logo
Flagging rise in drug abuse in CG, HC rejects PIL on hemp cultivation

Flagging rise in drug abuse in CG, HC rejects PIL on hemp cultivation

Time of India3 days ago
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking directions for the state govt to permit the cultivation and development of an ecosystem for industrial hemp/cannabis.
The court observed that the petition, filed by Dr Sachin Ashok Kale, appeared to have a "personal gain, private motive and oblique motive" and was an attempt to gain permission for commercial transactions of cannabis products. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru, while hearing the petition, noted the significant increase in the consumption of narcotic and psychotropic substances across Chhattisgarh in recent years.
The bench said that such consumption has "evil effects on the body and mind of the person consuming it, but it ruins the entire family and society as well."
The court emphasised that offences related to contraband and psychotropic substances are on the rise in the state, with numerous instances of crimes committed by individuals under the influence, leading to incarceration and hardship for their families. "Courts cannot direct the govt to make policy decisions, particularly in sensitive areas like narcotic control," the order stated, adding that the petition amounted to a "misuse of judicial process," the division bench said.
Dr Kale, appearing in person, argued that industrial hemp, with its low tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content (0.3 to 1.5%), is not psychoactive and has various industrial, medical, and environmental benefits. He cited permissions for hemp cultivation in other states like Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, as well as its historical and cultural significance in India.
He also referred to the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) notification regarding hemp seed and oil, and the ministry of ayush guidelines for hemp oil in medicines.
The petitioner contended that the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, permits mass cultivation of hemp for horticultural and industrial uses, but the Chhattisgarh govt has not framed rules to facilitate its medical or industrial use. Opposing the petition, the state govt's advocate, Sangharsh Pandey, argued that the PIL was an attempt by the petitioner to secure permission for cannabis cultivation and commercial transactions.
The high court, in its order, reiterated the importance of preserving the "purity and sanctity" of PILs, stating that genuine public interest litigations must be encouraged while discouraging frivolous ones. The bench cited previous Supreme Court judgments on the misuse of PILs, highlighting that courts should verify the credentials of petitioners and ensure the PIL aims to address genuine public harm or injury, without personal gain or ulterior motives.
The court stated, "Under the garb of this public interest litigation petition, this court cannot encourage any such activity nor issue any direction to the State, which may turn to be a disaster in future. The reasons assigned by the petitioner to permit cultivation of cannabis in the state of Chhattisgarh is totally frivolous and baseless." The bench concluded that Dr Kale lacked locus standi and the petition was not a genuine public interest litigation. It observed that courts cannot direct govts to make policy decisions, particularly in sensitive areas like narcotic control, which fall within the domain of the legislative and executive branches. HC also noted that cannabis cultivation is generally prohibited under the NDPS Act, except for specific permitted purposes with govt authorisation.
HC dismissed the petition and forfeited the security amount deposited by the petitioner.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Yamunanagar faces pollution crisis: 8 formaldehyde plants under scrutiny of pollution board
Yamunanagar faces pollution crisis: 8 formaldehyde plants under scrutiny of pollution board

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Yamunanagar faces pollution crisis: 8 formaldehyde plants under scrutiny of pollution board

Yamunanagar: As the 15-day deadline given to eight formaldehyde manufacturing units in Yamunanagar by the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB), it raises serious questions about the next course of action by the district administration. These units were and are still operating without mandatory environmental clearances and in violation of the Water Act and Air Act and the order of the Supreme Court. As per Sudhir Mohan, Executive Regional Officer (ERO) of the Yamunanagar of HSPCB, plant owners were issued notices on June 21 under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. They were asked to show cause why prosecution, closure orders, and environmental compensation should not be initiated against them. These eight units are established in different parts of Yamunanagar district including Yamunanagar, Jathlana, Jagadhri, Chhachhrauli, Radaur and others. ERO Sudhir said these units have submitted their replies after the notices, which are currently under scrutiny. He said after the scrutiny the report will be sent to the HSPCB headquarters for further action. The HSPCB in its notices warned that if they fail to meet the required environmental standards and secure Environmental Clearance (EC), closure notices will be issued. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Don't Pay Full Price for 2025's Top Games! Shop Now Undo The fate of these formaldehyde units could have a ripple effect on the local plywood industry. Formaldehyde is an essential chemical used in the production of resin, which binds plywood layers together. Without it, the industry cannot function. This chemical's pollution has cancer causing substances, said Yamunanagar deputy civil surgeon. According to JK Bihani, District President of the Plywood Factory Association, 'Formaldehyde is the backbone of the plywood industry. If these plants shut down, over 160 active plywood units could follow, especially when 190 have already closed due to recession.' Formaldehyde is classified as a hazardous chemical known to cause health issues like cancer, respiratory irritation, allergies, and skin problems. Its industrial use, especially in adhesive resins, requires strict regulation and environmental approval, which many of the plants had reportedly bypassed for years. Officials say a final decision on enforcement actions, including possible shutdowns, will be made after examining the responses submitted by the plant operators. As scrutiny continues, the region's critical plywood manufacturing economy hangs in the balance. Yamunanagar deputy civil surgeon Dr Divya Mangla said, 'When formaldehyde is dissolved in water, it is very hazardous for the human body. It can lead to irritation, respiratory problems and even can lead to cancer. It is very important to stop pollution from this chemical and protect air, water and the environment for better human health.' With the deadline now passed and the stakes high, the coming days will be crucial for Yamunanagar's environment and economy alike.

Packaged food alert: Why India needs warning labels, not health star ratings
Packaged food alert: Why India needs warning labels, not health star ratings

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Packaged food alert: Why India needs warning labels, not health star ratings

The Supreme Court, while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) recently, set a three-month timeframe for the Centre to implement food safety norms in the country. The PIL, filed by the Pune-based non-profit 3S and Our Health, had raised concerns about food safety and the need for package labelling norms, especially around nutrients of concern—salt, sugar and fat—so that consumers could make informed government, in its reply, informed that the country's highest food safety regulator, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), had received over 14,000 public comments from various stakeholders on the proposed labelling norms, and had started the amendment September 2022, FSSAI introduced draft Front-of-Package Nutrition Labelling (FOPNL) guidelines and proposed an Indian Nutrition Rating or Health Star Rating model. This is supposed to be an FOPNL system that rates the overall nutritional profile of food, from a star to 5 stars. The more the stars, the healthier the this model work? George Cheriyan, working president of the Consumer Protection Association, thinks otherwise. He argues that companies can add protein or some vitamins to offset the negative impact of sugar or salt content in their food products and still manage a decent rating. For instance, if a bar of chocolate contains some nuts, it may get a healthy score without accounting for the presence of excessive fat and sugar. 'The entire purpose of warning about the presence of harmful ingredients gets ignored in this,' says Cheriyan. Cheriyan suggests India needs warning labels such as those used in Chile, where excess calories, sugar and fat are displayed in large black octagons on food packages, since literacy levels are low in the country and language barriers abound. Thus, warning labels should be in the form of symbols or emojis—just like the red dot currently indicating non-vegetarian food and a green dot indicates a vegetarian are enough studies to underscore the positive impact of food warning labels on public health. Data suggests that 18 months after Chile implemented FOPNL norms, including restricting advertisements for unhealthy products between 6 am and 10 pm, warning labels on packaged food, and a ban on selling junk food in schools, the consumption of sweet beverages reduced by 25 per cent. The study, published in medical journal PLOS Medicine, had tracked 2,000 Arun Gupta, convenor of the National Advocacy in Public Interest, a think-tank on nutrition, says interpretative labels don't work. 'Consumers take 6-8 seconds to choose the brand, and the star rating system doesn't empower them to make decisions according to their personal choices and health and lifestyle preferences,' he states it is time consumers be made king in the real sense. 'It is time to go back to that ethos,' he says. That mission can only be accomplished through a food labelling system that empowers consumers to make choices and take health into their own hands, he Sanyal, chief operating officer and secretary at VOICE (Voluntary Organisation in Interest of Consumer Education), describes FOPNL as one of the most critical ways to curtail the rising consumption of ultra-processed foods in India. He says there is enough data to show how ultra-processed foods are impacting health and becoming was part of the FSSAI discussions on draft FOPL guidelines. He highlights that a more democratic dialogue is required to determine the right norms for the country. During the last discussion on the draft in 2021, he said, the participation in the meeting was heavily skewed in favour of the industry, with 25 representatives from industry associations such as the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) and Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), but only five from the other side—three from consumer organisations and one each from civil society and farmer producer says most of the regulations are limited to packaged food while there is also a responsibility to ensure food safety for unbranded products in the informal sector, which accounts for a much larger market than the formal sector in India. He shares how unbranded products or counterfeit brands are freely available in small confectionery shops along the highway or in rural areas. 'FSSAI needs to develop the intelligence-gathering mechanism to ensure that all regulations are implemented on the ground for all food products,' he to India Today Magazine- Ends

Weed and longevity don't mix: Bryan Johnson's anti-cannabis take explained
Weed and longevity don't mix: Bryan Johnson's anti-cannabis take explained

India Today

time12 hours ago

  • India Today

Weed and longevity don't mix: Bryan Johnson's anti-cannabis take explained

Weed doesn't vibe with longevity. Representative image created by AI. Weed is quietly damaging your brain, your body, and even your future Study shows that smoking weed leads to a 40% drop in blood flow According to Bryan Johnson, "If your goal is to live longer, cannabis works against that." Weed doesn't "vibe with longevity". Cannabis is having its moment in pop culture, romanticised in the movies, glorified in music, and casually used in social circles. However, beneath all the haze of hype lies a harsh truth: weed may be quietly damaging your brain, your body, and even your future. A few people are sounding that alarm louder than Bryan Johnson, the 47-year-old tech millionaire who has already spent millions trying to reverse his ageing process. Johnson, who is now the subject of a new Netflix documentary titled 'Don't Die: The Man Who Wants to Live Forever', is known for living a meticulously optimised life. For him, every single heartbeat, every calorie, and even his hormones are tracked. The one thing he refuses to touch? You got it right, it's cannabis. WEED ISN'T WELLNESS While social media may try their best to portray weed as a harmless escape or a wellness tool (some harp about its medicinal properties too), new research says quite the opposite. Johnson recently referred to a new study that examined how cannabis affects blood flow and the results are startling to say the least. The study, based on a marker called flow-mediated dilation (FMD) which measures how well blood vessels expand, found that smoking weed leads to a 40% drop in blood flow, while edibles (brownies or chocolates laced with it) caused a 50% drop. These numbers are on par with the vascular harm caused by tobacco use. In Johnson's words, 'I'm not morally against weed. But if your goal is to live longer and better, cannabis works against that. It harms your heart and shortens your life.' THE INDIA BIG PICTURE In India, where cannabis is still illegal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, the danger runs even deeper. The use of weed is spreading quickly amongst urban youth. Whether they are on college campuses, at house parties, or even among influencers promoting it as 'organic' or 'spiritual.' But experts are raising red flags. 'The very idea that it is a safe or gives a high that is organic is just misplaced,' says Dr. Dheeraj Lakhania, a Mumbai-based addiction psychiatrist. 'We have been seeing teenagers who start with casual use and that quickly spirals into dependency. This is a real public health issue, especially when they're unaware of the long-term harm.' And the harm isn't just psychological. Much of the weed circulating in India is mixed with dangerous adulterants (like boot polish and sedatives) that can easily trigger psychosis, organ damage, or result in fatal overdoses. And the harm isn't just psychological. Much of the weed circulating in India is mixed with dangerous adulterants (like boot polish and sedatives) that can easily trigger psychosis, organ damage, or result in fatal overdoses. IT ISN'T EXTREME, IT'S SMART Johnson's approach might seem intense: 3 p.m. dinners, zero sugar, bio-data-driven sleep and so goes the list. But his anti-cannabis stance comes from a place of deep logic. In his longevity model, anything that harms cognitive function, sleep quality, or cardiovascular health gets eliminated naturally. 'The data is simply very clear. Cannabis impairs your brain, disrupts rhythms, and it compromises your blood vessels too,' says Dr. Sreeja Pandit, a Delhi-based neurologist. 'This isn't about moral judgment. It's about protecting your future.' It may feel harmless in your twenties but the damage compounds over time, believe experts. Poor sleep, altered hormone levels, reduced motivation, memory loss â€' these are not only signs of ageing but these signal long-term exposure to substances your body doesn't need. Johnson's advice for the youth shouldn't be seen as a lecture but as a warning. Weed isn't a symbol of rebellion, neither is it a sign of freedom. 'There's a clear connection between regular cannabis use and lowered academic and professional performance,' says Dr. Rahul Jain, a Bengaluru-based internal medicine specialist. 'The younger the brain, the higher the risk.' That's why this message cuts through the noise. Johnson's life may be extreme, but his logic is simple: don't poison the very system that you're trying to perfect. Weed doesn't "vibe with longevity". Cannabis is having its moment in pop culture, romanticised in the movies, glorified in music, and casually used in social circles. However, beneath all the haze of hype lies a harsh truth: weed may be quietly damaging your brain, your body, and even your future. A few people are sounding that alarm louder than Bryan Johnson, the 47-year-old tech millionaire who has already spent millions trying to reverse his ageing process. Johnson, who is now the subject of a new Netflix documentary titled 'Don't Die: The Man Who Wants to Live Forever', is known for living a meticulously optimised life. For him, every single heartbeat, every calorie, and even his hormones are tracked. The one thing he refuses to touch? You got it right, it's cannabis. WEED ISN'T WELLNESS While social media may try their best to portray weed as a harmless escape or a wellness tool (some harp about its medicinal properties too), new research says quite the opposite. Johnson recently referred to a new study that examined how cannabis affects blood flow and the results are startling to say the least. The study, based on a marker called flow-mediated dilation (FMD) which measures how well blood vessels expand, found that smoking weed leads to a 40% drop in blood flow, while edibles (brownies or chocolates laced with it) caused a 50% drop. These numbers are on par with the vascular harm caused by tobacco use. In Johnson's words, 'I'm not morally against weed. But if your goal is to live longer and better, cannabis works against that. It harms your heart and shortens your life.' THE INDIA BIG PICTURE In India, where cannabis is still illegal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, the danger runs even deeper. The use of weed is spreading quickly amongst urban youth. Whether they are on college campuses, at house parties, or even among influencers promoting it as 'organic' or 'spiritual.' But experts are raising red flags. 'The very idea that it is a safe or gives a high that is organic is just misplaced,' says Dr. Dheeraj Lakhania, a Mumbai-based addiction psychiatrist. 'We have been seeing teenagers who start with casual use and that quickly spirals into dependency. This is a real public health issue, especially when they're unaware of the long-term harm.' And the harm isn't just psychological. Much of the weed circulating in India is mixed with dangerous adulterants (like boot polish and sedatives) that can easily trigger psychosis, organ damage, or result in fatal overdoses. And the harm isn't just psychological. Much of the weed circulating in India is mixed with dangerous adulterants (like boot polish and sedatives) that can easily trigger psychosis, organ damage, or result in fatal overdoses. IT ISN'T EXTREME, IT'S SMART Johnson's approach might seem intense: 3 p.m. dinners, zero sugar, bio-data-driven sleep and so goes the list. But his anti-cannabis stance comes from a place of deep logic. In his longevity model, anything that harms cognitive function, sleep quality, or cardiovascular health gets eliminated naturally. 'The data is simply very clear. Cannabis impairs your brain, disrupts rhythms, and it compromises your blood vessels too,' says Dr. Sreeja Pandit, a Delhi-based neurologist. 'This isn't about moral judgment. It's about protecting your future.' It may feel harmless in your twenties but the damage compounds over time, believe experts. Poor sleep, altered hormone levels, reduced motivation, memory loss â€' these are not only signs of ageing but these signal long-term exposure to substances your body doesn't need. Johnson's advice for the youth shouldn't be seen as a lecture but as a warning. Weed isn't a symbol of rebellion, neither is it a sign of freedom. 'There's a clear connection between regular cannabis use and lowered academic and professional performance,' says Dr. Rahul Jain, a Bengaluru-based internal medicine specialist. 'The younger the brain, the higher the risk.' That's why this message cuts through the noise. Johnson's life may be extreme, but his logic is simple: don't poison the very system that you're trying to perfect. Join our WhatsApp Channel

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store