Norris gets to 'live that feeling' of being Silverstone winner
Norris might end up with a second scar on his nose, to match one caused by a glass cut last year, after a photographer fell off the pit-wall barriers and knocked the McLaren driver's winner's trophy into his face as he was trying to celebrate his Silverstone victory with the fans.
Advertisement
But a little while later he was up on the fan stage, two strips of medical tape on his injury, with team-mate Oscar Piastri and McLaren chief executive officer Zak Brown.
Norris did three 'shoeys', the celebration where a winner drinks champagne out of his shoe brought to Formula 1 from Australian sport by his former team-mate Daniel Ricciardo, and Piastri and Brown followed suit.
It was the least he - and they - deserved after a demanding, incident-packed, intensely difficult race in constantly changing conditions between wet and dry, which Piastri would have won but for a controversial penalty for what was adjudged a safety-car infringement.
Piastri will be stewing over that one for a while, but while Norris inherited the win, there was little to choose between them all weekend. And the Briton was pressing Piastri hard at the time the Australian pitted for tyres for the final time and served the penalty.
Advertisement
Both had driven exceptional races, in a different class to the rest of the field, in a car that looked as impressive as it has done all season.
"Eventful race," Norris, 25, said. "It means a huge amount. Being on top in your home race is very, very special."
Norris started watching F1, he said, when Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso were driving silver McLarens at Silverstone in 2007. He recalled that, as well as Hamilton's brilliant victory in the wet in 2008.
And now, with Hamilton and Alonso still in the field, Norris had taken his own win in a silver - well, partially, anyway, at least for this weekend - McLaren.
Advertisement
"Lewis won, and I got that picture of him going around and seeing all the fans standing up, and that picture of what an atmosphere in Silverstone is like, and dreamed of that for many, many years," Norris said.
"Today I got to live that feeling myself and see it through my own eyes. So pretty amazing, pretty special. A lot of people, from my friends and family, my brother, my sisters, my mom, my dad, my dad's parents.
"Every person that I could have here is here. So, yeah, more special than ever, 100%. And a tough race to do it in as well."
Lando Norris celebrates the win with his family at Silverstone [Getty Images]
The win reduced his deficit to Piastri in the championship to eight points, and it was the first time he has won two races in a row. But he was wary of talking about the meaning of it beyond itself.
Advertisement
"You can always class it as momentum or whatever," he said. "I don't know. It's whatever you want to believe in the end of the day. I think it's still just one race at a time.
"I give my credit to Oscar at the same time because he drove an extremely good race.
"It's two wins, but they've not come easy by any means. We've had good fights, but they're pretty strenuous, exhausting weekends because you're fighting for hundredths and thousandths [of a second], and you're fighting for perfection every session and I'm against some pretty good drivers. So, it takes a lot out of you, especially when you have a race like today.
"I've had two good weekends and, of course, I would love to continue that momentum, but it still requires more consistency. Two weekends doesn't mean anything otherwise. And I just need to keep it up and keep working hard."
Advertisement
Piastri penalty 'very harsh'
Oscar Piastri was given a 10-second penalty for erratic driving immediately before a restart [Getty Images]
The events of the day were demanding on everyone, but the way the race turned was, according to McLaren team principal Andrea Stella, "very harsh" on Piastri.
Piastri was penalised for braking hard in the middle of the straight as he prepared for the restart after the final one of three safety-car periods. This, in the stewards' view, "resulted in [Max Verstappen's Red Bull] having to take evasive action to avoid a collision".
Piastri was furious. But, wary of the stance the FIA is taking at the moment on drivers speaking out and not wanting to risk a further penalty or a fine, he kept his remarks well under control afterwards.
Advertisement
"Apparently you can't brake behind the safety car any more," he said. "I mean, I did it for five laps before that. Again, I'm not going say too much till I get myself in trouble."
Piastri was bemused by the penalty, because all drivers know the leader's actions dictate things for those behind in this sort of situation, even if there are rules to follow.
The issue seemed to be that he had driven in this way after the safety car had switched its lights off, the point at which the rules say he must "proceed at a pace which involved no erratic braking nor any other manoeuvre which is likely to endanger other drivers".
Piastri said: "I hit the brakes. At the same time I did that, the lights on the safety car went out, which was also extremely late. And then obviously, I didn't accelerate because I can control the pace from there.
Advertisement
"I didn't do anything differently to my first restart. I didn't go any slower. I can only comment on what I felt I did, which I felt was well within the rules, and I did it once already in that race. So, yeah. I don't really get it. I'll go have a look back."
The contrast to the outcome of a very similar incident in Canada two races ago between Mercedes' George Russell and Verstappen was notable.
In Montreal, after the stewards took no action, Red Bull lodged a protest, but it was dismissed out of hand.
Piastri said: "Going back to Canada, I think he had to evade more there than he did today. So, yeah, I'm a bit confused to say the least."
Advertisement
There was also the feeling within McLaren that Verstappen may have 'gamed' the system by exaggerating how much it affected him.
"I don't think he had to evade me," Piastri said. "I think he managed the first time."
Team principal Andrea Stella said: "We'll have to see also if other competitors kind of made the situation look worse than what it is.
"Because we know that as part of the race car, some competitors definitely there's also the ability to make others look like they are causing severe infringement when they are not."
Verstappen said: "The thing is that it happened to me now a few times, this kind of scenario. I just find it strange that suddenly now Oscar is the first one to receive 10 seconds first."
Advertisement
Was that because because there was no difference to what Russell did in Canada?
"Well, to the stewards, yes," Verstappen said.
The end result was that Norris has moved himself on to four wins for the season, one short of Piastri.
"I felt like I drove a really strong race," Piastri said. "Ultimately, when you don't get the result you think you deserve, it hurts, especially when it's not in your control.
"I will use the frustration to make sure I win some more races later."
Both have two weekends off to reset and refresh before battle recommences at the Belgian Grand Prix, the start of the second half of the season.
Advertisement
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sabrina Carpenter joined by Duran Duran for Hungry Like The Wolf performance at BST Hyde Park
Sabrina Carpenter was joined by Duran Duran for a surprise performance of Hungry Like The Wolf at her second BST Hyde Park gig. The Espresso hitmaker was accompanied by the 1980s icons for a rendition of the 1982 hit at her second headlining show in London on Sunday (06.07.25). Introducing the band as she was joined on stage by frontman Simon Le Bon and bass guitarist John Taylor, Sabrina said: "I also thought it might be fun if I brought out some friends of mine from the UK. I'm going to need you guys to put that howling to good use. But everybody please give it up and make so much noise for the legendary Duran Duran." Sabrina was also joined by Clairo on both of her BST Hyde Park dates over the weekend, with Beabadoobee performing on Saturday (05.07.25) and Olivia Dean taking to the stage on Sunday. Meanwhile, the 26-year-old singer revealed last month that she was considering banning phones from her gigs after being inspired by a Silk Sonic gig in Las Vegas where fans were unable to access their devices. Asked if she would consider making a similar move to Adele and Madonna, Sabrina told Rolling Stone magazine: "This will honestly p*** off my fans, but absolutely. 'Because I went to see Silk Sonic in Vegas, and they locked my phone. I've never had a better experience at a concert. "I genuinely felt like I was back in the '70s — wasn't alive. Genuinely felt like I was there. Everyone's singing, dancing, looking at each other, and laughing. It really, really just felt so beautiful." The Manchild artist explained that phones being held up at shows is something that "feels super normal" to her generation, although she is wary of people zooming in on her facial features when she gets older. Sabrina said: "I've grown up in the age of people having iPhones at shows. It unfortunately feels super normal to me. "I can't blame people for wanting to have memories. But depending on how long I want to be touring, and what age I am, girl, take those phones away. "You cannot zoom in on my face. Right now, my skin is soft and supple. It's fine. Do not zoom in on me when I'm 80 years old up there.'

Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fringe Festival critic gets his comeuppance in entertaining 'Bring the House Down'
Any profession can corrupt its practitioners — and arts critics are no exception. Are they enlightened standard-setters dragging us back from a cultural abyss — or deformed exiles from the arts who, with sharpened pens and bent backs, are ready to pounce on plot-holes and devour careers at a moment's notice? If Charlotte Runcie's debut novel, "Bring the House Down," is anything to go by, it's a bit of both. The book centers around four heady weeks at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival, which begins the unraveling of two newspaper critics who have traveled up from London to cover the sprawling performance art event. Runcie, a former arts columnist for the Daily Telegraph, has created something so delightfully snackable that you may, as I did, gulp it down in two or three sittings. Runcie's anti-hero is theater critic Alex Lyons. Alex gives everything he reviews either one star or five, and the latter are vanishingly rare. He bemoans a world of 'online shopping reviews,' where 'five stars has come to mean the baseline, rather than outstanding,' and so insists on panning almost everything he sees. What's bad for artists is good for him: His reviews become desperately sought-after career makers or breakers. 'The paper didn't allow Alex to award zero stars. Otherwise, he'd do it all the time.' We learn about Alex's story through our narrator Sophie Ridgen, his colleague who, despite being in her mid-30s like Alex, is on a very different track. Alex rose quickly through the newspaper's ranks, and his reviews are featured on the front page almost daily. Sophie continues to toil as a junior culture writer, picking up whatever scraps nobody else wants. Sophie is also a new mom, overworking to compensate for time lost to maternity leave. She feels uncomfortable in her post-pregnancy body, exhausted and frustrated with her husband. Alex, on the other hand, finds it 'embarrassingly easy' to get laid. But Alex's glory days are numbered. Early on at the Fringe, he sees a one-woman show that, unsurprisingly, he hates. He writes a review as devastating as it is personal (calling the star a 'dull, hectoring frump,' her voice a 'high-pitched whine'). All of this would be business as usual for Alex except for one problem: After quickly filing his review of the show, he bumps into Hayley Sinclair, its creator and star, in a bar. He takes her home and sleeps with her. He knew the one star was waiting for her; she did not. When she finds out, there is hell to pay. Hayley transforms her nightly show into the 'Alex Lyons Experience,' collecting testimony from his ex-girlfriends and lovers, or even those who have simply received bad reviews from him. Over the following weeks her show swells into a Greek chorus of one man's wrongs. The whole nation, including members of Parliament, have hot takes (the performance is livestreamed). It doesn't help his case that Alex is a bit of a nepo baby, as his mother Judith is an actor whose name would be recognized in most British households. Sophie, living with Alex in the company-rented flat, has a front row seat to his public unraveling. She watches the livestreams with guilty awe, stalks Alex and Hayley compulsively online, and feverishly scans social media for the latest gossip (Runcie is great at writing a fake mean Tweet/X dispatch). She starts missing calls with her husband and their toddler son, as she becomes fully obsessed with the drama unfolding in Edinburgh. As she continues to inhabit the same flat as her colleague, Sophie is increasingly questioned by others as to whose side she's on, Alex or Hayley's. For much of the book, she seems unable to make up her mind. She refuses to give up on Alex, and increasingly becomes his only source of companionship, which she can't help but find flattering. But she also finds herself sympathetic to and magnetized by Hayley, whose popularity is blossoming on the Fringe circuit and beyond. Read more: 10 books to read in July While Alex and Hayley both appear to possess other-worldly levels of charisma, one flaw with Runcie's novel is that this is something we are repeatedly told, rather than shown. Alex spends most of the book being condescending to Sophie, and yet she is transfixed by him. 'He had the strange ability to make you feel as if you were the only person who was in on a joke, the only person who understood some fundamental truth about the world that escaped other people.' This feels unsatisfyingly generic, like something you might find in an online wedding vows template. We are at least given more backstory and a more plausible explanation for Sophie's fascination with Alex: the ego trip. Having been dragged down by motherhood, a rocky marriage, and grief over the death of her own mother, Sophie enjoys Alex's increasing dependence on her, a lone rock of support amid an ocean of alienation. There is something undeniably delicious in watching someone you revere fall to their knees, and Sophie begins to see in Alex 'a tiny flickering of fear, at first only visible as a barely perceptible interruption to his arrogance, like a power cut that dims the lights for just a hundredth of a second.' Read more: In defense of criticism: A theater critic asks what good does it do in an upside-down world Hayley, unfortunately, never quite comes to life in the same way. And it remains unclear why her show, which is essentially a litany of (legitimate) complaints about a real-life terrible man with some added pyrotechnics, takes Edinburgh and the entire country by such storm. 'I find I can't explain why it had the effect that it did,' Sophie tells us. 'This wasn't theater, not really; it was a happening. The audience weren't spectators anymore, but a silent, connected web of righteous energy.' Without more to go on, we have no choice but to take her word for it. The result feels like a missed opportunity to interrogate some important questions. How much does the identity (gender, race, or class) of the critic matter when it comes to their ability to judge art? What about the identity of the artist themselves? In other words, who shall criticize the critics? Readers may leave Runcie's novel feeling that some of these questions go unanswered, but this deeply entertaining novel is nonetheless well worth the price of admission. Mills is a writer and human rights researcher who has worked for Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Wall Street Journal and Associated Press. She lives in New York. Get the latest book news, events and more in your inbox every Saturday. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Everton closing in on loan for England's Robinson
Everton are closing in on an agreement to sign England winger Katie Robinson on loan from Aston Villa this summer, with an option to buy clause. The deal is not yet finalised but all parties are confident of an agreement with Robinson planning to carry out a medical at Everton on Wednesday. Advertisement Robinson joined Villa on a free transfer from Brighton in 2024 and has a year remaining on her current contract. The 22-year-old was the youngest member of Sarina Wiegman's Lionesses squad that reached the Women's World Cup final in 2023. She made 16 appearances in all competitions for Villa last season but only started five matches under new manager Natalia Arroyo between January and May. Robinson impressed during her time at Brighton and is considered a young forward with high potential. Everton manager Brian Sorensen has worked with young English talent before, enjoying success with Chelsea's Aggie Beever-Jones and Manchester City's Jess Park in loan spells at the club. Advertisement The Toffees are ambitious in this summer's transfer window following the arrival of new owners The Friedkin Group and fresh investment. Head here to get involved