Arena Holdings mourns celebrated and seasoned Sowetan executive editor Pearl Sebolao
'It is with sadness that we share the news of the passing of our colleague, Sowetan executive editor Pearl Sebolao,' she said.
The seasoned and much-loved Sebolao previously served as Business Day digital editor where she helped shape content and provide guidance in the newsroom.
'Pearl was a quiet force in our newsroom, thoughtful, meticulous and deeply committed to editorial excellence,' Makunga lamented.
Her career in journalism spanned many years.
Though Sebolao worked away from the limelight, her influence was impactful in the newsroom, said Makunga.
'The stories she helped shape and the support she offered to many colleagues over the years will be missed.
'She was a mentor and a steady hand and someone who brought integrity to everything she did.'
Makunga said Sebolao's death would leave a void in the newsroom.
Memorial and funeral details will be released by her family in due course.
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
FlySafair pilot strike leads to some flight cancellations
FlySafair has had to cancel 26 flights due to a labour strike by pilots. The Solidarity trade union said more than 200 pilots affiliated to it want a 10% salary increase and improved working conditions. They have rejected the airline's offer to workers of a 5.7% salary increase and adjustments to compensation. In a statement issued at 11pm on Sunday, the airline said while its contingency plans should ensure flight operations continue largely as scheduled on Monday, "unfortunately a quantity of flights have had to be cancelled". "The flights were assigned to pilots who had confirmed their availability to fly, but who late last night reported they would not fly. "All other flights are operating as planned, and affected customers have been contacted directly using details provided at the time of booking. Should there be further disruptions, customers will be notified promptly." Flights cancelled due to the pilot strike: FA112 — 11.45am Cape Town to Johannesburg FA262 — 2.25pm Johannesburg to Durban FA263 — 4.1pm Durban to Johannesburg FA310 — 7.20am Cape Town to Lanseria FA311 — 10am Lanseria to Cape Town FA690 — 3.15pm Cape Town to Johannesburg FA840 — 6.30am Cape Town to Bloemfontein FA841 — 8.40am Bloemfontein to Cape Town FA339 — 6.20am Cape Town to Lanseria FA315 — 9.20am Lanseria to Cape Town FA178 — 12pm Cape Town to Durban FA417 — 2.40pm Durban to Johannesburg FA418 — 4.3pm Johannesburg to Durban FA179 — 6.15pm Durban to Cape Town FA104 — 6.15am Cape Town to Johannesburg FA105 — 8.55am Johannesburg to Cape Town FA110 — 11.55am Cape Town to Johannesburg FA111 — 2.35pm Johannesburg to Cape Town FA540 — 7.45pm Johannesburg to Durban FA541 — 9.3pm Durban to Johannesburg FA306 — 11.30am Cape Town to Lanseria FA305 — 2.05pm Lanseria to Cape Town FA293 — 7am Cape Town to Johannesburg FA292 — 9.40am Johannesburg to Cape Town FA130 — 12.25pm Cape Town to Port Elizabeth FA031 — 2.30pm Port Elizabeth to Cape Town FlySafair said Solidarity's pay hike demand amounts to more than a 20% increase in overall cost to company, if the increase on base salaries and additional flight pay and bonuses are taken into account. This "is an unsustainable escalation for any company". By contrast, the company's offer on base pay and other benefits including a flight pay based bonus brings the total increase to 11.29% on a cost to company basis, Safair said. FlySafair pilots are among the best-compensated professionals in the country, the airline said. Its captains earn between R1.8m and R2.3m annually. "The salaries are regularly benchmarked against those at other local airlines and are higher than most. "In terms of workload, FlySafair captains spent an average of 63 hours last month in the cockpit flying passengers. This is well within regulatory limits set by the Civil Aviation Authority, IATA and ICAO, which cap flight duty at 100 hours per month. Additional responsibilities such as training and office time are factored in, as is standby duty, where pilots must be ready to fly at short notice, which is served from home under minimal restrictions." FlySafair defended the rostering system it implemented at the start of the year, which is a bone of contention with the union. "The system was designed to improve operational efficiency and provide pilots with maximum flexibility," it said. "Thes system, standard across the global airline industry and in force in every other airline in South Africa, allows pilots to receive their full monthly rosters by the 20th of the preceding month, enabling personal planning and scheduling. It also includes a preferential leave bidding process and a structured marketplace to facilitate duty swaps within regulated flight and duty limits. "We deeply regret the impact the situation is having on our customers. Our goal remains to reach a reasonable resolution quickly." What to do if your flight is cancelled. TimesLIVE
The Herald
3 hours ago
- The Herald
Kariega's ‘Home of Polo' accelerates into top gear
It's been a year to remember for Volkswagen Group Africa (VWGA), since it became the sole exporter of the Polo within the group globally, with 12 months that were marked by milestones for one of Mzansi's favourite vehicles. While the Kariega plant has been producing the Polo since 1996 and the Polo Vivo since 2010, it has only been the self-proclaimed Home of Polo since July 1 2024. The Polo is exported to 38 markets around the world and accounts for 88% of exported vehicles through the Port of Port Elizabeth, with 119,336 Polos having been exported from Kariega to Europe and the Asia-Pacific region in the last year. The Polo was SA's most exported vehicle in 2024 with the majority of the units shipped to Germany, France and the UK. VWGA production director Ulrich Schwabe said the Polo also performed strongly in the local market in 2024, selling 12,253 units and being named the top locally manufactured vehicle of the year at the Naamsa Accelerator Awards in October 2024. That same month was also the busiest production period for the plant, with a record-breaking 13,930 Polos built. 'The Polo is unquestionably an icon, and we are proud to call Plant Kariega its home,' Schwabe said. 'Our first year as the sole exporter of the Polo was a strong one, and we plan to build on the foundation of this success continuously and consistently, with the Polo, Vivo and our upcoming third model, the Tengo.' The plant celebrated a record production volume for 2024 with a total of 167,084 vehicles built in Kariega, of which 131,485 units were Polos for export, and 35,599 vehicles were Polos and Polo Vivos for the local market. Volkswagen also recently celebrated five decades of the Polo hatchback, with the launch of the new Polo Edition 50. However, the Edition 50 will only be available in European and UK markets. The Herald
Mail & Guardian
19 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Flood damage: An act of God or governance failure?
Car pool: When Toyota's vehicle assembly plant in Durban flooded in 2022, the car maker's insurer took the municipality to court. Photo: File Everyone remembers April 2022, when torrential rains pummelled KwaZulu-Natal and floodwaters ravaged homes, roads and factories. Lives were lost, families were displaced and infrastructure was destroyed. And although every part of the province bore the weight of that disaster, one story in particular has found its way into court. Toyota South Africa Motors (TSAM), has a vehicle assembly plant situated in Prospecton, Durban. It had to shut down operations after the factory was submerged during the flooding. The production lines came to a grinding halt. Pictures circulated on social media of thousands of brand-new vehicles drowning at the plant. They were written off before they even had a chance to hit the showroom floor. The damage was extensive, costs were astronomical and timelines for recovery, like so many things in this country, were uncertain. TSAM's insurer has now taken the matter to court, not against Toyota, but against eThekwini metropolitan municipality. The company said in court papers that the flooding and subsequent damages were exacerbated by the city's failure to maintain a key piece of public infrastructure: the Umlaas Canal. The canal was built decades ago to divert the uMlazi River around the industrial zone of Prospecton. According to court papers, the insurer contends that the canal, which is owned by Transnet but managed and maintained in conjunction with the department of transport and eThekwini municipality, had deteriorated to the point of failure. They argue that its structural integrity was so compromised that it could not handle the sheer volume of stormwater during the April floods. And that had the infrastructure been properly maintained, the damage would have been far less severe. Now, whether you agree with that line of reasoning or not, it raises a much bigger question that we should all be asking: when infrastructure fails and the consequences are devastating, who is responsible? Here in South Africa, we are immune to poor service delivery. We normalise the dysfunction of paying for taxes but not receiving adequate, standard services in exchange. The idea of infrastructure collapse has become so familiar that it's practically baked into our national psyche. Potholes are the size of bathtubs (some literally with trees growing in them). Water leaks persist for weeks and remain unrepaired, despite numerous community complaints made through official channels. Substations that blow up have not been maintained for decades. We shake our heads, mutter something about service delivery, and move on. Until something big breaks and suddenly, it's not just about inconvenience anymore. It's about livelihoods. It's about public safety. It's about people losing their jobs, assets and sometimes even their lives. So when a flood rolls through Durban and knocks out one of the biggest vehicle assembly plants in the southern hemisphere, we have to ask, was it really just an 'act of God'? Or was it a long-ignored systems failure, the kind that we have come to expect and accept? One of my followers offered an informed perspective that deserves space in this conversation and brings some balance to the argument. According to him, and a report by Aecom (Toyota's engineers), eThekwini hasn't been idle. Since the 2017 floods, it has reportedly worked with Toyota to implement several mitigation measures: installing a new outfall at Clark Road, upgrading the Prospecton Road canal and developing an attenuation facility upstream. Toyota has also enhanced its internal stormwater systems, all with the aim of managing flood risks well beyond standard design thresholds. Aecom estimates the 2022 flood was a one-in-200-year event, significantly more severe than the historic 1987 flood. If that's accurate, then perhaps this wasn't purely a failure of infrastructure maintenance, but rather a climate event that overwhelmed even above-standard defences. The same reader raised another important point: litigation might do more harm than good. The Dutch report on damages in the Prospecton area put the figure at a staggering R75 billion. In his view, that kind of crisis demands collaboration and consolidated funding, not courtrooms and high legal costs. Litigation, he argues, divides the very stakeholders who should be working together. Can you hold a municipality accountable for systemic failure, without undermining the partnerships that are needed to prevent future ones? There have been numerous instances in South Africa where maintenance funds are unaccounted for, and the organisation responsible remains unaccountable. Perhaps that's why we jump to the conclusion that eThekwini has failed us. This court case raises a real question: can a municipality be held liable for damages when its failure to maintain public infrastructure leads to a private sector loss? And if the metro loses this case, what precedent will it set for other private businesses whose operations were affected? I believe this will not be an easy case to prove. Municipalities will almost always argue that they don't have the funds, the personnel or the resources to do everything that needs to be done. If you're a business, and especially if you're a business investing in fixed assets such as factories, you operate under the assumption that the state will maintain basic infrastructure. That's not a luxury. It's the bare minimum. It's part of the social contract that underpins why we pay rates and taxes. In a province that is prone to flooding, business and government should constantly be working together to prevent infrastructure failures. This is a case worth hearing. Because if we start drawing legal lines around what constitutes negligence when it comes to public infrastructure, maybe it will shift the conversation away from vague, hand-wringing frustration and into the realm of consequences. Here's the part that really gets to me when it comes to infrastructure failures caused by government negligence: the fact that so many people read about these kinds of things and barely flinch. It seems that the norm for South Africans is to accept what is. Not because they don't care, but because they've stopped expecting better. There is a kind of quiet resignation that has set in when it comes to local government, especially in provinces such as KwaZulu-Natal, where service delivery failures have become the norm rather than the exception. It's almost as though people have internalised the dysfunction. 'That's just how it is,' they say. 'You can't fight a metro.' So they fix things themselves. Or they wait. Or they leave. They move to metros where things work better. Cape Town. George. The Garden Route. Suddenly, a flood in Durban isn't just a disaster, it becomes part of a trend. A reason to relocate. A push factor or a final straw in a long list of reasons people and capital are fleeing underperforming municipalities. And this is where the real long-term damage begins. When people leave a metro, they don't just take their frustrations with them. They take their tax contributions. Their rates. Their investments. Their businesses. Their energy. Their participation. They leave behind a shrinking municipal budget, fewer resources and a growing hole in the very capacity that was meant to fix the problem in the first place. And on the flip side? The metros that are functioning, or at least doing a passable job, are now buckling under the pressure of inward migration. Your roads are more congested. Your schools are fuller. Your hospitals have longer queues. And your infrastructure, which might have been designed for a population of a million, is now trying to support 1.5 million or more. It's a vicious cycle. One that affects everyone, not just the people who made the move. So although it's easy to say 'vote with your feet', we need to ask what kind of long-term structural consequences that has for our cities, our budgets and our national cohesion. I would like to see more municipalities being challenged. I want legal precedents that remind us that governance comes with responsibility. That neglect has a cost. That service delivery isn't optional. Not just outrage on X. Not just another audit report. Real legal and financial accountability. But more than that, I want us as citizens, residents, ratepayers and business owners to start asking better questions. To demand better answers. And to stop accepting mediocrity as the default setting for how this country is run. Yes, things are hard, we are resilient and budgets are tight. But we need to stop accepting those excuses as explanations for why things never improve. What happened at Toyota in Durban wasn't just a flood. It was a failure. A systems failure. And perhaps a governance failure. It could serve as a reminder that we are not powerless. That accountability doesn't begin and end at the ballot box. That municipalities exist to serve us, not the other way around. And that if we don't start holding them to a higher standard, we will be repeating this cycle of damage, disappointment, and decay. So the next time a pipe bursts or a streetlight stays broken for six months, don't just shrug. Ask the hard questions. Demand the repair. File the complaint. Write the letter. And, above all, stay on top of it. Because if we don't hold our metros accountable, who will? Ask Ash examines South Africa's property, architecture and living spaces. Continue the conversation with her on email (
