As Alligator Alcatraz adds more pavement, environmentalists add to legal complaints
In a newly filed legal notice, environmental groups accused the government agencies of ignoring even more environmental regulations while building and opening Alligator Alcatraz, despite the governor's pledge to have 'zero impacts' on the Everglades.
The second barrage of legal documents, filed two weeks after the first lawsuit, also suggests that the detention center is already making an impact on the fragile ecosystem around it.
'With each passing day, we see visible environmental impacts on this site. We are very concerned and filed this additional legal action to ensure the law is being complied with,' said Eve Samples, head of Friends of the Everglades, one of the groups spearheading the legal challenges.
Aerial photography revealed fresh patches of asphalt, including several short stretches of roads and an 11-acre patch of new blacktop. The lawsuit accuses the state and federal government of failing to get the proper permits to 'dredge and fill' those formerly open, grassy areas.
Florida's Department of Emergency Management spokesperson Stephanie Hartman said that the 11-acre paved-over area was actually a patch of concrete with overgrown grass.
'The photographed areas all reflect previously paved or concrete portions of the airport, including where the asphalt is pictured,' she told the Herald.
A consultant for Friends of the Everglades reviewed old aerial photography dating back to the construction of the Jetport in 1970 and never found a patch of concrete in that same spot, just vegetation.
'We doubt, looking at the aerials, if it was paved before,' said Paul Schwiep, one of the lead attorneys for the environmental groups and a partner at Miami-based Coffey Burlington. 'The statement that this was all built on the existing footprint does not appear to be correct.'
The notice of intent to sue in the next 60 days also dings the state and federal government for failing to consider the potential impacts on endangered and threatened species in the area, including the Florida panther, the bonneted bat and Everglade snail kite.
The original lawsuit accused the state and federal government of ignoring federal environmental laws that require them to analyze potential harms to the environment before building.
'They don't dispute that there hasn't been any analysis of any environmental impacts — impacts on wetlands, impacts on endangered species, none of it,' said Schwiep.
READ MORE: Feds move in court to distance Trump administration from Alligator Alcatraz
Instead, in court filings, the state has argued it didn't need to do those analyses because it was acting during an immigration-related state of emergency declared by Gov. Ron DeSantis three years ago. Federal agencies said they had nothing to do with the site — declaring it a Florida-operated detention center with no support from the Trump administration, despite the many public statements of support from federal officials at the highest levels of government.
'There are so many on-the-record statements regarding this federal state partnership,' said Samples. 'Their court filings do not align with their public statements on this topic.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Supreme Court pauses ruling that weakened 1965 Voting Rights Act
A lower court severely limited who can bring discrimination challenges under the landmark 1965 law. WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court paused a lower court's ruling limiting who can sue under the under the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act, a move backed by civil rights groups and other advocates. Over the objections of three conservative justices, the high court on July 24 put a ruling by the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on hold while two Native American tribes appeal it. If allowed to stand, the appeals court's decision would severely undermine enforcement of the law. It said only the U.S. attorney general is authorized to sue under a key section of the law, meaning voters, Native American tribes and groups like the NAACP would be barred from doing so. In this case, the tribes and three voters challenged a state legislative map in North Dakota they said dilutes the voting power of Native Americans. A federal district judge agreed, but the appeals court said vote dilution claims cannot be enforced through lawsuits brought by individual voters or groups. The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and the Spirit Lake Tribe called that decision a 'knee-cap' to the nation's 'most important civil rights statute.' Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color or other characteristics. In a brief supporting the tribes, the NAACP said the history of that section 'has been written largely through private enforcement.' But North Dakota's attorney general argues Congress did not clearly intend a private enforcement right when the act became law decades ago. The state also said the Supreme Court should keep the appeals court's decision in effect for now to allow the 2026 elections to be conducted under the map challenged by the tribes. That map eliminated two of the three legislative districts in which Native American voters could elect their preferred candidates. Three justices − Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch − said they would have kept the decision in place while the Supreme Court considers whether to hear the tribes' appeal. The appeals court's decision affects voting rights litigation in seven states: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. Republican attorneys general in most of those states and a few others filed a brief backing the appeals court's decision. More: Supreme Court defers decision on challenge to Louisiana congressional map The Supreme Court is still deciding how to resolve a dispute over Louisiana's congressional districts that involves an interplay between the Voting Rights Act and a racial gerrymandering challenge. Instead of issuing a decision, the court announced in June that it will hear new arguments in its next term.
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
The Fed just gave a rare look at its $2.5 billion renovation — right before Trump's tour
The Federal Reserve, one of the most notoriously tight-lipped institutions in Washington, has been suddenly thrust into an unusual situation: a high-stakes public relations battle with the White House. The central bank, under intense scrutiny from President Donald Trump and his allies, is quietly trying to mitigate any potentially inaccurate claims and attacks stemming from Trump's upcoming Thursday afternoon tour of the Fed's renovation site at its headquarters facing the National Mall. The White House has seized on the Fed's $2.5 billion construction project as a potential legal opening to oust Chair Jerome Powell, whom Trump has lambasted for months because the central bank has not lowered interest rates at all this year. The timing of the tour — amid mounting scrutiny over the president's past relationship with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein — may be a public relations maneuver of its own, designed to distract from the growing political scandal. Trump is set to join some of his top advisers to visit the Fed as he continues to publicly tear into Powell on social media. But the Fed made a strategic play by hosting a tour for a handful of media outlets beforehand. It shows that the Fed is now embroiled in a crisis communications strategy battle with the White House. 'The Fed laid the groundwork behind the scenes with the media, and that's exactly its longstanding playbook,' said Anne Marie Malecha, chief executive of Dezenhall Resources, a reputation and crisis management firm. 'You're not going to see the Fed take to Truth Social or engage with influencers, so I think this is as far out on a limb as we're going to see an institution like the Fed go.' The Fed declined to comment. Notes from reporters who attended the morning tour detailed a noisy, active construction site with scaffolding, cement mixers and construction machines throughout. The notes said the Marriner S. Eccles building, one of the two being refurbished, now has some new upgrades for security purposes. That includes blast-resistant windows and shear walls, which are big drivers of the building's cost, according to Fed staff during the tour. These upgrades are meant to abide by the Department of Homeland Security's highest level of security for federal buildings. The account from reporters also noted that seating on the rooftop of the Eccles building was nixed in order to avoid the appearance of being an amenity, even though it would not have been expensive to include it, according to Fed staff. Staff also noted during the tour that tariffs and higher costs for materials were big reasons for the cost overruns compared to estimates from 2018 and 2019. The project is expected to be finished by the fall of 2027, with a DC-based workforce of about 3,000 moving in through March 2028. Despite the Fed's attempts at being transparent about the project, administration officials have still harshly criticized the Fed for it, and may continue to do so after the tour. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described Trump's public gripes with Powell as 'working the refs' — a phrase in sports used when a player loudly protests a referee's call to force him to reconsider. 'I think the building is just a sideshow,' David Wessel, director of the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution, told CNN's Brian Todd. 'It's a way to get attention away from other problems that the president is facing.' 'They're 7 years into a 9-year building project,' Wessel added. 'It's hardly been a secret. (It's coming up now) because the president wants to make life miserable for Jay Powell.' Trump's attacks on Powell are nothing new: He levied the same gripes about the Fed chief — his own pick to helm the central bank — during his first term in office, too. But the attacks on Powell have grown in recent weeks, and Republicans have latched onto what was once a routine — albeit expensive — construction project for the Fed. The Fed renovation may be a convenient foil for Trump as the administration is dealing with its own crisis communications battle, some communications experts say. The Justice Department's handling of the so-called Epstein files has spurred outrage, even among some of Trump's die-hard supporters. CNN this week unveiled newly uncovered archived video footage and photos shedding more light on Trump's past relationship with Epstein. 'This administration is highly skilled at moving lawmakers, the media and the public to pay attention to issues and to take up causes that are beneficial to them. It's a 'look over there instead of here' strategy,' Malecha said. 'Whiplash is often an effective strategy,' she said. CNN's Brian Todd contributed reporting.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Onward! A Personal Tribute To Ed Feulner (1941-2025)
Ed Feulner and three of his main intellectual inspirations: G.K. Chesterton, Russell Kirk, and F. A. ... More Hayek painting by Deborah Melvin Beisner. Photo of a copy of the painting in the author's possession Dr. Edwin J. Feulner Jr. was such a significant policy player for over 50 years that, although numerous leaders have already shared memories of how he influenced their lives, there is ample room for further tributes. I first heard of Ed, as he liked to be called, as an immigrant from Argentina in the late 70s. For me Ed was an immense inspiration and later an extremely generous mentor and advisor. I came to the United States in 1978 to study under Dr. Hans F. Sennholz at Grove City College. Sennholz had been a disciple of Ludwig von Mises and, though of course primarily a teacher, was very active as a speaker in conservative free-market circles. He introduced me to the work of Feulner at the Heritage Foundation. I finally met Feulner in September 1980, when I was invited to the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS) meeting held at the Hoover Institution. Feulner became a key member of the MPS, occupying several leadership positions. My acquaintance with Ed deepened starting in 1985 when I joined Antony Fisher, the founder of the Institute of Economic Affairs in London and later founder of the Atlas Economic Research Foundation. Fisher attempted to hire Feulner to lead the International Center for Economic Policy Studies (ICEPS, today the Manhattan Institute). In 1978, Fisher had been discussing the creation of a New York-based think tank with his friend William J. "Bill" Casey, then a New York lawyer. Just as Feulner was about to start his new job, the recently established Heritage Foundation made him a much better offer, and the rest is history. Although disappointed at not being able to hire him, Fisher remained friends with Feulner and invited him to speak at Atlas events. As in its early days Atlas was located in San Francisco, far from Heritage, at first, I mostly saw Feulner at the meetings of the Mont Pelerin Society. At one of those meetings, in Guatemala, I as a member of the program committee was able to invite Fr. Robert Sirico to speak. Sir John Templeton, who worked closely with Antony Fisher, attended the meeting as well. Following conversations during the meeting, Fr. Sirico decided to establish the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty, and both Feulner and I were asked to be on Acton's founding board. At the end of our first Acton board retreat, I drove to the airport together with Ed. When I am with influential people, I ask the same questions: Whom do you always read? Who is doing great work, and should we support them more? And: What is the biggest problem we face today in our battle for freedom? I recall his answer to the latter vividly. It was in the mid 90's and Ed said: 'The young people who are joining the movement have a very shallow and superficial understanding of the principles of the free society. They join our think tanks, but they never went through the process of studying all the main works, the Founding Fathers, the great economists, Mises, Hayek, Friedman, conservative thinkers like Russell Kirk.' Feulner invested his time in organizations such as the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI), where he served as a long-standing trustee and chairman. ISI aims to fill the void Feulner spoke of by creating fellowships and academic programs for talented young people. In addition to his role as a think tank leader, Ed Feulner also played a significant role in grant-giving foundations such as the Sarah Scaife Foundation, which supports dozens of policy think tanks. He also served as an inspiration for other foundations. A little-known fact is that Sir John Templeton, in starting his organization, included Feulner on its charter as one of the authors who should serve as a guide for its grants in the realm of free enterprise. The other authors who preceded him are Adam Smith, Ludwig von Mises, F.A. Hayek, Milton Friedman, William E. Simon, and Antony Fisher. Ideas never die, and Ed Feulner's views and legacy will continue to inspire many of us. In addition to his leadership at think tanks and philanthropic organizations, Dr. Feulner played a role in various political campaigns. He worked alongside Jack Kemp when he was vice presidential candidate with Bob Dole. He also joined the campaign for Trump's 2016 presidential run. In 2016, at a private meeting with freedom fighters from around the world, Ed told us: 'Trump put one condition, that if we disagree with a policy, like I did on tariffs, we keep our disagreement private.' Dr. Ed Feulner being recognized for his service to the Mont Pelerin Society during the Hong Kong ... More general meeting in 2014. Dr. Allan H. Meltzer (1928-2017), then president of the Society, at his side When in 2014 the Mont Pelerin Society asked me to help choose a gift for Ed Feulner, I had a unique opportunity to learn about what inspired him. Without revealing my intention, I asked him during a private meeting at his office which intellectuals had had the greatest impact on his life. He was quick to answer G.K. Chesterton, Russell Kirk, and F.A. Hayek. An artist who knew him well, Debby Beisner, captured his response in a beautiful painting. Books will be written about Ed Feulner and his legacy. For now, one of his favorite words suffices to remember his spirit: Onward!
