San Diego City Council approves law banning technology used in rental price fixing
The city initiated action on the measure last October, and on Tuesday, the ordinance, spearheaded by Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera, was approved in an 8 to 1 vote. The law doesn't touch affordable housing programs or tools using public data.
'Some of the biggest corporate landlords in the country are teaming up with big tech to use powerful, secretive software to coordinate rent hikes. Software that weaponizes private data from what should be competing landlords to figure out just how high they can push prices,' Elo-Rivera said.
The law takes aim at companies like RealPage, which is also the subject of a federal investigation.
'If you use Realpage's own advertising that it can help a landlord outperform the market by up to 7%, that would equate to up to an extra $185 every month for a renter in a rental managed with this price fixing software,' said Maya Rosas, the deputy chief of staff to Elo-Rivera.
Heather Ferbert, the San Diego city attorney, said, 'The United States Department of Justice, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, and the attorneys general of eight other states agree this conduct violates both federal antitrust laws and California's unfair competition law, and they filed lawsuits to that effect, but we can't just sit and wait while San Diegans' rents keep rising.'
Supporters argue the ordinance is a protective measure against homelessness.
{sot: mohamed omar –partnership for the advancement of new americans}
'Like so many San Diegans, I felt the pressure of rising rents and fear of being priced out of my own city. It's unacceptable,' said Mohamed Omar from the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans.
Opponents believe the law will hurt housing development.
Michael Semko, an attorney for RealPage, said, 'Banning software like this that every other industry in the United States that has any scale to it at all to help sellers price widgets will not attract more housing to California.'
Similar fears are echoed by Councilmember Raul Campillo – the only 'no' vote.
'That's just something that I think is going to have too much of a negative effect and that will have a larger impact on rent as a whole throughout our region,' Campillo said.
Following the ordinance's enactment, renters can initiate legal proceedings against landlords for violations, and landlords may face fines of up to $1,000 per offense.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Democrats' 2024 autopsy is described as avoiding the likeliest cause of death
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Party officials described the draft document as focusing on the 2024 election as a whole, but not on the presidential campaign — which is something like eating at a steakhouse and then reviewing the salad. Advertisement Producing a tough-minded public review of a national electoral defeat would be a politically delicate exercise under any circumstance, given the need to find fault with the work and judgment of important party leaders and strategists. It is particularly fraught for the new DNC chair, Ken Martin, who promised a post-election review from his first day on the job but whose first few months in the role have been plagued by infighting and financial strains. Advertisement 'We are not interested in second-guessing campaign tactics or decisions of campaign operatives,' said Jane Kleeb, the Nebraska Democratic chair, who heads the association of Democratic state chairs and is a close ally of Martin. 'We are interested in what voters turned out for Republicans and Democrats, and how we can fix this moving forward.' Locked out of power at the federal level, Democrats are struggling to show that they have taken to heart the message that voters sent in November and are well suited to regain power in future elections. The review, which was begun in March and is being led by Paul Rivera, a veteran Democratic operative, is not yet complete and the report is not fully drafted. Rivera nonetheless has begun briefing people on what the report has found so far, and those briefings suggest that the Democratic autopsy will avoid addressing some of the likeliest or leading causes of death. Among those is whether Biden should have run for reelection. Some of Harris' top aides have faulted him for dropping out so late that she had just 107 days to campaign as the presidential nominee. But Biden's son Hunter said on a podcast this past week that Democrats lost 'because we did not remain loyal' to his father. Top Democrats said they did not intend for the report to address strategic decisions made by leaders of the Biden and Harris campaigns. Indeed, in a sign of the report's narrow scope, more than half a dozen people who were senior officials on the campaigns say they have not yet been interviewed. Advertisement DNC officials cautioned that interviews were still taking place and the report's conclusions might change before it is released this fall. 'We're glad to see there's so much interest in an after-action report on how Democrats can win again,' Rivera said. 'But folks might be better off holding their applause, or their criticism, until we have had a chance to complete our work and people can actually read it.' People briefed on the report's progress said they had been told it would focus more on outside groups and super political action committees that spent hundreds of millions of dollars aiding the Biden and Harris campaigns through advertising, voter registration drives and turnout efforts. Kleeb said she expected the report to accelerate the party's diversion of resources from advertising to organizing. 'The days of us spending millions and millions of dollars on traditional TV ads are over,' she said. 'And I do think that this report will put an exclamation point on that.' In particular, the people briefed on it said, the after-action review is expected to place blame with Future Forward, the party's main super PAC, which spent $560 million to support Biden and then Harris. They said the report would argue that Future Forward spent far too much propping up Harris and not nearly enough attacking Trump. It is expected to argue that Future Forward's advertising approach was too focused on television programs to be effective. And it will review the lack of coordination between the super PAC's advertising and the Harris campaign's, which were often not in sync. A Future Forward document that was distributed to donors and reviewed by The New York Times said about half of the super PAC's advertising was delivered on digital platforms, which includes television-like streaming services. The group said it spent more than $51 million just on YouTube ads. Advertisement A Future Forward aide, who insisted on anonymity to discuss the group's operations, said just 13% of its advertising was positive about Harris, with the rest attacking Trump. ( The critiques of Future Forward will not be new to Democrats who read real-time coverage of the campaign last year, along with more recent book-length and magazine accounts of the Biden and Harris campaigns. A DNC official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that Future Forward had been reflective and candid in its conversations with the review's authors, denied that Future Forward would be blamed for the loss and insisted that any criticisms of the group would also apply to the broader Democratic world. Rivera has conducted more than 200 interviews with officials from all 50 states, an aide said. 'The DNC's post-election review is not a finger-pointing exercise; it's about bringing together Democrats across the ecosystem to adopt an actionable playbook to win, not just for 2026 and 2028, but to dominate for cycles to come,' said Rosemary Boeglin, a spokesperson for the committee. 'Democrats are clear-eyed about the challenges facing the party — many of which are rooted well before the 2024 cycle — and it requires all of us to make structural changes in how we run campaigns.' Rivera's team has included aides to Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois and Rep. Raul Ruiz of California. Walz, the party's 2024 nominee for vice president, has spent time since November on an atonement tour publicly explaining what he thought went wrong in the campaign, including what he saw as his own missteps. Advertisement The DNC's election review, which will extend to contests for Congress and state offices, is not the only one underway. Jen O'Malley Dillon, who oversaw the Biden and Harris campaigns, is involved in a separate monthslong project being led by Melissa Williams, a former top official at Emily's List who oversaw the group's independent political spending. That project is seeking to piece together as comprehensively as possible the technical and tactical decisions made both by the campaign and leading outside groups, and to document the results from those spending decisions, according to three people with knowledge of the research. The results are not expected to be made public but rather to be circulated privately among Democratic strategists to provide a fuller record and greater understanding of what happened, the people said. A third look back is being led by the Strategic Victory Fund, a network of liberal donors and organizations. Scott Anderson, the group's president, said it had so far interviewed more than 100 people, including top officials from the Biden and Harris campaign and the DNC. Anderson said he did not intend to make its report public but would instead use it to inform Democratic donors and decision makers. 'So many people in my world, after 2016, jumped into a resistance mode that there wasn't a real thoughtful moment to talk for a minute with all the key people about what we're doing right and wrong about every aspect of politics and culture,' Anderson said. 'We really need to take a step back in a way that I don't feel was done after 2016, and have hard conversations.' Advertisement The DNC's report is expected to be far different from the so-called autopsy that Republicans produced after the 2012 election of Barack Obama. In March 2013, the Republican National Committee released a 100-page 'Growth and Opportunity Project' report that declared the GOP was in an 'ideological cul-de-sac' and called for moderation on immigration along with a number of other changes. While Republican leaders did adopt many of its recommendations in time for the 2016 election, Trump's campaign ran counter to many of the changes the RNC had proposed, and he has since remade the Republican Party in his image. This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why You Should Add Equity Residential Stock to Your Portfolio
Equity Residential EQR, which has a dominating presence in Boston, New York, Washington, D.C., Seattle, San Francisco and Southern California, is expanding into Denver, Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth and Austin, and positioning itself to benefit from a more diversified portfolio. The company is also banking on technology, scale and organizational capabilities to drive demand and limited resident turnover have helped sustain the occupancy level and driven rental rates higher, supporting same-store revenue growth in the first quarter of 2025. Moreover, per its investor update, physical occupancy remained strong and above the prior year in April and the U.S. apartment market remained impressively resilient in the second quarter of 2025, absorbing more than 227,000 units between April and June, a robust second-quarter figure. This bodes well for Equity Residential. Elevated absorption suggests that the renter appetite for professionally managed apartments is holding firm despite broader macro to RealPage data, annual absorption surpassed even the peak leasing surge of 2021 and early 2022, defying a backdrop of slowing job growth, weak business sentiment and broader economic uncertainty. While rent growth stayed muted, up just 0.19% in June, occupancy climbed steadily. At 95.6% in June, national occupancy rose 140 basis points year over shares of Equity Residential have declined 3.6% compared with the industry's fall of 3.2% in the past six months, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). Given its solid fundamentals, this decline offers a good entry point. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Factors That Make Equity Residential a Solid Pick Strategic Portfolio Positioning and Technology Initiatives: Equity Residential is targeting places where affluent renters prefer to live, work and play. In its strategy, the company is taking into consideration the hybrid working environment and the migration trends of affluent renters and opting for the acquisition and development of properties in suburban locations of its established markets and adding select new given the high cost of homeownership, especially relative to rents, the transition from renter to homeowner is difficult in these markets, making renting apartment units a viable option. The company expects its total same-store revenues to grow year over year between 2.25% and 3.25% in 2025. We estimate the same to grow by 2.8%.Equity Residential is also banking on technology and organizational capabilities to drive growth and improve the efficiency of its operating platform. Such efforts are likely to provide the company with a competitive edge over others and drive growth in net operating income (NOI) in the upcoming period. We estimate the same-store NOI to increase year over year by 2.2% for Sheet Strength: Equity Residential has a healthy balance sheet with ample liquidity and financial flexibility. As of March 31, 2025, the company had nearly $2.2 billion of liquidity. It has a well-laddered debt maturity schedule. It ended the first quarter of 2025 with a net debt to normalized EBITDAre of 4.21X. Unencumbered NOI as a percentage of the total NOI was 90.5% in the quarter. Further, an A-rated balance sheet renders the company access to the debt market at favorable rates. With manageable debt maturities, solid credit metrics, significant unencumbered assets and sufficient access to capital markets at favorable rates, Equity Residential seems well-positioned to meet its future obligations as well as ride the growth Payout: Solid dividend payouts remain the biggest attraction for REIT investors and Equity Residential remains committed to this purpose. Over the last decade, the residential REIT has delivered strong dividend growth while maintaining a manageable Dividend Payout Ratio. Based on the latest dividend, per its May 2025 Investor Day presentation, for the 2011-2025 period, the company's dividend witnessed a compound annual growth rate of 5.8%.Given the company's solid operating platform and balance sheet strength compared with industry counterparts, this dividend growth rate is expected to be sustainable over the long run. Other Stocks to Consider Some other top-ranked stocks from the residential REIT sector are Camden Property Trust CPT and American Homes 4 Rent AMH. Camden Property Trust and American Homes 4 Rent currently carry a Zacks Rank #2 each. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks Zacks Consensus Estimate for Camden Property Trust's current-year FFO per share has been raised marginally over the past two months to $ Zacks Consensus Estimate for American Homes 4 Rent's 2025 FFO per share has moved marginally northward over the past three months to $ Anything related to earnings presented in this write-up represents funds from operations (FFO) — a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Equity Residential (EQR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Camden Property Trust (CPT) : Free Stock Analysis Report American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
The Verge
3 days ago
- The Verge
RealPage goes from setting rent to collecting it
RealPage, the algorithmic rent-setting software company, has announced plans to acquire Livble, a service that lets people pay their monthly rent in installments. Livble describes itself as a 'flexible' rent payment solution. Renters can split payments into up to four installments throughout the month. The service bills itself as helping tenants 'avoid late fees and credit card fees' as well as 'build credit through rent,' but it charges $30 to $40 per loan. RealPage didn't disclose the terms of the deal. Under the deal, RealPage will integrate Livble into its property management software and will handle 'all collections.' Last year, the US Department of Justice and several states sued RealPage over claims that it monopolized the market for commercial revenue management software used to set the price of apartments. The lawsuit alleges RealPage used nonpublic rental prices from competing landlords to inform its algorithm, which provides rental price recommendations for property owners. In May, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Bernie Sanders (D-VT), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and others asked RealPage whether it had 'potential involvement' in Republicans' now-scrapped AI moratorium. They argued that RealPage would've benefited from a 10-year ban preventing states from regulating algorithms, as several local governments have already enacted laws regulating rent-setting software.
