logo
Funding uncertainty has MCHD in 'difficult financial straits'

Funding uncertainty has MCHD in 'difficult financial straits'

Yahoo03-06-2025
Jun. 2—MORGANTOWN — In the best of times, annual budgets are uncertain.
They're well-educated guesses — estimates, if you prefer the term.
You look at what you expect to get, weigh that against what you expect to spend — and hope nothing happens along the way that negatively skews either number beyond reconciliation.
But what if you have no real way of knowing what to expect ?
That's where leadership with the Monongalia County Health Department often is finding itself.
MCHD Executive Director Anthony DeFelice has estimated that up to 40 % of the health department's budget originates from federal sources.
As with most sectors dependent on federal dollars, there's considerable uncertainty in public health.
The MCHD launched into an unprecedented budgeting process knowing some of those dollars are secure, some have already been eliminated and some are complete unknowns.
"The IAP Grant is the immunization grant. It's just been a given every year that you're getting that. We've had no indication. They stopped the IAP grant and terminated it, " county Health Officer Dr. Brian Huggins said. "We don't know if the Vaccines for Children (Program) is going to exist next year. Those are significant funding sources that help pay for some of our nursing staff. With this budget, we didn't include them. If we get them, great. But we just don't know."
And that, DeFelice explained, is how MCHD is approaching this budgeting process. If leadership is confident the funds are secure, they're included. If there's any uncertainty, the dollars aren't being budgeted.
DeFelice described the process as "very thorough " and "very conservative."
Chief Financial Officer Devan Smith explained that the health department's program managers and executive team have gone meticulously through each line item in an effort to determine where reductions can be made.
Smith said budgeting in public health is already both art and science in that it often requires as much intuition as accounting.
"When you add in deep uncertainty about whether core functions of the organization will continue to be funded, it not only makes providing estimates difficult, but also means that you have to question what services will be kept or lost under different scenarios, " he said. "What made this budget year so hard for us was not the mechanical process of performing calculations or reviewing expenses. It was weighing the people element — -potential reductions in the services we are able to provide to families in our community or impacts to employees we have worked with for years that may no longer have a job."
Among the measures under consideration are fee increases. An initial example is a 10 % bump in fees for the health department's dental program. A review of if, where and when MCHD can continue to offer free and reduced-cost services is under consideration. The health department also plans to keep all vacant positions unfilled.
Further, some programming considered "enhanced " offerings — meaning beyond the core functions of environmental health, communicable disease, immunization, threat preparedness and community health promotion — are being scaled back as only core, or basic, functions are eligible for state and county support.
Huggins offered an example.
"The biggest thing that is changing is that our family planning clinic is going to go from five days a week down to a single day a week. The biggest reason for that is loss of funding streams that were supporting our basic services. Family planning is an enhanced service by state code. Family planning, unfortunately, loses money. It just does, " he said, explaining the program lost somewhere around $150, 000 in the 2025 fiscal year.
"There is potential with family planning that we may have to discontinue services completely if the funding stream stops. According to the DHHS budget that's been proposed by the administration, family planning is on the list of services that is to be eliminated — not moved to a different service, eliminated from funding. If that occurs, we'll look at everything we can because we realize, for a lot of people, this is a critical service."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. greenlights removing preservative from flu shots
RFK Jr. greenlights removing preservative from flu shots

Axios

time2 days ago

  • Axios

RFK Jr. greenlights removing preservative from flu shots

The Health and Human Services Department on Wednesday said it adopted a recommendation from Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vaccine advisers to remove from all influenza shots a preservative that anti-vaccine activists have suggested is linked to autism. Why it matters: The move hinged on the widely discredited belief that the mercury-containing compound, thimerosal, is harmful at the level at which it's included in vaccines. Despite the lack of evidence of harm, most Americans who get flu vaccines already receive products without thimerosal. The latest: Kennedy, in a statement, said the action fulfilled a promise to protect vulnerable populations from unnecessary mercury exposure. "Injecting any amount of mercury into children when safe, mercury-free alternatives exist defies common sense and public health responsibility," Kennedy said. "Today, we put safety first." The Centers for Disease Control customarily acts on such recommendations. But because the CDC lacks a full-time political leader, Kennedy signed the recommendation. HHS said that vaccine manufacturers confirmed that they have the capacity to replace multi-dose vials containing the preservative so that the federal Vaccines for Children program and adult vaccine supplies won't be interrupted. Kennedy's handpicked vaccine advisors voted 5-1 last month to no longer recommend that that Americans get flu shots containing thimerosal, following a presentation from a retired nurse and former president of Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine group with close ties to Kennedy.

Second round of county opioid grants announced
Second round of county opioid grants announced

Yahoo

time05-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Second round of county opioid grants announced

Jul. 4—MORGANTOWN — The Monongalia County Commission has concluded its second round of opioid grant funding, announcing seven awards totaling $454, 900. The funds being distributed are provided to the county annually as its cut of the "local government shares " of roughly $1 billion in opioid settlement dollars awarded to the state. Those local shares are provided to counties and municipalities for direct use, reimbursement of opioid abatement activities or, as in the county's case, suballocation. To date, the county has received a total of $1, 366, 277.79 in two installments—$1, 019, 972.52 on Jan. 12, 2024, and $346, 304 on Jan. 31. It's now approved the distribution of $1, 081, 800, leaving a balance of $284, 477.31. Commissioner Sean Sikora said the commission provided funds to each of the seven agencies that applied this year, though not necessarily the full request amount. "We had $757, 667 requested, and we approved $454, 900, which is about 60 % of what was requested, " he said. "But out of the seven, we approved at least part of all of them." The agencies receiving funding are:—Lauren's Wish Addiction Triage Center, $100, 000—Wise Path Recovery Center, $100, 000—Morgantown Area Youth Services Project, $60, 000—Jacob's Ladder Assistance Fund, $56, 200—Monongalia County Health Department, $55, 000—Mon EMS, $43, 700—Libera Inc., $40, 000 With the exception of Jacob's Ladder, each of the recipients also received grant funding from the county during its 2024 allocation. Last July, the commission distributed $626, 900 to 13 of the 18 agencies that applied. Of the opioid settlement funding coming to West Virginia, 72.5 % will be distributed as grants at the state level through the West Virginia First Foundation, 24.5 % goes to local governments and 3 % stays with the state. The West Virginia First Foundation has thus far completed one grant cycle, distributing nearly $17 million to 94 projects across West Virginia. Of that amount, roughly $3.4 million went to 21 recipients /projects in the 13-county Region 4, which includes Monongalia, Marion and Preston counties. In Monongalia County, a number of agencies have received grant awards from the West Virginia First Foundation and at least one allocation from the county. Those agencies, and total amount received, are:—Morgantown Sober Living, $440, 000—Lauren's Wish, $305, 850.71—Libera Inc., $228, 120.06—Monongalia County Health Department, $199, 528.17—Monongalia County Child Advocacy Center, $165, 620.70 Wise Path Recovery Center has received a total of $225, 000 in two county allocations. Morgantown Area Youth Services Project has received a total of $120, 000 in two county allocations.

‘I Never Want to See a Case of Polio, but I'm Very Fearful I Will'
‘I Never Want to See a Case of Polio, but I'm Very Fearful I Will'

New York Times

time04-07-2025

  • New York Times

‘I Never Want to See a Case of Polio, but I'm Very Fearful I Will'

Pediatricians like me come to our job with the conviction that children should not die — that whatever might hurt or kill them should be prevented, whether through car seat laws, safety tops on medication bottles, pediatric cancer research or, above all, routine vaccination. Now we're worried that vaccination will become less routine and less available. That the health care structure that keeps children safe may be under threat. That we will watch children suffer and even die, watch families grieve — and that part of the horror will be knowing that these were preventable diseases. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory group met last week — its first meeting since the health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., dismissed the panel's 17 experts and installed eight handpicked replacements, several with histories of vaccine skepticism. There, the panel, down to seven members after one withdrew, announced a review of the entire childhood vaccine schedule. That's scary. The recommendations of the panel, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, help determine what vaccines are provided at no cost for about half of American children through the Vaccines for Children Program and influence coverage by private insurers. If the committee turns science-based recommendations into wishy-washy talk-to-your-doctor suggestions or, worse, takes certain vaccines off the schedule, America risks unraveling the infrastructure that keeps children vaccinated and without polio, diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, measles, mumps, rubella, bacterial meningitis and all the other horrors. 'Every day I have at least one parent ask me, 'Are you still going to be able to give vaccines? Can I do something now in case they're not available later?'' said my colleague Dr. Jane Guttenberg, a pediatrician in New York City. Can we imagine a two-tiered system in which protection is available only to those with the means to pay hundreds of dollars for a vaccination? Can we imagine not giving a vaccine that a child needs? 'I've been thinking about that a lot,' said Dr. Sally Goza, a primary care pediatrician in suburban Georgia. 'Vaccines cost us money. I can't just give vaccines away. I wish I could.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store