
Japan flexes its military muscle at China, and Trump
Created in 2024, the fledgling regiment and its roving missile batteries occupy a hilltop base on the island of Okinawa that can be seen for miles.
The visibility is intentional. The 7th is one of two new missile regiments that the army, called the Ground Self-Defence Force, has placed along the islands on Japan's south-western flank in response to an increasingly robust Chinese navy that frequently sails through waters near Japan.
'Our armaments are a show of force to deter an enemy from coming,' said Colonel Yohei Ito, the regiment's commander.
China is not their only target. The display is also for the United States, and particularly President Donald Trump, who has criticised Japan for relying too heavily on the presence of US military bases for its security.
The missiles are part of a defence build-up that is central to Japan's strategy for appealing to Mr Trump. While Tokyo is now deep in negotiations with Washington over lifting new tariffs, its top priority is improving security ties.
On June 6, Japan's trade envoy, Ryosei Akazawa, met for 2½ hours in Washington with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Mr Howard Lutnick, the secretary of commerce, for talks on a tariff-lifting deal that will probably see Tokyo promise large purchases of energy, computer chips and weapons.
By adding new missiles and other advanced weapons, both American-made and domestically developed, Japan is transforming its long-restricted military into a potent force with the skills and technology to operate alongside America's ships and soldiers, to demonstrate that Japan is an indispensable partner.
'We want to be sure the US has our backs, and enhancing our conventional military capabilities is the way to do that,' said Nobukatsu Kanehara, who was deputy head of national security policy from 2014 to 2019 under then Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. 'We want to show President Trump that we are a valuable and essential ally.'
Given the growing military strength of nearby China and also North Korea, Japan wants to upgrade the defence alliance with the US by becoming a fuller-fledged military partner and moving further from the pacifism enshrined in its constitution adopted after World War II.
With the war in Ukraine stirring fears of a similar Chinese move on the democratic island of Taiwan, Japan announced in 2022 it would double spending on national security to about 2 per cent of gross domestic product. The resulting defence build-up is now under way.
Japan is buying expensive weapon systems from the US like the F-35B stealth fighter and Tomahawk cruise missiles that will give Japan the ability to strike targets on enemy soil for the first time since 1945.
The spending is also revitalising Japan's own defence industry. At a trade show in May near Tokyo, Japanese manufacturers displayed weapons currently under development, including a hypersonic missile, a laser system for shooting down drones, and a jet fighter to be built with Italy and Britain.
Japan is also demonstrating a new resolve to fight alongside the US during a future crisis. When he visited Tokyo this spring, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth praised a plan to create a new 'war-fighting headquarters' in Tokyo where Japanese and American commanders will work side by side.
'During our discussions, I told him how Japan is making our own strong efforts to drastically strengthen our defence capabilities,' Mr Gen Nakatani, the Japanese defence minister, said after meeting with Hegseth. 'We face the most severe security environment that Japan has encountered since the end of the war.'
It has been made even more severe by the uncertainty from Washington. While Japan's leaders and policymakers see strong support from Mr Hegseth and other hardliners on China, like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, they remain worried about America First isolationists who could try to pull back the US military in Asia.
There is also the unpredictability of Trump. Their biggest fear is that the US President might suddenly strike a grand strategic deal with China's leader, Xi Jinping, that would cede Japan and its neighbours to Beijing's sphere of influence.
'We need to convince Trump and the Maga (Make America Great Again) camp that Japan is too good to give away,' said Professor Satoru Mori, a professor of international politics at Keio University in Tokyo. 'It's in the US' interest not to let Japan fall into China's sphere.'
The Chinese government has criticised Japan's acquisition of offensive weapons as a return to wartime militarism.
Japan is hedging its bets by reaching out to other partners. In addition to the fighter plane jointly developed with Britain and Italy, it has strengthened defence relations with Australia, offering to sell it advanced Japanese-made frigates.
Tokyo also sent a warship and soldiers to the Philippines in May to join a multinational military exercise for the first time.
If Washington proves unreliable, Japan has an ultimate fallback: tonnes of plutonium stockpiled from its civilian nuclear power industry, which it could use to build a nuclear arsenal of its own. So far, the national trauma from the 1945 atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has kept such an option off the table.
'We need to think about a Plan B, if the US does withdraw from Asia,' said Mr Kazuto Suzuki, director of the Institute of Geo-economics, a Tokyo-based think-tank. -- NEW YORK TIMES via The Straits Times/ANN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump scores major own goal with labour official firing
US President Donald Trump's decision to fire a top labour official following weak jobs data obviously sends ominous signals about political interference in independent institutions, but it is also a major strategic own goal. Trump has spent six months attacking the Federal Reserve, and Chair Jerome Powell in particular, for not cutting interest rates. The barbs culminated in Trump branding Powell a "stubborn MORON" in a social media post on Friday before the July jobs report was released. The numbers, especially the net downward revision of 258,000 for May and June payrolls growth, were much weaker than expected. In fact, this was "the largest two-month revision since 1968 outside of NBER-defined recessions (assuming the economy is not in recession now)," according to Goldman Sachs. This release sparked a dramatic reaction in financial markets. Fed rate cut expectations soared, the two-year Treasury yield had its steepest fall in a year, and the dollar tumbled. A quarter-point rate cut next month and another by December were suddenly nailed-on certainties, according to rate futures market pricing. This was a huge U-turn from only 48 hours before when Powell's hawkish steer in his post-FOMC meeting press conference raised the prospect of no easing at all this year. Trump's constant lambasting of "Too Late" Powell suddenly appeared to have a bit more substance behind it. The Fed chair's rate cut caution centres on the labour market, which now appears nowhere near as "solid" as he thought. Trump could have responded by saying: "I was right, and Powell was wrong." Instead, on Friday afternoon he said he was firing the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, for faking the jobs numbers. Trump provided no evidence of data manipulation. So rather than point out that markets were finally coming around to his way of thinking on the need for lower interest rates, Trump has united economists, analysts and investors in condemnation of what they say is brazen political interference typically associated with underdeveloped and unstable nations rather than the self-proclaimed 'leader of the free world'. "A dark day in, and for, the US," economist Phil Suttle wrote on Friday. "This is the sort of thing only the worst populists do in the worst emerging economies and, to use the style of President Trump, IT NEVER ENDS WELL." It's important to note that major – even historic – revisions to jobs growth figures are not necessarily indicative of underlying data collection flaws. As Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale, argued on X over the weekend: "BLS's first-release estimates of nonfarm payroll employment have gotten more, not less, accurate over time." It should also be noted that the BLS compiles inflation as well as employment data, so, moving forward, significant doubt could surround the credibility of the two most important economic indicators for the US - and perhaps the world. Part of what constitutes "US exceptionalism" is the assumption that the experts leading the country's independent institutions are exactly that, independent, meaning their actions and output can be trusted, whatever the results. Baseless accusations from the US president that the BLS, the Fed and other agencies are making politically motivated decisions to undermine his administration only undermine trust in the US itself. "If doubts are sustained, it will lead investors to demand more of a risk premium to own US assets," says Rebecca Patterson, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. "While only one of many forces driving asset valuations, it will limit returns across markets." This furor comes as Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's resignation on Friday gives Trump the chance to put a third nominee on the seven-person Fed board, maybe a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place until Powell's term expires in May. Whoever that person is will likely be more of a policy dove than a hawk. Policy uncertainty, which had been gradually subsiding since the April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil, is now very much back on investors' radar.


The Star
24 minutes ago
- The Star
Opposition lawmakers' claims show they haven't read 13MP document, says PM
KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has dismissed Opposition claims that the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) overlooks bumiputra development. Anwar said such claims indicate a failure to read the 13MP document, which prioritises significant allocations for bumiputras. ALSO READ: Perikatan MP references May 13 riots in Parliament, causes uproar He emphasised the Bumiputra Economic Transformation Plan 2035 (PuTERA35) as a key component of 13MP, underscoring the government's dedication to bumiputra initiatives. "We need to study 13MP thoroughly. Otherwise, there's a misconception that funds are only for Chinese new villages and not bumiputra. Critics clearly haven't read it. "PuTERA35 includes substantial spending for bumiputra, like the Malay reserve in Bandar Malaysia, which is unprecedented since independence. ALSO READ: Mindset change needed for 13MP to succeed, says Rafizi "Only the Madani government has taken these bold steps. Previous administrations, despite their claims, never did," he said during Ministers' Question Time in the Dewan Rakyat on Tuesday (Aug 5). Earlier, Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim (PN-Pendang) alleged that 13MP, presented on Thursday (July 31), favours Chinese new villages over bumiputra development. ALSO READ: Opposition moots cross-party committee to draw up effective 13MP strategies Under 13MP, PuTERA35 focuses on broad participation, meaningful ownership, and control in strategic sectors. Efforts will also be made to prepare bumiputra companies for listing on Bursa Malaysia, with initiatives aimed at empowering entrepreneurs from the startup stage to becoming publicly listed.


New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Govt backbencher, opposition MPs clash during Prime Minister's Question Time in Parliament
KUALA LUMPUR: Tensions flared in the Dewan Rakyat this morning when a government backbencher got into a shouting match with an opposition member of Parliament over Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin's remarks on the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP). The exchange began when the opposition leader posed a question to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim regarding the 13MP, which was tabled last week. During a supplementary question, Hamzah said the 13MP lacked firmness in addressing the socioeconomic gap between Bumiputera and non-Bumiputera communities. "This isn't specifically about developing new Chinese villages. But when other MPs bring it up, what can I do?" he said. His remarks did not sit well with Mohd Sany Hamzan (PH–Hulu Langat), who interjected and asked the Larut MP, "Is this a debate?" He reminded the House that the session was Prime Minister's Question Time, not a debate. Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal (PN-Machang) then rose to defend Hamzah, questioning Sany's interruption. "Why are you interrupting the opposition leader? You keep interjecting. Just let him speak," he said. Sany shot back, reminding Hamzah and Wan Fayhsal that the session was meant for questions directed at the Prime Minister, not a debate. "Kau kenapa koyak? Koyak pula engkau." ("Why are you getting so worked up? You're the one losing it now.") The heated exchange was eventually diffused when Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul intervened, instructing all MPs to take their seats and allowing Hamzah to finish his remarks. Yesterday, tempers flared in the Dewan Rakyat after Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim (PN-Pendang) warned the government about a possible repeat of the May 13, 1969 race riots. Awang had alleged this could happen because the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) "sidelined Bumiputera interests". The uproar began when Awang interjected during opposition leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin's debate speech on the 13MP, claiming the plan lacked development for Bumiputera while discussing Chinese new villages.