
'Science refugees': French university welcomes first US researchers
The University of Aix-Marseille (AMU) welcomed the scholars on Thursday, following the March launch of its "Safe Place for Science" initiative, the first among 20 set to relocate there in coming months.
The programme has already drawn nearly 300 applicants from top institutions such as Stanford, NASA, and Berkeley.
The development comes as US universities have been threatened since Trump's return to the White House with massive federal funding cuts, causing research programmes to face closures.
Some staff also fear possible detention and deportation for their political views.
AMU -- one of France's largest universities, with some 12,000 international students alone -- is eager to provide a home for these scholars, with research funding for up to three years.
Historian Brian Sandberg said he decided to apply to the university in the southern Provence region on a return trip to the United States from France, when he feared he might face arrest at the border of his own country.
Though he was not detained, "it makes you think about what is your status as a researcher", said the academic from Illinois whose work focuses on religion, gender and violence.
Academic freedom 'under attack'
Sandberg is now one of 20 scholars specialising in subjects ranging from health, climate science, astrophysics and the humanities set to relocate to France in September. There, they hope to pursue their research in what they see as a more open academic environment.
"The principle of academic freedom, as well as the entire system of research and higher education in the United States is really under attack," said Sandberg.
"If I stay in the United States, I can continue to teach, but as a researcher, for the next four years, we're stuck," he said, referring to Trump's term in office.
One academic who requested anonymity said Trump's policies directly threatened her work on gender and human-caused global warming.
"Apparently, one of the banned words... is 'female'," she said. "I don't know how you can get around speaking about females without using the word," she said.
In February, the Washington Post reported that the National Science Foundation was flagging research using terms such as "female" and "women" that could violate Trump's orders rolling back diversity initiatives.
But she said her decision to move to France went beyond her professional freedom.
"I've got kids, I don't want them to grow up in a very hostile area," she said.
A 'science asylum programme'
AMU's programme is part of a broader push to cash in on US President Donald Trump's massive cuts in funding for education.
In May, France and the EU announced plans to attract US researchers in hopes of benefitting from the potential brain drain by supporting the costs of hosting foreign researchers.
French President Emmanuel Macron, who called the growing pressure on academia by Trump's administration "an error", has encouraged US scientists to "choose France".
He announced that his government would earmark 100 million euros ($117 million) to help attract foreign talent. French lawmakers have introduced a bill to create a special status for "science refugees".
European Commission head Ursula Von der Leyen has said the European Union will launch an incentives package worth 500 million euros to make the 27-nation bloc "a magnet for researchers".
For its part, AMU expects to welcome the other 12 American researchers in the coming months, with its budget of 15 million euros.
"Saving our American colleagues and welcoming them is also a way of welcoming and promoting global research," said the university's president Eric Berton.
"This is a science welcome programme, a science asylum programme. And above all, we want to enshrine the concept of science refugees in law," he added.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
8 hours ago
- France 24
Algeria sentences French football journalist to seven years in jail
Algeria 's authorities have sentenced a prominent French sports journalist specialised in African football to seven years in prison for "glorifying terrorism", media rights campaigners RSF said Sunday, denouncing the verdict as "nonsensical". Christophe Gleizes, 36, who contributes to the So Foot magazine, was ordered by the court in Tizi Ouzou to be immediately incarcerated and will appeal the ruling on Monday, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said. "He has now been unjustly convicted and imprisoned for simply doing his job," said the group. Gleizes, who has co-authored a book about football in Africa, was arrested in May 2024 and then placed under judicial control and was unable to leave the country, RSF said. "Christophe Gleizes has been subjected to an absurd judicial control order for over a year," said Thibaut Bruttin, RSF's director general. "His seven-year sentence is nonsensical and demonstrates one thing: today, nothing escapes politics," he added. Gleizes travelled to the country and Tizi Ouzou to write about the local football club Jeunesse Sportive de Kabylie, named after Algeria's Kabylia region, home to the Berber Kabyle people. "We are in shock," his family said in a statement shared by RSF. "There is no justification for Christophe having to endure this ordeal. How can one justify punishing a journalist for practising his profession with integrity?" 'In shock' As well as "glorifying terrorism", he was convicted of "possessing publications for propaganda purposes harmful to national interests", RSF said. It said Gleizes had 2015 and 2017 been in touch with a Tizi Ouzou football figure prominent in the Movement for the Self-Determination of Kabylie (MAK), designated a "terrorist" organisation by the Algerian authorities in 2021. "The first two interactions between Christophe Gleizes and this individual occurred well before this designation," it said adding he had also not concealed contacting the person again in 2024 as part of preparations for the report. "Imprisoned for doing his job!" said So Foot. "His loved ones and editorial team are in shock," it added. The jailing of Gleizes comes at a time of growing tension between Algeria and former colonial master France. Algeria arrested and jailed French-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal in November on national security charges and has defied calls from President Emmanuel Macron for his release. Macron angered Algiers in July 2024 when he backed Moroccan sovereignty over the disputed Western Sahara, where Algeria backs the pro-independence Polisario Front.


Euronews
10 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran: critical uranium enrichment could be matter of months, watchdog
Iran may be able to restart its uranium enrichment in a "matter of months", according to Rafael Grossi, Director General of the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency. Meanwhile during an interview with FOX News on Sunday US President Donald Trump said sanctions on Iran could be lifted if they agree to move forward in a peaceful manner, "We have the sanctions. But if they do what they have to, if they can be peaceful and if they show us that they won't do any more damage, I would revoke them, and it would make a big difference," Trump said. On 22 June, the United States launched multiple joint attacks with Israel against three of Iran's nuclear facilities: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump had said the facilities were "totally obliterated" and the attacks had set Iran's nuclear programme back "by decades". But Grossi told CBS News on Saturday that "The capacities they have are there. They can have,... in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium." Adding, "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there." Different voices on extent of damage caused by strikes On 25 June, a leaked preliminary Pentagon assessment also found that Iran's nuclear programme has possibly only been set back by a few months. Following the outing of the report, US President Donald Trump threatened to force journalists to reveal who leaked the report which contradicted his narrative on Iran's bombing. Meanwhile in Iran, on the one hand its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the strikes had not achieved anything significant, but on the other, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said "excessive and serious" damage has been done. International Atomic Energy Agency leader Grossi has enquired to inspect the damaged facilities, however Tehran has rejected the request and on Wednesday voted to suspend its relationship with the IAEA, accusing it of siding with Israel and the US as it did not condemn the attacks on Iran. But Grossi stays hopeful that the IAEA will be able to rebuild its relationship with Tehran. On Saturday, he said, "I have to sit down with Iran and look into this, because at the end of the day, this whole thing, after the military strikes, we will have to have a long-lasting solution, which cannot be but a diplomatic one." In 2015, Iran and world powers reached a nuclear deal that barred Tehran from enriching uranium above 3.67% purity — the limit set for civilian nuclear use — and was banned from conducting enrichment at its Fordo plant until 2030. Iran, which has always insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, is a signatory of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and is required to submit to IAEA inspections. But in 2018, Trump retracted the US from the deal, saying it failed to do enough to block Iran's route to a nuclear weapon, and reinstated American sanctions. By contrast, Israel is not part of the NPT and while Tel Aviv has never said whether it possesses nuclear arms or not, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the country is estimated to have at least 80 nuclear weapons. Israel began attacking Iran on 13 June, claiming Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon. Following a 12-day war, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire, however Trump said he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if intelligence found enough evidence that Iran's enrichment of uranium rose to worrying levels.
LeMonde
11 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump delays TikTok ban again, grants app 90-day extension to find US buyer
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday, June 19, he had given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration. The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," said a statement issued by the platform. Digital Cold War? Trump said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations. Trump has repeatedly downplayed risks that TikTok is in danger, saying he remains confident of finding a buyer for the app's US business. The White House had announced Monday that Trump would throw the wildly popular video-sharing app, which has almost 2 billion global users, another lifeline. During this new grace period the administration will work "to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," the administration said in a statement.