logo
At the edge of the ocean, a dazzling ecosystem is changing fast

At the edge of the ocean, a dazzling ecosystem is changing fast

Vox01-04-2025
is a senior producer and reporter on Unexplainable, Vox's science podcast. She covers everything scientists don't yet know but are trying to figure out, so her work explores everything from the inner workings of the human body to the distant edges of the universe
In just a few hours, the world I'm walking into will disappear beneath the waves.
I'm at Pillar Point Harbor, a 40-minute drive from San Francisco, near low tide. And because this is one of the lowest tides this August, the water has drawn back like a curtain to expose an ecosystem that's normally hidden away — a place called the rocky intertidal, or, because the receding water leaves little pools behind in the rocks, 'the tidepools.'
Dawn has just broken, pods of pelicans fly overhead, and sea lions bark from the nearby harbor. But I'm more focused on following my guide, a zoologist named Rebecca Johnson, as she picks her way out into these seaweed-covered rocks, pointing out species as she goes. These smooth green strands are surfgrass. Those fat bladders of air that look kind of like puffed-up gloves are called 'seasack.' This dark brown frond Johnson is draping over her shoulders is the aptly named 'feather boa kelp.'
' They're like wildflowers,' Johnson says, 'But it's seaweed.'
Rebecca Johnson wears a feather boa kelp like a feather boa. Byrd Pinkerton/Vox
As we make our way deeper, she points out odd creatures that only the ocean could dream up. A boring clam (which is far from boring, but does bore into rock) puffs itself up like a fierce fleshy ball before squirting a jet of water directly into the air to fend off our threatening vibes. A pale white brittle star, like a flexible daddy longlegs, dances for us across some algae. And rows of fat green anemones wear bits of shells like tiny hats.
' The theory is that…they're protecting themselves from the sun, like a sunscreen,' Johnson tells me.
We crouch together at the edge of a deep pool and see first one, then two — then three, four, five, six! — species of nudibranchs, the sea slugs that Johnson specializes in. One is hot pink and spiky. Another is an aggressive shade of orange. There's a pale lemon one, a ghostly white one. Johnson even finds one covered in orange polka dots, like a marine clown. Some of these species, she tells me, bubbling with enthusiasm, eat anemones and steal their stinging cells, repurposing them as their own defenses.
An orange polka-dotted nudibranch, known as a 'sea clown.' Byrd Pinkerton/Vox
This kind of diversity is wild to witness, but it isn't unusual for these tidepools.
'It's one of the places in the world that you can see species of invertebrates all really, really concentrated,' Johnson told me.
We wander further out, exploring this alien landscape together, until the tide begins to come back in and cover it over, bit by bit, hiding this weird world away again in a slow disappearing act.
' It's extra magical that you can only see it at certain times,' Johnson told me before we came out here, 'You get this little peek, this little window. And that's one of the things I love the most about it.'
Johnson has been coming to this exact spot off Pillar Point for almost three decades now, and in her role as director for the Center for Biodiversity and Community Science for the California Academy of Sciences, she spends time with volunteers monitoring tidepools up and down the California coasts. But she's still enchanted with them.
I'm not surprised. I fell in love with tidepools myself 20 years ago, when I first got to explore them as a kid at a summer camp in Mendocino. The odd, colorful creatures in them made me feel like magic was a little bit real, that science could feel like fantasy. It's part of the reason I'm a science reporter today.
But Johnson is worried about the future of these tidepools she loves so much. She's worried that, like so many ecosystems around the world, they may be heading toward a much more dramatic, much more permanent disappearing act.
So she, along with many, many collaborators all across the state of California and beyond, is doing what many scientists are trying to do for the ecosystems they study: to figure out — first, what's actually happening to them, and second, what, if anything, we can do to save them.
The sun rises over tide pools in Fort Bragg, California. Byrd Pinkerton/Vox
How did we get here?
For Rebecca Johnson, the troubles really began around the arrival of 'The Blob': a marine heatwave. By 2014, it had warmed waters significantly along the West Coast of the United States. Johnson was hearing concerning things from participants in the programs she organized through Cal Academy to get people to go into the tidepools and make observations.
'They started seeing an increase in this really beautiful pink nudibranch called the Hopkins Rose nudibranch,' she says.
Ruby Ash for Vox
Historically, the Hopkins Rose nudibranch has lived in Southern California — and ventured up to Johnson's more northern tidepools mostly during El Niño years. But as the temperatures shifted for the Blob, the spiky pink balls were showing up in huge numbers.
'It became the most common thing,' Johnson remembers.
She was also hearing disturbing reports about another animal — the sea star, known more colloquially as the starfish.
As early as 2013, before The Blob really hit, divers and researchers had started noticing that sea stars were, quite literally, wasting away.
'They were seeing white lesions on starfishes. And they were seeing the starfish kind of disintegrate in front of them,' she says, '[They would] see it one day with these lesions. They'd come back the next day and it was like almost dissolved and then almost gone.'
Sea star wasting also isn't unheard of, but in this instance, the wasting hit species after species of sea stars — at least 20 species in all. Also, as an evolutionary ecologist who studied this outbreak, Lauren Schiebelhut, told me, wasting normally happens on a more local scale — isolated to a single bay, for example.
'For it to spread across the entire West Coast here, that was something we had not seen before,' Schiebelhut says.
'[The Blob] certainly seemed to exacerbate it,' Schiebelhut says.
At one point, Johnson went down to her favorite tidepooling spot, Pillar Point, with a colleague, just to 'see what they could see,' and they saw almost no sea stars.
'It was just like the most bizarre feeling,' she remembers, 'I was still at this place that was spectacularly beautiful, covered with algae. All these other invertebrates are there. But there's just something kind of off about it.'
Byrd Pinkerton/Vox
It was like, she says, going into your room, only to realize that someone has moved all your stuff very slightly.
'And you're like, 'What's wrong with this room?' It had that disconcerting, unsettling feeling.'
This place Johnson knew so well — had been documenting and sharing with people for decades — suddenly felt unfamiliar. And at that moment, she felt a deep, deep uncertainty about its future.
'Like, there might not be starfish, like ever,' she remembers thinking, 'What does that mean?'
What it would mean to lose so many sea stars
The reason that Johnson was so worried about sea stars was not just that the tidepools at Pillar Point looked different. She was worried about the role sea stars play in the tidepools ecosystem. To us, they might seem like pretty creatures that come in a fun shape, but to many of the ocean animals they interact with, they are voracious predators that help keep their ecosystems in balance — chowing down on everything from mussels and barnacles to snails.
To understand why this is so important, let's journey a little beyond the tidepools, a little further offshore, into the California kelp forests. These are underwater forests of algae that are home to a huge diversity of animals, from fish and octopi to abalone. Kelp forests also provide a buffer for the coast against erosion, and they absorb and store large amounts of carbon dioxide, which benefits all of us as we try to stave off climate change. So they're amazing ecosystems.
But, like any forest, California's coastal kelp forest has grazers — basically the marine equivalent of deer. In this case, these are animals like the purple sea urchin, a spiky purple pincushion that chows down enthusiastically on kelp.
Ruby Ash for Vox
Normally, Peter Roopnarine, a paleontologist at the California Academy of Sciences who has studied kelp forests tells me, sea urchins are content to eat the bits of detritus that the kelp shed naturally. But if there isn't enough kelp detritus to go around, urchins can start feeding on the living kelp itself.
' That will happen if, for example, there are not enough predators around to keep their population in control, to keep them hiding,' Roopnarine says, ' Pretty soon they kill the kelp, and what you're left with is what we call an urchin barren, which are these stretches of seafloor that are covered with urchins. And nothing else.'
Sea otters are one of the predators — one of the wolves, to continue the metaphor, to our urchin deer — keeping urchins in check along some parts of the coast. Sea otters were hunted aggressively by European settlers, and have not returned along the northern part of the coast, but have made a comeback in central California.
Another important wolf for these kelp forests, though, is a sea star known as Pycnopodia helianthoides, or the 'sunflower sea star.' Sunflower sea stars are beautiful, often purple or pink, and kind of squishy. But they are also, at least as sea stars go, big. They can have twenty arms, and grow to the size of a dinner plate or larger. (As a kid, when we found them in the tidepools, we used to have to hold them in two hands.) And researchers have increasingly found that they, too, did a lot of work to keep urchins in check.
This is why it was such a big deal when the sea star wasting syndrome hit and wiped out so many sea stars, sunflower sea stars very much included.
After the sickness, a lot of sea star species did start to come back. You can find sea stars like ochre stars, leather stars, and bat stars in California tidepools, for example. But while sunflower sea stars can still be found in the wild further north, in places like Washington state, they have not bounced back along the coast of California. And that, scientists suggest, may have contributed to the issues they're now seeing in kelp forests.
Satellite surveys from a few years ago showed that the kelp forests off of Northern California have shrunk by 95%. Once again, this is probably due to a combination of factors. High water temperatures may have weakened the kelp, for example. But another factor was the explosion of urchin populations.
'This lack of the sunflower star in the kelp forest, especially in Northern California,' Johnson says, 'led to the increase of urchins. And the urchins then ate all the kelp.'
What does this mean for the future of these tidepools?
The tidepools haven't been hit as hard as the kelp forests. Clearly, as our visit last August showed, a place like Pillar Point has not turned into the equivalent of an urchin barren and is instead still home to a diversity of creatures.
Still, Johnson says, they have been affected. She has, anecdotally, noticed grazing species like abalone that normally spend more of their time in the kelp forests moving over to tidepools, probably in search of kelp to eat. And as temperatures continue warming over time, tidepool ecosystems are changing in other ways. A recent paper showed that a species of nudibranch range has moved northward. Another study showed that a whole bunch of different marine species, including nudibranchs, but also species of snail, lobster, and crab were spotted further north than their usual range during a heat wave. Some of these species are predators that might shake up the dynamics and the ecosystems they're coming into.
'We don't actually know what happens when they move north,' Johnson says, ' We don't really know the impact.'
And then, as Lauren Schiebelhut, the geneticist who studies sea stars, told me, there are other stressors like pollution and runoff from wildfires. This January, more than 57,000 acres burned from a series of wildfires in the greater Los Angeles area — a disaster whose scope of damage on intertidal ecosystems is not yet clear, researchers told me.
'The disturbances are becoming more frequent, more intense,' says Schiebelhut, 'It is a challenge to the system.'
Johnson admits that it's hard to know exactly how to interpret all these changes and stressors and use them to predict the future of the tidepools. After all, the California coastal ecosystems have survived the loss of important species before, and survived big natural disasters too.
A brittle star dances across the algae. Byrd Pinkerton
Byrd Pinkerton
My favorite sea slug: an opalescent nudibranch. Byrd Pinkerton/Vox
So I turned to Peter Roopnarine, the paleontologist. He studies how ancient ecosystems weathered — or didn't weather — things like climate change, and what we might learn from them to apply to ecosystems facing challenges today. I hoped he would have a sense of how the current moment fits into the bigger patterns of history.
'If you look in the fossil record,' he told me, 'one of the things that's really remarkable is that ecosystems can last a very long time. Millions of years. Species will come and go in those ecosystems, but what they do, who they do it to, and so on? That doesn't change.'
Ecosystems are a little like, say, a baseball team. You'll always need certain players in certain roles — pitchers and catchers and shortstops and outfielders. Different players can retire and be replaced by other players — if one predator disappears, another predator might be able to take over some of the role that it plays, for example.
But Roopnarine's research into the fossil record also shows that no ecosystem baseball team is endlessly flexible.
'They do eventually come to an end,' he says. Usually, that's when really extreme changes occur. And when he looks at the moments in the past when the climate changed dramatically, and he looks at forecasts for our future, he's very worried.
'We have to be realistic that if we do nothing, the future is extremely grim,' he tells me, 'There is no sugarcoating it.'
What can we do?
When it comes to safeguarding the future health of California's coastal ecosystems, there are lots of people doing lots of things.
Johnson is working with colleagues on a system that uses the community science app iNaturalist to better monitor the health of coastal tidepools.
The Steinhart Aquarium is one of several institutions where researchers are raising and studying baby sunflower stars. This tiny star has two new arms growing. Byrd Pinkerton
Anyone who goes to the tide pools can upload photos of all the species that they see. Those photos, geotagged with locations and timestamps, will hopefully help researchers figure out how populations are changing, to model the future of this ecosystem. They could also potentially serve as a warning system if there are big die-offs again, so scientists can try and intervene earlier.
Lauren Schiebelhut has studied the genomes of sea stars that did recover, to see what can be learned about what made them so resilient to wasting.
The California state government has partnered with nonprofits and commercial fishermen to clear urchins and restore kelp.
And then there's the consortium of institutions up and down the coast, all working on an initiative to try to breed sunflower sea stars in captivity so that they might, eventually, be released back into the wild and resume their role as key predators.
' There is no one person that can do all the things,' says Ashley Kidd, a project manager at the Sunflower Star Lab, one of the many groups working together to bring sunflower sea stars back. What gives her hope is that so many different people, from so many institutions, are working together toward solutions.
' You can't have all the knowledge of disease ecology, behavioral ecology, aquaculture by yourself,' Kidd says, 'It is a much bigger, wonderful group of people that you get to work with and then be connected with. … You're not alone.'
When I first heard that these tidepools might be in trouble, I felt an overwhelming sense of loss.
This ecosystem made me believe that the real world had its own magic — because sure, fairies might not be real, but opalescent nudibranchs come pretty close. It hurts to think that that magic might dim, or even disappear. But walking through these pools with Johnson and watching her walk over to a mother and her daughter to show them nudibranchs, eagerly sharing this world with strangers, I felt delight, and a wonderful sense of present-ness. I felt part of that community. A sense that, whatever the future of these tidepools might look like, they were here, now, and as magical as ever.
'In the midst of climate change and a future that is going to be hotter and harder and more difficult for people, you have to have joy,' Johnson told me, 'I struggle with it. I feel like marine systems especially are pretty complicated to think about restoring. What do you actually do out here? How do you protect things? … But you can't stop doing it, because then you've kind of lost everything.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These Two Simple Interventions May Cut CRC Recurrence Risk
These Two Simple Interventions May Cut CRC Recurrence Risk

Medscape

time3 hours ago

  • Medscape

These Two Simple Interventions May Cut CRC Recurrence Risk

This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hello. I'm Dr David Johnson, professor of medicine and chief of gastroenterology at Eastern Virginia Medical School and Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. New guidelines have lowered the age to begin screening for colon cancer to 45 years old. Although this change is positive, we're still seeing advanced cancer in younger patients who haven't been screened in time. Once diagnosed, these patients undergo surgery and chemotherapy and often return to us asking, 'What can I do now to help myself?' Two recent studies highlight interventions that are simple, affordable, and actionable today: exercise and aspirin. Let's take a closer look at the results. Exercise's Risk Reduction Potential The idea that exercise reduces cancer recurrence and mortality is supported by observational data. The mechanistic effects behind this have been ascribed to metabolic growth factors, inflammatory changes, immune function changes, and perhaps even positive impact on sleep. A study just published in The New England Journal of Medicine examined structured exercise after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. The phase 3 randomized CHALLENGE trial, mostly conducted at Canadian and Australian centers, recruited patients with resected stage II or III colon cancer (9.8% and 90.2%, respectively) who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with recurrences within a year of diagnosis were excluded, as they were more likely to have highly aggressive, biologically active disease. Patients were randomized to receive healthcare education materials alone or in conjunction with a structured exercise program over a 3-year follow-up period. The exercise intervention, delivered in person or virtually, focused on increasing recreational aerobic activity over baseline by at least 10 metabolic equivalent task (MET). An increment of 10 MET hours per week is not too vigorous. It is essentially the equivalent of adding about 45-60 minutes of brisk walking or 25-30 minutes of jogging 3-4 times a week. Patients were asked to increase MET over the first 6 months and then maintain or further increase the amount over the next 2.5 years. They were permitted to structure their own exercise program by choosing the type, frequency, intensity, and duration of aerobic exercise. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, with secondary endpoints assessing overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and other outcomes. Although designed to detect differences at 3 years, follow-up was also performed out to 5 and 8 years. At a median follow-up of 7.9 years, exercise reduced the relative risk of disease recurrence, new primary cancer, or death by 28% ( P =.02). This benefit persisted — and even strengthened — over time, with disease-free survival increasing by 6.4 and 7.1 percentage points at 5 and 8 years, respectively. Musculoskeletal adverse events were slightly higher in the exercise group compared with the health education group (18.5% vs 11.5%, respectively), but only 10% were directly attributed to the exercise. There are considerations when interpreting these results. First, there was an attrition over time for compliance and training. It would be interesting to see whether that impacted the results. Second, it's unclear whether patient pedigree or a genomic pathway may predispose to a benefit here for the exercise group. But overall, this phase 3 trial provides class 1 evidence supporting exercise as a low-cost, high-impact intervention to reduce cancer recurrence. Adjuvant Aspirin in Colon Cancer Subset That's a perfect segue into another recent study looking at the effects of adjuvant aspirin on the prevention of recurrence. The ALASCCA trial— conducted across centers in Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway — assessed patients with stage I-III rectal cancer or stage II-III colon cancer. It focused on a subset of patients with an oncogenic abnormality called PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha). PIK3CA occurs in approximately a third of colon cancers and is associated with significant chemotherapy resistance and a higher rate of disease progression. Of the included patients, 1103 (37%) had alterations in the PIK3CA pathway. Researchers randomized patients to receive either 160 mg of aspirin or placebo daily for 3 years, starting within 3 months of surgery. Among patients with PIK3CA mutations, aspirin dramatically reduced the risk for time to recurrence by nearly 50% at 3 years ( P =.044). Adverse events associated with aspirin were minimal, including one case each of gastrointestinal bleeding, hematoma, and allergic reaction. There is no evidence that higher aspirin doses provide greater prevention of colorectal cancer recurrence. The 160 mg use in the current study is fairly normal, roughly equivalent to two low-dose (81 mg) aspirin tablets. Now, it's worth noting that the use of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease was initially recommended by the US Preventive Task Services Force in 2016. This recommendation was then recanted in 2022, when the same group reported limited net benefit to this approach. Two Proactive Actions These studies highlight two interventions — exercise and aspirin — that are low cost, accessible, and appeal to patients eager to help prevent their cancer from recurring. Exercise is broadly beneficial and can be recommended immediately. For aspirin, patients should work with their oncologist to determine their PIK3CA mutation status, as this subgroup appears to benefit the most. These findings offer patients meaningful, proactive interventions they can apply to support their recovery and reduce the risk of recurrence. Hopefully these new findings will help guide your clinical conversations. I'm Dr David Johnson. Thanks for listening.

In seven years, here's what I got right and what I missed
In seven years, here's what I got right and what I missed

Vox

time12 hours ago

  • Vox

In seven years, here's what I got right and what I missed

is a senior writer at Future Perfect, Vox's effective altruism-inspired section on the world's biggest challenges. She explores wide-ranging topics like climate change, artificial intelligence, vaccine development, and factory farms, and also writes the Future Perfect newsletter. I've been at Vox since Future Perfect, our section devoted to tackling the world's most important and unreported problems, launched in 2018, and I am incredibly grateful to all of you — our readers — for what it has become. Over the past few weeks, I've been reading a lot of our old articles, asking myself, what holds up? What did we do best? What did we get wrong? Future Perfect Explore the big, complicated problems the world faces and the most efficient ways to solve them. Sent twice a week. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. It's a sober sort of accounting, because while I think we got a lot of stuff right that no one else did — our 2018 and 2019 coverage of the importance of preventing the next pandemic holds up particularly well — I am never quite sure if it mattered. The way that we learned we were right, after all, is that a pandemic happened, killing millions and devastating our world in a way that will take a long time to recover from. It's not generally considered the job of journalists to prevent catastrophes. But if there is anything we could have written that would have made the Covid-19 response actually work — to contain the virus early, or better target measures to keep people safe — that would have mattered more than anything else. I'm in this reflective mood because, after seven years at Future Perfect, I am leaving to start something new (I'll share more details in the coming weeks). I will be moving into a contributing editor role here at Future Perfect, because I still believe it is one of the most distinctive and important corners of the news. I have had an incredible experience here, and am incredibly grateful for all I've gotten the chance to write and do. But did it matter? At Future Perfect, we've highlighted incredibly cost-effective, lifesaving global aid programs that are the crowning achievement of the Bush administration and a testament to the fact American power can be used for good. Now they're under threat, and some of them are gone. I've written about the importance of preventing pandemics — yet post-Covid, the policy appetite for doing anything at all to prevent the next one seems totally absent. We are not uniquely doomed any more than humans have ever been. I've also covered the replication crisis in science and the gradual, painstaking progress the scientific community has made in imposing standards for reproducibility and truth, only for a massive new crisis in science to emerge: Under the new administration, funding for high-impact cancer and vaccine and anti-aging research has been slashed, programs canceled, and some top researchers deported. Reporting matters. I think it matters more than ever in this new AI-fueled world, where talk is cheap but new ideas, specific details, and an understanding of where our focus and attention should lie are relatively scarcer — and harder to find than ever in a growing vortex of uncertainty. Future Perfect matters, and our style of work — trying to tell the most important stories that others aren't paying enough to — is almost by definition always going to be underserved. I'm proud of the work we did. But I love our country and our world and I care about humanity's future, and it's impossible, in the present state of the world, to feel like we've done enough to actually change the course of things. I take comfort in the fact that, as grim as the world seems today, along every single dimension I lose sleep over, it has been worse before. Government corruption and political weaponization of the Department of Justice has been worse. Child mortality and the toll of infectious disease has been much worse. Even the blatantly stupid flirtation with annihilation, which I fear characterizes our current approach to AI, has been worse — it's hard to surpass the recklessness of the nuclear arms race early in the Cold War. We are not uniquely doomed any more than humans have ever been. So my parting wish for Future Perfect (my incredible colleague Dylan Matthews is taking over for me in our Friday newsletter) is that it focuses not just on writing the stories no one else is writing but also on the marriage between those stories and results in the real world. There's a lot of work to do, and journalism is more embattled than ever, but also more necessary than ever. I'm incredibly proud of the work I've done here, grateful for the chance to do it, and grateful for the whole team here. And I want to say again that I'm grateful to you, our readers. When I started at Future Perfect, there was an open question as to whether anyone even wanted to read about the topics we cover. But your readership has made Future Perfect a success for all this time — a rare bright spot in an increasingly difficult industry. Every week, I get thoughtful emails from people from all over the country and the world, sharing new perspectives I had never considered. You are the people who make Future Perfect possible, and I've learned so much from writing for you over the last seven years. You've read 1 article in the last month Here at Vox, we're unwavering in our commitment to covering the issues that matter most to you — threats to democracy, immigration, reproductive rights, the environment, and the rising polarization across this country. Our mission is to provide clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to stay informed and engaged in shaping our world. By becoming a Vox Member, you directly strengthen our ability to deliver in-depth, independent reporting that drives meaningful change. We rely on readers like you — join us. Swati Sharma Vox Editor-in-Chief Membership Monthly Annual One-time $5/month $10/month $25/month $50/month Other $50/year $100/year $150/year $200/year Other $25 $50 $100 $250 Other Join for $10/month We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay.

See the bizarre life forms scientists discovered more than 30,000 feet under the Pacific Ocean
See the bizarre life forms scientists discovered more than 30,000 feet under the Pacific Ocean

Vox

time2 days ago

  • Vox

See the bizarre life forms scientists discovered more than 30,000 feet under the Pacific Ocean

is an environmental correspondent at Vox, covering biodiversity loss and climate change. Before joining Vox, he was a senior energy reporter at Business Insider. Benji previously worked as a wildlife researcher. Collections of microbes at the bottom of a trench in the Pacific Ocean. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS The Titanic lies about 12,500 feet under the ocean. The pressure down there is so immense that even submersibles supposedly built for those conditions can, as we know, tragically fail. Now imagine taking a sub nearly three times deeper. That's what an international team of scientists did last summer. Led by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the researchers took a manned submersible to the bottom of deep-sea trenches in an area in the northwest Pacific Ocean, roughly between Japan and Alaska, reaching a depth of more than 31,000 feet. The researchers weren't looking for a shipwreck. They were interested in what else might be lurking on the seafloor, which is so deep that no light can reach it. It was there that they found something remarkable: entire communities of animals, rooted in organisms that are able to derive energy not from sunlight but from chemical reactions. Through a process called chemosynthesis, deep-sea microbes are able to turn compounds like methane and hydrogen sulfide into organic compounds, including sugars, forming the base of the food chain. The discovery was published in the journal Nature. This was the deepest community of chemosynthetic life ever discovered, according to Mengran Du, a study author and researcher at the Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Credit: Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS Using a deep-sea vessel called Fendouzhe, the researchers encountered abundant wildlife communities, including fields of marine tube worms peppered with white marine snails. The worms have a symbiotic relationship with chemosynthetic bacteria that live in their bodies. Those bacteria provide them with a source of nutrients in exchange for, among other things, a stable place to live. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS Among the tube worms the scientists encountered white, centipede-like critters — they're also a kind of worm, in the genus macellicephaloides — as well as sea cucumbers. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS The researchers also found a variety of different clams on the seafloor, often alongside anemones. Similar to the tube worms, the clams depend on bacteria within their shells to turn chemical compounds like methane and hydrogen sulfide that are present in the deep sea into food. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS Unlike other deep-sea ecosystems — which feed on dead animals and other organic bits that fall from shallower waters — these trench communities are likely sustained in part by methane produced by microbes buried under the seafloor, the authors said. That suggests that wildlife communities may be more common in these extremely deep trenches than scientists once thought. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, CAS 'The presence of these chemosynthetic ecosystems challenge long-standing assumptions about life's potential at extreme depths,' Du told Vox in an email.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store