logo
How Big Oil is ruining a small ‘slice of heaven' town in Texas

How Big Oil is ruining a small ‘slice of heaven' town in Texas

Yahoo04-06-2025
This is a condensed story of a three-part series produced by The Xylom and co-published by Drilled, Floodlight and Deceleration News. Subscribe to The Xylom's newsletter here.
On Jan. 6, 2024, nine minutes before midnight, the police department in Ingleside, Texas, uploaded on Facebook a now-deleted public advisory about an oil leak from a tank at the Flint Hills crude oil export terminal.
The roughly 700 members of Facebook group Citizens of the City of Ingleside on the Bay were in a frenzy. They reported a gaseous odor and burning eyes from the 2,900-barrel on-site oil spill. Town pharmacist Idana Merrick posted that she turned off all fans in her house to keep the fumes from being drawn in.
It was the second time in just over a year that the community had been subjected to a spill from Flint Hills. On Christmas Eve 2022, 335 barrels of crude flowed into Corpus Christi Bay, creating yellow gelatinous globs in the aquamarine water.
Ingleside on the Bay is a small seaside town with 614 residents in San Patricio County, Texas. Residents in this toney enclave have a front-row seat to picturesque Corpus Christi Bay.
Ingleside on the Bay is the opposite of the stereotypical 'fenceline' community: over 80% of the town's residents are white. Many are semi-retired. And unlike poor communities exposed to polluted air, water or land, many residents here have the means to move out. Almost overnight, this coastal community has become America's crude oil export capital — a place where residents supported Donald Trump — America's 'drill baby drill' president — by 50 points.
Within a 2-mile radius of Ingleside on the Bay's City Hall are three massive crude oil export terminals, which send tankers the length of a football field into the Gulf. The facilities are located at and near the site of a decommissioned U.S. Navy installation.
They include Gibson South Texas Gateway, Flint Hills Resources Ingleside Terminal and Enbridge's Ingleside Energy Center, the largest U.S. crude oil storage and export terminal by volume. Together they account for nearly half of U.S. crude oil exports — an estimated 700 million-plus barrels in 2024.
The crude that passed through the three export terminals in Ingleside on the Bay in 2023 alone was worth roughly $50 billion, or more than the entire GDP of the state of Wyoming, The Xylom estimates.
But the economic, health and environmental costs are also high: Local and federal governments have spent nearly half a billion dollars deepening the channel for the massive tankers. A 6-foot-tall pile of dirt from the dredging now blocks the Corpus Christi skyline. And white foamy gunk has started floating on the water. Dead sea turtles have washed ashore.
The Xylom asked students at MIT to look at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency environmental risk indicators around Corpus Christi. They found the score for the county including Ingleside on the Bay increased nearly 17-fold since 2018.
The indicators estimate risk based on 'the size of a chemical release, the fate and transport of a chemical within the environment, the size and location(s) of potentially exposed populations and a chemical's relative toxicity.'
Suzi Wilder, an RV park owner and Ingleside on the Bay City Council member, recalls that when the largest terminal run by Enbridge came to town, 'All hell breaks loose.'
'Ingleside on the Bay is our slice of heaven that you're willing to turn into hell for a profit,' said Kelley Burnett, who captains the local dolphin boat tours. 'This is not just about our health, but our livelihood.'
Troubled by what they could see, and even more so by what they thought they couldn't, the local Coastal Watch Association contacted Earthworks, a national nonprofit that aims to prevent the destructive impacts of energy extraction.
Using special cameras that observe chemicals normally invisible to the naked eye, Earthworks found several volatile organic compounds — which can cause respiratory system irritation, nervous system damage and even cancer — leaking out from Flint Hills Ingleside.
Lynne Porter, a retired assistant superintendent of the Ingleside School District, moved in three years ago. Porter, a board member for the Coastal Watch Association, says she now requires an inhaler to get through her day.
'That's the thing with this industry,' concludes Wilder. 'They're not out to protect this town.'
Enbridge and Gibson declined comment. In an emailed statement, Flint Hills, which was fined nearly $1 million for its spill, responded that it 'has worked cooperatively with state and federal agencies to resolve all matters related to a release of crude oil … in December 2022.'
In the mid-aughts, fracking technique refinements enabled the United States to precisely drill for more oil and gas where it would've been infeasible earlier.
Two Texas regions benefited from the shale oil boom: The Permian Basin, which spans 75,000 square miles across West Texas and southeastern New Mexico, and the Eagle Ford Formation, a 400-mile-long, 50-mile-wide band beginning in East Texas that snakes between Corpus Christi and San Antonio to the Mexican border.
A decade later, the door to Ingleside on the Bay's future as an oil export hub opened.
In late 2015, Intent on avoiding a government shutdown, Democratic congressional leaders held secret talks with Republican counterparts and reached a grand bargain. In exchange for an 'unprecedented' tax incentive for wind and solar power, President Barack Obama signed a bill that reversed over four decades of energy policy banning oil exports.
The first barrel of exported U.S. crude oil set sail from the Port of Corpus Christi on Dec. 31, 2015.
The change has been rapid, both for the country and for Ingleside on the Bay. For the past six years, the United States has produced more crude oil than any other country at any point in history.
And, 'It used to be that we would be out here, and one (oil tanker) would go by every four days. We're like, 'Oh, look!',' said Charlie Boone, the president of the Coastal Watch Association. 'It's 10 a day or more, just back and forth, back and forth.'
Despite being late to the environmental justice movement, Ingleside on the Bay residents are now enmeshed in the fight, along with local Latino and Indigenous allies.
Around 200 residents and advocates trickle into Portland Community Center on the evening of Jan. 11, 2024. They are greeted by Enbridge representatives and staff from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).
They are gathered to discuss the renewal of Enbridge's operating permit for the Ingleside site. (Since then, Enbridge has purchased the Flint Hills facility from Koch Industries and now owns two of the three export terminals in Ingleside on the Bay.)
Inside Climate News and The Texas Tribune reported in December 2023 how Enbridge convinced the TCEQ to split the Ingleside Energy Center's contiguous oil and gas operations into separately permitted sites. The Coastal Watch Association and Environmental Integrity Project charged that the move serves to bypass public participation by exploiting the legal distinction between major and minor pollution sources.
Although Enbridge has received six notices of violation, a then-Corpus Christi City Council member who chairs the local Sierra Club notes that the company maintained a perfect TCEQ compliance record at the time of the hearing.
Tim Doty, retired manager of TCEQ's mobile air monitoring unit, takes his former colleagues to task, noting the "significant" hydrocarbon emissions from the three facilities.
He questions whether the agency is 'rubber-stamping approval,' despite overwhelming opposition from the public. In a written response, TCEQ says the proposed permit has 'sufficient' requirements 'to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements.'
On Feb. 7, 2025, the TCEQ greenlit Enbridge's permit renewal. This means that Enbridge is on the 1-yard line of a process that would cement five more years of operational risk and greenhouse gas emissions. A final public petition period before the U.S. EPA ended May 27.
Ingleside on the Bay residents and their allies don't know the ultimate fate of their small town. But if they look across the bay at Corpus Christi's Black-majority Hillcrest neighborhood, the future may not be bright.
That neighborhood is now a series of abandoned house foundations. Vulnerable residents were cornered, bought out and severed from the rest of the city, first by oil refineries, then by a sewage treatment plant, a towering highway bridge to make way for supertankers and a proposed desalination plant to serve the water needs of the oil and gas industry.
At the hearing, Doty reserves his harshest words for Enbridge.
'You're not doing right by this community,' he says. 'You have not been a good neighbor.'
Reporting of this story was supported by the Society of Environmental Journalists, Institute for Journalism and Natural Resources and the Kelly-Douglas Fund at the MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences. The Xylom is the only Asian American-serving science news outlet in the United States.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Academics warn Columbia University deal sets dangerous precedent
Academics warn Columbia University deal sets dangerous precedent

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Academics warn Columbia University deal sets dangerous precedent

Columbia University's $200 million agreement with President Donald Trump's administration marks the end of a months-long showdown, but academics warn it is just the first round of a government "assault" on higher education. Academics from Columbia and beyond have expressed concerns that the deal -- which makes broad-ranging concessions and increases government oversight -- will become the blueprint for how Trump brings other universities to heel. The New York institution was the first to be targeted in Trump's war against elite universities, for what the US president claimed was its failure to tackle anti-Semitism on campus in the wake of pro-Palestinian protests. It was stripped of hundreds of millions of dollars of federal funding and lost its ability to apply for new research grants. Labs saw vital funding frozen, and dozens of researchers were laid off. But Columbia last week agreed to pay the government $200 million, and an additional $21 million to settle an investigation into anti-Semitism. According to Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, the lack of due process -- with the government slashing funding before carrying out a formal investigation -- left Columbia in an "untenable position." Columbia law professor David Pozen agreed, saying the "manner in which the deal was constructed has been unlawful and coercive from the start" and slamming the agreement as giving "legal form to an extortion scheme." - Federal oversight - The deal goes beyond addressing anti-Semitism and makes concessions on international student admissions, race and ethnicity considerations in admissions and single-sex spaces on campus, among other issues. Columbia also agreed to appoint an independent monitor to implement the deal, share ethnicity admissions data with the government and crack down on campus protests. Many of the provisions "represent significant incursions onto Columbia's autonomy," said Pozen. "What's happened at Columbia is part of a broader authoritarian attack on civil society," he said, pointing to similar pressures on law firms and media organizations to fall in line. According to the law professor, the deal "signals the emergence of a new regulatory regime in which the Trump administration will periodically and unpredictably shake down other schools and demand concessions from them." In the coming weeks, Pozen said he expected the "administration will put a lot of pressure on Harvard and other schools to follow suit." Harvard University has pushed back against the government, filing a lawsuit in a bid to reverse sweeping funding cuts. But Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard, said that "in terms of academic freedom and in terms of democracy, the (Columbia) precedent is devastating." - 'First round' - Education Secretary Linda McMahon said she hoped the Columbia deal would be a "template for other universities around the country." On Wednesday, McMahon announced a deal with Brown University to restore some federal funding and end ongoing investigations after the Ivy League school agreed to end race considerations in admissions and adopt a biological definition of gender. Brown President Christina Paxson admitted "there are other aspects of the agreement that were not part of previous federal reviews of Brown policies" but were "priorities of the federal administration." Harvard is reportedly considering forking out $500 million to settle, according to the New York Times. Others have made smaller concessions to appease the government, with Trump's alma mater the University of Pennsylvania banning transgender women from competing in women's sports, and the University of Virginia's head resigning after scrutiny over its diversity programs. Brendan Cantwell, a professor at Michigan State University who researches the history and governance of higher education, said government interference in universities "has not happened at scale like this, probably ever in American history." While some university staff see striking an agreement as the quickest way to reopen the federal funding spigot, Cantwell warned that concessions such as sharing ethnicity data from admissions could be "weaponized" and provide fodder for future probes. Levitsky agreed, saying: "Extortionists don't stop at the first concession. Extortionists come back for more." "There's a very high likelihood that this is just the first round," he said. Pozen noted that it will be harder for "major research universities to hold the line" compared to smaller colleges which are less reliant on federal funding. But Levitsky still urged Harvard to stand its ground and "fight back," including in the courts. "Fighting an authoritarian regime is costly, but that's what we have to do," he said. "This is an unprecedented assault, and universities need to work together." aks/wd

'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries
'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries

As President Donald Trump unveiled a blitz of new tariffs across different countries on Thursday, the markets remained largely unfazed by the move. What Happened: On Thursday, in a post on X, The Kobeissi Letter highlighted the market's muted response to Trump's sweeping new moves on the trade and tariff front. The post notes that Trump 'randomly' increased tariffs on Canada, the largest trading partner of the United States, from 25% to 35%. Followed by a string of new tariffs on others, such as 'Vietnam, Switzerland, South Africa, Taiwan, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Turkey, and Venezuela.' Trending: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics—now it's your turn to Yet, the market response was underwhelming, with S&P 500 futures 'down a mere 10 points,' which the post attributes almost entirely to 'Amazon's weak earnings results.' It says that in April, when the 'Liberation Day' tariffs were first announced, such a move would have sent the S&P 500 lower by 3% or more. The post says 'the trade war has lost all credibility' in the market, and that it has lost the 'shock effect' that it had a couple of months ago. Why It Matters: This could be seen as a fallout of the 'TACO Trade' meme, or 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' where investors buy equities right after Trump makes a tariff threat, knowing fully well that he will eventually back out. Economist Peter Schiff recently called this 'a classic paradox,' since markets not reacting to Trump's tariffs, because they expect him to 'chicken out,' will eventually lead him to follow through on his threats. 'Investors assume Trump will cancel the August 1 tariffs before they kick in, so stocks aren't selling off,' he says, but since there isn't a dramatic market response to this, 'Trump won't chicken out again.' Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo courtesy: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article 'The Trade War Has Lost All Credibility:' Markets Shrug Off Trump's Tariff Blitz On Multiple Countries originally appeared on

Not just Big Bird: Things to know about the Center for Public Broadcasting and its funding cuts
Not just Big Bird: Things to know about the Center for Public Broadcasting and its funding cuts

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Not just Big Bird: Things to know about the Center for Public Broadcasting and its funding cuts

Media-Public-Broadcasting-Trump The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps pay for PBS, NPR, 1,500 local radio and television stations as well as programs like 'Sesame Street' and 'Finding Your Roots,' said Friday that it would close after the U.S. government withdrew funding. The organization told employees that most staff positions will end with the fiscal year on Sept. 30. A small transition team will stay until January to finish any remaining work. The private, nonprofit corporation was founded in 1968 shortly after Congress authorized its formation. It now ends nearly six decades of fueling the production of renowned educational programming, cultural content and emergency alerts about natural disasters. Here's what to know: Losing funding President Donald Trump signed a bill on July 24 canceling about $1.1 billion that had been approved for public broadcasting. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense, and conservatives have particularly directed their ire at NPR and PBS. Lawmakers with large rural constituencies voiced concern about what the cuts could mean for some local public stations in their state. They warned some stations will have to close. The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday reinforced the policy change by excluding funding for the corporation for the first time in more than 50 years as part of a broader spending bill. How it began Congress passed legislation creating the body in 1967, several years after then-Federal Communications Commission Chairman Newton Minow described commercial television a 'vast wasteland' and called for programming in the public interest. The corporation doesn't produce programming and it doesn't own, operate or control any public broadcasting stations. The corporation, PBS, NPR are independent of each other as are local public television and radio stations. Rural stations hit hard Roughly 70% of the corporation's money went directly to 330 PBS and 246 NPR stations across the country. The cuts are expected to weigh most heavily on smaller public media outlets away from big cities, and it's likely some won't survive. NPR's president estimated as many as 80 NPR stations may close in the next year. Mississippi Public Broadcasting has already decided to eliminate a streaming channel that airs children's programming like 'Caillou' and 'Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood' 24 hours a day. Maine's public media system is looking at a hit of $2.5 million, or about 12% of its budget, for the next fiscal year. The state's rural residents rely heavily on public media for weather updates and disaster alerts. In Kodiak, Alaska, KMXT estimated the cuts would slice 22% from its budget. Public radio stations in the sprawling, heavily rural state often provide not just news but alerts about natural disasters like tsunamis, landslides and volcanic eruptions. From Big Bird to war documentaries The first episode of 'Sesame Street' aired in 1969. Child viewers, adults and guest stars alike were instantly hooked. Over the decades, characters from Big Bird to Cookie Monster and Elmo have become household favorites Entertainer Carol Burnett appeared on that inaugural episode. She told The Associated Press she was a big fan. "I would have done anything they wanted me to do,' she said. 'I loved being exposed to all that goodness and humor.' Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. started 'Finding Your Roots' in 2006 under the title 'African American Lives.' He invited prominent Black celebrities and traced their family trees into slavery. When the paper trail ran out, they would use DNA to see which ethnic group they were from in Africa. Challenged by a viewer to open the show to non-Black celebrities, Gates agreed and the series was renamed 'Faces of America,' which had to be changed again after the name was taken. The show is PBS's most-watched program on linear TV and the most-streamed non-drama program. Season 10 reached nearly 18 million people across linear and digital platforms and also received its first Emmy nomination. Grant money from the nonprofit has also funded lesser-known food, history, music and other shows created by stations across the country. Documentarian Ken Burns, celebrated for creating the documentaries 'The Civil War,' 'Baseball' and 'The Vietnam War', told PBS NewsHour said the corporation accounted for about 20% of his films' budgets. He said he would make it up but projects receiving 50% to 75% of their funding from the organization won't. Influence of shows Children's programing in the 1960s was made up of shows like 'Captain Kangaroo,' ''Romper Room' and the violent skirmishes between 'Tom & Jerry.' "Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood' mostly taught social skills. 'Sesame Street' was designed by education professionals and child psychologists to help low-income and minority students aged 2-5 overcome some of the deficiencies they had when entering school. Social scientists had long noted white and higher income kids were often better prepared. One of the most widely cited studies about the impact of 'Sesame Street' compared households that got the show with those who didn't. It found that the children exposed to 'Sesame Street' were 14% more likely to be enrolled in the correct grade level for their age at middle and high school. Over the years, 'Finding Your Roots' showed Natalie Morales discovering she's related to one of the legendary pirates of the Caribbean and former 'Saturday Night Live' star Andy Samberg finding his biological grandmother and grandfather. It revealed that drag queen RuPaul and U.S. Sen. Cory Booker are cousins, as are actors Meryl Streep and Eva Longoria. 'The two subliminal messages of 'Finding Your Roots,' which are needed more urgently today than ever, is that what has made America great is that we're a nation of immigrants,' Gates told the AP. 'And secondly, at the level of the genome, despite our apparent physical differences, we're 99.99% the same.' Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store