CBSE's two-board exam policy: A step towards fairer and flexible assessments
The new system allows students to appear for the board exams twice in a year once as the main attempt and once as an improvement attempt bringing India closer to global best practices and offering a more student-centric, equitable, and flexible assessment model.
A breakdown of the new exam structure
Under the updated policy, students will take the main board exam in mid-February, covering the full syllabus. If they wish to improve their performance, they can opt to reappear for one or more subjects during a second exam scheduled for May. This second attempt is optional and selective—students can choose to appear for improvement in a maximum of three core subjects. Internal assessments, however, will be conducted only once before the main examination and are not repeated for the second attempt. Importantly, the exam pattern and syllabus will remain consistent across both phases.
Eligibility and scope
The first examination (Phase 1) is mandatory for all fresh Class X students and also open to previous years' repeaters, compartment, and improvement candidates. The second exam (Phase 2) will be available only to those who appeared for the first phase and fall under eligible categories such as improvement, compartment, or those granted special permissions including sports persons whose events clash with the first exam, or winter-bound schools. However, a key exclusion exists: students who are absent in three or more subjects in the first exam will be marked as 'Essential Repeat' and will not be eligible to appear for the second exam.
Two separate Lists of Candidates (LOCs) must be prepared, one for each phase. The first is mandatory, while the second can include only existing candidates from Phase 1. No fresh entries or subject changes are permitted unless explicitly allowed by policy.
NEP 2020 alignment
This policy is a clear implementation of NEP 2020's vision outlined in Paragraphs 4.37 and 4.38. The policy calls for reducing exam pressure through modular and flexible assessments and recommends allowing students multiple opportunities to perform. The two-exam model moves away from the one-size-fits-all approach of previous years and embraces a learner-first mindset.
By offering students a second chance to improve scores without repeating an academic year, this system helps de-stigmatize failure and encourages reflection, resilience, and continual learning.
Student benefits: Performance without pressure
The two-board exam system gives students the rare but vital chance to redeem themselves without academic penalty. If a student underperforms in the first attempt due to illness, anxiety, or other reasons they have a built-in opportunity to recover.
This not only reduces the pressure associated with a single high-stakes exam but also nurtures a growth mindset. It allows students to treat the first attempt as a diagnostic experience and return better prepared, emotionally and academically, for a second chance. In the final result, only the better score between the two attempts will be considered a thoughtful step to ensure fairness.
Implementation challenges: A shared responsibility
While the intent is noble, the transition comes with logistical hurdles for schools, teachers, and the board itself.
♦ For Schools: Managing two full-fledged rounds of board exams within a four-month span increases administrative complexity. Schools must maintain two sets of LOCs, duplicate exam centre arrangements, and manage invigilation and staff deployment often during holidays or the start of a new academic year.
♦ For Teachers: Balancing regular classes with preparation for the improvement exam means extended responsibilities. Teachers will also need to guide students and parents through result interpretations, eligibility rules, and their implications for college admissions.
♦ For Students: Though student-focused, the policy may inadvertently create added pressure. Some students may feel compelled to reappear even when their initial scores are satisfactory, extending academic anxiety over a longer period.
♦ For the Board: Conducting two rounds of national exams requires significant operational planning and budgeting. From printing question papers to managing supervision and logistics, the resource burden is likely to double.
A progressive step forward
Despite the challenges, the CBSE's new two-exam system marks a major shift towards more compassionate and learner-friendly education in India. It recognizes that students deserve multiple opportunities to demonstrate their abilities and that learning is not a one-time event but a continuous journey. If implemented thoughtfully with adequate support systems in place, this move could reshape board exams in India from a source of anxiety to a platform for reflection, resilience, and reform.
(The author is Principal-New Town, Orchids The International School)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
HC dismisses plea challenging validity of CG's school fee regulation
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the state's school fee regulation law and the rules framed under it. After considering the arguments, a Division Bench comprising Justice Sanjay K Agrawal and Justice Sachin Singh Rajput observed that the constitutional validity of a law cannot be questioned merely on the grounds of hardship caused to individuals, particularly when the rules are framed in the public interest. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The petitions were filed by an association of private schools contesting the Chhattisgarh Non-Governmental Schools Fee Regulation Act, 2020, and the corresponding rules. The petitioners claimed the legislation violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution. According to the association, fee regulation under the Act would pose serious financial challenges for unaided private schools that receive no govt aid. They argued that CBSE-affiliated member schools rely entirely on fees collected from parents to cover salaries of teaching and non-teaching staff, infrastructure maintenance, and other statutory obligations. However, the court cited the precedent set in R.N. Goyal v. Ashwani Kumar Gupta and Others, reiterating that a rule serving the general public good cannot be invalidated solely because it causes inconvenience to a particular group or individual. The court held that the 2020 Act and its rules are constitutionally sound and do not suffer from unreasonableness. "Consequently, we find no justification to strike down the Act or the rules, as they are neither unconstitutional nor violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution," the bench stated. Further, the court noted that the petitioner societies and associations cannot invoke Article 19, as its protections extend only to citizens. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Since the petitioners are not individuals but legal entities, they are not entitled to claim rights under Article 19(1). This, too, constituted a ground for dismissal. The court emphasised once again that individual hardship does not warrant invalidation of legislation enacted in the wider public interest. It reiterated that where rules framed under Article 309 serve the general good, their impact on specific individuals or institutions cannot form a basis for declaring them unconstitutional. In conclusion, the court found no merit in the challenge to the 2020 Act and rules. The writ petitions were accordingly dismissed, with parties directed to bear their own costs. However, the judgment clarified that members of the petitioner associations are not barred from seeking relief through the appellate mechanism available under Section 13 of the 2020 Act, should they feel aggrieved.
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
While in power AIADMK surrendered T.N.'s autonomy by backing Centre's policies: Stalin
DMK president and Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Sunday charged the AIADMK with having 'surrendered' Tamil Nadu's autonomy during its previous rule by supporting the Centre's policies such as the NEET and the UDAY scheme. He accused AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami of 'betraying' the people of Tamil Nadu by aligning with the BJP. In a letter to his party cadre, Mr. Stalin alleged that the BJP-led government at the Centre allocated meagre funding to Tamil, the first language in India to be recognised as a Classical Language, while allocating several crores of rupees for Sanskrit. 'Through the National Education Policy, 2020, the Centre attempts to impose Hindi. The scientifically established cultural glory of Tamils, based on the findings of the Keeladi excavation, is being deliberately withheld by the Union Government,' he said. Mr. Stalin urged the cadre to honour the legacy of DMK patriarch and former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi by participating in a tribute rally on August 7, the latter's death anniversary, towards his memorial at Marina beach in Chennai and to pledge their commitment to securing victory in the 2026 Assembly election. Recalling Karunanidhi's initiatives for the uplift of the poor and society as a whole, he said: 'Carrying forward his legacy, our Dravidian Model government has implemented schemes such as the Kalaignar Magalir Urimai Thittam, Naan Mudhalvan, Pudhumai Penn, Makkalai Thedi Maruthuvam, and Innuyir Kappom. Several States across the country have followed our initiative.'
NDTV
11 hours ago
- NDTV
College Is Not Just for Degrees, It's For Real Responsibility: Delhi Minister
Education Minster At ARSD: Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma (ARSD) college conducted its 66th Foundation day on Saturday and what was initially expected to be a regular celebratory reunion took a reflective turn when Delhi's Education minister Ashish Sood talked about the "most important education reforms in decades" and asked students how they are going to contribute to the college, society and country. Back at the campus where he once studied commerce in the 1980s, Sood told students that the purpose of college isn't just to accumulate degrees, it's to prepare for real responsibility. "The three years of college are when you enjoy the most freedom," he said. "But life after that comes with responsibilities. Now is the time to ask yourself, how are you going to contribute to your college, your society, and your country?" The speech hit a personal note, with Sood calling his return to ARSD as Chief Guest a "deeply emotional moment," adding, "My foremost identity is that of an alumnus of this college, and I take great pride in that." But beyond the nostalgia, his message was sharply focused on the future, especially through the lens of the National Education Policy 2020. Calling NEP 2020 "a generational shift," the minister said the new policy is designed to transform not just what students learn, but how they learn. From interdisciplinary subject combinations to skill-based education, from academic flexibility to credit transfer and breaks, Sood said the reforms aim to put students at the center of the education system. "This policy isn't just about changing syllabi, it's about changing mindset. We are no longer in a world where just having a degree is enough," he said. "We need thinkers, problem-solvers, communicators, not just test-takers." He also mentioned Delhi's recent push to implement NEP at the grassroots level, including through pilot projects that integrate internships into credit systems and establish school-level skill labs. Mental health services on campus, he added, were also being reviewed as a priority following post-pandemic concerns among students. Referencing the name and founding values of Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College, the minister said Sanatan Dharma is not just a religious term, but one that represents eternal truths and social responsibility. "When some people talk about ending Sanatan, it is our duty to uphold and reestablish these timeless values by becoming their torchbearers," he said. While the minister's remarks were largely focused on student responsibility and institutional values, he also touched on current policy moves aimed at school-level reform. Beginning tomorrow, the Delhi Assembly will take up a long-awaited bill to regulate private school fee structures, a proposal that is expected to impact thousands of parents across the capital. Education Minister himself is set to table the bill, based on an ordinance cleared by the Cabinet on April 29. The proposed legislation introduces financial penalties for arbitrary fee hikes by private schools, ranging from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 10 lakh, and mandates refunds within 20 working days. Delays in processing refunds would trigger escalating penalties, while repeated violations could disqualify school authorities from revising fees or holding administrative office. The bill outlines a three-tier regulatory structure, school-level, district, and revision committees, with the latter having final authority in disputes. While some parents have welcomed the bill's intent, many say there needs to be deeper public dialogue before implementation. For students at ARSD, however, it was the focus on NEP and purpose-driven education that stood out. "Finally, someone's talking about how we study, not just what we study," said a second-year student. "We're tired of the placement rat race. If NEP can help us figure out what we actually want, that's real reform." Wrapping up his address, Sood quoted Acharya Chanakya: "A teacher is never ordinary, both destruction and creation lie in their lap." He thanked the college's past and present faculty for shaping thousands of young minds since 1959 and left students with one final reflection. "If we get NEP right," he said, "Delhi's students won't just pass exams, they'll shape the future." As the event drew to a close, Sood's message was clear: education reform won't mean much unless students are active participants, not passive recipients. "If we get NEP right," he said, "Delhi's students won't just pass exams, they'll shape the future." But as with most reforms, the impact will depend on what happens after the speeches. With the Assembly set to take up the private school fee regulation bill tomorrow, and NEP implementation still uneven across campuses, the coming weeks may reveal whether policies like these translate into real change, or remain distant headlines for students navigating everyday challenges. For many in the crowd, the takeaway was less about nostalgia and more about ownership. "Everyone talks about jobs and marks. It was different to hear someone ask us to think about our role in society," said a student. "College shouldn't just be a waiting room for placements, and if NEP delivers, maybe it won't be."
