Historical mortgage rates: How do they compare to current rates?
But for those still on the fence about buying a home, you're probably wondering — is it the right time to buy a house? Or should you wait until rates are lower? And do historical mortgage rates shed light on what's to come?
The short answer to all of these questions: It depends. However, steep mortgage rates may not be a deal breaker if your finances are solid and you can afford the payments on a new home loan. Furthermore, there's no crystal ball to show how rates will move. Still, understanding trends can help you make a more informed decision on when to buy a home — and maybe lift a weight off your shoulders when you realize that, historically speaking, today's mortgage interest rates aren't as high as you might think.
This embedded content is not available in your region.
In this article:
History of home interest rates
Historical mortgage rate trends
1970s
1980s
1990s
Mortgage rates in the 2000s
2000s
2010s
2020s
Factors that impact mortgage rates
Mortgage rates and the housing market
Mortgage rates and refinancing
The bottom line: How current mortgage rates compare to historical ones
FAQs
Congress established Freddie Mac in 1970 to expand the secondary mortgage market. Freddie Mac began tracking rates in April 1971.
The average annual rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage reached its highest point at 16.64% in 1981 and dropped to a historic low of 2.96% in 2021. At the time of publication, the average rate sits in the mid-to-high 6% range.
Here's a closer look at home interest rates over time.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 7.38%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 11.20%
Rates rose steadily from the mid-7% range to roughly 9% in the 1970s. Buyers saw a significant jump to over 11% by the decade's end. The Great Inflation caused the incline, a period marked by record-high inflation. It spanned from the mid-1960s to the early 1980s and was triggered by the Fed's monetary expansionary policies implemented during this period.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 10.19%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 16.64%
The upward trend continued into the 1980s, and average mortgage rates reached an all-time high of 16.64% in 1981. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) issued an oil embargo against the U.S. in the 1970s, and in response, the Fed slashed and increased short-term rates many times throughout the 80s. By the mid-1980s, the average rate started to drop and closed out at 10.32%
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 6.94%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 10.13%
Home buyers got a bit of relief in the 1990s. Mortgage rates cooled to just below 7% in 1998, then rose slightly to an average of 7.44% in 1999. Borrowers could thank the dot-com bubble and the rise of the internet for the dip in rates. More specifically, investors moved away from tech stocks and toward bonds and other fixed-income investments, pushing mortgage rates down.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 5.04%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 8.05%
Mortgage rates peaked at 8.05% in the early 2000s before dropping to 5.04% by 2009. The culprits were the economic crash and subsequent Great Recession. Both stemmed from astronomical growth in the housing market, mainly due to the influx of subprime borrowers.
The mortgage payments became too much for these borrowers to handle. Many found themselves underwater on mortgage loans, and the housing market eventually crashed. A wave of foreclosures followed, prompting the Fed to cut rates and stabilize the market. This is the perfect example of the general rule that mortgage rates decrease when the economy struggles.
Learn more: When will the housing market crash again?
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 3.65%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 4.69%
Mortgage rates remained low this decade. They temporarily reversed course in 2014 and again in 2018, with average rates at 4.17% and 4.54%, respectively — still four times lower than the all-time high. The decade ended with an average slightly below 4%.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 2.96%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 6.81%
The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in record-low rates, largely due to the Federal Reserve cutting the federal funds rate to make borrowing attractive again. Unfortunately, these enticing rates were short-lived, as the Fed followed up its actions with several rate hikes between March 2022 and July 2023.
Rate hikes made home loans more expensive. The average spiked to 5.54% in 2022, followed by another increase to 6.81% in 2023. A rate cut in September 2024 caused the rate to dip to 6.72% that year.
Despite these changes in recent years, rates haven't returned to their pre-pandemic levels and are among the highest since 2002.
Mortgage rates can fluctuate daily. Multiple factors affect mortgage interest rates, and here are some of the most common:
Federal funds rate: Mortgage rates typically increase when the Fed rate increases and decrease when the Fed rate decreases.
10-year Treasury yield: Because mortgages are longer-term loans, their rates follow the 10-year Treasury yield's movements even more than shorter-term yields (like the fed funds rate).
Inflation: You'll usually see mortgage rates increase when inflation rises more aggressively than economists expect.
Global events: Investors' perceptions of events like the U.S. presidential election or tariffs imposed on other countries can impact home loan rates either way.
Economic conditions: Mortgage interest rates tend to increase when the economy thrives and decrease when the economy struggles.
Job market: Since the job market is part of the overall economy, rates tend to increase when the job market is doing well.
Home-buyer demand: The more demand in the housing market, the higher the rates.
These are factors you can't control. However, a mortgage lender may give you a better interest rate if your personal finances are strong.
A mortgage lender's advertised rate may not be the one you receive. It depends on several personal factors, including your credit score, down payment, debt-to-income (DTI) ratio, and cash reserves (if applicable). Loan type also plays a role in the mortgage rate you're offered. For example, VA loans often have lower interest rates than conventional loans.
Read more: The best mortgage lenders for first-time home buyers
When rates are low, homeownership becomes more attractive, driving up demand. Home prices also follow suit as more prospective buyers hit the market.
Still, lower borrowing costs mean access to more buyer power and lower monthly mortgage payments. Keep in mind that the lowest mortgage rates are generally reserved for well-qualified borrowers with strong credit scores.
Refinancing a mortgage makes sense when rates drop, but only if you qualify for a better deal. It isn't a hard-and-fast rule, but many say you should consider refinancing if you can secure a rate reduction of at least 1%. If you plan to move soon, though, the costs of refinancing could outweigh the long-term benefits.
Mortgage rates fluctuate with economic conditions, and there's no surefire way to time the market or predict when rates will shift. Ideally, you want to purchase when rates are low to keep borrowing costs in check. However, buying a home is not necessarily a bad idea when rates are higher if your finances are in solid shape.
Current rates haven't returned to the pre-pandemic levels. Still, they remain well below the record highs in the late 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. And if you decide to buy a home before rates drop, refinancing into a lower rate later is always an option — provided your finances are up to par.
Learn more: 6 times when it makes sense to refinance your mortgage
This embedded content is not available in your region.
Inflation and Fed rate hikes in recent years have kept mortgage rates elevated. However, even though mortgage rates may seem very high, they're low compared to the rates from the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s.
As of April 2025, the average mortgage rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan is in the mid-to-high 6% range. Any rate around or below this number could be considered 'good.'
It's impossible to predict future mortgage trends with certainty. But if mortgage rates were to drop below 3% again, it would likely result from a major economic event, like the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to Freddie Mac, the lowest average weekly rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage was 2.65% in 2021 due to a Fed rate cut prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The cut was made to address economic uncertainty and persuade consumers to increase spending and borrowing levels, aiming to stimulate the economy.
This article was edited by Laura Grace Tarpley.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
20 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Senator says U.S. tariffs from Trump White House damaging for Washington state
Opponents from Washington state of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats against Canada are vowing to fight, saying the ongoing trade war has delivered a heavy blow to American border communities. In a conference call led by Democrat U.S. Senator Patty Murray that included British Columbia Premier David Eby, Murray said regions such as Whatcom County bordering Canada get about 12 per cent of taxable retail income from Canadian consumers. Murray said the drop in Canadian tourists visiting her state has also resulted in economic uncertainty among ferry operators and in Point Roberts, where residents cannot access the U.S. mainland without travelling through Canada. Eby said it is difficult to continue asking British Columbians to keep their money in Canada but the U.S. boycotts are necessary in the trade war despite circumstances being 'miserable' on both sides of the border. Earlier this week, Eby responded to statements by the U.S. Ambassador to Canada who called Canadians mean and nasty over their travel and alcohol boycott, saying Canadians would be 'proud' to be considered mean for standing up for their sovereignty. Edmund Schweitzer, founder of Washington-based digital device maker Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, said during the conference call that his company is predicting the tariffs will cost it US$100 million in 'unanticipated federal taxes.' Schweitzer said that means each of the 7,000 employees who co-own the company will take a financial hit of US$14,000 from the tariffs. 'President Trump seems to have created the 51st state that he was talking about, which is the great state of uncertainty,' he said Wednesday. 'And this is affecting all of us.' Murray said she is working in the U.S. Congress to bring Democrats and Republicans to join in the fight to wrestle back the power to set tariffs from the White House and urges other Americans to join the cause. 'Who is responsible for this, and we all need to remember this, is the president of the United States who started this,' Murray said. 'We are raising our voices to say, 'Enough is enough … stop this.' B.C. is among several Canadian provinces that banned the sale of U.S. alcohol from government-run stores after the trade war began, and industry groups say such sales in Canada have fallen sharply in March and April. Statistics Canada figures show the number of Canadians returning home by car from south of the border fell to just over 33 per cent in June compared with the same period last year, and return trips by air fell to just over 22 per cent during the same period. 'No one wants this,' Murray said of the falling numbers and economic uncertainty. 'We did not ask for this. It's been imposed on us. And I think that the premier is making it clear he has to make it painful for the United States. 'That doesn't change our relationship with British Columbia. We've always been friends, allies. We have had challenges in the past, but we talk to each other. We work through it, and that's what we both want at the end of this.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 23, 2025.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's Fed battle is not like his other political tussles
President Trump is once again floating the idea of firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, ostensibly in objection to excessively high interest rates. But this debate is not about monetary policy. It's a power play aimed at subordinating America's central bank to the fiscal needs of the executive branch and Congress. In other words, we have a textbook case of 'fiscal dominance' on our hands — and that always ends poorly. I'm no cheerleader for Powell. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he enthusiastically backed every stimulus package, regardless of size or purpose, as if these involved no trade-offs. Where were the calls for 'Fed independence' then? And where were the calls for fiscal restraint after the emergency was over? Powell failed to anticipate the worst inflation in four decades and repeated for far too long the absurd claim that it was 'transitory' even as mounting evidence showed otherwise. He blamed supply-side disruptions long after ports had reopened and goods were moving. And as inflation was taking a stubborn hold, Powell delayed raising interest rates — possibly to shield the Biden administration from the fiscal fallout of the debt it was piling on — well past the point when monetary tightening was needed. If this weren't the world of government, where failure can be rewarded — and if there had been a more obvious alternative — Powell wouldn't have been invited back for another term. But he was. And so Trump's pressure campaign to prematurely end Powell's tenure is dangerous. I get why with budget deficits exploding and debt-service costs surging, the president wants lower interest rates. That would make the cost of his own fiscal agenda appear more tolerable. Trump likely believes he's justified because he believes that his tax cuts and deregulation are about to spur huge economic growth. To be sure, some growth will result, though the effects of deregulation will take a while to arrive. But gains could be swamped by the negative consequences of Trump's tariffs and erratic tariff threats. No matter what, the new growth won't lead to enough new tax revenue to escape the need for the government to borrow more. And the more the government borrows, the more intense the pressure on interest rates. One thing is for sure: The pressure Trump and his people are exerting on the Fed is a push for fiscal dominance. The executive branch wants to use the central bank as a tool to accommodate the government's frenzy of reckless borrowing. Such political control of a central bank is a hallmark of failed monetary systems in weak institutional settings. History shows where that always leads: to inflation, economic stagnation and financial instability. So far, Powell is resisting cutting rates, hence the barrage of insults and threat of firing. But now is not the right time to play with fire. Bond yields surged last year as investors reckoned with the scale of U.S. borrowing. They crossed the 5% threshold again recently. Moody's even stripped the government of its prized AAA credit rating. Lower interest rates from the Fed — especially if seen as the result of raw political pressure — could further diminish the allure of U.S. Treasuries. While the Fed can temporally influence interest rates, especially in the short run, it cannot override long-term fears of inflation, economic sluggishness and political manipulation of monetary policy driven by unsustainable fiscal policy. That's where confidence matters, and confidence is eroding. This is why markets are demanding a premium for funds loaned to a government that is now $36 trillion in debt and shows no intention of slowing down. But it could get worse. If the average interest rate on U.S. debt climbs from 3.3% to 5%, interest payments alone could soar from $900 billion to $2 trillion annually. That would make debt service by far the single largest item in the federal budget — more than Medicare, Social Security, the military or any other program readers care about. And because much of this debt rolls over quickly, higher rates hit fast. At the end of the day, the bigger problem isn't Powell's monetary policy. It's the federal government's spending addiction. Trump's call to replace Powell with someone who will cut rates ignores the real math. Lower short-term interest rates will do only so much if looser monetary policy is perceived as a means of masking reckless budget deficits. That would make higher inflation a certainty, not merely a possibility. It might not arrive before the next election, but it will inevitably arrive. There is still time to avoid this cliff. Trump is right to worry about surging debt costs, but he's targeting a symptom. The solution isn't to fire Powell — it's to cure the underlying disease, which is excessive government spending. Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Bessent tamps down Powell threats
Bessent was asked on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' if the president should say he will let Powell finish his term to give certainty to the markets, after indications he would try to fire the head of the central bank have rattled them. The secretary pushed back on the question. 'I'm not sure where that question comes from, because President Trump has repeatedly said he's not going to fire Chair Powell,' Bessent said. 'He might like for him to resign, but he's not going to fire him. He's said that on numerous occasions. I think he may have even said it again yesterday.' The president said Tuesday he doesn't think Powell should resign before his term is up in May but bashed him for not lowering interest rates. 'I think he's doing a bad job, but he's going to be out soon anyway. In eight months, he'll be out,' the president said. When asked about the pressure campaign on the Fed chair to lower rates, Bessent said it is part of the role. 'I think anyone who goes into public service should expect pressure. I get pressure from the president, from the Congress, from constituents,' Bessent said.
