Teoh Beng Hock's sister demands accountability
Beng Hock's sister, Lee Lan expressed her dismay over the decision for no further action (NFA), especially given that multiple court rulings had established the death was not due to suicide or an accident.
She said that the Court of Appeal had ruled in 2014 that Teoh's death was caused by the actions of individuals, including Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers, and demanded that the police investigate the case under the proper criminal provisions.
"The recent police investigation of the case was under Section 342 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement, instead of provisions appropriate for a homicide case.
"The post-mortem revealed serious neck injuries, yet no one has been held accountable.This is a clear case of homicide," she said at a solidarity event for her brother.
She also called for those currently in the government to act appropriately as they had in the past stood by the fact that he was killed.
"Those in government now, had in the past stood by the fact that Beng Hock was killed.
"Why now NFA? It's a slap on their face (on what they have stood for)," she said.
Last month, Beng Hock's family was informed by police that their latest investigation into the case had been classified as requiring no further action or NFA.
On Nov 21 last year, the High Court had directed the police to complete their long-delayed investigation into the death more than 15 years ago.
Beng Hock died on July 16, 2009 at the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam, after being questioned for hours by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). An inquest was held and the coroner returned an open verdict.
However, the Court of Appeal in 2014 ruled that his death was caused by "one or more persons unknown", including MACC officers.
In 2019, police launched an investigation under Section 342 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement.
Prior to 2018, two special investigation teams were set up – one in 2011 and the other in 2015 – to look into Teoh's death, but both cases were classified as NFA by the public prosecutor.
Meanwhile, Eliminating Deaths and Abuse in Custody Together (Edict) chairman M. Visvanathan, said he would be able to solve the case within 21 days if he were appointed as a special prosecutor.
Speaking at the same event, he called for the A-GC to appoint him as an ad hoc prosecutor to oversee the case involving Beng Hock's death.
This, he said as three doctors had confirmed that Beng Hock had injuries to his neck which occurred prior to his fall from the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam.
"I propose to the AG, prime minister and home ministry, make me the ad hoc prosecutor. I will solve this case within 21 days of my appointment," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Developer liable for defects to Subang Parkhomes' common property
The Court of Appeal has affirmed a High Court ruling entering liability judgment in favour of the Subang Parkhomes JMB and for damages to be assessed. (Facebook pic) PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has unanimously dismissed a developer's appeal, affirming its liability to the joint management body (JMB) of a Subang condominium for loss and damage arising from defects in the common property. A three-member bench chaired by Justice Che Ruzima Ghazali upheld a judgment entered by the High Court in the JMB's favour, saying the ruling was sound both in law and fact. 'We decline to disturb the finding of liability,' said Che Ruzima, who sat with Justices Zaini Mazlan and Shahnaz Sulaiman. Che Ruzima also said the High Court did not commit any error in ordering an assessment of the damages payable. The bench also ordered the developer, Zen Estate Sdn Bhd, to pay costs of RM20,000 to Subang Parkhomes' JMB. The JMB represents some 475 condominium purchasers who had bought their respective units at between RM800,000 and RM1 million. Vacant possession to the units was delivered in 2013 and 2014. Following its formation in 2016 under the Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA), the JMB sought out the developer to hand over all documents to facilitate the management and maintenance of the units and the common property. It subsequently took out an application for discovery and, in 2020, filed a negligence suit against the developer over defects to the common property. The complaints included leaks to the roofs of its penthouses and at the complex's basement carparks, as well as damage to the tiles of its jacuzzi and swimming pools. The JMB also claimed the developer had failed to ensure that all electrical installations complied with the Electricity Regulations 1994. In its defence, Zen Estate contended that the complaint pertained to maintenance and that the 24-month defect liability period had lapsed. Accordingly, it argued that the suit was unsustainable. In the High Court last year, Justice Wong Kian Kheong ruled in the JMB's favour, holding that the loss and damage suffered were reasonably foreseeable. Wong, now a Court of Appeal judge, said the developer was aware that the JMB would eventually be constituted to assume responsibility for maintaining and managing the common property. He said Parliament had via the SMA expressly conferred statutory duties and powers on the JMB to carry out these functions. Wong held that the developer's obligations arose by operation of law and the absence of a contractual relationship with the JMB did not affect its claim. 'This is because the tort of negligence in itself is a cause of action which is independent of any contract between the plaintiff (JMB) and the defendant (Zen Estate),' he said. He also found that loss and damage suffered was reasonably foreseeable. Wong said the defects were attributable to the developer and ordered that damages — including for rectification work already carried out by the JMB — be assessed and paid. He also ordered the developer to compensate the JMB for loss of use and enjoyment of the common property in a sum to be assessed. Lawyers CK Lim, Julian Chan, David Yii and S Hemashantini represented the JMB while Cheryl Tay and Carmen Liao acted for the developer.
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Suspect in police stabbing case to be charged tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: A 56-year-old man accused of stabbing a policeman during a crime prevention patrol at Pasar Pudu, Jalan Yew, will be charged tomorrow. He is scheduled to be charged at the Kuala Lumpur Court at 9am. Acting Kuala Lumpur Police Chief Datuk Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad said the man was arrested after the incident and found with a knife. "Also seized were three clear plastic packets containing powder and chunks believed to be drugs. "The case is being investigated under Sections 307/186 of the Penal Code for attempted murder with a weapon and obstructing a public servant from performing his duties," he said. The attack occurred when the injured policeman and four colleagues were inspecting the suspect.
![[Watch] Penang Burglar's Epic Fail: Casually Strolls Past Confronting Homeowner, Bolts At Back Door, Then Returns For Forgotten Loot](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.therakyatpost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F08%2FUntitled24.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Watch] Penang Burglar's Epic Fail: Casually Strolls Past Confronting Homeowner, Bolts At Back Door, Then Returns For Forgotten Loot](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Ftherakyatpost.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Rakyat Post
6 hours ago
- Rakyat Post
[Watch] Penang Burglar's Epic Fail: Casually Strolls Past Confronting Homeowner, Bolts At Back Door, Then Returns For Forgotten Loot
Subscribe to our FREE A would-be burglar in Penang delivered a masterclass in criminal incompetence this week, first brazenly walking past a confronting homeowner like he owned the place, then sealing his own doom by returning to the crime scene for whatever he'd left behind. The suspect's audacious break-in at a Batu Maung residence started promisingly enough – slipping through the back door while the domestic helper was outside taking out trash. But when the homeowner spotted the intruder, what happened next was pure criminal comedy gold. According to Southwest District Police Chief ACP Sazalee Adam, the burglar didn't immediately panic when confronted. Instead, he had the sheer nerve to casually stroll toward the exit as the homeowner questioned his presence, maintaining his composure like some sort of discount Hollywood heist film character from It was only when he reached the back door that reality kicked in, and he suddenly bolted into the night. The whole surreal encounter was captured in a 25-second viral video showing the suspect nonchalantly descending the stairs while the homeowner – reportedly a TikTok influencer known as 'Choii' – demanded to know what he was doing in the house. From Burglar to Reluctant Entertainment But here's where criminal stupidity reached peak levels: instead of celebrating his narrow escape, our genius decided to double back for whatever treasure he'd forgotten in his hasty retreat. That's when the homeowner and friends were ready and waiting, turning the tables on the would-be thief and holding him until police patrol units from Zone 3 Batu Maung arrived. The defeated burglar even managed to give an impromptu 'interview' to the homeowner while sitting on their sofa, presumably while awaiting his police escort – because nothing caps off a failed heist quite like a casual chat with your victim. In what can only be described as the most bizarre criminal surrender ever, the suspect was also asked to show off some dance moves, which he obliged. The caught burglar even advised viewers not to follow his mistakes, delivering what might be the most authentic public service announcement ever recorded. The Chemical Explanation Drug screening revealed the suspect tested positive for methamphetamine, amphetamine, and benzodiazepine – a chemical cocktail that might explain both his initial Police records show previous drug-related offences, because naturally. The suspect faces charges under Section 448 of the Penal Code at the Balik Pulau Magistrate's Court today (5 August), carrying a maximum penalty of three years in prison or a fine of RM5,000 if convicted. In the hall of fame for 'boldest criminal moves that backfired spectacularly,' casually walking past your victim before panicking at the exit, then returning for seconds, has got to be a top contender. Sometimes, the best security system is simply a combination of criminal overconfidence and poor judgment calls. Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
