logo
'We should not be having race-based assemblies': Warren Mundine hits out at Victorian government over state-based Voice push

'We should not be having race-based assemblies': Warren Mundine hits out at Victorian government over state-based Voice push

Sky News AU3 days ago
Indigenous leader Warren Mundine has hit out at the Victorian government over its move to create its own Voice to Parliament after the state resoundingly voted against such a constitutional change two years ago.
The Herald Sun on Monday revealed the Allan government was planning to transform an Indigenous representative body set up as part of the state's Treaty process into its own Voice.
The First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria, comprising of 33 members, was established by Labor in 2018 to represent the state's Indigenous population during treaty negotiations.
However, the Allan government is planning to strengthen its powers and make the body permanent, creating what is likely to be the equivalent of a state-based Voice to Parliament.
The move comes despite more than 54 per cent of Victorians voting No during the Voice to Parliament referendum in October 2023.
Mr Mundine, a leading No campaigner during the referendum, took aim at the idea of establishing what he described as "race-based assemblies".
"What it says is that their government has failed. It has failed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that are living in Victoria," he told Sky News host Danica De Giorgio.
"They should be held accountable for that - that's number one."
Mr Mundine then recalled the journey of Indigenous Australians who have been fighting for equal representation for decades.
"When I was a young boy growing up... we all fought, my parents, my grandparents - we all fought to be treated equal," he said.
"We wanted all those Aboriginal laws that segregated us and that to be dealt with and done away."
Mr Mundine noted the prominent law change under Menzies government in 1962 which gave adult Indigenous Australians full voting rights.
Five years later in the 1967 referendum, Australians voted to change the constitution to ensure Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people would be acknowledged as equal citizens.
"(In) 1967, the Holt government. We were citizens of this country, but the states and territories were still holding us back. We got rid of all that, we've become full citizens," Mr Mundine said.
"You have education, you have land rights, you have native titles, you have business and economic development.
"In fact, I know some businesses have just gone over to India to actually do business and that over there.
"We've got a whole wide range of great things that are happening in this country because we want to be treated the same as every other Australian. We should not be having race-based assemblies."
All six states, or 60 per cent of Australians in terms of a national vote, rejected the proposal to change the constitution to establish an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the 2023.
The state with the highest No vote was Queensland with 68 per cent, followed by South Australia at 64 per cent and Western Australia with 63 per cent.
In New South Wales and Tasmania, about 58 per cent of people voted against the constitutional change in each state.
"The number of people who have rejected this idea... I just find it bizarre," Mr Mundine said, regarding the Victorian government's move.
Speaking to media on Monday, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan dismissed the suggestion that Victorians had rejected a state-based Voice.
"The key difference to the referendum that was put nationwide a couple of years ago is that was changing the constitution," the Premier said.
"This is not changing the Victorian constitution. It's simply taking a common-sense approach. It's sitting the First People's Assembly, an ongoing representative body, into our existing parliamentary structures.
"The significant change is it'll be a body where we will be listening and taking on their advice."
The government has not yet detailed what powers it will give the body.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Decision on new name for ‘offensive' park nears
Decision on new name for ‘offensive' park nears

Perth Now

time42 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Decision on new name for ‘offensive' park nears

Six years after first determining a Mullaloo park's name was no longer appropriate, the City of Joondalup is yet to settle on a replacement name for Blackboy Park. However, there may finally be an end in sight after the council last week voted to base the new name from an adjoining street after Landgate rejected the city's preferred option. When the matter arose in 2019, the previous council decided not to adopt a local street name as the park's new name, opting to seek appropriate Aboriginal place names instead. It wasn't until early 2024 that the city engaged with an Aboriginal-led consultancy and the name 'Koorlangka Park' was selected, meaning 'children's park' in Noongar. Despite spending more than $26,000 on the name and holding community consultation earlier this year, where broad support for the change was found, the city cannot proceed with 'Koorlangka Park' as Landgate said it was too similar to a nearby street. City of Joondalup council members ultimately voted last week to not support any more spending on consultancy about the renaming of Blackboy Park, unless identified and approved by council, and voted to support progressing with either Karalundie or Koolyanga Park — and if those names are not approved, to go with 'Laurel Park'. Cr Russ Fishwick, who initiated the renaming motion in 2019, expressed frustration with how long the process has taken. 'When I first raised this notice of motion some six-and-a-half years ago, I didn't really believe it would take this long, and it still hasn't been resolved,' Cr Fishwick said. 'I referred to President Kennedy when he said that at some stage 'I want to lob a man on the moon within 10 years', and that was done within about nine, so for us to take six-and-a-half years is really an issue with me.' Despite this, he was against choosing a local street name without proper consultation with Aboriginal elders. 'I still think we should relate it to an Aboriginal name preferably, and for that we need to rely on elders or the engagement people representing the Aboriginal community,' Cr Fishwick said. During last week's meeting, other councillors took issue with Landgate, criticising its decision to reject the city's preferred option after initially offering support. 'It is regrettable that Landgate raised no objection to that name until completion of the community consultation process,' deputy mayor Adrian Hill said. The park is named Blackboy Park due to the presence of a handful of xanthorrhoea plants, more commonly known today as grass trees. Credit: Simon Santi / The West Australian Speaking to PerthNow, a Landgate spokesperson confirmed Koorlangka Park was initially considered suitable but an official evaluation later found it too similar to a nearby street. 'In September 2024, Landgate advised its support for the removal of the name Blackboy Park and suggested the city use Landgate's online name pre-verification tool. This tool provides a high-level suitability check of a proposed name but does not guarantee approval,' the spokesperson said. 'When the city contacted Landgate again in April 2025, a formal assessment identified that Koorlangka Park was too similar to the adjoining Koolyanga Road. 'As a result, Landgate advised the name could not be supported at that location but may be suitable for an alternative location.' The streets immediately surrounding the park are Koolyanga Road, Karalundie Way, Laurel Street, and Balga Way. Blackboy Park is in Mullaloo. Credit: Google maps Landgate said consultation with Indigenous communities was usually required for Aboriginal place names but isn't needed if the names are already used as local street names. 'Landgate requires evidence of appropriate consultation with Aboriginal communities when approving new Aboriginal place names,' they said. 'However, as Koolyanga is already an approved name for the adjoining road, further consultation would not be required to apply the name to this park.'

'We're here': Australia joins the race for US academics
'We're here': Australia joins the race for US academics

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

'We're here': Australia joins the race for US academics

Australia hopes to bring America's brightest minds Down Under as Donald Trump's research cuts spark a US brain drain. The US president has taken a chainsaw to science funding, slashing thousands of government grants and transforming the global state of research. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten, now vice-chancellor of the University of Canberra, said efforts by the Australian Academy of Science to attract American talent was good national co-ordination. "I'm very pro-American, but if their current government doesn't want some of their best to brightest minds, why should we let them go to Europe or Asia?" he told AAP. "We haven't invented this challenging environment for American higher education ... but that doesn't mean that we should sit back and watch the French, the Germans, the Asian nations, recruit these clever people without at least Australia saying 'we're here too'." The academy has designed a relocation package which includes research funding, access to facilities, family relocation support and visa acceleration in a bid to recruit leading US scientists and Australians returning home. About 70 people have already indicated interest. Some were directly impacted by the Trump administration's budget cuts and lost either their positions or support for their areas of research. Though there have been cuts across a range of disciplines, some of the more significant slashes have been applied to areas such as virology and immunology, alongside cuts to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration which enables researchers to forecast weather and model climate change. Other interested researchers have seen the havoc wreaked on American academia and become "disillusioned or despairing" of their ability to pursue their interests in the US, Australian Academy of Science chief executive Anna-Maria Arabia said. By comparison, Australia's research landscape is more stable and less politically driven. "Whilst it's a volatile situation and quite an unfortunate one that we are experiencing, there is a tremendous opportunity for Australia," she told AAP. By bringing more to Australia, they can contribute to research and development which can eventually open up new economic sectors, new trade potential and a plethora of other benefits, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering chief executive Kylie Walker said. "You're looking at a decade or more to show benefits from that investment, but when they come - my goodness - they come," she told AAP. Australia isn't the only nation hoping to capitalise on Mr Trump's attack on academia. His cuts have ignited a "global race" for science and technology talent, and Australia's universities, research organisations and agencies such as the CSIRO are all trying to attract them. Almost half of the academy's fellows, which are Australia's most distinguished scientists, were born overseas and many had a multiplier effect when they arrived in Australia as they trained the next generation and helped seed industries. "This is the Australian story, this is what science is in Australia," Ms Arabia said. "It's multicultural, it's of the highest standard, it's undertaken in a supportive environment and in a democratic environment where we nurture science and our scientists."

‘Divided': Jacinta Allan hasn't ‘ruled out' any Yoorrook Commission report recommendations
‘Divided': Jacinta Allan hasn't ‘ruled out' any Yoorrook Commission report recommendations

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Divided': Jacinta Allan hasn't ‘ruled out' any Yoorrook Commission report recommendations

Sky News host Freya Leach discusses the Yoorrook Commission's report, claiming Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has not ruled out any of the 'controversial' recommendations listed within it. 'Four years and $44 million; the Victorian Government's Yoorrook Justice Commission has delivered its report, which contains 100 recommendations,' Ms Leach said. 'Some are so controversial that three of the five commissioners who authored the report didn't even want to endorse it. 'Jacinta Allan has not ruled out adopting any of those recommendations … even the Indigenous community is divided over the report.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store