Rohit Pawar named in charge sheet in Kannad SSK case
The investigation, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), found that the acquisition of the Kannad Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (SSK), based in Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar, was allegedly illegal, according to ED officials. The Kannad SSK has been acquired by Baramati Agro Private Limited (BAPL) owned by Pawar.
The ED had issued a provisional attachment order under PMLA, attaching all the assets of Kannad SSK, worth ₹50.20 crore, in March 2024.
Pawar, BAPL's then chief executive officer, was questioned twice by the ED last year. The NCP (SP) MLA represents the Karjat-Jamkhed assembly constituency in Maharashtra.
NCP (SP) spokesperson Clyde Crasto said on Friday, 'The opposition has been targeted for a long time now, while those in government are being overlooked despite evidence of malpractices. Pressurising the opposition through central agencies has not worked before and will not work in the future either.'
The MSCB money laundering case arises from an August 2019 FIR of the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) alleging fraudulent sale of Sahakari Sakhar Kharkhana (SSKs) by then officers and directors of the bank at 'throwaway prices' to their relatives or private persons, without following due procedure.
The EOW has alleged that MSCB, in order to recover an outstanding loan of ₹80.56 crore from Kannad SSK, had taken possession of all its assets in July 2009, under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act.
Further, on August 30, 2012, the MSCB had conducted an auction of Kannad SSK by allegedly fixing a very low reserve price based on a questionable valuation report, ED sources said.
Apart from BAPL, two other parties had entered the bidding process. The bidder with the highest bid was allegedly technically disqualified on allegedly flimsy grounds, whereas one of the other bidders was already a close business associate of BAPL, with no financial capacity or experience of running a sugar unit, according to the ED. Kannad SSK was eventually purchased by BAPL allegedly for around ₹50 crore.
BAPL was on the ED's radar in the case for allegedly funding a co-bidder for complying with the requirement of submitting an Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of ₹5 crore to participate in the auction, according to ED sources.
The ED has submitted a main charge sheet and two supplementary charge sheets before a Mumbai special court in connection with its probe relating to allegedly wrongful acquisition of three other SSKs as part of the MSCB case investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
ED opposes M3M director's plea to quash graft FIR: ‘Don't need sanction to prosecute private person'
The Enforcement Directorate Tuesday opposed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court a plea moved by M3M Director Roop Bansal seeking to quash a corruption case registered against him for allegedly conspiring to bribe a trial court judge. In the case, Bansal is booked under Sections 7, 8, 11 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) along with Section 120-B of the IPC. Bansal's lawyers contended that the proceedings were invalid due to the absence of sanction required under Section 17A of the PCA to prosecute the judge allegedly linked to the bribery. The counsel argued that a person could not be prosecuted solely under Section 120-B for criminal conspiracy unless tried alongside the public servant accused, and that without sanction against the judge, the entire case stood vitiated. Countering this, senior panel counsel Zoheb Hossain, appearing with Lokesh Narang for the ED, contended that the plea of want of sanction was not available to Bansal as he was a private individual, not a public servant. The ED further submitted that even if proceedings against a public servant were barred for lack of sanction, it would not automatically nullify the prosecution of private individuals accused of aiding, abetting, or conspiring to commit offences under the PCA or under Section 120-B of the IPC. After Chief Justice Sheel Nagu had recused from hearing the matter as he had dealt with it on administrative side, Bansal's plea was listed before Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing virtually for the petitioner, sought an adjournment due to network issues. Considering the request, the bench adjourned the matter to July 30 for final arguments. The corruption FIR quashing plea in Roop Bansal vs State of Haryana has seen unusual twists and turns. It was first listed before Justice Anoop Chitkara in October 2023. After change in roster, the matter was listed before Justice NS Shekhawat who recused from hearing the case in January this year. The matter was then listed before Justice Kaul, before whom it was dismissed as withdrawn. It then went to Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu, who heard the matter and reserved for judgment on May 2, with pronouncement due on May 12, when the Chief Justice, citing 'the interest of the institution' and the need to 'preserve and protect the reputation and dignity' of Justice Sindhu, reassigned it to himself on May 10. This case was assigned to Justice Kaul after Chief Justice Nagu recused himself from hearing it on July 3, citing the need to uphold the principle that justice must not only be done but 'should also appear to have been done.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Agri minister Manikrao Kokate seeks inquiry into card playing allegations, says will resign if found guilty
Nashik/Pune: State agriculture minister Manikrao Kokate on Tuesday again dismissed the allegations that he was "playing an online game of cards" on his cellphone during a state assembly session and said he was ready to face an inquiry. NCP (SP) MLA Rohit Pawar, however, claimed that the minister was lying and shared a video of the minister, along with the audio from the session. He insisted that Kokate resign before facing a probe. Kokate, who was in Nashik on Tuesday, said he would seek an inquiry into a video released by his political rivals and tender his resignation if found guilty during the winter session. Kokate also announced his intention to sue all those trying to defame him. When reporters brought up the opposition's demand, Kokate asked: "What should I give my resignation for? Have I committed any crime?" "I am going to write to the chief minister, deputy chief minister, the chairperson of the legislative council, and the Speaker of the assembly to conduct an inquiry into the episode and make public the report during the next winter session. If found guilty, I will tender my resignation to the Governor without even meeting the chief minister or the deputy chief minister," Kokate said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo He further said when he goes to Mumbai next week, he would contact his lawyers, issue notices to all politicians involved in defaming him, and file a defamation suit. "I have been in the House for over 25 years and would never indulge in acts that violate the norms. I have already clarified that when I wanted some updates on my cellphone, I opened it only to encounter a pop-up advertisement of the online game. I struggled to skip the advertisement despite attempting multiple times. There is a complete video, and it is longer than 17 seconds. It reveals the truth, as I was able to skip the advertisement after multiple attempts. I will, therefore, seek the call records of the politicians engaged in the act and file defamation cases against them," said Kokate. When asked about chief minister Devendra Fadnavis's statement that playing cards in the House was inappropriate, Kokate said, "Currently, I have neither briefed the CM (Devendra Fadnavis) nor the deputy CM (Ajit Pawar) on the issue. The CM's statement might have been based on the media reports." Does Not Take 42 Seconds To Skip Advertisement: Rohit Pawar A few days ago, Rohit Pawar had uploaded a video of Kokate without the background audio on his X handle. When Kokate claimed on Tuesday that he was surfing on his cellphone when there was no discussion going on in the assembly, the Karjat-Jamkhed MLA reposted it with the audio on the same social media platform. "Respecting the assembly's decorum, I first posted the video without the audio. However, since the state agriculture minister is lying, I had to repost it with the background audio. He was seen playing the game of cards on his cellphone while issues about a tribal community were being discussed in the assembly," Rohit said on X. He reiterated it while speaking to reporters in Karjat Jamkhed on Tuesday. Countering Kokate's claim that he was surfing on his cellphone when the advertisement of the online game popped up and he was skipping it, Rohit said, "It does not take 42 seconds to skip an advertisement. If the minister says that he will face a probe, he should resign and then appear for the inquiry." The MLA said that farmers expected much from the state govt, but the agriculture minister has been making controversial statements about them in the last four years. "When the farming community needs support, he is playing a game of cards. Such politicians should not hold a cabinet minister's post," Rohit Pawar added.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
ICICI-Videocon loan probe: PMLA appellate body upholds ED's property seizure in case against Chanda Kochhar
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act has allowed the seizure of properties in a case involving former ICICI Bank chief executive Chanda Kochhar , her husband Deepak Kochhar and Videocon Group promoter Venugopal Dhoot , overturning a ruling of the Adjudicating Authority to release its order on an appeal filed by the Enforcement Directorate that had attached the properties, the tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority "ignored crucial evidence" and based its ruling on "irrelevant considerations", particularly on the role of Deepak Kochhar in managing NuPower Renewables (NRPL) and a Rs 64 crore loan that the company received from Videocon-linked to the investigating agencies - ED and the CBI - this ₹ 64 crore was a quid pro quid for helping the Videocon Group get a loan from ICICI Bank where Deepak Kochhar's wife was a top executive. The Kochhars and Dhoot have denied the tribunal said the Adjudicating Authority placed undue emphasis on the shareholding structure of NRPL while overlooking material facts, including the control exercised by Deepak Kochhar as its managing director. On paper, the transfer of funds to NRPL may have been shown as from one Videocon Group company to another, "but if the veil is lifted, the affairs were under control of Deepak Kochhar", the tribunal said in its order pronounced tribunal ruled that the property transactions, including the transfer of a flat at CCI Chambers in South Mumbai were "nothing but proceeds of crime ". It noted that the flat purchased by a Videocon-linked entity for ₹3.25 crore was transferred to a family trust associated with Deepak Kochhar for just ₹11 rejected the defence's claim that the sanctioning of the loan to the Videocon Group was a collective decision at ICICI Bank, saying that Chanda Kochhar's active role, lack of disclosure and urgency in approving the loan raised serious concerns. It said as per rules, Chanda Kochhar should not have attended the meeting of a committee that cleared the loan, but she not only participated but also sanctioned the loan under the urgent category."This is taken to be nothing but commission of crime which includes even the offence under Section 420 IPC (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property)," the order upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision declining to confirm the attachment of ₹ 10.5 lakh seized during a raid on a Kochhar-linked company but confirmed the provisional attachment of all other that it did not find any illegality in the attachment, the tribunal said it "rather find perverse finding in the hands of the Adjudicating Authority on all the issues relevant to the case".
