Edinburgh ban on new student housing blocks proposed amid fear of oversupply
New student housing blocks in the capital should be banned over fears of an oversupply, according to an Edinburgh councillor.
Over 20,000 beds exist in private student halls in the city, and new projects are regularly being approved.
But SNP councillor Danny Aston says the private student halls sector is likely in a bubble, and that the city should look to stem the damage before it bursts.
He has put forward a motion to Thursday's full Edinburgh Council meeting, calling for a moratorium on new purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) projects.
Cllr Aston said: 'The developers don't seem to see the bursting of the bubble coming. There's plenty of evidence that it's either just started to happen or will happen soon.
'There have been recent applications, recent decisions. They're acting as if none of the issues are really happening.
'I'm concerned by the time they really start to bite, Edinburgh will have been disfigured by a whole bunch of white elephant developments that the operators can't fill.'
Glasgow City Council had an effective moratorium on new PBSA projects between 2019 and 2021, preventing many new projects from starting construction.
Cllr Aston wants councillors to compile a report exploring options for a moratorium, looking to the ban implemented in Glasgow for inspiration.
New PBSA developments are still restricted in parts of the city by planning rules.
PBSA projects are generally targeted at wealthier international students, with their high monthly rents adding a bar to entry for many.
In Edinburgh's private student housing blocks, prices often start at £800 or £900 per month for a room in a shared flat, and climb higher for studio flats.
Cllr Aston continued: 'The higher education sector clearly has financial issues. Edinburgh universities are not going to be immune to that.
'The other aspect directly affecting [the PBSA market] is that we're moving into a more troubled phase in terms of international relations. Relations with China in particular are becoming cooler.
'Chinese students, for a number of years, formed a very big part of the demand for PBSA in Edinburgh, particularly one year masters students, which is a big part of the market.
'And a lot of developers build specifically for that.'
Edinburgh locals have long been speaking out about the proliferation of student housing blocks in the city, with many new projects receiving dozens of planning objections.
A recent application to build a new PBSA block in Dalry saw locals strike out, with 7 student housing blocks already operating within 500 metres of the site.
At the time, law student Xander Lyons told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: 'We have too many [PBSA blocks]. There's so many student housing buildings around here, we've got Orwell Terrace and Bainfield, and then IQ.
'It seems like every time there's a new development planned, it's student flats. If they were affordable, then great, but they're not.
'You're quite often sharing with eight other people, and you're paying 800, maybe 900 pounds a month. It's not going to help the housing crisis.'
And continuing student flats development in Jock's Lodge has drawn anger, with one application last year drawing over 1,000 objections.
Two pubs and a popular local takeaway are in the firing line of the new development, which would host 191 student beds.
But despite the objections, both projects were approved, as they lined up with the city's development guidelines.
Cllr Aston said his motion was aimed at giving the city legroom to tackle the issue, saying: 'What I'm proposing in my motion is to buy some time.
'Give us some space to work out what the impact of the financial challenges and the international context are going to be for higher education.'
He said he was unaware of why the Glasgow moratorium ended, but that if his motion is passed, he would want the report to include this.
If Cllr Aston's motion is passed, council officers would return to the city's Planning Committee by September.
The motion will be discussed at the next full meeting of Edinburgh Council, set to take place on Thursday, 19 June, which can be viewed here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
38 minutes ago
- NBC News
Retailers avoided a worst case scenario in Vietnam. But executives say Trump's trade deal could still hit consumers.
The retail industry is breathing a sigh of relief after it appeared to avoid the worst case scenario on Vietnam tariffs. But some executives believe the tentative trade deal President Donald Trump announced Wednesday is still bad for business and could have a chilling effect on consumer spending. 'It's a lot better news than where we were on Liberation Day,' one CEO of a popular consumer brand told CNBC after Trump said tariffs on Vietnamese imports would be 20%, down from the 46% levy he proposed on April 2, then later suspended. The new rate would be double the 10% duty currently in place. Another executive called the news 'bad' but agreed that a 20% tariff was better than the 46% duty Trump originally imposed, however unrealistic the proposed rate was. 'I guess Trump needs 'positive' news,' a third executive said. 'I think things are going to evolve. Let's see if this is definitive.' Trump's announcement on Wednesday came only days before the 90-day suspension of the steep tariffs he proposed in April expires next week, and as his administration scrambles to strike agreements with dozens of trading partners. Even so, he did not say when the deal with Vietnam would take effect, or whether both sides have agreed to the tariff rates. In the months between Trump's April 2 tariff rollout and his announcement on Wednesday, retail executives in the apparel and footwear industries fretted over the potential that Vietnam imports could face tariffs nearly as high as the cumulative 55% duties for Chinese imports. Over the last decade, some of America's top retailers, including Gap, American Eagle and Nike, have all reduced their reliance on China to shield themselves from both high tariffs and the region's geopolitical turbulence. Many sought refuge in Vietnam, where the factories, some owned by Chinese businesses, are known to produce products at a similar quality and price as China. They also started manufacturing in other countries in southeast Asia, such as Cambodia, Bangladesh and Malaysia. Those countries were facing tariffs of 49%, 37% and 24%, respectively, under Trump's April plan, but are subject to a 10% duty for now. Vietnam is now the second largest supplier for footwear, apparel and accessories sold into the U.S. market, according to the industry trade group the American Apparel & Footwear Association. It has become an essential part of the footwear supply chain, on pace to become the largest supplier of shoes to the U.S. in 2025, according to the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America, another industry trade group. If Trump's proposed 46% tariff on Vietnam had taken effect, it would mean much of the industry's work to leave China would have been for naught. Some companies are relieved the tentative deal would set the levy at 20% and the announcement agreement is also a sign that Cambodia, Malaysia and Bangladesh could reach similar frameworks. 'Twenty percent is a sigh of relief,' said Sonia Lapinsky, a partner and managing director at AlixPartners who advises fashion brands. 'There's some positivity and some optimism that this is manageable. So at least there's that. This isn't business destroying, which is great. However, this does have real implications, right?' Most companies have plenty of tools to offset the impact of tariffs, such as working with their suppliers to share costs. But to avoid major hits to their profit margins, many including Nike are planning to raise prices. It's still unclear how those hikes will affect consumer spending because it will take time for the increases to trickle down in the supply chain. AlixPartners previously created pricing models for CNBC that examined how the price of Vietnamese-made sweaters and shoes could rise under Trump's proposed tariffs — if retailers do not pass any of the cost on to suppliers or shoppers. At a 10% levy, the cost of a $95 pair of men's shoes could rise by $7.42 to $102.42. With a 20% duty in place, the cost increase would be even larger. Many executives worry any tariff hike of this magnitude will be bad for businesses and consumers. Paul Cosaro, the CEO of Picnic Time, a supplier to top retailers like Target, Kohl's and Macy's, said if the clocks were wound back to April and Trump said there'd be a 20% tariff on Vietnamese imports, 'no one would've been happy.' 'There could be threats of a 46% tariff and you come back with 20 and it's going to sound better but… it's just more money coming out of the consumers' pockets at the end of the day and they have less money to spend on picnic baskets and coolers and things like that,' said Cosaro, who raised his prices between 11% and 14% earlier this year to offset the cost of China tariffs. 'It's not good for the consumer. Ultimately, it's just increasing the prices … I don't think that's good news.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
SNP MPs should not have sat on their hands during vote on proscription
Not for one moment do I believe their excuse that other groups listed as terrorist organisations needed to be proscribed, so they couldn't vote against the attacks on free speech and Palestine Action. Anyone with an ounce of sense could have argued against the vote but highlighted that it was Labour who tried to link Palestine Action with actual terrorist organisations. Why not even an amendment to remove Palestine Action from this list of suspected terrorists? READ MORE: The 26 MPs who voted against proscribing Palestine Action – see the list To be honest I fear the dead hand of John Swinney is behind this. It is his type of managerial politics that only annoys more people than actually standing up for a principle. No wonder the support for independence is breaking away from the stalling and falling support for the SNP. We are seeing 2003 happen all over again. One of the first things Swinney did was to repeat his failings last time as leader and spend more time and money promoting Labour politicians than the SNP's actual candidates or policies. For more than 10 years the SNP haven't had a policy on independence, and they still claim we're closer than ever – absolute nonsense. The party is going nowhere with Swinney – the SNP needs a leader who actually wants independence and has a plan to achieve it. The unintended outcome of this disastrous SNP position is that I will no longer contribute to any SNP election fund but will instead donate whatever the party would have received to help Palestine Action make a legal challenge to this attack on free speech. Alex Beckett Paisley THE majority of MP's have no moral compass. They should have demanded, like Corbyn, a separate vote on each group. Now this fascist government can include any group it dislikes in with another clearly terrorist group, and force their supine MPs to vote in favour. Meanwhile, the IDF – which is clearly a terrorist organ of Israel, having murdered tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians, even killing those starving as they queue for food – isn't sanctioned for its terrorism, but a group that sprays paint is considered as bad as the Wagner Group. Graham Hewitt via THE Haaretz newspaper published an article titled ''It's a Killing Field': IDF Soldiers Ordered to Shoot Deliberately at Unarmed Gazans Waiting for Humanitarian Aid'. Officers and soldiers were 'ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near food distribution sites in Gaza, even when no threat was present. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed, prompting the military prosecution to call for a review into possible war crimes.' One soldier said that civilians are 'treated like a hostile force – no crowd-control measures, no tear gas, just live fire with everything imaginable: heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, mortars.' READ MORE: Former government lawyer to defy Palestine Action ban in Parliament Square protest Since October 2023, IDF soldiers have shamelessly posted and bragged about their slaughter of Palestinians, even babies, on social media. Then we have the immoral Keir Starmer calling for the criminal prosecution and de-platforming of musicians who have the moral courage to condemn this genocide. He still can't bring himself to utter the 'G''word. Following the Glastonbury performances over the weekend by Kneecap and Bob Vylan, where the latter led the crowds in chants: 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF', Avon and Somerset police said they were assessing video evidence 'to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation.' Seriously? This is where we are. Someone insisted to me recently that what's happening in Gaza isn't a genocide but ethnic cleansing. I challenged him to explain the difference to me – he couldn't. The UK is run by morally vacuous imbeciles. They are so beholden to the Zionist entity that they agree with the genocider-in-chief Netanyahu that an Israeli newspaper quoting IDF soldiers describing their own atrocities is antisemitic, 'designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the world'. The criminals aren't the musicians who are condemning the Zionist entity's crimes but the Western 'leaders' giving it money, weapons and political cover. They belong in Dante's seventh circle of hell, a river of boiling blood and fire, reserved for those guilty of violence against humanity. Leah Gunn Barrett Edinburgh I AM writing this on a day when we are looking down the double barrel of supposed democracies in the USA and UK pushing hundreds of thousands of their voters into poverty and making access to healthcare and care support evermore difficult. At a time when the Chief Rabbi of England (Zionist) is claiming chanting 'Kill the IDF' is antisemitic while the IDF killing semites in the Middle East who are waiting for food hand-outs, is not. READ MORE: BBC drops high risk live performances after Bob Vylan Glastonbury set We have a Chancellor who has bought the austerity, capitalist rubbish about 'trickle-down' hook, line and sinker, especially where it relates to her personal funders' wishes and directions to protect their investments and profit margins. In the meantime we, in Scotland, are left with a party for independence that have seen the polls constantly positive to Scottish independence for more than a year, who think 'a safe pair of hands' is the way to go rather than seeking political advantage at a time when Labour and the Tories are in disarray and the UK is falling to bits as a unitary state. Its enough to make me tear my hair out, but as I have less and less of it these days maybe it's not the time, yet. Peter Thomson Kirkcudbright
Edinburgh Live
3 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
All the new Edinburgh polling places proposed as fewer schools to be used
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A new polling place near Edinburgh Airport and another to avoid staff working in a portakabin with no flush toilet are among over a dozen the city is planning to set up. The city is undertaking a review of its polling places and electoral districts, which it does every five years. Residents can comment on the proposed changes, which look to ensure polling places are best serving their communities, until 18 July. A total of 14 new polling places are proposed, with some being entirely new, and others representing polling places that are set to stop running. Some polling districts are set to change their boundaries, but retain their polling places. A spokesperson for Edinburgh Council said: 'We have a legal responsibility to review our polling arrangements every five years. This is to encourage and support turnout at elections, whilst also addressing issues such as accessibility and capacity. 'We'd encourage all residents to engage with the public consultation and make their views heard.' The differences in polling places listed below are versus the ones used at the 2024 General Election. Some polling places changed between the council's last review and then. The write-up also contains details on the new polling places set to be established. Almond ward In Almond ward, several new voting districts are proposed, with two in the stretch of land between Edinburgh Airport and Cammo, one along Turnhouse Road and one in Queensferry. The new districts near the airport cover the site of a massive residential development planned for the city in coming years, which will see up to 11,000 new homes built. No polling place has been determined for the site of the new development, but for the Turnhouse Road district, one is proposed at Turnhouse Golf Club. And in Queensferry, part of the town is suggested to be split off into a new voting district, with a polling place at the Queensferry Sports and Community Hub. In Muirhouse, the council is proposing moving the polling place back to North Edinburgh Arts Centre, which the city replaced with Muirhouse Millennium Centre during renovation works. Pentland Hills ward In Pentland Hills, the council is proposing that Wester Hailes voters use the Calder Gardens Sheltered Housing Community Room, after polling staff faced difficulty in 2022. During the council elections that year, no site for the election could be found, as both schools in the area – according to the city, the only sizeable community buildings in the district – could not host the polls. As such, the city set up a temporary cabin structure, with polling staff enduring the 'absolute minimum of welfare facilities', drinking bottled water and using a temporary toilet outside. In a report, Edinburgh Council said the generator noise at the temporary cabin was distracting for voters, that the temporary facility was expensive, and that it gave 'minimal space' for voter privacy. Drum Brae/Gyle ward In Drum Brae/Gyle, one merged polling district is proposed for voters currently going to the Lothian Valuation Joint Board building and a mobile library to cast ballots. The polling place for the district is proposed to be at Forrester Rugby Club, with the changes intended to avoid use of the council's new mobile library vehicles for elections due to their lack of toilets. And, a new polling district is suggested in the south of the ward near South Gyle, where it is recommended that voters also go to Forrester Rugby Club to vote. Forth ward In Forth ward, the council is proposing that some voters in Newhaven cast ballots at Newhaven Parish Church instead of the current Heart of Newhaven. Inverleith ward No changes to polling places are suggested in Inverleith ward. However, the council suggests that in future, voters who currently use Bristo Baptist Church to cast votes may be moved to the nearby Dean Building. Corstorphine/Murrayfield ward In the Corstorphine/Murrayfield ward, the council is proposing that voters currently using Murrayfield Parish Church Centre are moved to the Dean Building. And, they're suggesting that voters who currently use Corstorphine Library are moved to the 10th Craigalmond Scout Hall. Further, a new polling district is suggested, which would see voters in part of the ward cast ballots at St Ninian's Church Hall instead of St Thomas' church. Sighthill/Gorgie ward No changes of polling places are suggested for the Sighthill/Gorgie ward. Colinton/Fairmilehead ward In Colinton/Fairmilehead, a new polling place is suggested at Fairmilehead Parish Church Hall to serve a new voting district, which would take in some voters curently using Charwood. Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart ward No changes to polling places are proposed for Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart. Morningside ward In Morningside ward, it is proposed that two polling districts – those around the Church Hill Theatre and Studio and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints – are split in two. But each would retain its existing polling place. City Centre ward In the City Centre ward, the council is suggesting that voters using the Greyfriars Charteris Centre are moved to the Braidwood Centre, due to the latter reopening. Leith Walk, Leith, Craigetinny/Duddingston and Southside/Newington wards No changes to polling places are suggested for the Leith Walk ward, the Leith ward, the Craigetinny/Duddingston ward or the Southside/Newington ward. Liberton/Gilmerton ward In Liberton/Gilmerton ward, a new polling place at Tron Kirk, Moredun is proposed to be created to support an expected new development in both that ward and Portobello/Craigmillar, and another one – centred around a new polling district – is proposed to be established at Tron Kirk, Gilmerton. Portobello/Craigmillar ward In Portobello/Craigmillar ward, a new polling place near Tron Kirk, Moredun is proposed, to accommodate the new development that also stretches into Liberton/Gilmerton ward. And Niddrie Bowling Club is proposed as a polling place, to replace Newcraighall Primary School – stepped away from as the council is looking to stop using schools for elections. The details can be found in a write-up here and in maps here. Residents can voice their views on the proposed changes here.
