AfDB steps in with $474.6 million as South Africa pushes infrastructure reforms
Announced on Tuesday, the loan is the second major infrastructure financing deal secured by South Africa in recent weeks, following a $1.5 billion agreement with the World Bank in June. Together, the two loans represent a renewed show of confidence from international financial institutions in the government's efforts to reverse years of underinvestment and inefficiencies in key sectors.
In a statement, the AfDB said its contribution is part of a larger international financing package assembled to assist South Africa.
According to Reuters, the support includes a $1.5 billion loan from the World Bank, €500 million ($590.75 million) from Germany's KfW development bank, up to $200 million from the Japan International Cooperation Agency, and $150 million from the OPEC Fund for International Development.
The AfDB noted that the financing would directly support South Africa's Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan (ERRP), which seeks to improve infrastructure, stimulate economic growth, and foster greater resilience in the face of persistent challenges, including energy shortages and logistics inefficiencies.
South Africa's major power firms grapple with crises
South Africa is aiming to overhaul its transport and energy infrastructure in a bid to reignite economic growth, the National Treasury said on Monday.
For more than a decade, Africa's most advanced economy has struggled to expand, hampered by persistent power cuts, decaying rail systems, and congested ports that have disrupted key sectors such as mining and automotive manufacturing.
The African Development Bank's (AfDB) $474.6 million loan arrives at a critical moment. Power utility Eskom continues to suffer frequent breakdowns and load shedding, while logistics firm Transnet battles failing rail infrastructure and severe port delays—issues that have choked exports and undermined business operations.
Government officials view the AfDB's support as more than a financial boost; they see it as a strategic vote of confidence in the country's policy direction.
Years of mismanagement and financial strain at both Eskom and Transnet have placed them at the center of South Africa's economic woes.
The AfDB's intervention, alongside a $1.5 billion World Bank loan and other multilateral support, is expected to drive urgently needed upgrades and push long-overdue restructuring. As South Africa seeks to attract more private and international capital, this latest round of funding adds vital momentum to efforts to restore infrastructure, stabilize the economy, and lay the foundation for a more inclusive and resilient future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
World Bank's IFC ramps up investment amid global uncertainty
While the world economy faces instability from US President Donald Trump's threats of a global trade war, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) is dramatically ramping up its investment activities. The Washington-based IFC -- the World Bank's private sector arm -- mobilizes private capital and provides financing to support businesses across emerging economies. Though not widely known outside development circles, the organization plays a crucial role in creating jobs and supporting growth in less developed regions. "The world economy has been going through a bit of a turbulent time, but what I must say is that even though there is turbulence... we are seeing a lot of interest in investing in emerging countries," Makhtar Diop, the IFC's managing director, told AFP. This optimism is backed by concrete numbers. In the fiscal year ending June 30, preliminary data shows that the IFC committed over $71 billion -- nearly double its commitment from just three years ago and a significant jump from last year's record of $56 billion. The investment spans the globe, with more than $20 billion flowing to Latin America, $17 billion to Asia, and $15.4 billion to Africa. The dramatic increase stems from a deliberate strategic shift. Diop, an economist and former Senegalese finance minister, explained that the IFC has focused on becoming "simpler, more agile, and delegating decision-making to our teams that are in the field." This approach abandons the over-centralized structure that previously "was slowing down our ability to respond and seize new opportunities." The timing is significant. As Western economies pull back from direct aid to developing countries -- constrained by mounting debts, rising defense budgets, and increasingly inward-looking politics -- the IFC has accelerated. "It's totally understandable that they have fewer resources to make available in the form of grants to developing countries," Diop acknowledges. However, he emphasized that World Bank funding for the world's poorest countries remains fully replenished, calling it "the most efficient and best way to support countries." The IFC's expanding role within the World Bank Group is evident. Today, its funding nearly matches the support the bank provides directly to governments, making it an equal partner in development efforts. - Dubai to Africa - The organization is also attracting new types of investors. Many co-financing partners now come from regions that traditionally haven't invested outside their home areas. The IFC's largest renewable energy investment in Africa, for example, was completed with a Dubai-based company. These investors trust the IFC not only for its market knowledge but also for the risk-mitigation tools it offers, Diop said. In Africa particularly, the IFC pursues a strategy of identifying and supporting "national champions" -- successful local companies that need help to become more competitive and globally integrated. A significant portion of the IFC's mandate involves sustainability projects, an area where Diop decries debates with false choices between economic development and the environment, especially in electricity projects that form an important part of the agency's portfolio. "It happens that today, you don't have to make that trade-off because the sustainable solutions are often the cheaper ones, and that's the beauty of what we are seeing," he said. While fossil fuel generation remains part of the energy mix to ensure grid stability, the economics increasingly favor clean alternatives. Behind all these investments lies an urgent demographic reality: 1.2 billion young people will reach working age in developing countries over the next decade. For the World Bank, creating employment for this massive cohort is paramount. "The first question of any leader you meet from the developing world is how can you help to create jobs for young people?" Diop observed. Beyond infrastructure development that stimulates broader economic activity, Diop identifies tourism, pharmaceuticals, and agriculture as the most promising sectors for job creation. These industries can offer the scale and growth potential needed to absorb the coming wave of young workers entering the global economy. arp/st
Business Insider
4 days ago
- Business Insider
Kenya loses $1.5 billion annually to corruption, says AfDB
Kenya is losing up to Sh194 billion annually due to corruption, illicit financial flows, and inefficient public spending, according to a new report by the African Development Bank (AfDB). Kenya is losing up to Sh194 billion annually due to corruption, illicit financial flows, and inefficient public spending, according to the African Development Bank report. Despite challenges, the AfDB projects Kenya's economy to grow by five percent in 2025, albeit with persistent inequality concerns. Public spending inefficiencies and tax waivers are causing significant financial drain, estimated at Sh650 billion per year. The African Economic Outlook Kenya Country Focus Report, launched in Nairobi, sheds light on how mismanagement, tax exemptions, and weak oversight mechanisms are eroding Kenya's revenue base and undermining its capacity to finance critical sectors of the economy. Public spending inefficiencies and tax waivers take a toll The report estimates that inefficiencies in public expenditure cost the country approximately Sh650 billion each year, roughly five per cent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Meanwhile, losses from tax incentives and exemptions are pegged at Sh105 billion annually. These persistent financial leakages are deepening Kenya's debt crisis, with the government now allocating more funds to interest payments than to essential services such as education and healthcare. 'Corruption and illicit financial flows cost the East African nation as much as $1.5 billion (Sh193.6 billion) annually, funds that could transform health, education, and infrastructure development,' the report states. State capture and weak rule of law hindering progress The AfDB highlights state capture, where political elites shape legislation and enforcement for personal or political gain, as a major obstacle to governance reforms. This undermines the legal environment, discourages both domestic and foreign investment, and creates a climate of uncertainty. 'Investors fear biased rulings, delays, and lack of transparency, increasing operational risks and deterring investment,' the report notes. 'Ultimately, the rule of law, upheld by robust law enforcement and an independent judiciary, remains the foundation for sustained economic growth, social equity, and public trust in governance.' While the AfDB estimates corruption-related losses at $1.5 billion annually, Kenya's own Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) places the figure much higher—at Sh608 billion or 7.8 per cent of GDP. Kenya's performance on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index also remains weak. The 2024 index ranks the country 121st out of 180 countries, with a score of 32 out of 100, just one point higher than the previous year, and still below both the African (33) and global (43) averages. A five-year review shows minimal improvement, and historical data since 1996 reveals a persistent struggle with corruption, with Kenya's best ranking at 52 in 1996 and the worst at 154 in 2010. AfDB projects growth but warns of inequality Despite these challenges, the AfDB maintains a cautiously optimistic outlook, forecasting Kenya's economy to grow by five per cent in 2025, buoyed by agriculture and services. However, growth is expected to slow slightly to 4.8 per cent in 2026. 'Rising poverty, high unemployment, and growing inequality indicate that Kenya's economic growth has not been fully inclusive,' the report warns. AfDB's projections are more optimistic than those from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, both of which expect Kenya's growth to slow to 4.8 per cent.
Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
The World's Biggest Carbon Emitters—And The Story Behind The Numbers
SAMARINDA, INDONESIA: A tug pulls a coal barge past the Islamic center in Samarinda, Kalimantan, ... More Indonesia. Indonesia's overall carbon emissions remain relatively low, but they are growing faster than any other country among the world's top ten carbon emitters. (Photo by) The previous article discussed global and regional carbon emission trends. Today, I take a closer look at the world's ten biggest carbon emitters. Carbon emissions are typically measured in metric tons, but context matters. To better understand the cause and impact of a country's carbon emissions, we must look at emissions per capita and carbon productivity—how efficiently nations generate economic output from each ton of CO₂-equivalent emissions (defined in the previous article) released. A Deeper Look at the World's Top 10 Carbon Emitters In 2024, the same ten countries topped the list of the world's largest CO₂ emitters, although Canada and South Korea swapped positions at the bottom. Population and GDP data, sourced from national statistics agencies, the IMF, and World Bank estimates, offer valuable context for analyzing emissions in terms of scale, efficiency, and fairness. Metrics for Top 10 Global Carbon Emitters. Cumulatively, these ten countries account for nearly 70% of all global CO₂ emissions. But a closer look at the numbers shows that not all emissions are created equally. The table reveals structural differences between mature economies and emerging ones, between per capita emissions and economic productivity, and between nations whose emissions are falling and those where they're still accelerating. China: Big Footprint, Modest Efficiency China was responsible for more than the combined emissions of the next four countries on the list. Despite significant investments in renewables, China's emissions continue to rise, growing 1.8% per year over the past decade. More striking is China's carbon efficiency. For every kilogram of CO₂ emitted, China generates just $1.50 USD in economic output, a modest return compared to more efficient economies. Its per capita emissions, at 8.9 tons, are still lower than in many developed countries, but far higher than in other emerging economies. United States: Lower Emissions, Higher Consumption The U.S. ranks second in total emissions at 5.1 billion metric tons, or 12.5% of the global share. But the underlying trends are encouraging. Over the past decade, U.S. emissions have declined by an average of 1.0% per year. And when it comes to carbon efficiency, the U.S. is the best in the top ten. Every kilogram of CO₂-equivalent emissions yields $5.71 in economic output. Still, individual consumption remains high. The average American emits 15 tons of CO₂ annually—more than double the average Chinese citizen and nearly seven times the per capita emissions of an Indian. The U.S. is decarbonizing, but personal and lifestyle emissions remain a major challenge. India: Growing Fast, But Not Yet a Huge Contributor India illustrates the classic dilemma of the developing world. Emissions have grown 3.8% per year for the past decade—faster than any other country in the top ten except Indonesia. Per capita emissions remain extremely low at just 2.2 tons, but productivity is one of the lowest on the list at $1.21/kg of carbon emitted. This reflects India's population size, its ongoing industrialization, and its efforts to lift millions out of poverty. In climate discussions, India's leaders often point to these disparities to argue for more flexible targets. Contrasts and Outliers Other nations offer useful contrasts: The Legacy U.S. CO₂ Inventory Although China currently dominates growth of global carbon emissions--and will continue to do so for quite some time--the legacy atmospheric contribution is important. To understand the long-term impact of emissions, it's useful to step back and ask: What is the legacy impact of U.S. carbon emissions? What if we could magically erase all the carbon dioxide the U.S. has ever released into the atmosphere? As of May 2025, global atmospheric CO₂ levels hover around 430.5 parts per million (ppm)—up from about 280 ppm before the Industrial Revolution. The United States is responsible for approximately 24% of all historical CO₂ emissions since the 1800s, contributing an estimated 421 billion metric tons. Converting that into atmospheric impact isn't an exact science—it depends on how much CO₂ is absorbed by the oceans and forests—but a widely accepted estimate is that 1 ppm of CO₂ in the atmosphere equals roughly 7.8 billion metric tons of carbon emissions. Doing the math: 421 billion metric tons ÷ 7.8 billion metric tons per ppm ≈ 54 ppm That means if all of the U.S.'s historical emissions were somehow removed from the atmosphere, today's CO₂ level would drop from 430.5 ppm to around 376.5 ppm. That's roughly where the world's atmospheric CO₂ concentration stood in the late 1990s. It's a powerful reminder that carbon dioxide doesn't just vanish. It accumulates over time, creating a legacy effect that today's climate policies must reckon with. And it underscores why historical responsibility—alongside current emissions—is a key part of international climate discussions. Legacy emissions play a key role in climate discussions, but current emissions shape our trajectory. China's current output raises atmospheric CO₂ by roughly 1.6 ppm per year. The U.S. adds around 0.65 ppm. Final Thoughts: Emissions Must Be Viewed in Context Looking at emissions only in total terms misses critical context. Per capita and GDP-based metrics provide a more nuanced view of who is emitting, why, and with what result. These measurements also highlight the complexity of balancing economic growth, energy access, and climate commitments. In the next article in this series, I'll look at global oil production and consumption trends, which are helping drive record carbon emissions.
