Apology for S Korean woman convicted of biting man's tongue as he attacked her
"For 61 years, the state made me live as a criminal," Ms Choi told reporters outside the court ahead of the hearing.She said she hoped future generations could live a happy life free from sexual violence.At the start of the trial, Busan's Chief Prosecutor Jeong Myeong-won said "we sincerely apologise"."We have caused Choi Mal-ja, a victim of a sex crime who should have been protected as one, indescribable pain and agony."A final ruling is scheduled for 10 September, with legal observers expecting the court to overturn Ms Choi's conviction.Outside the courtroom after the hearing, Ms Choi raised her fist and said: "We won!"She celebrated by embracing campaigners from civic organisations who were there to support her.
In 1964, an 18-year-old Choi Mal-ja was attacked by a 21-year-old man, who forced his tongue into her mouth as he pinned her to the ground in the southern town of Gimhae, according to court records.Ms Choi escaped the attack by biting off 1.5cm (0.59in) of the aggressor's tongue.The man was sentenced to six months in prison, suspended for two years, for trespassing and intimidation. He was never convicted of attempted rape.Ms Choi was given a harsher sentence than her attacker for causing him grievous bodily harm. The court at the time said her actions had exceeded the "reasonable bounds" of self-defence.Ms Choi's case has since been cited in legal textbooks in South Korea as a classic example of a court failing to recognise self-defence during sexual violence.
'Justice is alive in this country'
After taking inspiration from South Korea's #MeToo movement in the late 2010s, Ms Choi contacted advocacy groups to begin work on petitioning for a retrial.She filed a petition in 2020, 56 years after the attack, but it was initially rejected by the lower courts. Three years later, the Supreme Court ruled that Ms Choi's retrial could go ahead.Her fight for justice became well known in South Korea, with Ms Choi and fellow activists holding protests outside the Supreme Court building in Seoul."I still can't believe it," Ms Choi said after Wednesday's hearing, the Korea JoongAng Daily newspaper reported."But if the prosecution is admitting its mistake even now, then I believe justice is alive in this country."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ohio ex-police officer sentenced to 15 years to life in 2020 killing of Andre Hill
A former Ohio police officer convicted of murder in the shooting of Andre Hill, a Black man who was holding a cellphone and keys when he was killed, was given a mandatory sentence Monday of 15 years to life. Former Columbus officer Adam Coy shot Hill four times in a garage in December 2020, as the country reckoned with a series of police killings of Black men, women and children. He told jurors that he feared for his life because he thought Hill was holding a silver revolver. Coy, who is being treated for Hodgkin lymphoma, told the court Monday he plans to appeal against the verdict. 'I feel my actions were justified,' Coy said. 'I reacted the same way I had in hundreds of training scenarios. I drew and fired my weapon to stop a threat, protect myself and my partner.' Prosecutors said Hill followed police commands and was never a threat to Coy. In victim impact statements Monday, Hill's sisters and ex-wife described the 47-year-old as a gentle man who had never met a stranger. His grandchildren called him 'big daddy'. Police body camera footage showed Hill coming out of the garage of a friend's house holding up a cellphone in his left hand, his right hand not visible, seconds before he was fatally shot. Almost 10 minutes passed before officers at the scene rendered aid. Coy, who was fired afterward, had a lengthy history of citizen complaints, although most were declared unfounded. Weeks later, the mayor forced out the police chief after a series of fatal police shootings of Black people. Columbus later reached a $10m settlement with Hill's family, and the city passed a law requiring police to give immediate medical attention to injured suspects.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Ex-officer who mistook a Black man's keys and phone for a gun gets 15 years to life for murder
A former Ohio police officer convicted of murder in the shooting of Andre Hill, a Black man who was holding a cellphone and keys when he was killed, was given a mandatory sentence Monday of 15 years to life. Former Columbus officer Adam Coy shot Hill four times in a garage in December 2020, as the country reckoned with a series of police killings of Black men, women and children. He told jurors that he feared for his life because he thought Hill was holding a silver revolver. Coy, who is being treated for Hodgkin lymphoma, told the court Monday he plans to appeal the verdict. 'I feel my actions were justified,' Coy said. 'I reacted the same way I had in hundreds of training scenarios. I drew and fired my weapon to stop a threat, protect myself and my partner." Prosecutors said Hill followed police commands and was never a threat to Coy. In victim impact statements Monday, Hill's sisters and ex-wife described the 47-year-old as a gentle man who had never known a stranger. His grandchildren called him 'Big Daddy." Police body camera footage showed Hill coming out of the garage of a friend's house holding up a cellphone in his left hand, his right hand not visible, seconds before he was fatally shot. Almost 10 minutes passed before officers at the scene rendered aid. Coy, who was fired afterward, had a lengthy history of citizen complaints, although most were declared unfounded. Weeks later, the mayor forced out the police chief after a series of fatal police shootings of Black people. Columbus later reached a $10 million settlement with Hill's family, and the city passed a law requiring police to give immediate medical attention to injured suspects.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Epstein victim Annie Farmer issues urgent warning to Trump amid talks of clemency deal with Ghislaine Maxwell
One of Ghislaine Maxwell 's accusers is urging federal prosecutors to keep the convicted sex trafficker behind bars amid growing speculation that she may soon be pardoned by President Trump. Annie Farmer, one of four abuse victims whose testimony helped convict Jeffrey Epstein 's madam in 2021, believes that any clemency deal with Maxwell would not only betray those harmed by the pair's abuse, it would also be seen as an 'admission of guilt' by the president. 'I think it would be devastating. It would feel like a slap in the face,' she told in an exclusive interview. 'This case, on so many levels, is about people using their power to get away with things.' Maxwell, 63, who's serving a 20-year sentence in Florida, met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche at the federal prison in Tallahassee last week as the Trump administration continues to take heat over its alleged 'cover-up' of the Epstein files review. Now efforts are underway - including by Congress - to release more records and to have Maxwell testify about what she knows about Epstein and his circle of high-powered friends. Her legal team had claimed she's ready to speak 'truthfully' about the Epstein case and his inner circle. But Farmer has warned Blanche of Maxwell's 'charm' and said anything she says should be treated with 'a lot of skepticism'. 'She would be only sharing information if she has something to gain. It is problematic at best,' she said. 'I think she was so good at doing what because she was very charming, very disarming. '[She] seemed very interested and seemed like a trustworthy character which is why she gained the access she did, which is why young girls and women trusted her. 'That is part of what frightens me. She can come off as someone who is very charming'. Over the two days of questioning with Blanche, Maxwell was reportedly asked about 100 powerful friends of Epstein, including Britain's Prince Andrew and Elon Musk. Her attorney David Oscar Markus on Friday said Maxwell has not asked for anything in exchange for speaking with the government about what she knows. But Trump had added to the fervor when he refused to rule out invoking his presidential pardon powers for Maxwell last week. 'I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I haven't thought about,' the president said. That prospect has raised difficult questions for Trump as Maxwell was indicted on two counts of perjury, though those charges were dismissed after her criminal conviction. In their sentencing memo, prosecutors said that Maxwell had engaged in a' significant pattern of dishonest conduct', and Judge Alison Nathan admonished Maxwell for her 'lack of candor' about her finances. Farmer said it would be hard to believe 'there would be trustworthy information coming from her'. 'She's lied about me, she's lied about my family,' she said. 'I'm not one to give her the benefit of the doubt'. To Farmer, who was just 16 when she was abused by Epstein and Maxwell, the lack of consultation with the victims this time around feels like history repeating itself. 'It doesn't sit well that this is all happening without any involvement from the people they asked to testify in her case, or other victims. 'It's hard not to be anxious.' Any potential arrangement in the case, she says, would likely be like 'sweetheart deal no.2' - referring to Epstein's notorious non-prosecution agreement in 2008. Under the deal, the pedophile served just 15 months in a low security prison where he used an email account with 'vacation' in the handle, such was his contempt for the law. 'Ever since Epstein got the sweetheart deal the first time we have been left out of a process that was done behind closed doors and led to a poor outcome,' Farmer said. 'This could be a sweetheart deal no.2 and that is terrifying for the people who she's harmed, she's threatened. 'I'm really really hoping that's not what's occurring but it's hard not to be worrying'. Now Farmer's 'very fearful' that Trump would pardon Maxwell to save himself, no matter how bad it might look. 'For this to happen because powerful people in Washington are willing to barter with someone else that has a history of being a very privileged person and not taking into account the voices of the victims, it would be another iteration of that. 'Because she's been a known individual with this information for so long and this is a new maneuver in the context of a backlash against the admin it's hard not to see it as not just about giving information or further investigation. 'It feels it would be about protecting powerful people'. Farmer worries that Maxwell still poses a danger to society and issued a direct plea to Trump and the federal government about the possibility of offering her clemency. 'Please don't cut a deal with Maxwell. That would be interpreted by the general public as an admission of guilt,' she said. 'If you truly are not implicated please don't allow this predator who not only assisted in procuring girls for Epstein but participated in the abuse, don't let her face any other sentence than the one she was given by a jury of her peers. 'If she gives us the names of five men who were there one time, and she's freed. 'That's not a win. That would feel like a loss to a lot of the people who were harmed. 'She had a trial and was found guilty and she's serving the sentence she deserves'. Farmer was just 16 when she met Epstein and Maxwell, who she was introduced to by her older sister Maria, an aspiring artist who was working for them in 1996. After accepting an invitation to fly from her home in Arizona to see them in New York, Epstein rubbed Farmer's hand and leg while they went to see a movie. She brushed it off but on a second trip to see Epstein and Maxwell in New Mexico, things took a dark turn. One morning Epstein came into her bed and asked for a cuddle and another time Maxwell persuaded Farmer to give the pedophile a foot massage. Maxwell also persuaded Farmer to take off her clothes and bra as Maxwell massaged her. Farmer did not tell her sister out of fear she would ruin her arrangement with Epstein and Maxwell. But then the pair sexually assaulted Maria and the two sisters opened up to each other and realized they were both victims of the twisted pair. Earlier this year Maria Farmer sued the US government for failing to properly investigate her claims against Epstein and Maxwell. She said that she first reported the pair to the FBI in 1996 when she and her sister were assaulted. Maria Farmer reported them again to the FBI in 2006 when Epstein was investigated by police in Palm Beach, Florida. Speaking to Annie Farmer said she agreed with her sister and felt like the FBI's handling of their story had been a 'failure'. She said: 'It sends a message that what occurred to you was not a big deal 'I had a fear that this behavior could continue and a fear I knew something about these very powerful people that they would not want known. 'The fact that holding onto that and believing it wasn't of interest or concern to law enforcement, that's a problem. 'Now looking back it's most upsetting because of everything they went on to do, which was my fear'. Farmer also now supports the release of more Epstein files, even though she has in the past been wary of doing so because she didn't want it to affect Maxwell's appeal of her conviction. Maxwell is currently asking the US Supreme Court to consider her case after an appeal court ruled against her. Farmer said: 'Not every single thing has to be released for there to be more transparency but there are pieces of information they've held onto that have not helped people in terms of understanding this (sex trafficking) operation or getting closure or holding other people accountable'. Should Maxwell be released, Farmer and other Epstein victims would have a 'sense of fear' that she may seek retribution. In the 1990s, Maxwell threatened to burn all of Maria Farmer's artwork and that she would destroy her career. Farmer said: 'There is a sense of not knowing what she's capable of 'She's still well connected, she still has access to a lot of resources. It's a scary thing to live under that uncertainty'. The White House said it wouldn't comment on the possibility of a pardon for Maxwell. The Department of Justice declined to comment.
