logo
India-Pakistan conflict claims an unlikely victim: Himalayan pink salt

India-Pakistan conflict claims an unlikely victim: Himalayan pink salt

Al Jazeera09-06-2025
For the past three decades, Vipan Kumar has been importing Himalayan pink salt from Pakistan to sell in India.
The 50-year-old trader who is based in Amritsar in Punjab, the spiritual hub of Sikhs in India, told Al Jazeera that the recent blanket ban on trade between the two countries following the massacre of 26 people, mostly Indian tourists, at Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir in April has brought that trade to a screeching halt after New Delhi banned imports of all Pakistani goods, including those routed through third countries.
Kumar says he typically sold 2,000 to 2,500 tonnes of pink salt a quarter. 'The profit margin is very thin, but still the business is feasible because of the bulk sales. But the ban has completely halted the pink salt business. We don't know when the situation would turn normal,' he told Al Jazeera.
The Himalayan Pink Salt has a pinkish tint due to a trace of minerals, including iron, and is used in cooking, decorative lamps and spa treatments. Hindus also prefer to use this salt during their religious fasts as it is a non-marine salt.
The Himalayan pink salt is mined at the Khewra Salt Mine in the Punjab province of Pakistan, the second largest salt mine in the world after Sifto Salt Mine in Ontario, Canada, and located about 250 kilometres (155 miles) from the city of Lahore, which also at times lends its name to the pink salt – Lahori namak, which is Hindi for salt.
The salt mine contains about 82 million metric tonnes of salt, and 0.36 million metric tonnes is extracted every year. About 70 percent of the salt is used for industrial purposes, and the rest for edible use.
'The mine is very scenic and attracts several thousand tourists every year,' Fahad Ali, a journalist who lives close to the mine, told Al Jazeera.
It has approximately 30 salt processing units where the huge rock salt boulders are hand-mined and loaded on trucks before being dispatched, he said.
The salt is exported in a raw form to India, where importers process, grind and pack it for sale.
India mostly depends on Pakistan for this pink salt.
But after the Pahalgam massacre, India announced an end to all trade with Pakistan, which reciprocated the ban. The halt in trade was one of a series of diplomatic and economic tit-for-tat measures the neighbours took against each other before engaging in an intense four-day exchange of missiles and drones that took them to the cusp of a full-fledged war. On May 10, they stepped back from the brink, agreeing to a truce. However, the trade ban remains in place.
Salt traders in India told Al Jazeera that the current pause in imports has started to hamper their business as prices are starting to rise.
'It has been barely over a month since the announcement of the ban, and prices have already gone up,' said Gurveen Singh, an Amritsar-based trader, who blamed traders with existing stocks for selling them at higher prices.
'The salt which was sold in the retail market for 45 rupees to 50 rupees per kilogramme [$0.53-$0.58] before the ban is now being sold for at least 60 rupees per kilogramme [$0.70],' Singh said.
In some places, the price is even higher. In Kolkata this week, pink salt was being sold in markets for between 70 rupees and 80 rupees per kilogramme [$0.82-$0.93].
'We have no idea when the situation would return to normal. There would be complete crisis once the stocks get exhausted,' he said.
The rates, however, go up even more on the other side of India in the east due to the transportation cost incurred to send the salt from Amritsar.
Traders in Kolkata told Al Jazeera that the prices of the salt have gone up by 15-20 percent in the city, but that has not hampered demand as yet.
'The Himalayan rock salt remains in huge demand across the year, especially during festivals when people remain on fast and prefer the pink salt over the marine salt that is produced in India,' said Sanjay Agarwal, a manager in a private firm that deals in pink salt.
Dinobondhu Mukherjee, a salt trader in Kolkata, said that the government should look for an alternative country to procure this salt. 'The relations between the two countries are usually strained, and that affects the trade. Our government should look for alternative countries to procure the salt so that the supply chain is never disrupted,' Mukherjee told Al Jazeera.
Pakistani exporters, however, said that the Indian ban would have a 'positive impact' on their trade. Indian traders, they said, brand their salt as their own to sell in the international market at higher prices.
'The recent ban would help us to expand further as it would wipe off the competition from India,' Faizan Panjwani, chief operating officer of Karachi-based RM Salt, told Al Jazeera.
'Undoubtedly, India is a big market and has a lot of potential, but we want to send the salt by doing value addition and not in raw form. Our salt is already in huge demand globally,' he said.
Trade between the two countries has been decreasing since the 2019 attack on security forces in Pulwama in Indian-administered Kashmir in which 40 security personnel were killed. In response, India revoked the non-discriminatory market status – better known as Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status – that it had granted to Pakistan. It also imposed heavy tariffs of 200 percent on imports from Pakistan.
According to India's Ministry of Commerce, the country's exports to Pakistan from April 2024 to January 2025 stood at $447.7m, while Pakistan's exports to India during the same period were a paltry $420,000.
In 2024, India imported about 642 metric tonnes of pink salt, which was far lower than the 74,457 metric tonnes imported in 2018 – largely as a result of the high tariffs.
Prior to the latest ban, India's major exports to Pakistan included cotton, organic chemicals, spices, food products, pharmaceuticals, plastic articles, and dairy products. India normally imports copper articles, raw cotton, fruits, salt, minerals and some speciality chemicals from Pakistan.
'The implementation of the heavy duty had raised the import price of the salt from 3.50 rupees [$0.041] per kilogramme to 24.50 rupees [$0.29] per kilogramme in 2019, even though the salt was being routed from the third country like Dubai,' trader Kumar told Al Jazeera.
'Still, it had not impacted our business as the demand was too high, and buyers were ready to pay the price. But the government, this time, has also prohibited the entry of Pakistani goods from any third country, which has brought the supply to a complete standstill,' he said.
One unusual industry that is being hurt by the ban – lamps made from the Himalayan pink rock salt that are used as decorative lights and even tout unproven claims of being air purifiers.
'We have to look for an alternative country if the supply of rock salt doesn't come from Pakistan,' said Global Aroma founder Deep, who uses a single name. 'The prices of the lamps had already increased after the imposition of a 200 percent tariff in 2019, and the procurement from any other country will lead to further escalation of cost.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In South Korea, Trump's tariff threats place US love affair under strain
In South Korea, Trump's tariff threats place US love affair under strain

Al Jazeera

time10 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

In South Korea, Trump's tariff threats place US love affair under strain

Seoul, South Korea – When Sideny Sim had a chance to visit the United States on business several years ago, it was the fulfilment of a lifelong dream. Like many South Koreans, Sim had long admired the US as a cultural juggernaut and positive force in the world. These days, Sim, a 38-year-old engineer living near Seoul, feels no such love towards the country. As US President Donald Trump threatens to impose a 25 percent tariff on South Korea from August 1, Sim cannot help but feel betrayed. 'If they used to be a country that was known to be a leader in culture, the economy and the perception of being 'good,' I feel like the US is now a threat to geopolitical balance,' Sim told Al Jazeera. South Korea and the US share deep and enduring ties. South Korea is one of Washington's closest allies in Asia, hosting about 28,000 US troops as a bulwark against North Korea. The US is home to a larger South Korean diaspora than any other country. But with the return of Trump's 'America First' agenda to Washington, DC, those ties are coming under strain. In a Pew Research Center survey released earlier this month, 61 percent of South Koreans expressed a favourable view of the US, down from 77 percent in 2024. Like dozens of other US trading partners, South Korea is facing severe economic disruption if it cannot reach a trade deal with the Trump administration by the August deadline. The Asian country, which is a major producer of electronics, ships and cars, generates more than 40 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) from exports. In addition to sending a letter to South Korean President Lee Jae-Myung outlining his tariff threats, Trump earlier this month also claimed that Seoul pays 'very little' to support the presence of US Forces Korea (USFK). Trump's comments reinforced speculation that he could demand that the South Korean government increase its national defence spending or contributions to the costs of the USFK. After Trump last week told reporters that South Korea 'wants to make a deal right now,' Seoul's top trade envoy said that an 'in-principle' agreement was possible by the deadline. With the clock ticking on a deal, the uncertainty created by Trump's trade policies has stirred resentment among many South Koreans. Kim Hyunju, a customer service agent working in Seoul, said that although her company would not be directly affected by the tariffs, Trump's trade salvoes did not seem fair. 'It would only be fair if they are OK with us raising our tariffs to the same level as well,' Kim told Al Jazeera, adding that the Trump administration's actions had caused her to feel animosity towards the US. 'I can't help but see the US as a powerful nation which fulfils its interests with money and sheer power plays,' Kim said. 'I've always thought of the US as a friendly ally that is special to us, especially in terms of national defence. I know it is good for us to maintain this friendly status, but I sort of lost faith when Trump also demanded a larger amount of money for the US military presence in our country.' Kim Chang-chul, an investment strategist in Seoul, expressed a more sanguine view of Trump's trade policies, even while acknowledging the harm they could do to South Korean businesses. 'The US tariff policy is a burden for our government and businesses, but the move really shows the depth of US decision-making and strategy,' Kim told Al Jazeera. 'Trump wants South Korea to be more involved in the US's energy ambitions in Alaska. It's part of the US pushing for geopolitical realignment and economic rebalancing.' Earlier this year, the US held talks with South Korean officials about boosting US exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to South Korea, a major LNG importer. Keum Hye-yoon, a researcher at the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), said it has been difficult for a US ally like South Korea to make sense of Trump's comments and actions. 'When Trump cites 'fairness' in his tariff policy, it's based on unilateral expectations of improving the US trade balance or restoring economic strength to certain industries,' Keum told Al Jazeera. 'As allies like South Korea share supply chains with the US and work closely with its companies, disregarding these structures and imposing high taxes will likely create burdens on US businesses and consumers as well.' While Trump's most severe tariffs have yet to come into effect, South Korean manufacturers have already reported some disruption. South Korea's exports dropped 2.2 percent in the first 20 days of July compared with a year earlier, according to preliminary data released by Korea Customs Service on Monday. Kim Sung-hyeok, the head of research at the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) Labour Institute, said exporters in the auto, steel, semiconductor and pharmaceutical sectors had been especially affected. 'As exports in these fields decreased considerably since the tariff announcements, production orders in domestic factories have declined,' Kim told Al Jazeera. 'Some automotive and steel production lines have closed temporarily, while other manufacturing sites have closed altogether. Voluntary resignations and redeployments have become rampant in some of these workplaces.' Kim said small companies may face the brunt of the tariffs as they are not capable of 'moving their manufacturing plants to the US', or 'diversifying their trade avenues outside of the US'. 'And as major companies face a general decline in exports, these small companies will consequently face a shortage in product delivery volume that will cause employment disputes,' he said. The Korea Development Institute estimated in May that the number of employed South Koreans would increase by just 90,000 this year, in part due to the economic uncertainties, compared with a rise of 160,000 last year. Even before Trump's arrival on the political scene, US-South Korea relations had gone through difficult periods in the past. In 2002, two South Korean middle-school girls were killed when they were struck by a US Army armoured vehicle. After the American soldiers involved in the incident were found not guilty of negligent homicide by a US military court, the country saw an explosion in anti-US sentiment and nationwide protests. In 2008, nationwide protests took place after the South Korean government decided to continue importing US beef despite concerns about the risk of Mad Cow Disease. More recently, President Lee, who was elected in June, has emphasised the importance of maintaining positive relations with China, Washington's biggest strategic rival and competitor. The KIEP's Keum said the US-South Korea relationship has evolved into a partnership where the US has become a 'conditional ally', where 'economic interests take precedence over traditional alliance'. 'The US is increasingly demanding South Korea to cooperate in its containment strategy of China among its other socioeconomic policies,' she said. Keum said that South Korea will need to seek out alternative markets and diversify its exports to mitigate the fallout of Trump's agenda. 'South Korea also doesn't need to act alone. The country can seek joint action with countries such as EU members, Japan and Canada to come up with joint responses to the current predicament,' she said.

Tesla finally parks in India. But can it survive the tariff war?
Tesla finally parks in India. But can it survive the tariff war?

Al Jazeera

time3 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

Tesla finally parks in India. But can it survive the tariff war?

New Delhi, India – Tesla is finally cruising in India, the world's third-largest car market, with the launch of its Model Y. The rollout marks the culmination of a decade-long, topsy-turvy journey. Showcased at its new showroom in Mumbai, India's financial capital, on Tuesday, Tesla's Model Y is now on sale for about $70,000, a price comparatively higher than in any other major market. Elon Musk's electric vehicle (EV) company is braving high tariffs and stiff competition in India's nascent but rapidly expanding EV market. As New Delhi negotiates a trade deal with the United States, India's car sector tariffs, arguably among the highest in the world, are a central topic. 'Tesla's entry into India marks a significant expansion of the company's global footprint,' said Kwan Wongwetsawat, a senior auto analyst at the research firm GlobalData. 'Before this decision, Tesla faced several market challenges,' he said, ranging from geopolitical concerns, a decline in global sales, and an uncertain launch schedule for a new compact model. So, what's the buzz about Tesla coming to India? Can it leverage the developing Indian market? And can India give a shoulder to Musk's EV giant as its global sales plummet? What is Tesla offering in India? To start with, in India, Tesla has chosen to offer its Model Y in the mid-range luxury segment, combining its hallmark features: minimalist design, high performance, and long-range driving distance. The driver-assistance technology is available as an add-on for 600,000 Indian rupees, or $7,000. Tesla is offering two variants of Model Y in India: the rear-wheel drive (RWD) and the long-range RWD edition. While the RWD has a range of up to 500 kilometres (310 miles) on a single charge, the long-range variant has a range of 622km (386 miles). In the Indian market, the Model Y will go head-to-head with other premium electric SUVs, such as the Mercedes-Benz EQB, BMW iX1, Volvo EC40, and Kia EV6. Tesla offers a four-year, or 80,000km, vehicle warranty for the battery and drive unit, whichever comes first. 'Tesla is the biggest EV company in the world, and its entry in India is a big milestone for the national EV industry,' said Puneet Gupta, who leads the India and Southeast Asia teams at automotive intelligence firm S&P Global Mobility. 'It's not just about selling cars in India. But Tesla's entry can help India to build the EV ecosystem,' Gupta told Al Jazeera. 'And the biggest impact of a company like Tesla is that it boosts people's confidence in EVs as a category.' The Model Y reaches a top speed of 201km/h (125mph), with six coloured exterior finishes. It is equipped with standard features such as automatic emergency braking, forward collision alerts, blind spot monitoring, and lane departure warnings. Tesla's signature Dashcam and Sentry Mode provide real-time recording and alerts for suspicious activity, even when the vehicle is parked. Why is Tesla so expensive in India? Tesla's Model Y rear-wheel drive is priced at 6 million Indian rupees, or $70,000, while the long-range RWD edition is priced at about 6.8 million Indian rupees, or just below $80,000. Tesla's website does not provide the price breakdown, including delineating the additional import tariff costs and levies imposed by a state. These prices for Model Y are higher than in any other major car market. They start at $44,990 in the United States, $36,700 in China, and $53,700 in Germany. India currently imposes one of the highest import duty tariffs on fully built cars in the world, significantly shooting up prices of foreign vehicles, including EVs like those from Tesla. Until recently, India imposed a 110 percent import duty on all fully built vehicles. The Indian government revised this policy, lowering the import duty to 15 percent for carmakers committing to invest and set up local manufacturing facilities within a three-year timeframe. This steep tariff structure has been a point of contention for global carmakers like Tesla, which has long lobbied for a reduction in duties to test market viability before committing to local manufacturing. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised and called out India as a 'tariff king'. Both countries continue to negotiate a trade agreement, where the auto sector reportedly remains a central focus. Musk, Tesla's CEO, has also noted that 'import duties [in India] are the highest in the world by far of any large country!' What is India's EV sector like? India has set a national goal of achieving 30 percent EV adoption by 2030. While electric car sales in India increased by 20 percent in 2024 from the year before, EVs still represented just 2.5 percent of the total 4.3 million passenger vehicles sold. Despite its relatively small base, the EV sector in India is projected to grow rapidly, from its current market value of $54.41bn to $111bn by 2029. Currently, local manufacturers dominate the space, offering competitively priced EVs tailored to India's cost-conscious consumers. Tata leads with approximately 60 percent of the market share in the electric car segment, followed by JSW MG Motor India – a collaboration between India's JSW Group and China's SAIC Motor – and then Mahindra & Mahindra. High-end electric cars, priced above $20,000, made up a minuscule 6.6 percent of total EV sales last year. This is where Tesla will have to compete with the likes of Mercedes-Benz, BMW, KIA and Audi. How are Tesla sales faring in other markets? Tesla is coming to India as its EV sales plunge in global markets, and as the company bets on its revised Model Y to turn its fortunes around. In its home market, the US, sales continued to fall in the second quarter of 2025 by 6.3 percent, marking Tesla's third straight quarterly drop in year-over-year domestic sales. Facing protests against Musk's politics and earlier involvement with the Trump administration, sales have fallen for five straight months in Europe. With some consumers switching to cheaper Chinese EVs, Tesla's market share has dropped to just 1.2 percent in May from 1.8 percent a year ago. In China, Tesla's second-biggest market, the Q2 deliveries fell by nearly 12 percent. 'Tesla has been facing tough times globally, so the company also desperately wants new markets, and India, being the world's third-largest market, is a great opportunity for them to make up for some loss,' said Gupta of S&P Global Mobility. In several countries, Tesla's Chinese competitors are outselling Musk's EVs. And that's where the vast Indian market comes into the equation for Tesla, noted experts. Due to geopolitical tensions between India and China, rival Asian neighbours, only a few Chinese EVs are pitching to the Indian market. In 2023, the Indian government rejected BYD's proposal to establish a $1bn factory locally. While SAIC Motor operates in India in collaboration with India's JSW Group, BYD relies on importing multiple models. 'BYD is a direct competitor to Tesla, but the brand is also facing challenges in India and has yet to establish local production in the country,' said Wongwetsat. As a result, he added that both Tesla's prices in India and those of BYD are higher than in other markets. 'However, there is a clear price distinction between Tesla and local competitors like Tata, MG, and Mahindra,' placing Musk's company in the luxury segment. Unlike other Chinese-dominated EV markets in Asia, India offers a rather open market for Tesla to introduce high-end features and build an ecosystem from the ground up. 'The Chinese companies are not comfortable investing in India, and even Indian consumers are not comfortable buying Chinese due to the uncertain geopolitical situation,' said Gupta. 'For now, the Indian market's positioning is a very good advantage for Tesla, where you really don't get competition from Chinese, which is really killing Tesla both in terms of price and features,' Gupta told Al Jazeera. What challenges does Tesla face in India? For starters, India, which has the world's biggest population, is a starkly unequal country, where 90 percent of the population does not have discretionary spending capacity. Tesla's base offering is priced at $70,000, where, on a national average, per capita income is $2,880. Another concern is that India's infrastructure, including the condition of its roads and poor traffic discipline, could pose challenges for Tesla vehicles' lower ground clearance. India has only one charging station for every 235 EVs, with a total of 26,367 public charging stations nationwide for its 1.46 billion people. In contrast, the US has more than 61,000 charging stations for its 330 million people. At its media-only launch in Mumbai on Tuesday, Isabel Fan, Tesla's regional director, said, 'We are here to create the ecosystem, to invest in the necessary infrastructure, including the charging infrastructure.' Tesla announced that it will set up four charging stations in Mumbai. More will come to Delhi soon. 'We are building from 0 to 100. It will take time to cover the whole country,' Fan said. Reading into the Indian EV market, Wongwetsat of GlobalData said that 'Tesla's arrival may not significantly impact overall battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales in India, but it could attract demand from consumers interested in luxury brands like BMW and Audi.' Additionally, the launch of Tesla cars in India may be just one aspect of Tesla's broader ecosystem, Wongwetsat said, which includes sectors such as solar energy, energy storage systems, and even the space industry, all of which could enhance Tesla's appeal. Will Tesla lose subsidies in the US? Musk and the US president's apparent public fallout took a sharp turn earlier this month as Trump threatened to cut off billions in federal environmental subsidies that have benefitted Tesla and Musk's other companies. The clash follows Musk's renewed criticism of Trump's tax and spending bill, which includes provisions to eliminate key clean energy incentives – specifically, the $7,500 consumer tax credit for electric vehicles that has long supported Tesla's market growth. Trump, responding to Musk's criticism, warned that the Tesla CEO could 'lose a lot more' than just EV incentives. The dispute has broader implications. Musk has threatened to fund campaigns against lawmakers who back the bill and even floated the idea of launching a new political party.

India's ban on Jane Street raises concerns over regulator role
India's ban on Jane Street raises concerns over regulator role

Al Jazeera

time3 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

India's ban on Jane Street raises concerns over regulator role

Indian tax authorities and market regulator are considering widening their probe of United States trading giant Jane Street Group to investigate it for tax evasion in addition to an earlier charge of price rigging in the Bombay Stock Exchange's benchmark Sensex, according to media reports. The tax evasion charge comes on the heels of market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), seizing 48.43 billion rupees ($570m) and banning four Jane Street-related entities from operating in the market for alleged price manipulation in the National Stock Exchange (NSE). SEBI's order has roiled the Indian markets, raising questions about regulator surveillance and investor protection in the world's largest options trading market. Trading in India's weekly equity index options has slumped by a third on the ban on Jane Street, the Reuters news agency reported on Thursday. Trading of equity options lets investors buy or sell a stock at a predetermined price and date. As the Indian market rapidly grew to handle more than half of all global options trades, retail investors entered the market too. Questions of price manipulation have dogged this rapid rise but remained vacuous until a New York court case in April 2024, where Jane Street alleged that its rival, Millennium Partners, had stolen its algorithms that helped it make in the Indian options market. A whistleblower, Mayank Bansal, then made presentations to SEBI showing Jane Street's trading patterns. Bansal had agreed to speak to Al Jazeera about his interaction with SEBI on the matter, but then backtracked. On July 3, in a detailed interim order, the regulator said that 'by preponderance of probability, there is no economic rationale that can account for this sudden burst of large and aggressive activity … other than the intent to manipulate the price of securities and index benchmark'. SEBI has alleged that Jane Street accumulated large long positions in stocks that are a part of the NSE's Bank Index and built large short positions in index options at the start of trade. Around market closing time, it would reverse its trades in the cash and futures segments, pushing down the index and earning large profits in the options segment. This activity was blurred by its offshore entities making some of these trades. 'Lawyers [can] push back with SEBI on jurisdiction-related issues, but when underlying [Indian] securities are issued, SEBI can take action,' Joby Mathew, managing partner at the law firm Joby Mathew and Associates and a former legal officer at SEBI, told Al Jazeera. Jane Street has disputed SEBI's findings and has hired lawyers to represent it before SEBI in the case. It has deposited the 48.43 billion rupees ($563m) of allegedly ill-gotten gains in an account pending the investigation and final report. 'Such processes typically take eight to 24 months,' especially in 'complex manipulation cases', Sumit Agarwal, a former SEBI officer and cofounder of Regstreet Law Advisors, told Al Jazeera in an emailed response. But the investigation can only be part of a broader questioning of Jane Street and the regulator's role in identifying and curbing such trades sooner and protecting retail investors. 'Highly speculative and volatile' As India's options market grew, retail investors were drawn to it, enticed by the growing volumes, the prospect of quick gains and less fettered trades than the equities market, where a rapidly rising stock could hit circuit breakers, leading to a halt in trading to prevent manipulation. Mathew says his clients from the options trading segment range from students to award-winning cardiologists who may not have a refined knowledge of the market but were sold on the idea by traders or social media influencers. Most ended up losing money. Deven Choksey, managing director at the Mumbai-based stock brokerage KR Choksey Shares and Securities, says retail investors form nearly half the Indian options market, while Jane Street and other sophisticated institutions form a little more. 'It's like a bullock cart facing a race car. Their meeting is bound to cause accidents.' If Jane Street is found to have manipulated the market, its earnings would have come through losses for retail investors. Bhargavi Zaveri, a financial regulations researcher formerly at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy and currently a doctoral researcher at the National University of Singapore, says retail investors have made losses in the options segment, but the total amount is not clear. Identifying and compensating investors can be hard in such cases. So even if the final order goes against Jane Street and the 48.43 billion rupees fine goes into an investor protection fund, it may be hard to distribute it onwards to retail investors who incurred losses. The best protection may be to stem irregular trades early, experts say. 'SEBI has a surveillance system and they can well monitor the markets in a timely way.,' says Choksey. SEBI's interim order is based on trades made by Jane Street between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2025, a period in which retail investors may have incurred substantial losses, going by SEBI's estimates. Regstreet's Agarwal says, 'SEBI's own 2024 consultations flagged expiry day options as highly speculative and volatile.' India has fortnightly expiry dates for options, which is when they have to be settled. That is when Jane Street allegedly manipulated prices. In a February 6 letter, SEBI told Jane Street, 'The above trading activity prima facie appears to be fraudulent and manipulative.' But it did not issue its order curbing Jane Street until July 3. SEBI's recent measures limiting weekly expiries, tightening spreads and higher margins 'reflect a push for greater protection' for retail investors, Agarwal says. But the best way to protect retail investors would be to have them trade separately from proprietary trading firms in the options segment, Choksey points out. 'India is unique … and in no market will you see so many retail investors. So, SEBI must create product differentiation by customer segment.' to protect retail investors Chiksey says. Challenges in proving manipulation In an internal email, Jane Street reportedly told employees it was using 'basic index arbitrage trading' and called SEBI's allegations 'extremely inflammatory'. It has hired Mumbai-based law firm, Khaitan and Co, to represent it before SEBI. Proving price manipulation involves showing intent, which can be hard, and experts are divided on whether a SEBI investigation will be able to demonstrate that. 'Trading to incur losses makes no sense, and so it indicates manipulation,' says Mathew, the former legal officer. But NUS's Zaveri says it is not so clear. 'I think three problems are being conflated here. One, the size of the options segment being manifold the underlying cash segment. Two, that retail investors have made losses on the options segment, which I'm not sure have been quantified. Three, Jane Street arbitraged between an illiquid cash and highly liquid options segment.' According to her, the three occurrences may not prove the intent to manipulate. Under Indian law, proving manipulation is challenging and 'Jane Street can argue its expiry day trades were legitimate index arbitrage recognised by regulators, making a manipulation finding difficult without clear intent evidence,' Regstreet's Agarwal says. Any action by SEBI could affect Jane Street's reputation. Last month, an investigation by Bloomberg found that Jane Street cofounder Robert Granieri was duped into funding weapons for an attempted coup to overthrow the government in South Sudan. If SEBI's final order lays out any action against Jane Street, 'they may well have to disclose it in their filings, which will affect them elsewhere in the world', says Mathew.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store