&w=3840&q=100)
Bangladesh: 86% women in 2.1 mn job loss, can Yunus deliver where Hasina did?
Once a global symbol of women's empowerment, Yunus now presides over a decline in employment of women in Bangladesh read more
In recent years, the narrative around women's economic participation in Bangladesh has appeared encouraging on the surface. Official data from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) claims a notable increase in female labour force participation, from 36.3 per cent five years ago to 42.68 per cent in 2022.
Particularly in rural areas, where the participation rate exceeds 50 per cent, this suggests a nation steadily progressing toward greater gender parity in employment, according to BBS figures released on March 29, 2025. Yet, a deeper look into the quality, sustainability and truth behind these figures tells a starkly different story.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to an analysis by the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), the actual participation rate of women in economic activity may be closer to 19 per cent. This dramatic discrepancy raises crucial questions about how labour force participation is measured, what constitutes employment and who is left out of official tallies.
At the same time, a recent loss of 2.1 million jobs in the first half of the fiscal year— with women accounting for nearly 86 per cent of those losses— has exposed the fragility and superficial nature of women's inclusion in the economy, as highlighted during an event titled Advancing Gender-Responsive Budgeting and FfD4 Outcome organised by Citizen's Platform for SDGs, Bangladesh and UN Women Bangladesh, The Daily Star reported.
A shift in leadership and the waning of women's gains
Bangladesh made significant strides in including women in its economy during Sheikh Hasina's time as prime minister. Her government introduced policies focussing on women, expanded social safety nets and promoted female employment in sectors like garments, microfinance and education. Initiatives to support rural female entrepreneurs and reduce child marriage were also more noticeable and measurable under her leadership.
Ironically, when Muhammad Yunus, a Nobel Peace Prize winner known for empowering rural women through microfinance, became the Chief Adviser of Bangladesh, progress for women in the labour market did not continue as expected. Despite his global reputation, employment indicators worsened, NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) rates rose, and safe overseas job opportunities for women declined. This suggests a disconnect between symbolic leadership and effective policy execution.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Yunus's administration has faced challenges, including youth unemployment, economic instability and a loss of public trust in the banking system. While efforts are being made to reform labour laws and improve transparency, the situation highlights the irony of a leader celebrated for empowering women struggling to maintain that progress in a broader administrative role.
Measurement mirage: Conflicting data and the real picture
The BBS paints a picture of steady advancement. Their survey emphasises significant progress in rural female employment, crediting women with increasingly contributing to the national economy. However, CPD Senior Research Fellow Towfiqul Islam Khan, speaking at the UN Women event, highlighted that the official labour force figures overstate the actual engagement of women, The Daily Star reported. Only 19 out of every 100 women are actively participating in economic activity, many of whom are not even securing formal employment.
This gap between BBS and CPD data is not merely a statistical disagreement but a reflection of flawed definitions and inconsistent measurement frameworks. For instance, BBS considers anyone working even one hour per week for pay as employed. This definition inadvertently captures many women engaged in irregular, marginal or unpaid family labour, thereby inflating participation rates and masking economic vulnerability.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Further complicating the narrative is the officially reported female unemployment rate of 3.6 per cent, which Khan argues is closer to 9.7 per cent. Among young women, unemployment exceeds 22 per cent. These figures suggest that the real crisis is not just in the quantity but the quality and security of employment opportunities available to women.
Unseen and unpaid: Hidden economy of women's labour
A significant portion of women's economic contributions remains invisible in national statistics. This is particularly true for the overwhelming number of women engaged in unpaid care work, domestic labour and informal sectors. CPD found that 80.8 per cent of employed women hold what are termed 'vulnerable jobs', characterised by low productivity, limited security and poor financial returns. Only 3 per cent of employed women receive pensions or retirement benefits, highlighting the lack of long-term social protection.
The World Bank, in its report Voices to Choices: Bangladesh's Journey in Women's Economic Empowerment released in April 2019, highlights that over one-third of women in the labour force are unpaid family helpers. These women work without pay in family-run farms, shops or other informal enterprises, often without acknowledgment or compensation. In essence, they serve as the backbone of rural and low-income household economies while remaining statistically invisible and economically powerless.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The burden of unpaid work further constrains women's ability to engage in paid employment. Childcare, elder care and household responsibilities disproportionately fall on women, leaving them with fewer hours, less mobility and limited opportunities for formal work or education. This entrenched inequality in time use is a critical but under-discussed barrier to gender parity in the labour market.
A silent exodus: Job losses and economic shocks
Economic stressors like inflation and declining private investment have disproportionately affected women, according to Debapriya Bhattacharya, convenor of the Citizen's Platform for SDGs and a distinguished fellow at CPD, The Daily Star reported. Sectors that traditionally absorb female labour, including ready-made garments, domestic work and small-scale retail, have faced the brunt of economic contraction, automation and global shifts in supply chains.
CPD noted that nearly two-thirds of young women belong to this group, indicating a systemic failure to integrate half the population into meaningful economic roles. This represents not only a wasted demographic dividend but a looming social crisis with long-term implications for national productivity and stability.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Economic disempowerment and structural barriers
Behind every statistic lies a web of social, cultural and institutional barriers that continue to limit women's access to quality work. The World Bank points to persistent gender gaps in asset ownership, financial inclusion and entrepreneurial activity. For instance, women own significantly less agricultural and non-agricultural land than men and have limited access to credit and formal banking systems.
Even among those women who work, control over income remains an issue. The World Bank found that many women must hand over their earnings to husbands or family members, reducing their financial autonomy. Only 36 per cent of women have bank accounts, compared to 65 per cent of men. These disparities limit women's ability to save, invest and engage in entrepreneurial ventures, reinforcing cycles of dependence and poverty.
The situation is worse for women seeking work abroad. Female migrant worker departures dropped from 8,789 per month in 2022 to just 4,610 so far in 2025, according to data from the Bureau of Manpower, Employment and Training cited by CPD. For those who do manage to migrate, reports of forced labour, abuse and exploitation are increasingly common highlighting the need for stronger legal protections and safer migration pathways.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The crisis in women's employment is not just a setback for gender equality but a national economic emergency in Bangladesh. While 44 ministries currently produce gender budget reports, the quality and utility of these documents remain limited.
The perception of progress in female employment in Bangladesh is built on precarious foundations. The contradiction between official statistics and lived realities reflects deep-seated structural inequalities that policies have yet to meaningfully address.
As women continue to dominate low-quality, insecure and invisible forms of labour, Bangladesh risks stagnating not only in its gender equality goals but also in its overall economic development.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Bangladesh anti-government protests: Uprising, unrest and elections
DHAKA: Bangladesh on July 1 marks one year since students launched protests that culminated weeks later in the overthrow of the government. After ruling with an iron fist for 15 years, Sheikh Hasina became the latest leader to be toppled by force since independence from Pakistan in 1971. The Muslim-majority nation of about 170 million people is now in political limbo, led by a caretaker government until elections slated for 2026. Here are five key events in the South Asian country since protesters took to the streets a year ago. - July 1, 2024: Anti-government protests - University students launch demonstrations to demand reforms to a quota system for sought-after public sector jobs. They say the scheme is used to stack the civil service with those loyal to Hasina, who won a fifth term as prime minister months earlier in a vote without genuine opposition. Hasina's rule saw widespread human rights abuses, including the mass detention and extrajudicial killings of her political opponents. Deadly violence intensifies later in July with police opening fire. Bangladesh is the world's second-largest garment exporter, and the industry is hit hard by the protests. Clashes escalate despite a curfew, the deployment of soldiers and an internet blackout. Up to 1,400 people are killed in the unrest, according to the United Nations.


Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Melania Trump's visa controversy re-surfaces in shocking twist: Why is the ‘math ain't mathing' in her case?
What is Melania Trump's visa controversy? Live Events What is Einstein visa and how did Melania Trump get one? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Last week, US First Lady Melania Trump's immigration history once again came under fire during a heated congressional hearing. Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett questioned how the former model qualified for a visa typically reserved for individuals with "extraordinary ability." Crockett's remarks come at a time when the president is railing against immigrants and directing ICE officials to enact raids across the country.'The first lady, a model—and when I say model, I'm not talking Tyra Banks, Cindy Crawford, or Naomi Campbell-level—applied for and was given an EB-1 visa ,' Crockett said incredulously.'Let me tell you how you receive an Einstein visa ,' she said, 'you're supposed to have some sort of significant achievement, like being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize or a Pulitzer, being an Olympic medallist, or having other sustained extraordinary abilities and success in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics. Last time I checked, the first lady had none of those accolades under her belt. It doesn't take an Einstein to see that the math ain't mathin' here.'Melania Trump was a Slovenian model living in New York when she applied for the EB-1 in 2000. Then she was Melania Knauss. At that time, she was a model by profession in the New York and was reportedly dating Donald Trump. The visa was approved in 2001, and she became a US citizen in 2006. That citizenship later allowed her to sponsor her parents for green cards and helped her earn the the right to sponsor her parents, Viktor and Amalija Trump's case has drawn special attention as comes at a time when her husband Donald Trump seeks to end what he calls 'chain migration'- the very same policy that enabled his wife to sponsor her family. His proposed merit-based system would have blocked his in-laws' sponsorships. During the hearing, Crockett asked, 'why aren't we talking about integrity when it comes to the president's family's visas?', highlighting the hypocrisy of Republicans in their treatment of Melania a swipe at the First Lady, Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute, who also testified during the House hearing, said she deserved credit for marrying Mr Trump. "And I think that's quite an achievement, so I think she deserves credit for that. Nobody up here could have done it!" she said.'Not everyone could marry Donald Trump and I think that's quite an achievement,' he said, while sarcastically 'defending' the first lady. 'I think she deserves credit for that. Nobody up her could have done it.'The EB-1 visa, colloquially known as the "Einstein Visa", is reserved for people with extraordinary talent, applicants who are highly acclaimed in their field. According to the government, Pulitzer, Oscar, and Olympic winners are examples, apart from academic researchers and multinational Trump obtained US citizenship on a visa reserved for immigrants with "extraordinary ability" and "sustained national and international acclaim", according to a report in the Washington reports of how US First Lady obtained her EB-1 visa when her husband has launched an aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration and attempting to scrap the right of new citizens to sponsor family members has raised multiple questions. Questions have also been raised about her suitability for the extraordinary ability obtain an Einstein visa, applicants must demonstrate 'sustained national or international acclaim' through a major award — such as a Nobel Prize — or meet at least three of ten listed criteria, according to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The criteria include coverage of the applicant in major publications, original and significant contributions to a field, and work displayed at artistic exhibitions."You do not have to be a Nobel prize winner to get the extraordinary ability visa. I've gotten EB-1 visas for people you've never heard of and never will," Susan McFadden, a specialist US visa lawyer at the Gudeon and McFadden law firm in London told the BBC."An experienced lawyer knows what the US citizenship and immigration services is looking for, and how to bring out of the client's background things that will be attractive to the agency."Securing an EB-1 is often about defining a field, McFadden said, in the hope of proving the client is outstanding in that EB-1 visa program has faced criticism over its vulnerability to potential misuse. In 2012, Canadian model and Playboy Playmate Shera Béchard obtained an EB-1 visa, raising questions about how modeling — a profession not typically linked to Nobel-level recognition — qualified under the program's high standards. Similar doubts have been raised about Melania Trump's eligibility. In 2000, she was primarily known for her modeling work and her relationship with Donald Trump, rather than for widely recognized professional achievements.


Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
Jerome Powell accused of lying to Congress over $2.5B lavish Fed HQ renovation — calls for punishment grow
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is under fire from lawmakers and former officials who say he misled Congress about the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Washington headquarters, and now, some are calling for him to face consequences, as per a report. Jerome Powell Denies Luxury Upgrades Under Oath During a Senate Banking Committee hearing last week, Powell dismissed reports that the central bank's building revamp includes luxury amenities, as per the New York Post. He called the media coverage "misleading and inaccurate" and insisted that the renovation does not include anything extravagant, according to the report. Powell told senators, 'There's no VIP dining room, there's no new marble. There are no special elevators,' adding, 'There are no new water features, there's no beehives, and there's no roof terrace gardens,' quoted the New York Post. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No.1 Swing Trading Strategy Revealed by Mr. Hemant – Free Access! TradeWise Learn More Undo ALSO READ: Brace yourself: Why this could be the summer of economic hell for millions of Americans Planning Documents Tell a Different Story But the project's planning documents from 2021, which haven't been revised since, show contradicting details, as per the report. According to filings with the National Capital Planning Commission, the project includes 'The private dining rooms on Level 4 (of the Fed's Eccles building) will be restored,' and 'The Governors' private elevator will be extended to discharge at the dining suite level,' quoted New York Post. Live Events The documents also mention 'vegetated roof terraces' that will welcome 'urban wildlife and pollinators' and also new marble and water features, as per the report. ALSO READ: Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize? After Pakistan, now Congo joins the push Calls for Accountability Grow The contradiction between Powell's testimony and what's on the official paper has sparked outrage among some lawmakers, who now say the Fed chair may have lied under oath, as per the New York Post report. A professor of economics at Dartmouth College, who had also served as an economist and advisor to the Fed's board from 1992 to 2012, Andrew T. Levin has urged Congress to step in and punish Powell for lying to lawmakers, as reported by the New York Post. He pointed out that, 'A top Fed official cannot be permitted to make false statements under oath at a congressional hearing. Such statements must be promptly corrected, and in egregious cases, subject to censure by the Senate,' as quoted in the report. ALSO READ: Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill sparks panic among MAGA voters: 'We'd lose everything' A majority member of the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) said that Powell 'was clearly not prepared for his testimony, and should be embarrassed,' as quoted in the New York Post report. Lummis highlighted that, 'He made a number of factually inaccurate statements to the Committee regarding the Fed's plush private dining room and elevator, skylights, water features, and roof terrace,' adding, 'This is typical of the mismanagement and 'don't bother me' attitude that Chair Powell has always shown,' as quoted in the report. Powell also rejected the concerns that the revamp was being subsidised by American taxpayers during the hearing, saying simply that 'the cost overruns are what they are,' quoted New York Post. Project Costs Keep Climbing Meanwhile, the total cost for the renovation has already increased by 30% from an original estimate of $1.9 billion, according to the report. Chair of the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. Scott called the renovations as 'luxury upgrades that feel more like they belong in the Palace of Versailles,' as quoted in the report. FAQs Why is Jerome Powell being accused of lying? Because he denied under oath that the Fed's renovation includes luxury features, but planning documents show that those features are part of the project. What features did Powell say aren't in the renovation? He said there's no VIP dining room, no marble, no special elevators, no water features, and no rooftop gardens, as per the New York Post report.