FlySafair slammed for allegedly refusing CCMA mediation as strike strands passengers
Image: Supplied
Scores of FlySafair passengers were left stranded on Monday morning as pilots embarked on a strike over wages and working conditions.
According to union Solidarity, which is representing the aggrieved pilots, the airline is refusing to partake in a mediation process initiated by the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA).
'The CCMA has offered its help in terms of section 150 of the Labour Relations Act (No. 66 of 1995) to resolve the dispute between Solidarity and FlySafair. Solidarity has formally agreed to the CCMA process, but by the end of the weekend FlySafair was still refusing to agree to it,' Solidarity said in a statement released on Monday morning.
IOL has reached out to FlySafair for commentary on the CCMA matter.
FlySafair said it cancelled 8% of its flights on Monday after pilots who had previously indicated their availability to fly, instead joined the two-week strike.
Airports Company South Africa said it was aware of the ongoing operational disruptions affecting FlySafair flights on Monday and said it has implemented contingency measures to minimise disruptions.
'While a number of flights have been cancelled, the majority of FlySafair services are operating as scheduled, and airport operations continue as normal,' ACSA said.
The airports company said passengers should contact FlySafair directly for flight-specific updates and use the ACSA Mobile App for live flight notifications.
Talks in deadlock after a weekend of no progress
Solidarity said the strike was initially meant to last for one day, to get FlySafair to the negotiating table. But it said the airline then responded by locking out the pilots for seven days.
'We welcome the CCMA's intervention. The disruption of an airline is a matter of national interest. Such disruption must be avoided. Our aim with the one-day strike notice was to get FlySafair to the negotiating table,' Solidarity commented.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'We were prepared to do everything possible over the weekend to prevent the disruption and find a solution with the help of the CCMA. Instead of coming to the table, FlySafair escalated the disruption by locking out the pilots for at least seven days.'
Pilot pay is competitive, FlySafair says
Solidarity has accused FlySafair of having an 'aggressive business style', leading to around 90% of its members voting in favour of a strike.
Solidarity is demanding a 10.5% increase for 2025/26, with pilots claiming they're still earning 10% less than pre-pandemic levels. However, FlySafair says that this would amount to a cost-to-company increase of more than 20% once additional demands had been factored in, which it says is an unsustainable escalation for any company. The airline has offered its pilots an 'above inflation' increase of 5.7%.
FlySafair maintains that its pilots are among the best-compensated professionals in South Africa, with captains earning between R1.8 million and R2.3 million per year, placing them within the country's top 1% of earners. These salaries are regularly benchmarked against those at other local airlines and are higher than most, the airline said.
Responding to accusations that pilots were overworked, FlySafair said its captains spent an average of 63 hours in the cockpit last month, which is well within regulatory limits set by the Civil Aviation Authority, IATA and ICAO, which cap flight duty at 100 hours per month.
This is a developing story. Stay tuned to IOL for further updates.
IOL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
FlySafair, Solidarity union head back to negotiating table after ‘some progress made'
FlySafair has made schedule changes affecting flights from July 22 to 28. Image: Supplied The mediation process between FlySafair and Solidarity, the labour union representing the carrier's striking pilots, is set to resume on Friday afternoon. 'We have reached a sensitive stage in the discussions and some progress has been made. Parties will reconvene on Friday at 2pm, to continue discussions,' a source at Solidarity told IOL. The strike and lockout conditions remain the same since talks began on Wednesday, the source added, and in the interim, parties have agreed to a media blackout to 'ensure the integrity of the process'. A FlySafair spokesperson told IOL that the airline continues to run a stable, reduced timetable and remains engaged in mediation with Solidarity and the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). The airline has reportedly entered into an agreement with South African Airways (SAA) to operate two of its daily flights under a 'passenger protection agreement'. However, there are fears that flight cancellations could be necessary next week if the strike is not resolved. That's because the pilots who are currently operating FlySafair's reduced schedule could reach their legal flying time limit by then, The Citizen reports. These regulations, designed to prevent fatigue, state that pilots cannot fly for more than 40 hours within a seven-day period. According to Solidarity, the strike was initially meant to last for one day (Monday), in order to get FlySafair to the negotiating table. But it said the airline then responded by locking out the pilots for seven days. Solidarity member pilots are demanding a 10.5% increase for 2025/26, with pilots claiming they're still earning 10% less than pre-pandemic levels. However, FlySafair says that this would amount to a cost-to-company increase of more than 20% once additional demands had been factored in, which it says is an unsustainable escalation for any company. The airline has offered its pilots an 'above inflation' increase of 5.7%. Next Stay Close ✕ FlySafair maintains that its pilots are among the best-compensated professionals in South Africa, with captains earning between R1.8 million and R2.3 million per year. However, the pilot roster system is a significant point of contention for pilots. ALSO READ: Why FlySafair pilots are striking - it's more than just money In a statement released earlier this week, Solidarity claimed that FlySafair's new rostering system drastically changed the established working conditions of pilots, impeding their rest periods and undermining their family life. 'As pilots' workdays often start before sunrise and last until late at night, sufficient rest is of utmost importance for the safety and well-being of pilots and passengers alike. 'In addition, pilots work seven days a week on a rotating schedule, which significantly impacts their family life compared to those who work standard office hours,' Solidarity said. Responding to earlier accusations that pilots were overworked, FlySafair said its captains spent an average of 63 hours in the cockpit last month, which is well within regulatory limits set by the Civil Aviation Authority, IATA and ICAO, which cap flight duty at 100 hours per month. This is a developing story. Stay tuned to IOL for further updates. IOL News
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
How FlySafair echoes the Argus foreign investment failure
As profits head to Ireland and workers protest, the Safair saga reveals hard truths about foreign investment. The Western capitalist fan club forever warns that this or that transgression will deter foreign investment… and the government in particular is expected not to annoy the Godlike 'foreign investor'. But, as in the fable of The Emperor has no clothes, few people look beyond the rhetoric to point out that, on occasions, the foreign investment emperor's raiments are, at the least, looking a bit threadbare. A case in point was the acquisition, back in the mid1990s, of the then Argus newspaper company in South Africa by Tony O'Reilly's Independent group from Ireland. The SA company was bought at better than a firesale price – because the Irish company used the then 'financial rand' mechanism and there was general fear about the future of a newly democratic South Africa. By the time the company was sold to Iqbal Survé in 2014, it had funnelled billions of rands back to Ireland, in profits – many times what was paid for the company. ALSO READ: FlySafair under fire for offshore payouts amid staff wage freezes But, this foreign investment also cost two-thirds of the employees of the Argus company their jobs, as the Irish applied swingeing cost-cutting. That little exercise in foreign investment was actually a bottom-line loss to South Africa, in terms of precious foreign exchange and something over 2 000 jobs. We are wondering if there is not a similar – also Irish-linked – phenomenon under way at the moment with Safair, the company which operates low-cost carrier FlySafair. As some of its pilots continue their strike for better conditions and pay, it has been revealed that the company transferred more than R1.3 billion to its shareholders in Ireland in the past three years. As the money funnel was opened, the airline told the world it was financially strapped and employees that there wasn't enough money for decent increases. ALSO READ: Rostering issue at heart of pilot strike, says Solidarity Mind you, business doesn't have a conscience, does it?
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
What the Eastern Cape High Court ruling means for foreign employee terminations
A law firm looks at the law following a judgment saying employers are not entitled to fire foreign nationals on the spot if they are working without a valid visa. Image: File A foreign national employee must be provided with proper notice of their termination in line with the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCA). Failure to provide such notice may result in the termination being unlawful. This is the warning of employment law experts at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (CDH), following a recent Eastern Cape High Court judgment. This was after an application by a research assistant and Zimbabwean national, Samuel Nyakudya. He was granted a temporary residence permit allowing him to reside in South Africa and seek employment in the category of general work as provided for under the Immigration Act. His employer, the OR Tambo District Municipality, however, terminated his employment contract due to allegations of its unlawfulness and irregularity. Commenting on the case, CDH said that this area of termination has just become a lot clearer for employers after the recent ruling, stating that employing a foreign national without a work visa does not automatically grant an employer the right to summarily terminate the employment contract. 'This indicates a key warning for employers highlighting their responsibility to act lawfully and in accordance with the BCA,' CDH said. The experts explained that a foreign national employee must be provided with proper notice of their termination in line with the BCA. 'Failure to provide such notice may result in the termination being unlawful. The dismissal may also be found to be unfair in the CCMA (Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration).' Nyakudya was employed on successive fixed-term contracts, but following the expiration of his last contract, the municipality allowed him to continue working without a new fixed-term contract. Throughout his employment, Nyakudya was not consistently in possession of a work visa. In November 2023, the municipality notified him that his contract had expired on March 31, 2022, and that he had failed to provide a copy of his South African identity document, despite being requested to do so. Consequently, the municipality claimed it had no choice but to terminate his employment immediately, citing the unlawful nature of his contract due to the expiration of his work visa. While Nyakudya could have contested the fairness of his dismissal before the CCMA, he opted to challenge the termination in the High Court. The court ultimately ruled that Nyakudya's employment contract termination was unlawful.. CDH said the Immigration Act outlines an employer's responsibilities regarding the employment of foreign nationals, specifically in Section 38, which prohibits the employment of illegal foreigners or those whose status does not authorise them to work. It said the court also referenced Section 49(3) of the Immigration Act, which states that employing an illegal foreigner or a foreigner in violation of the Act constitutes a criminal offence. The court confirmed that such employment is punishable by fines or imprisonment upon conviction. Regarding the summary termination of Nyakudya's contract, the court considered Section 37(1) of the BCEA, which stipulates the notice period required for termination based on the duration of employment. The court highlighted that the purpose of providing notice is to allow employees to prepare for a smooth transition. 'Nyakudya's lack of a work visa or South African identity document was a critical factor in the case. The court determined that employing a foreign national without a work visa is prohibited, and thus, the municipality's immediate termination of Nyakudya's contract was unlawful. 'This case serves as a significant reminder that employing a foreign national without a work visa does not automatically grant an employer the right to terminate the employment contract summarily,' CDH warned.
