
Riders are opposed to a plan to rip out 22.5km of bike lanes, while many motorists blame them for traffic jams
Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow arrived for her first day in office two years ago riding a bike.
She was not pleased with the law, arguing that the city had sole discretion to decide street rules.
Chow did not respond to a request to comment. But in public remarks, she has since softened her tone, suggesting it was possible to have a 'win-win solution' by relocating some bike lanes or keeping them in place while adding more driving lanes.
'We could design them better,' Chow told reporters in April.
Bike lanes are a sore point for many drivers frustrated by the constant traffic jams in the heart of Toronto.
'There's so much traffic because of bike lanes,' said Nasser Moradman, who has driven a taxi in Toronto for 30 years.
The lanes aren't even used much during the long winter, he complained, adding: 'It's miserable. It's very tough to drive in the city.'
Cycling proponents and others who vehemently oppose Ford's move mounted a legal challenge, and a provincial court has temporarily barred the removal of any bike lanes until a judge decides if the new law is unconstitutional.
Cities across the world, including New York and Paris, have added kilometres of bike lanes to make streets safer for cyclists and encourage drivers to abandon their vehicles and opt for more climate-friendly modes of travel, such as cycling and public transportation.
In some places, the lanes have also set off criticism from drivers and others who say that they have made life worse for people who have to drive, including delivery workers and taxi drivers.
Sharon Danley who opposes Toronto's bike lanes. Photo / Ian Willms, the New York Times
United States President Donald Trump called New York's bike lanes dangerous and claimed that cyclists were 'whacking people'.
In Canada, government data shows that about an average of two million people commute to Toronto by car on workdays.
And those commuters contribute to the city's congestion, which ranks second behind Vancouver among Canadian cities, according to TomTom, a global traffic index.
Toronto's chronic traffic snarls can come as an unwelcome surprise to some visitors.
In February, the Carolina Hurricanes hockey team had to abandon a ride because of traffic and walk the remaining blocks to a downtown arena — not the first time that professional athletes have had to do that.
The problems have cost the Toronto region about CA$45 billion ($54.6b) in lost productivity per year, according to a report by the Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis.
'Congestion has reached crisis levels,' said Giles Gherson, president of the Toronto Board of Trade, which suggested in a report that Toronto 'rebalance' its roads by cutting back street-level parking and moving bike lanes.
Many commuters also argue that driving into Toronto from the suburbs is often faster than using public transportation, with experts saying that the city lacks enough rapid transit to meet its needs.
The provincial government has been criticised for long delays to transit projects.
The province says only 1.2% of workers commute by bike. For comparison, even in New York City, which has a large system of bike lanes, about 1.4% of people commute by bike, according to city figures.
The conflict in Toronto has resonated with people such as Sharon Danley, a retiree.
She recently joined a citizens group opposing a bike lane on her street, which she said was disruptive and unfair. The lane, she said, slows down a transit bus for people with disabilities.
'Now what we're doing is clogging up lean arteries and causing a lot of harm,' Danley said.
In Toronto, where the car has long been king, cyclists have been gaining ground.
Toronto added 67 miles (110km) of bike lanes between 2020 and 2024 and now has 207 miles (333km) of them. The city's bike-share service had 6.9 million rides in 2024, up from 2.9 million in 2020.
'Cycling has become more pleasant,' said Chad Mohr, a food-bank volunteer who delivers groceries by bike.
'Now they're talking about ripping tonnes of that infrastructure out, which would be a tragedy and just a giant, ridiculous, expensive step backward.'
The city spent about CA$27 million ($32.7m) to install the bike lanes that Ontario now wants to eliminate. In a report, it estimates that removing them would cost CA$48m.
A ghost bike memorial to a cyclist killed in a traffic collision in Toronto, Canada. Photo / Ian Willms, the New York Times
Last year, Toronto said halfa dozen cyclists were killed in the city, the highest number in two decades. Between 2016 and 2023, 260 cyclists have been seriously injured, with most crashes on streets with no bike lanes.
Removing bike lanes would 'cost people their lives', said Geoffrey Bercarich, a bike-repair technician who installs memorials called ghost bikes in places where cyclists have been killed.
Ford has made it clear that he is not opposed to cyclists or cycling.
'I'm not against bike lanes,' he told reporters in May. 'Build all the bike lanes you want, just not on main arterial roads.'
Cycling proponents argue that the province has not shown any evidence that removing bike lanes will ease traffic.
'This idea that they're somehow the cause of Toronto's traffic woes isn't based on any fact,' said Michael Longfield, executive director of Cycle Toronto, an advocacy group.
He was speaking by phone from a hospital, where he was recovering from a fractured leg that he said he sustained while cycling when a driver opened a door into a bike lane.
The Ontario Government has passed a measure that would protect it from lawsuits by cyclists injured on roads where the province tears out bike lanes.
Cycling supporters say the move amounts to a tacit acknowledgment that riders will be hurt if the province is allowed to eliminate bike lanes, said David Shellnutt, a personal-injury lawyer in Toronto specialising in cycling cases.
'It is an admission that, yes, we know that what we're proposing here will result in injury and death,' Shellnutt said, 'and so we're going to insulate ourselves from accountability.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Vjosa Isai
Photographs by: Ian Willms
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Dozens of countries cop steep tariffs
US President Donald Trump has slapped steep tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners including Canada, Brazil, India and Taiwan, pressing ahead with his plans to reorder the global economy. NZ slapped with 15% US tariff Trump set rates including a 35% duty on many goods from Canada, 50% for Brazil, 25% for India, 20% for Taiwan and 39% for Switzerland, according to a presidential executive order. The order listed higher import duty rates of 10% to 41% starting in seven days for 69 trading partners as the 12.01am (EDT) deadline on Friday approached. Some of them had reached tariff-reducing deals; others had no opportunity to negotiate with his administration. Trump included an exception for some goods shipped within the coming week. Goods from all other countries not listed would be subject to a 10% US import tax. Trump had previously said that rate might be higher. The administration also teased that more trade deals were in the pipeline as it seeks to close trade deficits and boost domestic factories. Facing a Friday deadline of his making, the Republican president has tapped emergency powers, pressured foreign leaders, and pressed ahead with trade policies that sparked a market sell-off when they were first announced in April. This time, markets had a more muted reaction. Stocks and equity futures fell modestly in Friday morning trading in Asia. Trump's order said that some trading partners, "despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters." Other details are still to come, including on the "rules of origin" that will determine what products might face even higher tariffs. Trump also said "we have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country," and a U.S. official later told reporters that they were still to be announced. CANADA, MEXICO Trump issued a separate order for Canada that raises the rate on Canadian goods subject to fentanyl-related tariffs to 35%, from 25% previously, saying Canada had "failed to cooperate" in curbing illicit narcotics flows into the United States. The higher tariffs on Canadian goods contrasted sharply with Trump's decision to grant Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs of 30% on many goods to provide more time to negotiate a broader trade pact. Trump complained to reporters earlier that Canada had "been very poorly led." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said he was disappointed by Trump's decision, and vowed to take action to protect Canadian jobs and diversify the country's export markets. "While we will continue to negotiate with the United States on our trading relationship, the Canadian government is laser focused on what we can control: building Canada strong," he said in a post on X. The extension for Mexico avoids a 30% tariff on most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade and came after a Thursday morning call between Trump and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. "We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum wrote on X, adding that the Trump call was "very good." About 85% of US imports from Mexico comply with the rules of origin outlined in the USMCA, shielding them from 25% tariffs related to fentanyl, according to Mexico's economy ministry. Trump said the US would continue to levy a 50% tariff on Mexican steel, aluminium and copper and a 25% tariff on Mexican autos and on non-USMCA-compliant goods subject to tariffs related to the US fentanyl crisis. "Additionally, Mexico has agreed to immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many," Trump said in a Truth Social post, without providing details. INDIA DISCORD Goods from India appeared to be headed for a 25% tariff after talks bogged down over access to India's agriculture sector, drawing a higher-rate threat from Trump that also included an unspecified penalty for India's purchases of Russian oil. Although negotiations with India were continuing, New Delhi vowed to protect the country's labour-intensive farm sector, and the threat of higher rates from Trump triggered outrage from the opposition party and a slump in the rupee. Trump's rollout of higher import taxes comes amid more evidence they have begun driving up consumer goods prices. Commerce Department data released Thursday showed prices for home furnishings and durable household equipment jumped 1.3% in June, the biggest gain since March 2022. Recreational goods and vehicles prices shot up 0.9%, the most since February 2024. Prices for clothing and footwear rose 0.4%. TOUGH QUESTIONS FROM JUDGES Trump hit Brazil's exports on Wednesday with a steep 50% tariff as he escalated his fight with Latin America's largest economy over its prosecution of his friend and former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from heavier levies. The run-up to Trump's tariff deadline was unfolding as federal appeals court judges sharply questioned Trump's use of a sweeping emergency powers law to justify his sweeping tariffs of up to 50% on nearly all trading partners. Trump invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare an emergency over the growing US trade deficit and impose his "reciprocal" tariffs and a separate fentanyl emergency. The Court of International Trade ruled in May that the actions exceeded his executive authority, and questions from judges during oral arguments before the US Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit in Washington indicated further scepticism. Meanwhile, China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. A US official told reporters that they are making progress toward a deal.


Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Trump hits dozens of countries with steep tariffs
US President Donald Trump has slapped steep tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners including Canada, Brazil, India and Taiwan, pressing ahead with his plans to reorder the global economy. NZ slapped with 15% US tariff Trump set rates including a 35% duty on many goods from Canada, 50% for Brazil, 25% for India, 20% for Taiwan and 39% for Switzerland, according to a presidential executive order. The order listed higher import duty rates of 10% to 41% starting in seven days for 69 trading partners as the 12.01am (EDT) deadline on Friday approached. Some of them had reached tariff-reducing deals; others had no opportunity to negotiate with his administration. Trump included an exception for some goods shipped within the coming week. Goods from all other countries not listed would be subject to a 10% US import tax. Trump had previously said that rate might be higher. The administration also teased that more trade deals were in the pipeline as it seeks to close trade deficits and boost domestic factories. Facing a Friday deadline of his making, the Republican president has tapped emergency powers, pressured foreign leaders, and pressed ahead with trade policies that sparked a market sell-off when they were first announced in April. This time, markets had a more muted reaction. Stocks and equity futures fell modestly in Friday morning trading in Asia. Trump's order said that some trading partners, "despite having engaged in negotiations, have offered terms that, in my judgment, do not sufficiently address imbalances in our trading relationship or have failed to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national-security matters." Other details are still to come, including on the "rules of origin" that will determine what products might face even higher tariffs. Trump also said "we have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country," and a U.S. official later told reporters that they were still to be announced. CANADA, MEXICO Trump issued a separate order for Canada that raises the rate on Canadian goods subject to fentanyl-related tariffs to 35%, from 25% previously, saying Canada had "failed to cooperate" in curbing illicit narcotics flows into the United States. The higher tariffs on Canadian goods contrasted sharply with Trump's decision to grant Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs of 30% on many goods to provide more time to negotiate a broader trade pact. Trump complained to reporters earlier that Canada had "been very poorly led." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said he was disappointed by Trump's decision, and vowed to take action to protect Canadian jobs and diversify the country's export markets. "While we will continue to negotiate with the United States on our trading relationship, the Canadian government is laser focused on what we can control: building Canada strong," he said in a post on X. The extension for Mexico avoids a 30% tariff on most Mexican non-automotive and non-metal goods compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade and came after a Thursday morning call between Trump and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. "We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow," Sheinbaum wrote on X, adding that the Trump call was "very good." About 85% of US imports from Mexico comply with the rules of origin outlined in the USMCA, shielding them from 25% tariffs related to fentanyl, according to Mexico's economy ministry. Trump said the US would continue to levy a 50% tariff on Mexican steel, aluminium and copper and a 25% tariff on Mexican autos and on non-USMCA-compliant goods subject to tariffs related to the US fentanyl crisis. "Additionally, Mexico has agreed to immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many," Trump said in a Truth Social post, without providing details. INDIA DISCORD Goods from India appeared to be headed for a 25% tariff after talks bogged down over access to India's agriculture sector, drawing a higher-rate threat from Trump that also included an unspecified penalty for India's purchases of Russian oil. Although negotiations with India were continuing, New Delhi vowed to protect the country's labour-intensive farm sector, and the threat of higher rates from Trump triggered outrage from the opposition party and a slump in the rupee. Trump's rollout of higher import taxes comes amid more evidence they have begun driving up consumer goods prices. Commerce Department data released Thursday showed prices for home furnishings and durable household equipment jumped 1.3% in June, the biggest gain since March 2022. Recreational goods and vehicles prices shot up 0.9%, the most since February 2024. Prices for clothing and footwear rose 0.4%. TOUGH QUESTIONS FROM JUDGES Trump hit Brazil's exports on Wednesday with a steep 50% tariff as he escalated his fight with Latin America's largest economy over its prosecution of his friend and former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from heavier levies. The run-up to Trump's tariff deadline was unfolding as federal appeals court judges sharply questioned Trump's use of a sweeping emergency powers law to justify his sweeping tariffs of up to 50% on nearly all trading partners. Trump invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare an emergency over the growing US trade deficit and impose his "reciprocal" tariffs and a separate fentanyl emergency. The Court of International Trade ruled in May that the actions exceeded his executive authority, and questions from judges during oral arguments before the US Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit in Washington indicated further scepticism. Meanwhile, China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. A US official told reporters that they are making progress toward a deal.


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Trump warns Canada trade deal at risk over Palestine recognition
France was the first to take the step last week. Days later, Trump announced a trade deal with the European Union, which includes France and several other countries that have recognised Palestinian statehood. Since his return to the White House, Trump has levied 25% tariffs on Canadian goods not covered by the United States-Mexico-Canada trade pact (USMCA). In July, he threatened to raise tariffs on Canada to 35% on August 1 because of unsubstantiated concerns over an 'invasion' of fentanyl from Canada. A White House official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said it is likely that USMCA-compliant goods would remain exempt but that Trump would make the final decision. Nearly 60% of US imports from Canada were USMCA-compliant in May, according to data from the US Commerce Department, up from 34% in January. Trump has separately imposed tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminium, and autos. Trump threatened sweeping tariffs on Canadian imports as Canada joins G7 allies in recognising Palestine. Photo / Getty Images Canadian officials have for months travelled to the US to seek a deal that would lift the levies, but they have recently said it is likely that any agreement with the US will involve some level of tariffs. Carney said Wednesday that negotiations might drag on beyond August 1. Canada's Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request early Thursday for comment on Trump's Truth Social post. Carney was elected leader of Canada's Liberal Party in March and led it to a comeback victory in April against a backdrop of rising anxiety over Trump, while running on an explicitly anti-Trump platform. Carney declared the traditional US-Canada relationship 'over' and pledged to fight back with targeted retaliatory tariffs. When Trump repeatedly mused about the US annexing Canada, Carney said his country was 'not for sale'. In recent months, Carney has tried to use flattery and firmness with Trump – to mixed results. Trump has called him 'a nice gentleman'. But in June, Trump abruptly halted trade talks with Canada over the country's digital services tax, calling it 'a direct and blatant attack' on the US and branding Canada as a 'difficult' partner. The Canadian Government later said it would rescind the tax. Days later, Trump threatened more tariffs. Now, geopolitics could further destabilise the talks. Canada is the third major US ally in a week, after France and Britain, to say it is prepared to change its decades-old stance on Palestinian statehood as outrage has grown over the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza. Canada is the third Group of Seven nation to back Palestinian statehood, following France and Britain. Photo / Getty Images Local authorities say more than 60,000 people – including 18,500 children – have been killed in the Israeli military campaign against Hamas in Gaza. Israel has restricted aid into the enclave, prompting the UN to warn about 'mounting evidence of famine and widespread starvation'. Trump acknowledged Monday that there is 'real starvation' in Gaza, breaking with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said Monday that 'there is no starvation in Gaza, no policy of starvation in Gaza'. Yet on Tuesday, when asked about France's and Britain's endorsements of a Palestinian state, Trump said: 'You could make a case that you're rewarding Hamas if you do that. And I don't think they should be rewarded. So I'm not in that camp'. Canada's announcement was met with praise from Palestinian officials and harsh criticism in Israel. The Palestinian Authority's Foreign Ministry said in a statement posted on X: 'This courageous and principled decision marks a significant step towards justice, peace, and the long-overdue realisation of the Palestinian people's inalienable right to self-determination.' The Israeli Foreign Ministry said: 'The change in the position of the Canadian government at this time is a reward for Hamas and harms the efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages'.