Brits believe roads will be fully driverless in 15 years - but want tougher laws
The government has set a timetable for the introduction of self-driving vehicles but research suggests many people are wary
People want tough laws to keep driverless cars safe, a poll found. Most think self-driving vehicles will be commonplace within 15 years, and a quarter of young adults expect to buy one in the next three years. But the safety of the rapidly evolving technology is a concern.
Nearly four in 10 questioned in research by National Accident Helpline disagreed that the current laws are adequate to address it. This figure rose to more than half among people aged 55 and over. Nearly 60% of the 2,000 respondents agreed that drivers should have a new licence for a self-driving car, while almost eight in 10 think self-driving cars should be required to pass more stringent safety tests than human-driven vehicles.
The results come after Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander this week announced that the government will allow self-driving commercial vehicle pilot schemes from spring 2026.
Uber, one of the first firms taking advantage of the move, says it will launch a robotaxi service in partnership with UK AI firm Wayve in London as soon as next spring. A wider rollout is expected when the full Automated Vehicles Act becomes law from the second half of 2027, although local authorities' consent will be required.
John Kushnick, legal operations director at National Accident Helpline, said: 'What's fascinating is that many people express safety concerns about self-driving cars, yet often overlook how unsafe human drivers actually are. This highlights a clear gap in public understanding – most accidents are caused by human error, not technology.
'Over a third of respondents said they'd trust autopilot on planes more than a self-driving car, but again, that comes down to familiarity and education. Automation is already making travel safer, and public attitudes will likely shift over time, just as they did with autopilot in planes.
"Liability, however, remains a key question. With autonomous vehicles, it's likely that manufacturers will bear more responsibility.
"The benefit is that these cars will record everything, making it easier to establish fault. However, we'll need to rethink how insurance works when the human is no longer in control – does the policy belong to the person or the machine?"
The implementation of the Automated Vehicles Act has been delayed by a year. It became law in May 2024, was initially hailed as a major step forward for the UK's self-driving car ambitions, establishing a legal framework stating that when a vehicle is in self-driving mode, the manufacturer - not the human occupant - is liable for its behaviour, with the intention of paving the way for the introduction of autonomous vehicles as early as 2026.
Several factors contributed to the government's decision to push back the approval date, with safety concerns playing a major role.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Hundreds of drivers failing to show up for tests in Bristol
Hundreds of candidates are failing to attend driving tests that were booked, a Freedom of Information request has average, a candidate fails to attend a test at both Bristol centres in Avonmouth and Kingswood every day, data from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) many learners find booking a test in their home city almost impossible, every day there is likely to be a test cancelled because nobody turns in April, transport secretary Heidi Alexander said: "We inherited an enormous backlog of learners ready to ditch their L-plates but being forced to endure record waiting time for their tests." Between October 2023 and September 2024, 439 tests did not go ahead in Kingswood because candidates did not show up, an average of 37 every the same period, 344 tests did not go ahead in Avonmouth for the same reason, an average of 29 every month. In both centres, this represents about 3% of all tests four tests did not go ahead on average each month in the two Bristol centres because candidates arrived late; while six tests did not go ahead because of mechanical failure, the second most common reason after candidates not turning drivers across the country have been struggling to book tests for several years now, with a giant backlog first building up during the pandemic. The crisis has since got worse, with companies using bots to book tests and then resell them to learners at an inflated Alexander said in April: "I am instructing DVSA to take further action immediately to reduce waiting times which will see thousands of additional tests made available every month. We're acting fast to get Britain's drivers moving."The DVSA said in April that it was "continuing to reduce waiting times, and to encourage learners to only book their test when they're ready".
BBC News
17 hours ago
- BBC News
Uber fares up despite driver income decline, Oxford study suggests
Uber's use of dynamic pricing has led to higher fares for passengers and lower earnings for drivers, whilst increasing the company's share of revenue, a study has University of Oxford study analysed data from 258 Uber drivers in the UK over more than 1.5 million trips between 2016 and found there had been a "significant shift" when the company introduced a dynamic pricing algorithm in 2023, which it said meant "passengers now pay more per trip, but drivers' earnings have declined".Uber said some claims in the report were "totally false", adding that all drivers were shown their potential earnings for a trip before deciding whether to accept it. The study, which was carried out by researchers from the university's Computer Science, said Uber's commission had risen from about 25% to 29% since its dynamic pricing model was the same time, researchers found that drivers' hourly income fell from more than £22 to just over £19 - with drivers spending more unpaid time waiting for rides than began operating in Oxford in February, despite private hire and black cab drivers warning the taxi app giant that it may struggle to succeed in the said the study "highlights the widening gap between what customers pay and what drivers receive"."The higher the value of the trip, the more of a cut Uber takes. So the more the customer pays, the less the driver actually earns per minute," its lead author, prof Reuben Binns, study was commissioned by the Workers Information Exchange, which is run by former Uber driver James Farrar - who previously successfully campaigned for the company's drivers to be treated as workers, rather than to the study, an Uber spokesperson said the company "do not recognise the figures in this report."They highlighted that drivers in the UK took home more than £1bn in earnings between January and March of this year, with all drivers receiving a weekly summary of their earnings, including a "clear breakdown of what Uber and the driver received from trips".On average across the week, the percentage kept by Uber has "remained stable for several years, but can vary from week to week and from one driver to another", the company said."We are proud that thousands of drivers continue to make the positive choice to work on Uber as passenger demand and trips continue to grow," the spokesperson added. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Times
a day ago
- Times
Private rail firms face probe over ‘super' profits
A major row has erupted after ministers ordered a review into privately owned train companies extracting 'super normal profits' that risk costing taxpayers more than £200 million a year. An 'extremely late' intervention by transport secretary Heidi Alexander to clamp down on 'open access' train operators has this weekend sparked recriminations from FirstGroup, one of the country's biggest transport companies. It also threatens to derail Sir Richard Branson's bid to return the Virgin name to Britain's railways. Open access services have proved popular with consumers, with the likes of FirstGroup-owned Lumo offering fares from London to Edinburgh for as little as £19.99. Labour is pressing ahead with plans to bring the railways into full public ownership as the contracts to run services on behalf of the state expire. Alexander has insisted that open-access operators, which are not tied to timetables set by the government and compete with state-contracted firms, will be allowed to continue on the railways. Other popular operators include Grand Central and Hull Trains. But the government's top transport official is now urging a tougher stance on open-access firms. Richard Goodman, director-general for Rail Reform & Strategy, last week wrote to the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), the transport regulator, to raise the bar for granting licences to new open access operators. New analysis by the Department for Transport (DfT) had found that the annual 'abstraction' cost to the Exchequer would be up to £229 million if all the open-access operator licence applications were granted. 'This represents significant additional cost to taxpayers and would materially affect the funds available to the secretary of state. We therefore believe it is critical that the ORR immediately takes steps to fully understand and consider the cumulative scale and impacts of abstraction when it assesses open access applications,' Goodman continued. 'The secretary of state considers that this analysis should be undertaken in respect of all live applications as well as existing services in order for the ORR to fully discharge its duty to consider impacts to the secretary of state's funds.' Whitehall sources singled out FirstGroup, the FTSE 250 company behind London and Edinburgh service Lumo, and Hull Trains, which achieved a 32 per cent operating profit of £34.1 million in 2024-25. 'These super normal profits come about because [open-access operators] do not pay the full cost of accessing the track, nor do they have to meet public service obligations that require them to put on the services people need,' they said. FirstGroup this weekend hit back with a strongly worded letter of its own. Bosses raised concerns about the 'extremely late-stage' intervention by government officials. Steve Montgomery, FirstGroup managing director, said that Goodman's 'openly hostile' letter included claims that were 'demonstrably untrue' such as suggestions that open-access operators were an 'unwelcome drain on the DfT budget'. Sources close to the firm added that FirstGroup's open-access operations had been lossmaking during the pandemic and would soon be paying more in track access charges than contracted operators such as east coast main line firm LNER. South Western Railway was the first to be nationalised under Labour in May. It will be followed by c2c next month and Greater Anglia in October. They will join LNER, Northern, Southeastern and TransPennine Express, which were brought back into public ownership by the Conservatives after operational or financial failings. Others will be nationalised between now and 2028 and will ultimately be rebranded as Great British Railways. There has been an influx of open-access applications to the ORR since Labour swept to power last July. Among them is Branson, the billionaire whose operator Virgin Trains ran services on the west coast mainline between 1997 and 2019. Virgin has applied to start an open-access service on the same line. Alexander has previously voiced concerns about open-access operators luring customers that would otherwise travel on the incumbent state-contracted, or state-owned, operator. Fare income would go into the pockets of private companies that would otherwise be paid to the Exchequer. Politicians and civil servants refer to this as 'abstraction'. In a major blow to Branson's ambitions, Goodman said that the south part of the west coast main line was already 'severely constrained'. 'Additional open-access services would both prevent development of revenue-generative contracted services and increase performance risks to existing services due to perturbation,' he concluded. The government reiterated that there will be a place for open-access operators, even once all contracted services are brought under full public ownership. In May, the prime minister backed a new open-access service running from north Wales, the West Midlands and London called the Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway.
