The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights ARKK, WGMI, HYDR, URA and CHPS
Here are highlights from Monday's Analyst Blog:
Wall Street is set to wrap up one of the strongest monthly advances so far in 2025, fueled by optimism surrounding global trade and easing fears over tariffs. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite Index closed at an all-time high Friday, another milestone in the stock market's remarkable recovery from a springtime plunge caused by fears that the Trump administration's trade policies could harm the economy.
With just a day left to close the month, the S&P 500 has climbed 4.4%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq rose nearly 6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has also rallied 3.7% (read: S&P 500 ETFs to Tap as Market Optimism Builds Up?).
We have highlighted five top-performing ETFs from different industries that led the market higher in June.
The market's swift recovery this month reflects a renewed wave of investor optimism. The "Magnificent Seven" (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Tesla) regained lost ground, collectively adding $4.7 trillion in market cap since April. Additionally, the Fed kept interest rates steady at 4.25-4.50% on June 18, with more dovish signals from board members, fueling speculation of a cut as early as July.
Further, markets shrugged off geopolitical risks. Fears that the Israel-Iran conflict could disrupt global oil supply have subsided following a ceasefire. U.S.-Canada trade tensions eased as Canada removed a digital-services tax, resuming negotiations.
However, uncertainty still looms. A pause on retaliatory tariffs affecting a broad group of nations is set to expire in July. Failure to reach agreements can trigger a new round of tariffs, threatening market sentiment and consumer confidence.
Let us dig into the details of the above-mentioned ETFs:
ARK Innovation ETF – Up 24.6%
ARK Innovation ETF is an actively managed fund investing in companies that benefit from the development of products or services, technological improvements, and advancements in scientific research related to the areas of DNA technologies and genomic revolution, automation, robotics, energy storage, artificial intelligence, next generation Internet and Fintech innovation. In total, the fund holds 40 securities in its basket. ARK Innovation ETF has gathered $6.7 billion in its asset base and charges 75 bps in fees per year from investors. It trades in an average daily volume of 12 million shares (read: Cathie Wood's ARKK ETF Turns Red Hot in June: Here's Why).
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF – Up 23.3%
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF is an actively managed ETF that offers pure-play access to North America's leading Bitcoin mining industry, a crucial component of the Bitcoin ecosystem. It provides targeted exposure to the companies at the forefront of transaction verification, ensuring transparency and security on the blockchain. Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF holds 20 stocks in its basket, charging 75 bps in annual fees. It has amassed $155.4 million in its asset base while trading in an average daily volume of 612,000 shares.
Global X Hydrogen ETF – Up 19.9%
Global X Hydrogen ETF seeks to invest in companies that stand to benefit from the advancement of the global hydrogen industry. It tracks the Solactive Global Hydrogen Index, holding 25 stocks in its basket. American firms make up the largest allocation in the basket at 35.8%, while Britain and South Korea account for a 17% share each. Global X Hydrogen ETF has an AUM of $31.4 million and trades in an average daily volume of 17,000 shares. It charges 50 bps in annual fees.
Global X Uranium ETF – Up 19.6%
Global X Uranium ETF provides investors access to a broad range of companies involved in uranium mining and the production of nuclear components, including those in extraction, refining, exploration, or manufacturing of equipment for the uranium and nuclear industries. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index and holds 48 stocks in its basket.
Canadian firms make up the largest allocation in the basket at 38.2% while the United States accounts for a 20.8% share. Global X Uranium ETF has amassed $3.7 billion in its asset base and charges 69 bps in annual fees. It trades in an average daily volume of 5 million shares (read: Data Centers to Power Nuclear Energy and Uranium ETFs).
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF – Up 18.3%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF targets the semiconductor industry and seeks to track the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. It holds 54 stocks and charges 15 bps in annual fees. Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF has an AUM of $8.1 million and trades in an average daily volume of 1,000 shares.
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks' free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week.
Get it free >>
Media Contact
Zacks Investment Research
800-767-3771 ext. 9339
support@zacks.com
https://www.zacks.com
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Zacks Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. These returns are from hypothetical portfolios consisting of stocks with Zacks Rank = 1 that were rebalanced monthly with zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios of stocks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index. Visit https://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK): ETF Research Reports
Global X Uranium ETF (URA): ETF Research Reports
Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR): ETF Research Reports
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity Etf (CHPS): ETF Research Reports
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump plans to phase out FEMA. Here's what it could mean if you live in a floodplain
President Donald Trump announced plans June 10 to phase out FEMA, according to a report from Reuters. Here's what we know about FEMA: What does FEMA stand for? FEMA is the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the U.S. Why will President Donald Trump phase out FEMA? Is Trump ending FEMA after 2025 hurricane season? On June 10, Trump said he plans to start "phasing out" FEMA after the hurricane season, according to the Reuters report. The president noted states would receive less federal aid to respond to natural disasters. "We're going to give out less money," Trump said. "We're going to give it out directly. It'll be from thepresident's office. We'll have somebody here, could be Homeland Security." FEMA currently oversees the distribution of financial aid to states following a president's declaration of a disaster. State governors are being encouraged to work together in response to natural disasters, according to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. She believes that FEMA "fundamentally needs to go away as itexists." "We're building communication and mutual aid agreements among states … so that they can stand on their own two feet with the federal government coming in catastrophic circumstances with funding," Noem said. When is the 2025 hurricane season in the US? When is Trump phasing out FEMA? The hurricane season officially started in the U.S. on June 1 and runs through Nov. 30. This season is expected to generate as many as 10 hurricanes, according to a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecast last month. What is FEMA? FEMA exists to help people "before, during and after disasters," according to The agency's core values can be found at: 'We Are FEMA' or Publication One (Pub 1). How did FEMA start? President Jimmy Carter officially created FEMA in 1979 through an executive order, according to FEMA became part of the Department of Homeland Security on March 1, 2003, and has roots dating back to 1803. What is the maximum FEMA payout in 2025? FEMA may help pay for costs insurance doesn't cover up to a maximum award amount. In 2025, the maximum amounts are $43,600 for "housing assistance" and $43,600 for "other needs," according to FEMA. How Trump's decision to end FEMA could impact you Flooding causes more destruction in the United States than any other form of severe weather. It can happen anywhere, whether you live in a coastal Florida city or in the Midwest. In the past 10 years, damage from flooding has averaged $46 billion per year, according to a report by the Congressional Budget Office, which estimates the cost will increase by as much as a third in 2050 because of climate change. It's unclear exactly how Trump's plan to end FEMA would impact the Midwest. But the decision to give out fewer federal dollars could affect the amount of money struggling homeowners receive and how quickly that money is dispersed after a severe weather event. Others are reading: Map shows where anti-ICE, Trump protests have occurred around the US What's my risk of flooding? How much risk you have for flooding depends on where you live and how often floods occur. To understand your risk, it's recommended you learn whether you live in a floodplain. FEMA flood maps: Find out if you live in a floodplain in Indiana Visit to find out how often floods happen in your area. Use tools, maps and past claims data to understand your flood risk and make informed decisions to stay safe. To see if your home is situated on a floodplain, visit and enter your address at: Reuters reporter Nathan Layne contributed to this article. Chris Sims is a digital content producer for Midwest Connect Gannett. Follow him on Twitter: @ChrisFSims.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Suozzi says Mamdani ‘tapped into the same thing' as Trump
Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), a moderate Democrat, said President Trump and Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani 'tapped into the same thing' that catapulted their respective underdog campaigns to victory. In an interview on CBS News's 'Face the Nation,' Suozzi noted that both Trump and Mamdani, a democratic socialist who officially clinched the New York City mayoral nomination last week, focused their campaigns on affordability. 'I disagree with Mr. Mamdani. I have to make that very clear that, you know, I'm a democratic capitalist. I'm not a democratic socialist,' Suozzi said. 'But you have to recognize that he tapped into something,' he continued. 'He tapped into the same thing that Donald Trump tapped into, which is that people are concerned that the economy is not working for them. Affordability and the economy is the number one issue in the country.' Suozzi said 'too often,' people perceive Democrats as prioritizing reproductive rights and LGBTQ protections over issues related to economic mobility and affordability. The former two issues are 'important issues,' Suozzi continued, 'but they're not the issues that people think about every night when they're lying in bed thinking about paying their bills or when they're talking about how they're going to send their kids to school.' Suozzi said Democrats can learn from Trump's and Mamdani's diagnoses of the problem — even if not their proposed solutions. 'Democrats have got to do a better job learning from both Trump and Mamdani, not with their solutions, which I think are wrong, but with the diagnosis of the problem — that we're frustrated, we're concerned.' 'Everybody in America — whether you're a right-wing conservative or a left-wing progressive — should believe that, in return for working hard, you make enough money so you can live a good life. You can buy a home, you can educate your children, you can pay for your health insurance, you can retire one day without being scared,' Suozzi said. 'People don't feel that currently, and we have to do a better job of communicating that,' he added.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's trade brinkmanship imperils market stability
As the United States and China inch toward formalizing the outcomes of their recent economic talks in London, markets are sending a clear signal: they want stability, not another season of tariff theatrics. Yet the Trump administration's renewed protectionist tilt, including the looming July 9 deadline for punitive tariffs, risks derailing a fragile recovery and undermining American economic resilience. The London meetings followed a call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, culminating in a framework that would resume China's rare earth exports and ease U.S. trade restrictions. It's an imperfect deal, but it reflects an important truth: Economic coercion has failed to deliver strategic outcomes. Markets, manufacturers and consumers are all still paying the price of the last trade war. Rare earths remain a critical node in this standoff. China refines nearly 80 percent of the global supply — inputs essential to American electric vehicles, semiconductors and defense technologies. When Beijing halted export approvals earlier this year, U.S. manufacturers faced mounting delays and soaring input costs. The reversal eases a significant bottleneck and offers inflation relief. In exchange, China will regain access to U.S. manufacturing inputs and regulatory clarity — a win for both sides, but especially for U.S. firms squeezed by global supply chain frictions. Rare-earth dynamics further reinforce the stakes. China's June 26 pledge to resume rare-earth shipments to the U.S. triggered a sharp rally in domestic producers. Meanwhile, export volumes from China had fallen nearly 50 percent year-over-year in May, citing tightened controls. Those disruptions directly impacted U.S. electric makers and aerospace supply chains. In this context, the tentative deal on rare-earths licensing isn't a niche victory — it's a strategic pivot that underscores: markets reward policy clarity, even in geopolitically charged commodity markets. Yet the calm is temporary. Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff framework proposes up to 50 percent duties on countries that fail to sign new bilateral deals by July 9. A 90-day grace period has been offered, but this is brinkmanship disguised as strategy. And if the deadline passes without a broader deal, the tariffs snap back — with potentially damaging ripple effects. The last trade escalation offers a cautionary tale. Tariffs on Chinese goods hit 145 percent; Beijing responded with levies up to 125 percent. American manufacturers endured record costs, while exporters in both countries lost access to reliable markets. The U.S. goods trade deficit with China didn't shrink — it widened to $396 billion in 2024. Meanwhile, American farmers faced oversupply, and consumers bore the burden through higher prices. U.S. equities have responded to this nascent trade detente with enthusiasm. The S&P 500 ETF recently hit $615, brushing off earlier tariff jitters. Meanwhile, traders have rotated into commodities, with copper futures climbing nearly 3 percent in late June, reflecting expectations of stronger industrial demand under clearer supply logistics. Even gold has softened from conflict-driven highs. Markets are signaling that certainty matters — not tariff theatrics. The contrast is clear: a modest trade framework sparks calm; tariff threats inject volatility. That is the heartbeat investors care about. The global spillover from trade tensions was immediate. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank and International Monetary Fund all downgraded growth forecasts, citing the uncertainty created by revived trade barriers. Investor sentiment plunged. Only now, as trade talks signal détente, has the S&P 500 rallied and oil futures stabilized. Markets know the difference between real strategy and performative populism. So do the businesses that depend on open trade. Trump's tariffs didn't reshore factories or rebalance the trade deficit. What they did do was erode U.S. credibility with allies, invite World Trade Organization scrutiny and distort global supply chains. If the objective was to discipline China's behavior, the evidence shows failure. What has worked — albeit modestly — is targeted cooperation, regulatory certainty and consistent enforcement of existing rules. The current agreement is a pragmatic step forward. It restores supply chain continuity for U.S. firms, removes ambiguity for global investors, and signals that economic diplomacy still matters. It also nudges U.S. trade policy back toward rational engagement after years of unilateral theatrics. Legal uncertainty still clouds the picture. A recent federal court ruling in V.O.S. Selections v. United States raises questions about whether the White House even has the authority to implement broad-based tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. If the decision is upheld, it will undercut the legal rationale for Trump's tariff agenda — and perhaps prompt overdue congressional clarity on trade powers. The broader lesson is clear: economic interdependence isn't weakness — it's leverage. The U.S. and China will remain strategic competitors, but durable competition requires rules, not impulsive penalty regimes that backfire on domestic producers. If this new framework holds, it won't mark the end of rivalry — but it could mark the beginning of a more coherent doctrine of economic statecraft. One that recognizes that markets punish uncertainty, and that protectionism is not a patriotic virtue but an economic deadweight. For now, Washington would do well to recognize what the S&P already has: stability is strength. And the best way to keep markets calm is not through tariffs — but through smart, disciplined diplomacy. Imran Khalid is a physician and has a master's degree in international relations.