15 years after Deepwater Horizon oil spill, lawsuits stall and restoration is incomplete
Oil giant BP paid billions of dollars in damages, propelling ambitious coastal restoration projects across five states. Yet cleanup workers and local residents who suffered health effects they attribute to the spill have struggled to have their cases heard in court, and few have received significant compensation.
Conservation groups say the spill catalyzed innovative restoration work across the Gulf Coast, but are alarmed at the recent halt of a flagship land-creation project in Louisiana. As the Trump administration expands offshore oil and gas drilling, they are concerned the best opportunities for rebuilding the Gulf Coast are slipping away.
In the coastal community of Lafitte in southeast Louisiana, Tammy Gremillion is celebrating Easter Sunday, the anniversary of the April 20 spill, without her daughter. She remembers warning Jennifer against joining a cleanup crew tasked with containing the spill for BP.
'But I couldn't stop her — they were offering these kids lots of money,' Gremillion said. 'They didn't know the dangers. They didn't do what they should have to protect these young people.'
Jennifer worked knee-deep in oil for months, returning home reeking of fumes, covered in black splotches and breaking out in rashes and suffering headaches. She also was exposed to Corexit, a chemical approved by the Environmental Protection Agency that is applied on and below the water to disperse oil, which has been linked to health problems.
In 2020, Jennifer died of leukemia, a blood cancer that can be caused by exposure to oil.
Gremillion, who broke down in tears as she recounted her daughter's death, is '1,000% confident' that exposure to toxins during the cleanup caused the cancer.
She filed a lawsuit against BP in 2022, although the allegations have been difficult to establish in court. Gremillion's suit is one of a small number of cases still pending.
An investigation by the Associated Press previously found all but a few of the roughly 4,800 lawsuits seeking compensation for health problems linked to the oil spill have been dismissed and only one has been settled.
In a 2012 settlement, BP paid ill workers and coastal residents $67 million, which amounted to no more than $1,300 each for nearly 80% of those seeking compensation.
Attorneys from the Downs Law Group, representing Gremillion and about 100 others in cases against BP, say the company leveraged procedural technicalities to block victims from getting their day in court.
BP declined to comment on pending litigation. In court filings, the company denied allegations that oil exposure caused health problems and it attacked the credibility of medical experts brought by plaintiffs.
The environmental impact was devastating, recalled PJ Hahn, who served on the front lines as a southeast Louisiana coastal management official. He watched the oil eat away at barrier islands and marsh around his community in Plaquemines Parish until 'it would just crumble like a cookie in hot coffee, just break apart.'
Oyster beds suffocated, reefs were blanketed in chemicals, and the fishing industry tanked. Pelicans diving for dead fish emerged from the contaminated waters smeared in a black sheen. Tens of thousands of seabirds and sea turtles were killed, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Since then, 'significant progress' has been made restoring Gulf habitats and ecosystems, according to the Natural Resource Damage Assessment Trustee Council, a group of state and federal agencies tasked with managing restoration funded by penalties levied against BP.
The council says more than 300 restoration projects worth $5.38 billion have been approved in the Gulf of Mexico. The projects include acquiring wetlands in Mississippi to protect nesting areas for birds, rebuilding reefs along Pensacola Bay in Florida and restoring about 4 square miles of marsh in Lake Borgne near New Orleans.
Though a tragedy, the spill 'galvanized a movement — one that continues to push for a healthier, more resilient coast,' said Simone Maloz, campaign director for Restore the Mississippi River Delta, a conservation coalition.
The influx of billions of dollars in penalties paid by BP 'allowed us to think bigger, act faster and rely on science to guide large-scale solutions,' she added.
Yet what many conservationists see as the flagship of the restoration projects funded by the Deepwater Horizon disaster payout — an approximately $3-billion effort to divert sediment from the Mississippi River to rebuild 21 square miles of land in southeast Louisiana — has stalled over concerns of its effect on the livelihoods of local communities and dolphin populations.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry has said the project would 'break our culture' by harming local oyster and shrimp fisheries due to the influx of freshwater. This month, his Republican administration paused the project for 90 days, citing its high costs, and its future remains uncertain.
The Trump administration is seeking to sell more offshore oil and gas leases, which the industry trade group American Petroleum Institute called 'a big step forward for American energy dominance.'
BP announced an oil discovery in the Gulf last week and plans more than 40 new wells in the next three years. The company told the AP that it has improved safety standards and oversight.
'We remain keenly aware that we must always put safety first,' BP said in an emailed statement. 'We have made many changes so that such an event should never happen again.'
But Joseph Gordon, climate and energy director for the nonprofit Oceana, warned that Deepwater Horizon's legacy should be 'an alarm bell' against the expansion of offshore drilling.
Brook writes for the Associated Press.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
11 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Should you wear sunscreen when it's cloudy in S.F.? Here's what experts say
How much can the sun damage our skin if we can't even see it? That's a reasonable question in San Francisco, especially given that it's the city's coldest, foggiest summer in recent memory. But experts say there's no ambiguity: You still need to wear sunscreen. Weather — even our eternal fog — should not play a role in your decision. 'There's a significant or clinically meaningful amount (of skin-damaging radiation coming through), even if it is foggy,' said Dr. Sungat Grewal, co-director of laser surgery and cosmetic dermatology at UCSF. On foggier days, clouds scatter and absorb a portion of ultraviolet radiation from the sun, but a lot still gets to the ground — especially UVA rays (which primarily cause skin aging), and to a lesser extent UVB rays (which primarily cause sunburn). Both types can lead to cancer. Up to 80 to 90 percent of UV rays can penetrate fog and clouds, according to Dr. Estelle Kahn, a dermatologist at Kaiser Permanente. All UV radiation contributes to your risk of getting skin cancer, and the damage is cumulative — meaning the problem is not just one day, but rather total exposure throughout your lifetime. Grewal recommends wearing tinted, broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or higher, every day. 'Broad spectrum' protects against both types of ultraviolet light, whereas SPF mainly refers to UVB protection. The tinted element is more for cosmetic purposes — fighting aging — but still important to consider, both Grewal and Kahn said. Tinted sunscreen blocks visible light, which leads to pigmentation and other skin appearance issues. 'The best sunscreen is the one that you like … and are going to want to use every day,' Grewal said. The UV index, found at the Environmental Protection Agency's SunWise UV Index app or your preferred weather app, shows considerable variation during the day in San Francisco. On Friday in San Francisco, for example, the index — which runs on a scale of 1 to 11 — showed 2 until around 9:30 a.m., but then soared to 10 around 1 p.m. While you can forgo sunscreen if the index is at 1 or 2, indices of 3 and upward warrant sun protection, according to the EPA — and a 1 or 2 can very quickly become a higher number, with 8 or more considered 'very high to extreme.' The National Weather Service calculates the UV index using both UVA and UVB rays. Winter months have a lower UV index. But Kahn said you still need to wear sunscreen then. She reiterated that UV radiation is invisible and doesn't correlate with temperature. Chronicle meteorologist Greg Porter's advice? 'Don't base your sunscreen choice on the cloud cover, certainly in this city.'


Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
JTWNI, GARD join EarthJustice, other groups in legal action against EPA
Two Northwest Indiana community groups have joined EarthJustice to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's actions to delay air pollution compliance in steel mills. 'The 2024 air standards — hard-won safeguards for fenceline communities — are being stripped away, as the agency grants emissions exemptions to steel mills and eliminates public input,' Lisa Vallee, organizing director of Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said in a Wednesday news release. 'This is environmental injustice: they are sacrificing our communities, gutting our social safety nets, and taking away our future. We will not stay silent.' Earlier this month, the EPA issued a final rule delaying air pollution protections for communities near steel mills, according to the Federal Register. Current rules have required steel mills to reduce emissions since last April, but the agency's new action delays compliance until April 2027, allowing pollution to continue at current levels. According to EarthJustice, the EPA published the final rule without notice, which did not allow the public to object to the extension before it went into effect. EarthJustice is a San Francisco-based nonprofit public interest environmental law organization that works with community groups nationwide. EarthJustice Senior Attorney Adrienne Lee said in a Wednesday news release that it's alarming for the EPA to delay protections without first accepting public input. The action is also inconsistent with the agency's responsibility to human health and the environment, Lee said. 'Communities living near steel mills in states such as Indiana and Pennsylvania deserve better,' she said. 'Each year, steel mills expose these communities to hundreds of tons of toxic air pollution which places them at increased risk of developing cancer and a variety of chronic health conditions.' An October report from Industrious Labs found that most residents in Gary are in the top 10% nationally for being most at-risk for developing asthma and at-risk of low life expectancy. In 2020, Indiana had a lung cancer rate of 72.5 per 100,000 people, with Lake County as one of the state's counties with the highest cancer mortality rates, according to the American Lung Association. A 2016 JAMA Network report also found Gary as one of the top five U.S. cities with the lowest life expectancy at one point. The EPA declined to comment on the legal action, saying in an email that it's longstanding practice not to comment on current or pending litigation. Dorreen Carey, president of Gary Advocates for Responsible Development, said in the news release that EPA's actions fail to protect Gary and surrounding Northwest Indiana communities' residents. Carey called out U.S. Steel's Gary Works facility specifically, saying pollutants have led to increased health issues in the city. 'The current outmoded and insufficient methods of hazardous air emission monitoring and control at Gary Works are not protective of human health and the environment,' Carey said. 'Residents must have a voice in EPA decisions and rulemaking and EPA must do its job to protect the residents and the natural resources of Gary…' A U.S. Steel spokesperson responded to the action in a statement Thursday. 'Environmental stewardship is a core value at U.S. Steel, and we remain committed to the safety of our communities as do our more than 3,400 Gary Works employees,' the statement said. JTNWI and GARD have previously expressed concerns with U.S. Steel's application for two-year exemptions from hazardous air pollutant rules for integrated iron and steel, coke and taconite iron ore process, according to Post-Tribune archives. U.S. Steel previously told the Post-Tribune in a statement that it challenged all three rules because they were not supported by science or law and would impose significant costs while setting technically unachievable standards. Seeking these exemptions doesn't mean U.S. Steel isn't 'supportive of revisions to regulations that are within (the EPA's) statutory authority, based on sound science and are technically feasible,' according to Post-Tribune archives. In March, the EPA announced corporations could apply for presidential exemptions to sections of the Clean Air Act. Exemption applications were due March 31, and if approved, can be extended for up to two additional years. 'Northwest Indiana is already home to some of the worst air pollution in this country,' a previous JTNWI statement said. 'In this region, we suffer from a cumulative, generational impact of exposure to industrial toxins in communities like Lake County, Indiana. These exemptions are a free pass for these polluters at the continued cost of our health and safety. We're adamantly opposed to this astonishing reversal of environmental law in no uncertain terms. Our communities and region are not expendable sacrifice zones for this administration or corporations.'


Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Restores Public School Program Axed by Obama Administration
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump on Thursday will move to reinstate the Presidential Fitness Test, a decades-old program designed to encourage healthy, active lifestyles among American schoolchildren. First launched in 1966, the test once required students to run and complete exercises such as situps, pullups or pushups, along with a sit-and-reach flexibility assessment. It was overhauled in 2012 under the Obama administration to emphasize personal health goals rather than athletic performance. Trump "wants to ensure America's future generations are strong, healthy, and successful," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement, adding that the goal is to foster "a culture of strength and excellence for years to come." In a White House ceremony Thursday afternoon, Trump is expected to sign an order reestablishing both the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition and the fitness test itself. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will oversee the program, which will also introduce a new Presidential Fitness Award. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.