Palestine Action terror ban made UK ‘international outlier', High Court told
The group's co-founder Huda Ammori is making a bid to legally challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20.
The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge over that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
The case returned to the High Court in London on Monday, where lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to grant the green light for a full legal challenge against the decision to ban the group, saying it was an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression.
Raza Husain KC said: 'We say the proscription of Palestine Action is repugnant to the tradition of the common law and contrary to the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights).'
The barrister continued: 'The decision is so extreme as to render the UK an international outlier.'
Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.'
'The consequences are not just limited to arrest,' Mr Husain later said, telling the court there was 'rampant uncertainty' in the aftermath of the ban.
Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also for Ms Ammori, later said: 'The impacts (of proscription) have already been significant.'
She continued: 'Dozens and dozens of people have been arrested for protesting, seated and mostly silent protest.'
The barrister later told the court that Merseyside Police had bailed arrested protesters with a condition not to mention Palestine.
'People have been bailed to not mention Palestine?' Mr Justice Chamberlain asked, with Ms Ni Ghralaigh replying: 'It is a condition of bail that they do not mention Palestine.'
'The Secretary of State has not distanced herself from any of these actions,' she continued, adding that Ms Cooper had not described actions like this as an 'overreach'.
The Home Office is defending the legal challenge.
Previously, Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court.
Sir James Eadie KC, representing the department on Monday, said that an 'exceptional case' would be needed for it to go to the High Court, rather than the POAC.
He said: 'Judicial review is, and has been accepted to be, a remedy of last resort and that is for very good and well-established reasons.'
However, Mr Husain told the court on Monday morning that the POAC was not 'convenient nor effective' in this case.
He continued: 'It would be quite absurd to say that we should tolerate the consequences of the proscription… even if it is unlawful, and just go to POAC.
'That is an absurd position.'
In written submissions, Sir James said that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription.
He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.'
Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'.
More than 100 people were arrested across the country during demonstrations this weekend protesting against the proscription, with protests held in London, Manchester, Edinburgh, Bristol and Truro on Saturday.
Saturday's arrests brought the total number of people arrested since the ban came into force to more than 200, with more than 72 arrested across the UK last weekend and 29 the week before.
The hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain is due to conclude on Monday.
A decision may be given at the end of the hearing, or in writing at a later date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Council backs Palestine Action motion against own legal advice
A council in Northern Ireland has gone against its own legal advice and voted to call for charges to be dropped against people arrested for supporting the newly-banned group, Palestine City and Strabane District Council is understood to be one of the first local authorities in the UK to back such a government proscribed Palestine Action earlier this month under the Terrorism Act following a break-in at an RAF base, with membership carrying a maximum jail term of 14 of people have been arrested for carrying placards supporting the group, including an elderly female vicar and an 81-year-old former magistrate. More than 100 people protesting the decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terror group have been held across the in support of the pro-Palestine activist group took place in London, Edinburgh, Manchester, Bristol and Truro, in Cornwall, on Metropolitan Police said 55 people were arrested on suspicion of terrorism offences for displaying placards in support of Palestine Action, at the largest demonstration in Action lobbies against Israeli-linked businesses in the UK and accuses the British government of complicitity in genocide in Gaza. 'Reap the whirlwind' The motion calling for charges against the arrested supporters of Palestine Action to be dropped was passed by Derry City and Strabane District Council on Wednesday. That was despite the advice of the city solicitor, Philip Kingston, and chief executive John Kelpie, who told councillors that a section of the motion calling for the charges to be dropped "must come out".The Sinn Féin Mayor Ruairí McHugh said he would allow the motion in its entirety and it was carried with support of his party, the SDLP, People Before Profit and some independents. The Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) and Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) voted motion also calls for the ban to be lifted, but as this was enacted by the Westminster Parliament, it would have to be repealed by that body. People Before Profit councillor Shaun Harkin, who proposed the motion, said tens of thousands of people had been "killed and slaughtered" in Gaza and Palestinian children were being "starved to death".The government, he said, were "complicit in this" and would "reap the whirlwind".He said the banning of Palestine Action was a "ridiculous use of legislation" which could end up in peaceful people being put in councillor Gary Donnelly said the ban was an attempt to "scare the life out of people" and "scare them off the streets", while Catherine McDaid, of the SDLP, described the legislation as "the slippery slope"."If you go out and oppose genocide, you are going to be done for supporting a terrorist organisation," she DUP councillor Niree McMorris said it was "absurd" for the council to go against their own legal advice.
Scottish Sun
36 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Evil Scots murderer who ‘hacked girlfriend to death' with knife & claimed he was ‘possessed' jailed for 18 years
He stabbed the 31-year-old mum-of-two 27 times during the brutal attack in February MONSTER CAGED Evil Scots murderer who 'hacked girlfriend to death' with knife & claimed he was 'possessed' jailed for 18 years Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MURDERER who stabbed his partner 27 times was caged for 18 years - as a court heard his victim had revealed fears she'd be killed by the brute. Corey Dryden, 32, hacked his partner Megan Hughes to death at their home in Chirnside, Scottish Borders. 3 Corey Dryden who stabbed his partner Megan Hughes to death has been jailed 3 The evil killer has been sentenced to 18 years in prison He stabbed the 31-year-old mum-of-two 27 times during the brutal attack in February. Evil Dryden, who was high on a mix of street valium and alcohol at the time, used a large kitchen knife and a claw hammer during the savage assault. Megan suffered wounds to the front and back of her chest, face, neck and her left arm, as well as blunt force trauma to her face, forehead and the back of her head. At the High Court in Edinburgh today, the sicko was jailed for life. Dryden and Megan got together in February last year and had known each other since childhood. She had two children from a previous relationship and they began living with each other five months later. The court heard how just months before her death, Dryden had bombarded Megan with verbal abuse at a local bar. The brute admitted the offence on September 22 last year and was fined £300. But Megan had expressed fear that Dryden would 'kill her' if she returned home that night, according to the author of the pre-sentencing report. Soon after the fatal attack in the early hours of February 9, officers arrested Dryden. Two hikers seriously injured after plunging from cliff at Scots beauty spot Prosecutor Tracey Brown told the court that the killer started crying during a police interview. Speaking to detectives, Dryden grovelled: 'I did really love her, you know.' He was assessed by mental health professionals while in detention. Ms Brown said: 'He was asked how he would access services if he was released on bail. 'The offender replied, 'with all due respect I'm not getting released' and also said, 'that's unlikely cause I'm going to plead guilty 'cos I hacked my girlfriend to death'.' She added: "When asked about what had happened, the offender stated, 'I can't remember anything about it'. 'He then placed his hands over his face and began crying. He then stated, 'it was like I was possessed'." Earlier this year, Dryden pleaded guilty to killing Megan and during his sentencing today, he appeared via video link. Lord Harrower heard how Dryden was 'deeply remorseful' for his actions. But the judge told him he would have to serve 18 years behind bars for the 'sustained' and 'savage' attack. Lord Harrower told Dryden: 'I am grateful to Megan's former partner, her sister and her mother for providing me with detailed and moving accounts of what sort of woman Megan was, why she was special to them, and of the terrible devastation you have caused to her whole family. 'As Megan's family has explained, such was the nature of the injuries you inflicted, they were deprived of the opportunity to look upon her face one last time. No sentence of this court can alleviate their anguish.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Tipp-Ex divorcee' is locked in High Court libel fight with property developer over his plans for housing in grounds of her £6.75m castle
A castle owner known as the 'Tipp-Ex divorcee' is locked in a High Court libel battle with a tycoon who wants to develop housing in the grounds of her £6.75million home. Sally Nightingale, 66, who took over the 900-year-old Cumbrian estate after her high-profile 2009 split from millionaire lawyer Christopher Nightingale, is being sued for libel over a letter she sent to planning officials. She was dubbed the 'Tipp-Ex divorcee' after her lawyers accused her former husband of doctoring bank statements with correction fluid. The former fashion consultant has described the property as a 'poisoned chalice' but went on to spend years renovating the estate, which now houses a museum, hotel and wedding venue. She is now locked in a court battle after a Grade-I I-listed former stable block in the grounds of the castle was bought by property developer James Carlton, through his company last year. Mr Carlton claims that she tried to frustrate his plans to convert the stables into housing by writing a libellous letter to the local council's planning department about work there. The developer says the letter implies that he committed a criminal offence in removing historic flagstones from the grounds of the stables and that it has ruined his reputation. His lawyers say he 'has been seriously injured in his reputation and has been brought into public scandal, odium and contempt'. However, Ms Nightingale, 66, is fighting the libel claim, denying that she damaged Mr Carlton's reputation and claiming that she was only doing her duty by bringing to the council's attention elements of the work on the property. Ms Nightingale, who married her lawyer husband Christopher in 1984 and lived in Hong Kong and Singapore, before moving to Appleby Castle in the late 1990s. They were married for 24 years and had three children, and at one point owned three castles. However, in 2009 their marriage ended after Christopher left Sally for another woman, reported to be a Moroccan pole dancer, Massahine Bojji. As a result, Ms Nightingale was given the keys to Appleby, which boasts 22 bedrooms and 19 bathrooms, two great halls and a 15th-century dining room, while operating as a hotel and museum. She went on to renovate and the house is now for sale for £6.75million. On top of getting the castle, Christopher also agreed to hand over a quarter of his holding in a company he helped to found – a stake she said she was told would be worth about £1.5million. To her surprise, Christopher only gave her £83 after claiming the sale of his shares only sold for £330. In the same year he got divorced, Mr Nightingale, pictured, gave Miss Bojji shares in his company, which worth said to be worth around £252,000 at the time But Sally's lawyers fought back, arguing that his bank statements show he actually received £6million from the sale, despite his attempt to use correction fluid on the statements to obscure the crucial deposits. In the same year he got divorced, Mr Nightingale gave Miss Bojji shares in his company, which worth said to be worth around £252,000 at the time. The Nightingales ended up agreeing to a confidential out-of-court settlement after five hours of private negotiations. But she is now set for a court battle after property developer Mr Carlton filed his libel claim, seeking up to £10,000 damages at the High Court against her. In claim documents, his lawyers describe him as a 'prolific and experienced property developer' who operates through his company, Chancellor Developments Limited, which last year acquired a Grade-I listed property known as 'The Stable Block' within the castle grounds. James Carlton, through his company Chancellor Developments Ltd, submitted a planning application to Westmorland & Furness Council for major works on the historic stable block. His solicitor, Williams Jones, said the proposals include 'the restoration of decayed external and internal fabric, finishes, and service installations,' along with the renovation of three existing vacant dwellings and the conversion of former single-storey stables into four new homes. The plans also seek listed building consent for alterations and possible demolition within the protected site. According to Mr Carlton's solicitor, Williams Jones, the libel claim centres on a submission Ms Nightingale made to the council last December, in which she wrote: 'The new owner, seemingly unaware of the significance of these materials, removed the pile of historic flagstones from the site. This action resulted in the irreversible loss of another vital aspect of the stable block's authentic historical fabric.' Mr Jones argues that the statement implied Mr Carlton had carried out unauthorised works that harmed the architectural and historical integrity of the listed building. He said the comments, published on the council's planning portal, were potentially 'extremely damaging' and could influence the outcome of the planning application. In her defence, Ms Nightingale denies the letter was an 'objection' to the planning application, claiming it simply outlined concerns she believed the council should consider. She also rejects the claim that her words were defamatory, arguing they did not suggest Mr Carlton or his company had personally carried out any work that damaged the property's historic character. She also claims that what she wrote was her 'honest opinion' about 'extensive work' carried out by the previous owner of the property, not Mr Carlton or his company. Mr Carlton's libel claim was filed in May, with Ms Nightingale's defence following last month, but the case has not yet appeared before a judge in court. It will be listed at the High Court at a later date, unless settled by negotiation.
