Surge in number of Sassa beneficiaries cut off without explanation — Black Sash raises concern amid reviews
'We reject the notion that SMSs and bulk communication are sufficient or effective.
'Black Sash has consistently called Sassa out on its poor communication strategy and bulk communication in a short time does not address the issue of beneficiaries not receiving their grants within a reasonable time in a way that Sassa can constitute adequate notice confirming that the beneficiary has been informed. It is the state's duty to provide reliable, direct and accessible communication and not to shift the blame onto those who are most excluded from formal systems.'
The organisation called on Sassa to ensure fairness, transparency and dignity during the review process. It urged Sassa to pause the review process until effective, community-based communication strategies are in place.
'Black Sash does not oppose fair and lawful grant reviews. But a review process that results in confusion, exclusion and hunger without due process is not a review.
'While we appreciate the attempt to explain the legal framework and rationale behind the reviews, the reality for grant recipients on the ground tells a far more troubling story, one that cannot be brushed aside by semantics, administrative language or internal justifications.
'Social grants are not just a bureaucratic process, they are a lifeline, a constitutional right and a matter of life and dignity for millions. We urge Sassa to act swiftly and justly.'
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
21 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
‘Fortress Europe's' African victims
African refugees and migrants fleeing war and dictatorships in search of safety on European shores. (AFP) Europeans may be horrified by United States President Worse, the European Commission seeks to double down on this approach: a leaked proposal for the next long-term budget cycle calls for conditioning development aid for African countries on meeting migration-reduction targets. Africans comprise a fairly large share of the EU's irregular migrants, with West and Central African countries accounting for about a third of those arriving in the first half of 2024. At least 11 million African-born migrants live in Europe — more than double the number living in Asia and North America — where they boost the labour force and ease economic pressures caused by a rapidly aging local population. But many Europeans treat irregular migrants as a security threat, criminalising their entry and scapegoating them for broader societal problems. After millions of Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi refugees fled to the bloc in 2015-16, the EU began strengthening 'Fortress Europe'. Some countries, including Greece, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia, built external border fences, while others, like Germany and the Netherlands, have reintroduced border controls. Efforts to secure the bloc have included violent pushbacks against refugees and migrants at external borders — a violation of international human-rights law — and partnerships with third countries to curb flows. According to Amnesty International, the EU's externalisation policy, coupled with Italy and Malta's hostility to rescue ships, were responsible for 721 migrant deaths in the Mediterranean in June and July 2018. More recently, several European rescue organisations blamed the deaths of 3000 people in the Mediterranean in 2023 partly on an EU decree enacted that year that severely restricted their response capacity. There is a stark divide between how European and African governments view this issue. From Sweden and Poland to Italy and Germany, far-right parties have surged in popularity by stoking anti-immigrant sentiment, which has pushed many mainstream European politicians to embrace xenophobic policies. By contrast, African governments largely oppose the EU's forced return of migrants, for both humanitarian and economic reasons. African migrants are a vital source of remittances, sending back $100 billion in 2022 — more than the continent received in official development assistance and foreign direct investment combined. These governments are also quick to note that they bear the brunt of African migration: of the more than 45 million Africans forcibly displaced last year, 34.5 million remained in the continent. This does not absolve African governments of responsibility for their actions: poor governance, political exclusion and development failures have contributed to the migration surge. The lack of economic opportunities, in particular, has forced many young Africans to flee to wealthier countries. The continent has the world's youngest population, with 70% in sub-Saharan Africa under the age of 30. But instead of using its economic might to bolster growth and support job creation in Africa, the EU poured €500 million ($585 million) into its 2016 Migration Partnership Framework, a new way of working with source countries to reduce migration. The resulting partnerships with Ethiopia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria and Senegal subordinated development aid to migration goals. This heavy-handed approach, particularly the EU's obsession with negotiating the forced return of African migrants and pushing its own interests, failed to stem the flow of people, alienated African governments and undermined the bloc's human-rights and development principles. Now, the commission has its sights on hardening this negative-incentive structure and applying it more widely. Overall, migrant arrivals in the EU declined by about 20% in the first five months of 2025. But this decline came after years of human-rights abuses by the EU's third-country partners, which were effectively bribed to slow the movement of people. In 2024, the European Court of Auditors criticised the bloc's €5 billion Emergency Trust Fund for Africa for failing to address the human-rights risks involved in subcontracting migration policy to autocratic regimes in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. That same year, more than 2000 African migrants died while trying to reach Europe. The behaviour of these regimes is reprehensible. The Libyan coast guard has subjected African migrants to 'unimaginable horrors' — sexual violence, torture, arbitrary detention, beatings and enslavement. Tunisia's security forces have raped women, beaten children, dumped others in the desert and reportedly colluded with smugglers. Last year, a leaked internal report from the European External Action Service warned that continued support for Tunisia, which has cracked down hard on dissent, would damage the EU's reputation. The cruelty on display in the bloc is no less shocking. Frontex, the EU's border control agency, was reportedly involved in covering up hundreds of illegal pushbacks in the Aegean Sea. Polish border guards forced migrants back into Belarus, where they were beaten and raped. Last year, three Egyptian teenagers froze to death after Bulgarian officers reportedly obstructed their rescue near the Turkish border. Many Sudanese asylum seekers continue to be held illegally in Greek prisons. The EU's current approach is ineffective and inhumane; its proposal to use foreign aid as a stick is even more so. To address the source of African migration, European policymakers must understand why young people embark on this perilous journey. A 2019 report by the United Nations Development Programme, based on interviews with 1970 African migrants from 39 nations, conducted in 13 EU member states, found that they were typically educated above the average levels in their home countries and had held steady jobs there. But only 38% said they had earned enough 'to get by'. Unable to fulfill their ambitions in Africa, and with many facing war and repression, these young people looked to Europe for opportunity and safety. Reducing migration from Africa requires contributing generously to its development, not funding third countries — many of them ruled by repressive regimes — to harden borders by any means. The EU has cynically chosen the latter approach, eroding its moral standing. If the bloc wants to portray itself as a global force for good following the US's retreat from the world stage, it must pursue migration policies that reflect our shared humanity, rather than self-interest. Adekeye Adebajo, a professor and a senior research fellow at the University of Pretoria's Centre for the Advancement of Scholarship, served on UN missions in South Africa, Western Sahara and Iraq. He is the author of (Routledge, 2025) and (Routledge, 2024). This article was first published in .
Mail & Guardian
14 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
MPs recommend an ad hoc parliament committee to investigate Mkhwanazi's allegations
KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Parliament's justice and police committees have recommended the formation of an ad hoc committee to consider allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lieutenant-General During a joint sitting on Wednesday, committee members agreed that this was the most appropriate mechanism to consider Mkhwanazi's allegations that Mchunu pressured him to disband a unit investigating organised crime in KwaZulu-Natal. ActionSA MP 'This work must be wrapped up before the end of the year,' he said. National Assembly speaker Thoko Didiza had tasked the committees with determining how to handle Mkhwanazi's allegations earlier this month that political interference in police operations led to direct instructions to shut down investigations into high-level criminal activity in KwaZulu-Natal. Last year, Mkhwanzi told the Mail & Guardian that political interference remained one of the During Wednesday's joint sitting of the committees, parliament's legal team warned MPs that a full-scale inquiry by the legislature would probably replicate the work of the Legal adviser Andile Tetyana said parliament still had a constitutional obligation to exercise oversight but should do so through a streamlined, time-bound mechanism. He recommended the formation of an ad hoc committee under rule 253 of the National Assembly, which allows for temporary committees with a defined scope and duration. 'This is about accountability and improving police governance,' Tetyana told MPs. He said the ad hoc committee could look into several specific issues raised by Mkhwanazi, including the disbanding of the political killings task team, the alleged removal of 121 case dockets by the minister, leadership instability in crime intelligence and the overlap in roles of the South African Police Service and the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (Ipid). 'Parliament's control over the executive means influence, not direct power. It remains advice, not command; criticism, not obstruction,' Tetyana said. The committees considered three options: a full parliamentary inquiry; invoking rule 169 to allow committees to confer; or establishing a new ad hoc committee. The latter was favoured as the least likely to cause jurisdictional overlap and the fact that it could conclude its work within a specific timeframe. MPs also proposed that any interim reports produced by the presidential commission be made available to parliament to ensure coordination and oversight without interference. The committees are expected to meet again next week to finalise the draft terms of reference and reporting timelines for the ad hoc committee. A formal recommendation is expected to be tabled in the National Assembly next Wednesday. This comes as the police service grapples with the continued fallout from Mkhwanazi's allegations. On Tuesday, national police commissioner Fannie Masemola confirmed that deputy commissioner for crime detection Shadrack Sibiya had been Both Mchunu and Sibiya have denied any wrongdoing. If the National Assembly approves the recommendation, the ad hoc committee will be empowered to summon witnesses, gather evidence, and deliver a report to parliament.
The Herald
14 hours ago
- The Herald
Ramaphosa threatened with legal action over failure to appoint NYDA board
'Nothing further is required of the president. Accordingly it is inexplicable how the appointment of the incoming board could have been so unreasonably delayed.' The foundation argued that Ramaphosa has to appoint this new board as the term of the interim board has not been extended beyond June 1, making its standing irregular and unlawful. One of the foundation's other concerns is that the chair of the interim board, Asanda Luwaca, has been appointed to the board of the National Skills Authority. 'The deputy executive chairperson (Karabo Mohale) has also recently been appointed to serve as the commissioner of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa — a role which is full-time in its nature. Again, this exacerbates the leadership deficit facing the agency,' it said in the letter to Ramaphosa. 'Thulisa Ndlela, who forms part of the interim board, is also above the age of the 35, which is the threshold of youth. This is quite concerning in that the youth of South Africa and their interests cannot be championed by those who do not fall within the youth bracket.' TimesLIVE
