a package of incremental policies to stabilize market confidence.
On May 12, China and the US released a joint statement after economic and trade talks in Geneva, in which the US agreed to remove some additional tariffs, and China reciprocated accordingly, temporarily easing tariff pressures. However, over the medium-to-long term, challenges in Sino-US economic and trade relations persist.
It is worth noting that tariffs may not be the Trump administration's ultimate goal, but rather a bargaining tactic aimed at achieving the dual objectives of reducing the US trade deficit and maintaining the dominance of the greenback.
In fact, since the onset of the trade conflict in 2018, the US government has been exerting significant pressure and imposing extreme restrictions on China in both trade and technology sectors. We must be fully aware of the worsening international economic and trade environment in the foreseeable future and recognize that China and the US will continue their strategic contest for a long time.
So, against this backdrop, how should China enhance the resilience of its economy? We believe the most important approach is to focus on doing our own job well, remain self-reliant and persist in expanding domestic demand. At the same time, we must unswervingly expand high-level opening-up.
Expanding domestic demand is the top priority for 2025. Following the directives from the Central Economic Work Conference in December 2024, expanding domestic demand became the top priority of economic work this year.
This is because insufficient domestic demand is currently the main stumbling block in China's economy. In 2024, total retail sales of consumer goods grew by only 3.3 percent year-on-year, significantly lower than the 9.7 percent average between 2015 and 2019. From the perspective of the three engines of GDP — consumption, investment and exports — final consumption in 2024 contributed an average of only 2.3 percentage points per quarter to GDP growth, much lower than the 4.2-percentage point average between 2015 and 2019.
Breaking down the three factors influencing household consumption — changes in income, wealth and expectations — we find that in the short term, the main constraint on consumption growth is the sharp slowdown in household income growth since the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2024, cumulative year-on-year growth in per capita disposable income was 4.6 percent in urban areas and 6.6 percent in rural areas, well below the 7.9 percent and 9.6 percent levels of 2019.
Over the long term, two main factors constrain consumption: first, weak expectations and confidence about future employment and income; second, evident imbalances in income distribution across households, the government and enterprises, as well as within the household sector itself.
Rising risk aversion among residents has led to an increase in precautionary savings, reflected in the sharp rise in new deposits and continued decline in new loans since 2022.
In terms of income distribution, profits generated by enterprises have not been sufficiently transferred to households, and the income distribution within the household sector also needs improvement. Beyond the income gap between urban and rural residents, an even more important issue is the much wider gap in property and social security entitlements.
To sum up, we believe that to stimulate consumption, macroeconomic policy stimulus is needed in the short term, while structural reform should be accelerated in the medium term. Based on the logic of moving from short-term stimulus to long-term reform, the following policy recommendations are proposed.
First, a more proactive fiscal policy and a moderately accommodative monetary policy are keys to driving a rebound in China's nominal GDP growth. The main issue facing the Chinese economy is insufficient aggregate demand and a negative output gap.
In the short term, to address the lack of domestic demand, central government finances should increase borrowing and spending to drive a rebound in consumption and investment. In addition to promptly implementing the expansionary policies outlined in the Government Work Report, additional stimulus measures should be planned for the second half, especially through greater issuance of special treasury bonds.
To make full and effective use of proactive fiscal policy, we recommend accelerating the issuance of the remaining quota of local government special bonds and special treasury bonds in the second quarter, and issuing an additional 2 to 3 trillion yuan ($411.6 billion) in special treasury bonds for the year.
Second, increasing short-term incomes for low and middle-income households through fiscal subsidies is advised. We recommend issuing universal consumption vouchers to encourage spending, especially among low and middle-income earners. To maximize the multiplier effect of consumption vouchers, they should be issued without being tied to specific products or services.
Third, lifting asset prices from the bottom can also help restore consumer confidence. On real estate policy, housing prices in core areas of the largest cities should be stabilized promptly, and support should be given to leading well-managed private developers.
All purchase and loan restrictions should be lifted to unleash demand from first-time and upgrading buyers. Special-purpose bonds should be issued to provide low-cost, long-term financing for high-quality developers.
The government can also purchase idle commercial housing in second and third-tier cities and convert it into rental-based public housing. In the stock market, efforts should be made to cultivate a long bull market.
In addition, with an aging population and slowing investment-driven growth, China's potential economic growth rate is trending downward. To reverse this trend and restore confidence among microeconomic actors, bold structural reforms are needed. These include reforms in income redistribution, education, healthcare, pensions, housing, development of a unified domestic market and support for private enterprises.
The writer is deputy director of the Institute of Finance and Banking of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily. - China Daily/ANN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Halal rules non-negotiable in US tariff talks, says Tengku Zafrul
Investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz stressed that Malaysia won't compromise on trade sovereignty, national interest or key policies in US tariff talks. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Malaysia's halal certification standards are among the non-negotiable issues in ongoing tariff negotiations with Washington, says investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz. He said if the US wanted to have its halal certification recognised, it must comply with the guidelines set by the Islamic development department (Jakim), Berita Harian reported. 'The guidelines we've drawn up reflect lessons from past experiences,' he told the Dewan Rakyat during question time. 'If their halal standards are in line with Jakim's requirements, and the process is consistent with what we accept from other countries, then we can agree (to it), but Jakim must recognise it.' Tengku Zafrul was responding to a question from Syahir Sulaiman (PN-Bachok), who asked about the clear boundaries or 'red lines' Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently said would not be crossed during the negotiations. The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) previously cited Malaysia's halal import rules and Bumiputera equity requirements as barriers leading to the 24% tariff initially imposed on April 2. In its 2025 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers, the USTR said Malaysia's halal standards exceeded international norms, requiring dedicated halal-only facilities and involving complex registration processes, which raised costs and delayed exports. Tengku Zafrul also said Malaysia's negotiation approach would be shaped by past experiences, taking into account both local sensitivities and US concerns. He emphasised that the government remains open to fair and constructive dialogue, but certain matters were not up for compromise. 'These include the Bumiputera policy in terms of local ownership and participation in strategic sectors, as well as the preference for local and Bumiputera companies in government procurement. Those are red lines,' he added. Tengku Zafrul reiterated that Malaysia would not yield on matters of trade sovereignty, national interest, or socioeconomic policy, whether in talks with the US or with multinational corporations. 'All of this is to protect Bumiputera interests and ensure balanced national economic development,' he added.


Focus Malaysia
an hour ago
- Focus Malaysia
Balance of trade between nations need to reflect parity and equality
ONE of the reasons cited by US President Donald Trump in increasing trade tariffs with Malaysia is that the balance of trade has been in Malaysia's favour for many years, and that the Malaysian government has not seriously addressed the problem. Trump had expressed hopes that higher tariffs could redress the situation and expects Malaysia to purchase a more wider range of American goods and products. Many nations too have lopsided balance of trade with the US and this is one of the reasons for the much-feared Trump's tariffs worldwide which will begin to be implemented from Aug 1. Numerous countries have taken advantage of the large unrestricted open US market to increase exports exponentially but buy back less in imports leading to an unfavourable balance of trade. The US has lost out to many countries in the trade of agricultural and manufactured goods as well as services. This is the reason why the US is now the world's biggest debtor nation. Many American multi-national have also added to the problems by opening new manufacturing centres outside the US to take advantage of lower labour costs and other incentives and exporting their products to the US for higher profits. This has led to the famous 'rust belt', a vast number of US factories that had been shuttered down due to economic changes. This became a major socio-economic issue during the presidential elections. The range of products and services the US depends on worldwide especially from the European Union (EU) and Asean countries has increased manyfold over the last few decade and is straining the US economy with the huge range imports which are not matched with imports by these countries. This has been cited as one of the reasons for the much talked about decline of the US as a superpower. Trump is imposing punitive tariffs on nation he feels are restricting US imports through restrictions, regulations and import substitution. The entry of China as a big time trading nation has upset the balance of trade internationally. China's economy of scale has led to cheaper and competitive prices and many nations have lost their erstwhile monopoly. Previously, Malaysia trade with the US was more balanced as Malaysia used to buy a large range of manufactured products and other goods and services from the US. However, the situation has drastically changed when China began flooding its products in Malaysia. This led to Malaysia buying less from not only the US but also the EU, among others. Malaysia often lauds its favourable trade balance as an economic achievement and advantage but does not take into account the disadvantage it causes to others. For a healthy trading relationship there should not be a very wide gulf or deficit between trading partners. Another country with a perennially lopsided balance of trade with Malaysia is India. India has had an unfavourable balance of trade with Malaysia for decades. India is Malaysia's largest importer of palm oil and is one of the main countries Malaysia considers to sell off any glut arising in palm oil. This enables palm oil prices to be kept high and well above production costs. The palm oil sector has been one of the most profitable and Malaysia reaps billions of ringgit due to high prices fuelled by large scale imports by India. In fact whenever palm oil exporters get wind of prospective large scale purchase of palm oil from India due to domestic vegetable oil shortage or demand for festivals many of these exporters and speculators jack up the prices. The situation became so exploitative more than a decade ago when India decided to have a more stable palm oil pricing with a government to government arrangement with Indonesia. Needless to say Malaysia-India trade ties need to become more balanced and fair to both sides. Malaysia needs to import more from India considering the presently wide range of manufactured as well as tradition products from India. Indian investors and businesses need to reciprocate by increasing their economic activities in Malaysia and their involvement in the IT and related sectors is one way to improve the balance of trade. The Malaysian Indian community should look into good investment opportunities in Tamil Nadu as the government is providing various incentives for export-related manufacturing for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and larger firms. Alternatively, joint ventures between India and Malaysia need to be increased .This will also help redress the gap between imports and exports. Governments worldwide need to ensure that the balance of trade is fair and amicable for both sides and ensure that exploitative restrictions, over-regulation and domestic discrimination as well as unfair practices do not lead to countries reacting with higher tariffs and taxes. Trump's tariffs show how the US now unilaterally reacts to stop the disadvantages to the US economy. He has shown the way as to how to redress unfavourable trade balances with tariffs and other restrictions to save a country's economy. Tariffs will be a feature of the future with more nations feeling they are being exploited through unfair and discriminatory trade practices. Suffice to say, the days of unrestricted open markets are officially over. ‒ July 22, 2025 V. Thomas is a Focus Malaysia viewer. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: AFP/Andrew Hanik


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
GM's core profit slides in second quarter as Trump's tariffs bite
NEW YORK: General Motors' second-quarter core profit fell 32 per cent to US$3 billion on Tuesday, as the automaker continued to confront challenging tariff policies, which it said sapped US$1.1 billion from the results. The automaker's revenue in the quarter ended June 30 fell nearly two per cent to about US$47 billion from a year ago. Its quarterly adjusted earnings per share fell to US$2.53 compared with US$3.06 a year earlier. Analysts on average expected the company to notch a quarterly adjusted profit of US$2.44 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. The largest US automaker by sales said it expects the tariff impact to worsen in the third quarter and stuck to a previous estimate that trade headwinds threaten to hit the bottom line by US$4 billion to US$5 billion. GM said it could take steps to mitigate at least 30 per cent of that impact. GM was among the many corporations to pull its annual guidance as it evaluated the impact of US President Donald Trump's tariffs, but eventually reinstated it to a lower annual adjusted core profit of between US$10 billion and US$12.5 billion.