
What is Ed Miliband's ‘postcode pricing' plan for energy bills and how would it work?
The government is weighing up a change to the way UK households and businesses pay for electricity, where homes in the South of England could pay more than those in Scotland.
Zonal electricity pricing, which is being dubbed 'postcode pricing' for bill payers, splits the UK into parts with different electricity rates for each.
In Scotland, renewable power, including wind and hydroelectric, amply provides for all the nation's power needs, and prices there could drop significantly.
Meanwhile, in the South and Midlands of the UK, peak power demand requires far more fossil fuels to be used, which would mean higher prices compared to Scotland.
Proponents of the plan insist that it could slash energy prices for everyone and end an effective subsidy which parts of the UK provide to the south, where wind and solar farms are scarce.
But critics say the plan does not solve the underlying problem which plagues the UK's grid, that household prices are tied to those of expensive natural gas.
They also point out that prices for homes in the south could go up.
But Energy Secretary Ed Miliband insisted the reforms were far from finalised and that bill hikes were out of the question.
He told LBC: 'I'm not going to take a decision that is going to raise prices in some parts of the country. That is not what I'm going to do.
'Honestly, this is about reforms to cut prices for people, that is my absolute bottom line here.'
Campaigners have long called for a faster uptake of green energy and also more insulation for draughty homes in order to cut bills.
In theory, green energy is cheaper than fossil fuels because the fuel - wind and solar power - are both free, while oil, gas and coal are expensive to extract, process and transport.
In practice, because wind and solar energy only come during sunny and windy periods, the grid needs to top itself up with gas-fuelled electricity. This costs a lot more and is used as a gauge for domestic electricity pricing.
Dale Vince, the green entrepreneur who set up the energy firm Ecotricity, told the Today programme that he thought zonal pricing was a 'terrible idea'.
He warned that in the areas where most people live in the UK, such as Southern England, 'people will pay more'.
'That's a gift for the people who say we can't afford green energy,' he said.
What is 'zonal pricing'?
Zonal pricing is where different areas of the UK pay different rates for electricity.
The idea behind this is that it is unfair for those who live close to wind and solar farms which provide cheap, low-carbon energy to pay the same as those who live far away.
Proponents of zonal pricing, such as Greg Jackson, the boss of Octopus Energy, say this would lower bills for everyone since more wind power could be used. On particularly windy days suppliers are sometimes paid to switch wind generation off.
This is because the grid was designed for coal-fired power stations and it needs to be overhauled, Mr Jackson.
Smaller zones could be priced using renewables instead.
How would it work?
The UK would be divided into zones. If you live in a zone with more renewable power generation, you and your business will pay less for electricity.
This will reward those who support cheap, green energy projects in their area and could prove a boon for Scottish and northern English manufacturing, as the UK suffers the highest industrial electricity prices in Europe.
Many of the smaller zones would use a much higher percentage of renewable energy.
How much would household energy bills be affected?
This is still unknown. It would depend on where these zones are and how, precisely, the benefits of cheaper renewable power are calculated.
Would southerners pay more?
Homes in the South of England would pay more than everyone else in this scenario, but it is yet to be decided if they will pay more than they currently pay.
This is largely down to whether zonal energy is paired with other reforms in electricity pricing, which could cut prices for everyone.
Recent surges in electricity prices have been down to high natural gas prices.
Natural gas supplies less than a third of UK power with low-carbon sources such as wind, solar, hydro and nuclear power providing more than half.
But because gas-powered stations can be quickly turned on to pick up the slack on windless days or when demand surges, they attract higher prices, driving up the costs for all users.
A reform to this system could help cut costs for most customers.
How would it come into effect?
The government would have to give this plan a green light.
Zonal pricing is one idea being considered within a broader review of the UK's electricity market, which was kicked off by the last government.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Energy sector set to discuss how National Grid can meet AI demand
Energy firms are set to discuss how the National Grid could be upgraded to cope with the future demands of AI at a meeting with ministers on Monday. The AI Energy Council are set to discuss how much power will be needed to cover the increase in computer capacity that is expected in the next five years, as the AI sector grows. The group is made up of energy providers, tech companies, energy regulator Ofgem and will be chaired by Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and Tech Secretary Peter Kyle. It is thought that sectors that are looking to adopt AI and the impacts those changes could have on the energy demand will also be up for discussion, to try and prepare the energy system for the future. Tech secretary Mr Kyle said that ministers are putting 'British expertise at the heart of the AI breakthroughs which will improve our lives'. He added: 'We are clear-eyed though on the need to make sure we can power this golden era for British AI through responsible, sustainable energy sources. Today's talks will help us drive forward that mission, delivering AI infrastructure which will benefit communities up and down the country for generations to come without ever compromising on our clean energy superpower ambitions.' Earlier this month Sir Keir Starmer said that the UK must persuade a 'sceptical' public that AI can improve lives and transform the way politics and businesses work. In a speech in London, the Prime Minister acknowledged people's concern about the rapid rise of AI technology and the risk to their jobs but stressed the benefits it would have on the delivery of public services, automating bureaucracy and allowing staff such as social workers and nurses to be 'more human'.

Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Energy sector set to discuss how National Grid can meet AI demand
The AI Energy Council are set to discuss how much power will be needed to cover the increase in computer capacity that is expected in the next five years, as the AI sector grows. The group is made up of energy providers, tech companies, energy regulator Ofgem and will be chaired by Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and Tech Secretary Peter Kyle. It is thought that sectors that are looking to adopt AI and the impacts those changes could have on the energy demand will also be up for discussion, to try and prepare the energy system for the future. Tech secretary Mr Kyle said that ministers are putting 'British expertise at the heart of the AI breakthroughs which will improve our lives'. He added: 'We are clear-eyed though on the need to make sure we can power this golden era for British AI through responsible, sustainable energy sources. Today's talks will help us drive forward that mission, delivering AI infrastructure which will benefit communities up and down the country for generations to come without ever compromising on our clean energy superpower ambitions.' Earlier this month Sir Keir Starmer said that the UK must persuade a 'sceptical' public that AI can improve lives and transform the way politics and businesses work. In a speech in London, the Prime Minister acknowledged people's concern about the rapid rise of AI technology and the risk to their jobs but stressed the benefits it would have on the delivery of public services, automating bureaucracy and allowing staff such as social workers and nurses to be 'more human'.


Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Labour considers copying Macron's net zero housing laws
Ed Miliband and Angela Rayner are considering copying French laws that impose strict net zero limits on housebuilders. The Cabinet duo are exploring whether to adopt Emmanuel Macron's green approach, which has driven up construction costs by around a fifth. In 2022, France introduced a law setting limits for how much carbon buildings should produce over their lifetime, including their construction. It comes as Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, faces an uphill battle to fulfil Labour's manifesto promise to build 1.5 million new homes by 2030. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said: 'Adopting French-style regulations would seriously undermine house-building efforts in the UK. 'Already, Labour's tax policies, reduction in housing starts and failure to control our borders are pricing British families out of the market. This latest proposal would only make things worse, leaving hard-working people with less chance of owning a home. 'Above all, it highlights once again the recklessness of Labour's unrealistic net zero targets. This must not go ahead.' Mr Macron's reforms have proven controversial, being blamed for driving up construction costs, thwarting development and causing house prices to stagnate. Under the scheme, the limits are gradually ratcheted down. They were toughened at the start of this year, with the next change scheduled for 2028. But amid mounting criticism, ministers in Paris are attempting to backtrack and have ordered a review of the planned level for three years time. Valérie Létard, the French housing minister, said there was a need to find a better 'balance of standards' that 'allow for faster projects', adding: 'Urban planning and housing must serve our citizens and not be a source of administrative bottlenecks or a drop in purchasing power.' In a note issued last year, BCG, a leading consulting firm, said the regulations had sparked 'a dramatic effect on construction costs and property values'. 'In new build, the rules require companies to use more energy-efficient materials and equipment,' experts from the company wrote. 'As a result, the cost of constructing a new building has risen by an estimated 10-20 per cent, significantly slowing demand.' The firm said the new regulations had also exacerbated concerns about a value gap opening up between new homes and older, less energy-efficient ones. Despite the criticisms, officials at both Mr Miliband's and Ms Rayner's departments confirmed they were looking at introducing similar rules in the UK. The net zero department, run by Mr Miliband, quietly revealed that it was looking at the French-style reforms in a paper published last week. A Government spokesman insisted no decision has been taken on whether to go ahead. Any changes would come on top of other controversial net zero reforms that have been driven through by Labour ministers. They include the planned introduction of a 'glass tax' that is set to push up the cost of a bottle of wine by 9p and beer by 4p. Mr Miliband is also considering proposals to shift green levies from electricity bills to gas ones, pushing up the cost of central heating. The Home Builders Federation, the trade association for housebuilders, said the UK industry was already building more energy-efficient homes and cautioned against extra regulation. Rhodri Williams, its technical director, said: 'As we look to increase housebuilding to address our chronic housing shortage, and address the failings in the planning system that have for too long resulted in endless delays and additional costs for construction projects generally, any moves to add further potentially significant restrictions on construction need to be carefully considered. 'Adding yet more costs into housebuilding, on top of the other recent major increases for, amongst other things, solar panels, biodiversity net gain, the building safety levy, and employee costs would make even more sites unviable to develop and potentially slash housebuilding across the country.' Ms Rayner, who has fronted the pledge, is under growing pressure amid a widespread expectation that she will not be able to deliver the target of 1.5 million new homes across the course of this Parliament. Despite sweeping changes to planning rules, housebuilding slowed down by 14 per cent last year, according to the British Property Federation. Asked about the prospect of the new net zero limits, a spokesman for the Ministry of Housing said: 'No decisions have been made on this. We are currently considering the right approach to embodied carbon in new buildings, and will ensure that our plans do not block development. 'We are taking decisive action to speed up the planning process and deliver our stretching target of 1.5 million homes through our Plan for Change, with work already being driven through our seismic planning reforms and landmark Planning and Infrastructure Bill.'