
US copper tariffs threat are met with shrugs, skepticism, though risks remain
US President Donald Trump 's declaration on Tuesday of the coming tariffs came before a study on their need had been released, and the commitment came with no details of whether any countries might be exempt.
On Wednesday, Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that the copper tariffs would take effect Aug. 1.
But while key details remain unknown, Canadian mining companies have so far said they don't expect to be affected because copper concentrates are shipped overseas, largely to China.
The raw resources are headed there because the country has built up massive smelting and fabricating operations, accounting for 75 per cent of added smelter capacity since 2000 and virtually all additions in the past five years, and 80 per cent on the fabrication side since 2019, according to Wood Mackenzie.
China's growing dominance in metal processing is exactly why the US has, even before Trump's second term, moved to try and encourage more domestic capacity.
The rush to impose steep tariffs immediately, even as capacity will take many years to develop, will mean US businesses and consumers will pay the price, said Michael Dobner, national leader of economics and policy practice at PwC Canada.
"What I expect is that most of that tariff will be paid by US companies who are buying that copper," he said in an interview.
Companies don't have much wiggle room on buying copper because it's so essential to many products, so they'll have to keep relying on imports, including from Canada, for some time, he said.
"I expect most of it will fall on US companies, and so the impact on Canada in the short term will not be significant."
Canadian aluminum producers have similarly been able to keep selling into the US despite high tariffs because US production capacity is so limited.
Steel producers in Canada however have been hit much harder because there was excess capacity in the US, said Dobner.
The prospects of US consumers getting hit with more costs because of Trump's policies raises the question of how viable they really are, and explains some of the muted market reaction, said Derek Holt, head of capital markets economics at Scotiabank.
"Markets may be waiting to see proof and even then waiting to see if the moves are durable, given Trump's well documented erratic ways," he said in a note.
"Simply put, markets have a tough time viewing his moves as credible," said Holt.
"There is no sensible rationale for these measures that American consumers and businesses will pay for."
Canadian exports of copper to the US totalled $5.7 billion in the 12 months through May, meaning a lighter potential impact than tariffs on steel and aluminum where Canada exported $34 billion worth of metal to the US, said BMO senior economist Robert Kavcic in a note.
Quebec would be most affected as it's where most exports originate as Canada's only copper smelter, owned by Glencore plc, is there, but there could be wider repercussions, he said.
"Bigger picture, even if a copper tariff would be relatively contained, it would be another shot that impacts business confidence more broadly."
The threat of tariffs has already driven up copper prices in the US, and because it's such a core metal to the economy, the higher prices themselves could hit wider economic growth, said Dobner.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
22 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Tariffs threaten Asian beauty product boom in US
NEW YORK (AP) — When Amrita Bhasin, 24, learned that products from South Korea might be subject to a new tax when they entered the United States, she decided to stock up on the sheet masks from Korean brands like U-Need and MediHeal she uses a few times a week. 'I did a recent haul to stockpile,' she said. 'I bought 50 in bulk, which should last me a few months.' South Korea is one of the countries that hopes to secure a trade deal before the Aug. 1 date President Donald Trump set for enforcing nation-specific tariffs. A not-insignificant slice of the U.S. population has skin in the game when it comes to Seoul avoiding a 25% duty on its exports. Asian skin care has been a booming global business for a more than a decade, with consumers in Europe, North and South America, and increasingly the Middle East, snapping up creams, serums and balms from South Korea, Japan and China. In the United States and elsewhere, Korean cosmetics, or K-beauty for short, have dominated the trend. A craze for all-in-one 'BB creams' — a combination of moisturizer, foundation and sunscreen — morphed into a fascination with 10-step rituals and ingredients like snail mucin, heartleaf and rice water. Vehicles and electronics may be South Korea's top exports to the U.S. by value, but the country shipped more skin care and cosmetics to the U.S. than any other last year, according to data from market research company Euromonitor. France, with storied beauty brands like L'Oreal and Chanel, was second, Euromonitor said. Statistics compiled by the U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent federal agency, show the U.S. imported $1.7 billion worth of South Korean cosmetics in 2024, a 54% increase from a year earlier. 'Korean beauty products not only add a lot of variety and choice for Americans, they really embraced them because they were offering something different for American consumers,' Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said. Along with media offerings such as 'Parasite' and 'Squid Games,' and the popularity of K-pop bands like BTS, K-beauty has helped boost South Korea's profile globally, she said. 'It's all part and parcel really of the same thing,' Lovely said. 'And it can't be completely stopped by a 25% tariff, but it's hard to see how it won't influence how much is sold in the U.S. And I think what we're hearing from producers is that it also really decreases the number of products they want to offer in this market.' Senti Senti, a retailer that sells international beauty products at two New York boutiques and through an e-commerce site, saw a bit of 'panic buying' by customers when Trump first imposed punitive tariffs on goods from specific countries, manager Winnie Zhong said. The rush slowed down after the president paused the new duties for 90 days and hasn't picked up again, Zhong said, even with Trump saying on July 7 that a 25% tax on imports from Japan and South Korea would go into effect on Aug. 1. Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia subsequently reached agreements with the Trump administration that lowered the tariff rates their exported goods faced — in Japan's case, from 25% to 15% — still higher than the current baseline of 10% tariff. But South Korea has yet to clinch an agreement, despite having a free trade agreement since 2012 that allowed cosmetics and most other consumer goods to enter the U.S. tax-free. Since the first store owned by Senti Senti opened 16 years ago, beauty products from Japan and South Korea became more of a focus and now account for 90% the stock. The business hasn't had to pass on any tariff-related costs to customers yet, but that won't be possible if the products are subject to a 25% import tax, Zhong said. 'I'm not really sure where the direction of K-beauty will go to with the tariffs in place, because one of the things with K-beauty or Asian beauty is that it's supposed to be accessible pricing,' she said. Devoted fans of Asian cosmetics will often buy direct from Asia and wait weeks for their packages to arrive because the products typically cost less than they do in American stores. Rather than stocking up on their favorite sunscreens, lip tints and toners, some shoppers are taking a pause due to the tariff uncertainty. Los Angeles resident Jen Chae, a content creator with over 1.2 million YouTube subscribers, has explored Korean and Japanese beauty products and became personally intrigued by Chinese beauty brands over the last year. When the tariffs were first announced, Chae temporarily paused ordering from sites such as a shopping platform owned by an e-commerce company based in Hong Kong. She did not know if she would have to pay customs duties on the products she bought or the ones brands sent to her as a creator. 'I wasn't sure if those would automatically charge the entire package with a blanket tariff cost, or if it was just on certain items,' Chae said. On its website, YesStyle says it will give customers store credit to reimburse them for import charges. At Ohlolly, an online store focused on Korean products, owners Sue Greene and Herra Namhie are taking a similar pause. They purchase direct from South Korea and from licensed wholesalers in the U.S., and store their inventory in a warehouse in Ontario, California. After years of no duties, a 25% import tax would create a 'huge increase in costs to us,' Namhie said. She and Greene made two recent orders to replenish their stock when the tariffs were at 10%. But they have put further restocks on hold 'because I don't think we can handle 25%,' Namhie said. They'd have to raise prices, and then shoppers might go elsewhere. The business owners and sisters are holding out on hope the U.S. and Korea settle on a lower tariff or carve out exceptions for smaller ticket items like beauty products. But they only have two to four months of inventory in their warehouse. They say that in a month they'll have to make a decision on what products to order, what to discontinue and what prices will have to increase. Rachel Weingarten, a former makeup artist who writes a daily beauty newsletter called 'Hello Gorgeous!,' said while she's devoted to K-beauty products like lip masks and toner pads, she doesn't think stockpiling is a sound practice. 'Maybe one or two products, but natural oils, vulnerable packaging and expiration dates mean that your products could go rancid before you can get to them,' she said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Weingarten said she'll still buy Korean products if prices go up, but that the beauty world is bigger than one country. 'I'd still indulge in my favorites, but am always looking for great products in general,' she said. Bhasin, in Menlo Park, California, plans to keep buying her face masks too, even if the price goes up, because she likes the quality of Korean masks. 'If prices will go up, I will not shift to U.S. products,' she said. 'For face masks, I feel there are not a ton of solid and reliable substitutes in the U.S.' ___ AP audience engagement editor Karena Phan in Los Angeles contributed to this report.


Globe and Mail
22 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
The state of Canadian tourism in the ‘elbows up' moment
Travel to the U.S. has plummeted ever since President Donald Trump started talking about annexing Canada and imposing tariffs on us. Politicians on this side of the border are embracing the moment, encouraging people to take trips closer to home. So how is it all working out for Canadian tourism? The Globe's Jason Kirby, who writes for the Report on Business, joins us to talk about what this summer looks like for Canada's travel sector. Questions? Comments? Ideas? Email us at thedecibel@

CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Trump respects strength': Ex-White House official says Canada must hold firm in trade talks
Canadian and American flags fly near the Ambassador Bridge at the Canada-USA border crossing in Windsor, Ont. on Saturday, March 21, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Rob Gurdebeke The United States has agreed on a trade framework with the European Union, but Canada is still without a deal and could face the threat of steep new U.S. tariffs as early as Friday. U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced an agreement Sunday that sets a 15 per cent tariff on most goods traded between the two economies. It is the latest in a series of agreements the U.S. has signed with allies including Japan, the U.K., and Vietnam. Canada, meanwhile, remains under the threat of 35 per cent tariffs on exports, if an agreement isn't reached by Trump's Aug. 1 deadline. The country is already facing U.S. levies on steel, aluminum, and automobiles. New tariffs on copper are expected to kick in next. Former White House official Larry Haas says Ottawa has reason to be concerned. 'The tone between the United States and Canada is a lot more negative than the tone seems to be between the United States and the EU,' Haas said during an interview with CTV News Channel on Sunday. 'I think both countries... are preparing for the very strong possibility that we're going to get tariffs.' Haas said the deadline could still shift, depending on economic signals. 'Trump has backed away from other deadlines when it came to tariffs,' he said. 'If we approach August 1 and these tariffs are looming, and the stock market all of a sudden becomes shaky, I could envision another extension.' Canada has taken steps to respond to U.S. pressure, including boosting border inspections and cancelling a digital services tax. Still, Haas says the Canadian government faces a difficult negotiating environment. 'President Trump respects strength as opposed to weakness,' he said. 'Canada needs to make clear to the United States that it's not going to take just any deal.' Haas said tariffs are not a 'formula for long-term economic growth,' but not 'Canadian officials or anyone else is going to talk President Trump out of his fondness for tariffs.'