Medway Council has nearly £20m in unused funds from developers
After an agreement, developers can then begin work and pay the contributions when they reach a certain point in the construction schedule.However, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests submitted by the LDRS show issues with money getting to where it was initially intended.The report revealed as of December, the council held £4m of S106 cash for schools and education, £3.1m for community centres and museums, and £5.3m for open spaces.Of the £4m agreed with developers since 2013, just £1.2m has been collected with only £17,846 spent.In total, funding from 40 different agreements has been received by Medway Council, but only two projects have actually seen money spent.
A £9,446.36 sum from a 2014 agreement for development on Richmond Road, Gillingham, was used for "healthcare services".The report also revealed another £8,400 was spent from a £9,197.96 agreement from 2020 for a development in Twydall, which was used for a health pod in the Woodlands Family Practice, Gillingham.The LDRS reported the largest S106 contribution collected for a single development was £180,869.99 for a 300-home scheme on land at Otterham Quay Lane, Rainham.This was agreed for improvements to GP services at the Rainham Healthy Living Centre, the Thames Avenue Surgery or the Maidstone Road Surgery.The LDRS reported none of the money has been spent yet.
Out of the five towns and Hoo Peninsula, Chatham is the place with the most health-based S106 funding currently held by the council, which is £406,000.The LDRS added if the fund was not spent by a certain deadline, the developer could request the money be returned.Deadlines range between five and 10 years but Medway Council said it had never had to return any funding.However, another FOI submitted by the LDRS revealed £175,000 of S106 funding agreements for health projects was allowed to expire before the money was collected by the council.
Medway Council chief planning officer Dave Harris told the LDRS the issue of getting the NHS Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board (ICB) to request the funds collected "had been a long-term frustration".He said the council was having regular meetings with the ICB to discuss how to use the available funds as the local authority was unable to spend the money on services itself.An ICB spokesperson said: "We request S106 funding when there is an identified and approved project to allocate the funding to."Where we have an opportunity to pool S106 funding contributions, we will sometimes do so where appropriate."The spokesperson added there can be a "significant lag" between the S106 contribution being secured, the development and getting to a point when the contribution is due."Due to the time lag, the ICB may consider a different project from that proposed originally is required and we will discuss this with Medway Council," they added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Lack of support for Cambridgeshire man with learning disability
An apology has been made to a man with a learning disability after they did not receive the care coordinator they were entitled Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman found fault with the Integrated Care Board (ICB), Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust (CPFT) and Peterborough City Council's adult social care for not allocating a coordinator to the man, referred to as Mr also found local policy was written more restrictively than national guidance in such three organisations wrote to Mr Y to apologise for the distress caused through "avoidable uncertainty" and acknowledged the failings. When someone has a mental health disorder, local authorities and ICBs have a duty to provide or arrange free aftercare services for anyone previously detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said. 'Comprehensive review' A report to be put before a council committee on 8 July states: "There are people with a learning disability and people who are autistic who access mental health services, and they would be entitled to the same offer of support as everyone else accessing those services, however, Mr Y was not provided with the same offer."It adds that it is "essential" a suitable care coordinator is identified to help an individual to navigate complicated care systems and provide ombudsman found the local policy was restrictive, for example, it stated that a care coordinator needed to be a health care provider, while national guidance left it open for social workers to take on the role ombudsman also found there was a discrepancy in the agreement with the scope of delegated functions between the ICB and CPFT."The scope includes people suffering with mental illness as well as challenging behaviour which then creates a gap as there are no dedicated care coordinator roles for specialist learning disability health services," the report City Council's prevention, independence and resilience scrutiny committee is recommended to consider that the CPFT, the ICB and council agree an interim solution before local policy and commissioning issues are resolved, whereby Mr Y's allocated social worker acts as the care committee will also consider a comprehensive review of the current policies and procedures takes place to align with national guidance. Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Government accused of undermining Ardrossan harbour
The ship is too big to fit into Ardrossan harbour safely, with planned upgrades halted in 2023 due to rising costs. The Scottish Government said earlier this year it was considering renationalising the harbour to ensure Ardrossan remains the mainland port for Arran. Read More: However, former Labour MP for Cunninghame North - now largely North Ayrshire and Arran - Brian Wilson has raised concerns after submitting a Freedom of Information request. The Herald columnist asked for communications concerning Ardrossan between transport secretary Fiona Hyslop and (Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd). Wilson wrote: "One interesting line had either slipped through the net or been left in deliberately, in which the chief executive of CMAL, Kevin Hobbs, wrote, the week following Ms Hyslop's instruction: 'We do not believe and have expressly stated that resilience at Ardrossan (given the entrance through the roundheads and turn) will never be as resilient as Troon given the open sea approach'. "In other words, the chief executive of CMAL could hardly have been clearer that they have no interest in pursuing what, in public, has been their obligation and the Scottish Government's aim. So the question now is whether Ms Hyslop's 'instruction' is ever intended to prevail? "I make no claim to nautical expertise but that is not the issue at stake. The real question is whether, consistent with Mr Hobbs' comments, CMAL and Transport Scotland have been (and still are) working to ensure that Ardrossan never again will be the gateway port for Arran. "If that is the case – as I believe it is – the people of Arran and Ardrossan have, for the past decade, been cynically and cruelly deceived. To that, I object strongly – and call for an inquiry into the full circumstances, without evasions or redactions." Under current regulations, the Scottish Government does not have the power to force a sale of the Ardrossan harbour. It's understood negotiations are ongoing between CMAL and Peel Ports over a potential deal. A Transport Scotland spokesperson said: 'This Government is fully committed to Ardrossan serving the Arran route and to investing in the harbour to ensure that the service is fit for the future. 'We want to see progress just as much as local campaigners do. However, as was explained to them when they met recently with CMAL, Transport Scotland and CalMac, a timeline can only be reasonably established and published should actual purchase and transfer of control of the port be successful. 'It is wholly appropriate that CMAL leads on the Ardrossan negotiations. Should ownership transfer be successful, CMAL would be the asset owner and responsible for taking forward any development works at Ardrossan. As owners of 26 ports and harbours across Scotland, they also bring essential experience to these complex discussions. 'We will of course update Parliament and the local community once there is progress and an outcome to report, however, CMAL and Peel Ports need time and space to undertake and conclude negotiations.'
Rhyl Journal
10 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Final days to apply for Prestatyn Mission Green fund
A £5,000 pot is available through the Mission Green Prestatyn scheme, funded by Castle Green Homes as part of its Sŵn y Môr development on Gronant Road. The scheme supports projects that promote sustainability, environmental improvement, health, or wellbeing. Sian Pitt, sales director at Castle Green Homes, said: "The concept of Mission Green is simple – we want to celebrate and support those people and organisations in and around Prestatyn who are working hard to look after the environment or residents' wellbeing. "We've already received applications from both existing projects and those looking to start something new, but as we want to share the funding as widely as practical, we're open to more suggestions as to how the funding would be used." Examples of eligible projects include community gardens, forest school schemes, or training for counsellors. READ MORE: Plans for 'high-quality' new flats on Rhyl's High Street get green light Ms Pitt said: "The application process is simple, with a short form to complete online before midnight on July 8. "We'll then review the entries and decide how to share the £5,000." The Mission Green fund is separate from the community investment committed under the Section 106 planning agreement. Castle Green Homes plans to divide the £5,000 between several different projects rather than allocate the full amount to a single cause. Application forms can be found at
