logo
Can free money help people stay off drugs? These programs are trying it.

Can free money help people stay off drugs? These programs are trying it.

Boston Globe09-06-2025
Nothing stuck until Pagan, a 36-year-old personal caregiver from Revere, learned late last year of
engaged in physical exercise, Pagan was rewarded with $5 loaded onto a debit card.
Advertisement
While modest, the payments were enough to motivate Pagan to keep coming back, week after week, to a program that taught her new strategies for controlling her cravings.
'When you're living on the edge, sometimes you need something — even if it's small — to feel better about yourself and your future," she said.
Pagan is among hundreds of people addicted to stimulants in New England who are part of a bold but debated experiment: giving financial rewards to people who abstain from illicit drugs.
In cities across the region, treatment providers are embracing the concept of monetary awards as they seek new ways to combat a troubling surge in the use of psychostimulants such as methamphetamine and cocaine.
Advertisement
The approach is known as
Policy makers are banking on the intervention to help address a gaping hole in the substance use treatment system. There are no targeted medications for the estimated
'People have been brainwashed into thinking that depriving people and letting them `hit bottom' is the only way for somebody to get better, and contingency management flies in the face of that,' said Deirdre Calvert, director of the state Department of Public Health's Bureau of Substance Addiction Services. 'Most importantly, it works.'
While offering people small rewards for abstinence dates to the 1980s, the approach has been slow to catch on.
One of the biggest obstacles has been the moral objection to the idea of paying people to stay off drugs — which, critics argue, they should be doing anyway. Legal concerns have been another barrier. Treatment providers have long worried they could run afoul of
Advertisement
Yet attitudes began to change a few years ago amid a troubling new reality. Many people were taking cocaine and meth without realizing it was
At the same time, states received the
So in 2021, Boston Medical Center received a $1.43 million grant from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health to launch
Interest in the program has far exceeded expectations.
Justin Alves, co-medical director for the START program and a nurse educator with the
Advertisement
All told, 660 patients with stimulant use disorders have participated in the program since 2021; and more than 50 percent have been people of color, according to Boston Medical Center.
Organizers of the program are now looking to tap opioid settlement funds to expand the incentives to $300 to $500 per person per year, consistent with scientific studies showing that larger amounts are more effective in promoting abstinence.
'The $75 was enough to get people to come to group [meetings],' Alves said. 'By the time the $75 ran out, we had nurse-patient relationships with people and that's what has made the program blossom.'
Behavioral scientists said the programs are effective in part because the prizes act much like stimulants do — by increasing dopamine levels in the brain.
The US Department of Veterans Affairs was
Advertisement
The concept is also taking hold in Maine, which has been
And in Vermont,
Some treatment providers are wary of giving prizes that they say patients could then sell or trade for drugs. Yet that hasn't emerged as a problem, say clinicians and researchers. The Howard Center tracks how participants spend the rewards and found they largely use the money to buy food, gas, and other basic items.
Rosario Malcolm-Testaverde credits a contingency management program with potentially saving his life.
He spent 15 years addicted to crystal methamphetamine, bouncing in and out of hospital emergency departments, before he discovered the Boston Medical Center program. He didn't need the money, yet the weekly prizes gave him an incentive to show up at group meetings. There, he encountered a community of people who understood the powerful pull of crystal meth and its dangerous side effects — including paranoia and auditory hallucinations.
Advertisement
'I felt fully recognized as a human being,' said Malcolm-Testaverde, 36. 'And the rewards system helped replace the dopamine hit I would get [from crystal meth].'
At noon on a recent Monday, the mood was upbeat as Pagan and a dozen other people in recovery filed into a brightly lit conference room at the Boston Health Care for the Homeless office at 780 Albany St.
One by one, members introduced themselves and talked about what they were looking forward to in their lives. An older man named John described the daily challenge of staying sober when, each day, he encountered people using cocaine outside his apartment building in Cambridge's Central Square.
Among the last to speak, Pagan proudly announced to the group that she had just received word of a new job opportunity and was brushing up her resume — something she never would have imagined just a couple of years ago, when she was still living on the streets and using drugs.
'Hopefully a door opens because I feel like I'm ready,' Pagan said.
In an instant, everyone around the table burst into applause.
Chris Serres can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mass. beach closures: Nearly 40 beaches closed on Sunday, July 13
Mass. beach closures: Nearly 40 beaches closed on Sunday, July 13

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mass. beach closures: Nearly 40 beaches closed on Sunday, July 13

Several beaches across Massachusetts are closed on Sunday, July 13. Nearly 40 beaches were closed mostly due to high bacteria levels, according to the state Department of Public Health. One of those is the main beach at Walden Pond State Reservation, which will remain closed for the entirety of summer 2025 as a new, state-of-the-art $6.1 million bathhouse is constructed. Red Cross Beach at Walden Pond will remain open with no lifeguards. Here is the list of closed beaches: Ashby: Damond Pond Beach for an unlisted reason Ashland: Ashland Reservoir-Main Beach due to bacterial exceedance Beverly: Brakenbury due to bacterial exceedance Boston: Constitution at Middle, North and Rec Center; Malibu; Tenean; all due to bacterial exceedance Bourne: Cataumet Harbor; Patuisset due to bacterial exceedance Brewster: Upper Mill Pond due to harmful cyanobacteria bloom Brookfield: South Pond due to bacterial exceedance Chatham: Jacknife Harbor due to bacterial exceedance Concord: Walden Pond - Main - due to an unlisted reason Danvers: Sandy Beach due to bacterial exceedance Dartmouth: Jones Town Beach North and South due to a CSO/SSO event; Moses Smith Creek due to bacterial exceedance Eastham: S. Sunken Meadow due to bacterial exceedance Lynn: Kings beach at Eastern Ave., Kimball Road and Pierce Road due to bacterial exceedance Quincy: Wollaston at Channing Street, Milton Street, Rice Road, and Sachem Street due to bacterial exceedance Salem: Children's Island - Back - and Ocean Avenue due to bacterial exceedance Springfield: Camp Wilder at Right due to bacterial exceedance Swampscott: Fisherman's, Kings and Phillips, due to bacterial exceedance Swansea: Leeside due to bacterial exceedance Templeton: Beamans Pond, at Campground and Day Use, due to bacterial exceedance Westminster: Crow Hill Pond Beach due to bacterial exceedance Winchester: Shannon Beach at Upper Mystic due to bacterial exceedance Winthrop: Donovans and Halford due to bacterial exceedance Bacteria in beach water can come from a variety of sources, including: Stormwater (rain) run-off Failing or malfunctioning septic systems Combined and sanitary sewer overflows Leaking sewer pipes Illegal sewer hookups Wildlife and pet waste Agricultural runoff In order to ensure beaches are safe for swimming, the DPH tests the waters anywhere from daily to monthly, depending on how likely the beach is to have water quality issues and its popularity. If a beach is used often or is prone to water quality issues, then it's tested more often and vice versa, the DPH wrote. Beaches remain closed until laboratory analysis shows bacteria levels are within the acceptable range for safe swimming. 'Laboratory analysis for all beach samples takes approximately 24 hours,' according to the department's website. 'So it is common for a beach closure to last a day or two following an exceedance.' Swimming in beach water that has high levels of bacteria can be risky and can result in illnesses, including: Gastrointestinal symptoms- nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain Respiratory symptoms- sore throat, cough, runny nose and sneezing Dermatological symptoms- skin rash and itching Eye and ear symptoms- irritation, earache, itching Flu-like symptoms- fever and chills Therefore, it's important to check for any warnings or beach closures indicating that the water could be unsafe. To do this, done check the weather, avoid swimming after heavy rain, watch for signs of water pollution like discolored, fast flowing and strong smelling water, do not swim near trash or litter floating in the water, avoid swallowing the water and swim in areas designated as 'swim beaches.' Although a beach could be posted, the public can still visit the location and take part in other activities that don't involve contact with the water. This can include anything from playing sports like volleyball or frisbee to sunbathing or collecting seashells or sea glass, the DPH said. The public can also do its part in helping to reduce contamination and pollution at the beach by: Cleaning up after pets Not feeding the birds as it encourages them to hang around the beaches, which increases fecal matter Using public restrooms Picking up and throwing away trash using public restrooms or properly disposing of it at home Not entering the water when sick or feeling unwell Changing diapers and putting plastic or rubber pants, known as swim diapers, on diapered children before they enter the water Not dumping anything down storm drains, as water moving through these drains does not get treated at a wastewater facility and flows directly into lakes and streams Avoiding the use of fertilizers and pesticides in yards since these chemicals can easily carry into the surface of waters during rain events and snowmelt Use walkways and avoid walking on dunes to prevent erosion and preserve vegetation that filters out pollutants from runoff before they reach the beach More details from the DPH can be found here. After long break, Our Lady of Mount Carmel Italian Feast is back (Photos) Generations of Desmarais family gather in Chicopee for 100th reunion 'He didn't deserve this': Mass. man who died after police struggle identified Driver injured after crashing into 2 Springfield homes Gardener's Supply Co. bankruptcy is set to hit WMass farms hard Read the original article on MassLive.

HHS restricts undocumented immigrants' access to federal benefits
HHS restricts undocumented immigrants' access to federal benefits

Axios

time4 days ago

  • Axios

HHS restricts undocumented immigrants' access to federal benefits

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Thursday said his department is immediately restricting undocumented immigrants' access to Head Start, community health centers and other federal benefits, as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration. The big picture: Undocumented immigrants are already prevented from accessing most federal benefits. But HHS is taking the additional step of rescinding a 1998 notice that defined certain publicly-funded programs like free preschool and accessible health clinics in a way that allowed undocumented immigrants to use them. Where it stands: Head Start, federally funded health centers, mental health and substance use disorder treatment programs and block grants, the Title X family planning program and nine others programs will now be considered federal benefits. Additional programs could be added to the list, HHS says. Zoom out: The change follows a February executive order from President Trump directing federal agencies to tighten restrictions on undocumented people's access to taxpayer-funded benefits. Undocumented immigrants paid $55.8 billion in federal taxes in 2023, according to the American Immigration Council. What they're saying:"This decision undermines the fundamental commitment that the country has made to children and disregards decades of evidence that Head Start is essential to our collective future," Yasmina Vinci, executive director of the National Head Start Association, said in a statement. "The Head Start Act has never required documentation of immigration status as a condition for enrollment over the last 60 years," she said. "Attempts to impose such a requirement threaten to create fear and confusion among all families who are focused on raising healthy children, ready to succeed in school and life." Context: Congress in 1996 passed a welfare reform law that stipulated that undocumented immigrants aren't eligible for federal public benefits, with a narrow set of exceptions. The law defines federal public benefits as retirement, welfare, health, disability, housing assistance, postsecondary education, food assistance, unemployment benefits and similar benefits where federal assistance is provided to an individual, household or family. It also includes grants, contracts, loans and licenses provided by a federal agency or with federal funds. HHS is now saying that the Clinton administration "impermissibly" allowed exemptions to the law, including for benefits that are targeted to communities in general, rather than requiring individual eligibility. The policy change won't alter funding levels for the programs but it "ensures that public resources are no longer used to incentivize illegal immigration," per an HHS news release. For Head Start, the change is expected to free up about $347 million annually, but will cost an estimated $21 million a year in time spent by individuals seeking to use the benefits and those who have to review program eligibility. The changes are effective immediately, though HHS is accepting public comment for 30 days, per the notice.

Common Cold Virus Infections Drop After SARS-CoV-2 Exposure
Common Cold Virus Infections Drop After SARS-CoV-2 Exposure

Medscape

time6 days ago

  • Medscape

Common Cold Virus Infections Drop After SARS-CoV-2 Exposure

TOPLINE: Detection of common cold coronaviruses (ccCoVs) decreased by approximately half after the widespread SARS-CoV-2 exposure and COVID-19 vaccination, whereas detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza virus remained largely unchanged. METHODOLOGY: As ccCoVs share genetic and antigenic features with SARS-CoV-2, widespread exposure to SARS-CoV-2 (through infection and vaccination) might affect ccCoV circulation. Researchers conducted a single-center retrospective study at Boston Medical Center comparing the incidence of ccCoV, RSV, and influenza virus infections before the COVID-19 pandemic and after the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron surge and widespread vaccination. The data collected encompassed five pre-COVID-19 seasons (October 2015 to March 2020), designated as period 1, and two post-widespread Omicron infection and COVID-19 vaccination seasons (October 2022 to April 2024), designated as period 2. Test positivity was evaluated while accounting for age, biological sex at birth, and level of hospitalization. TAKEAWAY: Weekly ccCoV detection decreased by approximately 50% in period 2 vs period 1 (intercept, 12.35; β, -5.87; P < .0001), while RSV (intercept, 14.55; β, 4.34; P = .08) and influenza virus (intercept, 41.86; β = 2.83; P = .73) showed no significant decrease. After adjusting for age, sex, and level of medical care, the odds of detecting ccCoV were > 50% lower in period 2 than in period 1, whereas the odds of detecting RSV were approximately 25% higher. Individuals younger than 18 years had significantly higher ccCoV and RSV infections but not those older than 65 years. higher ccCoV and RSV infections but not those older than 65 years. Biological sex at birth was not associated with the incidence of either ccCoV or RSV disease. IN PRACTICE: 'Our current work demonstrates changes in ccCoV epidemiology in the city of Boston after nearly ubiquitous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 antigens from infection and COVID-19 vaccination,' the authors wrote. 'SARS-CoV-2 infection potentially provides this heterotypic immunity, we cannot discount the effect of COVID-19 vaccination in this investigation,' they added. SOURCE: The study was led by Trisha Parayil, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston. It was published online on June 18, 2025, in Open Forum Infectious Diseases. LIMITATIONS: The study showed associations but did not prove causation. The findings need to be validated from health centers beyond Boston to establish generalizability. Ongoing CoV evolution and waning SARS-CoV-2 immunity may alter these associations in the future. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness. The authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store