Jeffrey Kitingan denies involvement in Sabah mining scandal, vows legal action over RM1.78m payout claim
KOTA KINABALU, June 30 — Sabah Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Seri Jeffrey Kitingan has denied claims that he received RM1.78 million linked to a mining scandal in Sabah.
He said the allegation, published by a news portal, was baseless and politically motivated by his critics in an attempt to destabilise, smear and topple the current Sabah government, Berita Harian reported today.
'I have never received any funds related to mining applications or any alleged scandal,' he was quoted as saying.
He described the allegation as a fabrication by desperate political players trying to interfere with Sabah politics.
'This is a tactic that has been used since the 1960s,' he said.
Kitingan, who is also Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku (STAR) president, said his party has never applied for any mining licence nor was it involved in any mining activities.
He described himself as a supporter of the Nature Conservation Agreement (NCA), adding that mining goes against STAR's conservation stance.
Kitingan said he and party members are fully cooperating with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and have submitted detailed statements to aid its investigations.
'This is the price we pay in our struggle to reclaim Sabah's rights,' he was quoted as saying.
Kitingan also claimed that earlier statements by whistleblowers had cleared STAR and Parti Bersatu Sabah of wrongdoing.
As such, he said he will take all available legal action over what he described as malicious and false accusations.
This includes legal action against the news portal that published the report.
'We expect more false allegations and slander.
'It would not be surprising if certain parties try to exploit this to shift Sabah's political landscape,' he was quoted as saying.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court to hear case that could upend campaign finance coordination rules
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a Republican-led challenge to campaign finance limits on coordinated spending between candidates and political parties, potentially blowing up the money-in-politics landscape ahead of the 2026 midterms. A ruling in favor of the Republican plaintiffs would deliver the GOP's biggest campaign-finance win since the landmark 2010 Citizens United case, fundamentally changing how party committees spend tens of millions of dollars every election cycle, particularly on TV advertising. A GOP victory could allow party groups to pour unlimited amounts into ads in competitive races across the country, making it easier for campaigns to benefit from that spending. Republicans' top congressional campaign committees — the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee — brought the case with then-Sen. JD Vance in 2023, arguing that federal law limiting coordination between candidates and political parties violates the First Amendment. The Supreme Court's decision to take up the case after the conservative 6th Circuit upheld the spending limits suggests the court is considering reversing decades-old precedent. And it comes after the Justice Department took the unusual step last month of choosing not to defend the constitutionality of the law and encouraging the high court to rule. 'In the Department's view, the challenged provision violates political parties' and candidates' core First Amendment rights under the Court's recent precedents on campaign-finance restrictions,' Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in a June letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson. Party committees can currently coordinate with candidates for between $63,600 and $127,200 in spending for House races, and $127,200 to $3,946,100 for Senate races, depending on the size of the district or state. Those funds often go to purchasing television ads, which are cheaper when bought in concert with a campaign than entirely by outside groups. If the limits on coordinated spending are overturned, party groups would dramatically accelerate their purchase of ad time. Democrats oppose the effort to overturn the limits, warning that doing so would cede political power to large donors. That would advantage Republicans, who generally rely less on small-donor fundraising. While individual donors can only give up to $3,500 to a campaign per election, they can send donations up to $44,300 per year to national party committees. The NRSC and NRCC hailed the court's decision to hear the case during its next term this fall. "The government should not restrict a party committee's support for its own candidates," Sen. Tim Scott and Rep. Richard Hudson — the chairs of the committees — said in a joint statement. 'Coordinated spending continues to be a critical part of winning campaigns, and the NRSC and NRCC will ensure we are in the strongest possible position to win in 2026 and beyond." The court on Monday also allowed the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to join the case in opposition to the GOP. Those groups sought to intervene after the Justice Department declined to defend the law, and the Justice Department and the Republican plaintiffs told the court they did not mind the intervention. A victory for Republicans in this case is far from guaranteed, and some legal experts have already argued there's plenty of precedent to counter the core argument. They point to a 2001 Supreme Court ruling in which the court found 'little evidence to suggest that coordinated party spending limits adopted by Congress have frustrated the ability of political parties to exercise their First Amendment rights to support their candidates." But the ideological makeup of the court was much different that year, and in that ruling, Justice Clarence Thomas — the only justice still serving from that time — dissented. 'This provision sweeps too broadly, interferes with the party-candidate relationship, and has not been proved necessary to combat corruption,' Thomas wrote at the time.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Celebrates Civil War Win by Threatening Entire GOP
Donald Trump is once again reminding Republicans where disloyalty gets you. The president celebrated on Sunday night shortly after GOP Senator Thom Tillis announced he would not seek re-election next year. A day earlier, the North Carolina Republican had voted against advancing Trump's signature spending package—the so-called 'big, beautiful bill'—incurring the president's wrath. Trump quickly slammed Tillis in Truth Social posts and threatened to back a primary challenger. 'Great News! 'Senator' Thom Tillis will not be seeking reelection," Trump wrote on Truth Social after Tillis bowed out. In a follow-up post, Trump suggested that Republicans who oppose his legislative priorities could pay a political price. 'For all cost cutting Republicans, of which I am one, REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected,' he wrote. Tillis, 64, responded on X with some politely delivered snark. 'Thanks for the retirement wishes, Mr. President, looking forward to working with you for a successful 2026,' he wrote. 'Word to the wise, let's avoid minisoldr,' he added, sharing a September 2024 article about Trump's support for then-North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson. Robinson, the GOP nominee for governor, lost the race after a scandal involving comments he allegedly posted on a porn forum under the screen name 'minisoldr.' In Tillis' earlier announcement, he said it had become 'increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species.' He said he was not eager to spend another six years 'navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington,' and would prefer to spend more time with family. He intends to continue serving North Carolina for the next 18 months 'without the distraction of raising money or campaigning,' and with the 'pure freedom to call the balls and strikes as I see fit,' he said. Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law, is among the names being floated as a contender to replace him, a source close to the Trump family told NBC News. Tillis is not the first GOP lawmaker Trump has threatened to primary in recent weeks. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky is being targeted by a new pro-Trump super PAC that seeks to unseat him next year, after he voted against the bill in the House and criticized Trump's strikes on Iran. The version of the spending bill that the Senate moved forward with on Saturday would add nearly $3.3 trillion to the national debt over a decade, according to an estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. That's nearly $1 trillion more than the earlier iteration passed by the House. The package includes sweeping tax cuts, increased spending on defense and anti-immigration initiatives, and rollbacks to social programs like Medicaid. The CBO analysis also found that close to 12 million Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill was passed. Tillis had said the Senate version of the bill 'contains significant changes to Medicaid that would be devastating to North Carolina, and I cannot support it.' He was one of two Senate Republicans to join Democrats in opposing the bill in a 51–49 procedural vote to advance it. The bill now proceeds to full Senate debate, with Republicans aiming to send it to Trump's desk by July 4 following final House approval. In a Sunday evening post, Trump encouraged Senate Republicans to overrule the chamber's parliamentarian—a nonpartisan official who interprets Senate rules—in order to pass key components of his bill. Democrat Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, slammed the legislation as debate began on Sunday. 'Republicans are about to pass the single most expensive bill in U.S. history, to give tax breaks to billionaires while taking away Medicaid, SNAP benefits and good paying jobs for millions of people,' Schumer said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Leaving Trump's side didn't make Elon Musk much more popular
Recent polls show Elon Musk's favorability declined with Republicans after feuding with Donald Trump. Musk's overall favorability already had sustained significant hits during his time in the White House. The billionaire's struggles come during a critical time for Tesla. Elon Musk's image isn't what it used to be. The Tesla CEO's feud with President Donald Trump risked worsening his already underwater popularity, and new polling shows that even the apparent peace between the once-friends hasn't repaired Musk's standing with Republicans. A new Morning Consult poll found that Musk's net favorability is at -14 percentage points. The good news for the billionaire is that his overall standing as of June 20 is up four points since June 15, the week after the peak of his feud with Trump. It's still lower than where he stood when he left the White House in late May. Among Republicans, Musk is down roughly 12 points; he'd dropped 10 points immediately after he criticized Trump in early June. "In the US, Musk managed to alienate both those on the left (due to his support for DOGE, the Trump administration, and the election) and those on the right (as seen in his statements on X following his fallout with the President over the "big beautiful bill")," Frank T. Rothaermel, a regents' professor at the Scheller College of Business at Georgia Tech, told Business Insider in an email. "The good thing in the US is that people's memories are short and a ton of stuff is happening every day," he added. Voters began to become increasingly polarized toward Musk after his takeover of Twitter, Morning Consult US Politics Analyst Eli Yokley told Business Insider. Musk's closeness to Trump "poured fuel on the fire," which left his image in a much different state than some of his fellow tech moguls, who also sought to curry favor with the White House. "It weighs on him in a very unique way that other CEOs who have tried to kiss the ring a bit just haven't experienced to the same extent," Yokley told Business Insider. Musk's favorability isn't polled as frequently as someone like Trump. YouGov, which has sporadic data on Musk going back to 2018, found that immediately after the feud, Musk recorded his lowest net favorability in its records. The handful of post-feud polls that have been released show similar warning signs. Namely, many Republicans, who were once the bulwark for Musk's sagging numbers, no longer have such rosy views of the billionaire. An Economist-YouGov poll taken in the week after the feud found that Musk's net favorability among Republicans dropped 20 points. A Reuters-Ipsos poll found that he dropped 13 points in net favorability in a roughly one-month span. This embedded content is not available in your region. On June 22, Tesla began a limited rollout of its robotaxi service in Austin. The stock jumped as much as 11% the following day, though it had pared its gains by the end of the week. Overall, it's been a wild year for Tesla's share price. Musk is the face of Tesla, a close association that comes with some risk. Some analysts downgraded the company during his feud with Trump. "The recent incident between Musk and President Trump exemplifies key-person risk associated with Musk's political activities," Baird senior research analyst Ben Kallo wrote in a note earlier this month. Musk has signaled a retreat from politics, though whether he sticks by that commitment remains to be seen. Tesla is facing other challenges. In China, the newly announced Xiaomi YU7 is priced to compete with Tesla's popular Model Y, and Tesla's sales have fallen in key markets like Europe in recent months. The automaker is set to announce its second-quarter delivery numbers on Wednesday, and many analysts are expecting a year-over-year decrease. John Helveston, an assistant professor at George Washington University, told BI that Musk's "political unpopularity is very unhelpful" as the CEO looks to navigate Tesla through the challenges it's currently facing. "Elon Musk is strongest [indeed, world-class, second to none] when he focuses on his core competencies: solving 'impossible' engineering problems," Rothaermel said. "If I were on the board of directors at Tesla, that is what I would want him to focus on." The Morning Consult poll is based on data collected during the firm's tracking poll from June 20 to 22nd, based on a representative sample of 2,205 registered U.S. voters. The margin of error is +/- 2 percentage points. Smaller subsamples have a larger margin of error. Full results are available here. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
