ELV截止日期：Rosen Law Firm敦促損失超過10萬美元的Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV)股東與法律事務所聯絡以瞭解有關其權利的資訊
紐約--(BUSINESS WIRE)--(美國商業資訊)-- 全球投資人權益法律事務所Rosen Law Firm提醒投資人，一名股東代表在2024年4月18日至2024年10月16日期間購買Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV)普通股的投資人提起了集體訴訟。Elevance將自身描述為「一家為多個市場提供健康保險計畫的醫療保健公司」。
如欲瞭解更多資訊，請遞交 表格 、向Phillip Kim律師 寄送電子郵件 ，或致電866-767-3653聯絡我們。
指控內容：Rosen Law Firm正在調查對Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV)在其業務營運方面誤導投資人的指控。
起訴書指稱，被告做出了虛假和/或誤導性陳述及/或未揭露：在醫療補助(Medicaid)重新認定程序接近完成時，被告向投資人表示，其正密切監控與重新認定程序相關的成本趨勢，且Elevance與各州協商的保費費率足以因應繼續參加醫療補助計畫病患的風險和成本狀況。儘管被告承認醫療補助支出在上升，但仍多次向投資人保證，這已充分反映在Elevance的年度指引中。這些陳述存在重大虛假或誤導性。事實上，重新認定導致Elevance醫療補助會員的疾病嚴重程度和醫療服務利用率顯著上升，因為被移出醫療補助計畫的會員平均而言比保留資格的會員更健康。這一變化的程度並未反映在Elevance與各州的費率協商中，也未體現在其2024年的財務指引裡。訴訟稱，當市場瞭解真實詳情後，投資人蒙受了損失。
現在怎麼辦：您可能有資格參與針對Elevance Health, Inc.的集體訴訟。如果有股東希望擔任該集體訴訟的原告代表，則必須在2025年7月11日之前向法院提出申請。原告代表是指代表其他集體訴訟成員主導訴訟的當事人代表。您無需參與此案即有資格獲得追償。如果您選擇不採取任何行動，您也可以保持缺席集體訴訟成員的身分。如欲瞭解更多資訊，請點選 此處 。
所有代理均為勝訴後取酬。股東無需支付任何費用或開支。
關於Rosen Law Firm：與Rosen Law Firm不同，一些就此等事宜發表公告的法律事務所並不會實際提起證券集體訴訟。身為股東權益訴訟領域公認的領導者， Rosen Law Firm 一直致力於協助股東挽回損失、改善公司治理結構，並追究公司高階主管的違法行為責任。自成立以來，Rosen Law Firm已經為股東挽回了超過10億美元的損失。
請在LinkedIn： https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm 、Twitter： https://twitter.com/rosen_firm 或Facebook： https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/ 上關注我們，以瞭解最新情況。
律師廣告。先前案例不保證可獲致類似結果。
免責聲明：本公告之原文版本乃官方授權版本。譯文僅供方便瞭解之用，煩請參照原文，原文版本乃唯一具法律效力之版本。
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Debate is underway in the Senate on Trump's big bill, but overnight voting is delayed
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But other Senate Republicans, along with conservatives in the House, are pushing for steeper cuts, particularly to health care, drawing their own unexpected warning from Trump. Advertisement 'Don't go too crazy!' the president posted on social media. 'REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected.' All told, the Senate bill includes some $4 trillion in tax cuts, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. Advertisement The Senate package would roll back billions in green energy tax credits that Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide, and impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements and making sign-up eligibility more stringent. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. If the Senate can pass the bill, it would need to return to the House. Speaker Mike Johnson has told lawmakers to be on call for a return to Washington this week. Democrats ready to fight all night Unable to stop the march toward passage of the 940-page bill, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress is using the tools at its disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took some 16 hours. Then senators took over the debate, filling the chamber with speeches, while Republicans largely stood aside. 'Reckless and irresponsible,' said Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan. 'A gift to the billionaire class,' said Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Sen. Patty Murray, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. 'In my 33 years here in the United States Senate, things have never — never — worked this way,' said Murray, the longest-serving Democrat on the Budget Committee. Advertisement She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. 'Go back home and try that game with your constituents,' she said. 'We still need to kick people off their health care — that's too expensive. We still need to close those hospitals — we have to cut costs. And we still have to kick people off SNAP — because the debt is out of control.' Sanders said Tillis' decision not to seek reelection shows the hold that Trump's cult of personality has over the GOP. 'We are literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids,' Sanders said, while giving tax breaks to Jeff Bezos and other wealthy billionaires. GOP leaders unfazed Republicans are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, and appeared undeterred, even as they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. 'We're going to pass the 'Big, beautiful bill,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman. The holdout Republicans remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. Trump, who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. He threatened to campaign aginst Tillis, who was worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' Advertisement Later Sunday, Tillis issued a lengthy statement announcing he would not seek reelection in 2026. In an impassioned evening speech, Tillis shared his views arguing the Senate approach is a betrayal of Trump's promise not to kick people off health care. 'We could take the time to get this right,' he thundered. But until then, he said he would remain opposed. Democrats can't filibuster, but can stall Using a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can rely on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome objections. Without the filibuster, Democrats have latched on to other tools to mount their objections. One is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Democrats also intend to use their full 10 hours of available debate time, now underway. And then Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package, a process called vote-a-rama. But Republicans late Sunday postponed that expected overnight session to early Monday. GOP senators to watch As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' Several provisions in the package are designed for her state in Alaska, but some were out of compliance of the strict rules by the Senate parliamentarian. A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vance joined in. Later, Scott said, 'We all want to get to yes.' Associated Press writers Ali Swenson, Fatima Hussein and Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
‘Big Ugly Bill': California's top officials excoriate Trump's big bill while it is debated in Senate
California's top Democrats condemned President Donald Trump's signature domestic policy package Sunday, as the U.S. Senate continued to debate its version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The legislation is a vast array of tax breaks and spending cuts, plus additional money for national defense and deportations, that Republicans say are crucial to keeping the country running. Democrats, however, have said it will destroy state budgets and lives, particularly among the most vulnerable who rely on government-funded programs. 'Millions will lose health care. Hundreds of thousands of jobs will be lost. Electricity costs will skyrocket. Needy families will lose access to food,' Gov. Gavin Newsom posted on the social media platform X on Sunday. 'The GOP's budget bill does all that so @realDonaldTrump can give hundreds of billions in tax breaks to his rich friends.' 'Late last night, Senate Republicans voted to advance Trump's Big Ugly Bill that strips health care from nearly a million people MORE than the version passed by the House,' California Sen. Alex Padilla also posted to X on Sunday. 'All to give tax breaks to big corporations and billionaires.' As of Sunday night, Senators were still debating the measure, which Trump had wanted to sign by July 4. The bill must still win final House approval, as well. The Associated Press reported Sunday that a new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, which is nearly $1 trillion more than the House-passed bill. The office also concluded that nearly 12 million Americans would lose their health insurance by 2034 if the bill becomes law. The legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that were set to expire by year's end, while adding new breaks, leading to a total of $4 trillion in tax cuts. The Senate package would also roll back billions in green energy tax credits and impose roughly $1.2 trillion in cuts, mostly to Medicaid and food assistance, while committing $350 billion to national security, part of which would pay for Trump's mass deportation agenda, according to the Associated Press. California Democrats have warned that the cuts, particularly to Medicaid, would decimate federal spending by imposing more checks on enrollees and providers, establishing work requirements and reducing funding to states that provide insurance to undocumented immigrants. To compensate, state lawmakers have said that states will need to raise taxes and shift funds from other programs. More than a quarter of Californians are on the state's Medicaid program, including 41% of all children, 49% of adults with disabilities and 41% of people living in nursing homes. Throughout the weekend, California representatives turned to X to weigh in. On Sunday, California Sen. Adam Schiff said that Trump's 'Big Ugly Bill' would strip health insurance away from millions of people while driving up energy costs. 'The longer this bill exposed to the sunlight,' U.S. Rep. Lateefah Simon, D-Oakland, wrote on Saturday. 'The more people will be able to see what this Republican disaster really is: an unforgivable betrayal of American values and governance that will cause significant, tangible harm to millions of people nationwide for years to come AND disproportionately impact communities of color, the disability community, and seniors.' 'GOP Senators whose states will be screwed by Trump's budget bill are now cutting side deals, eg, exempt Alaska from SNAP work requirements & give $ to rural hospitals,' State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, also wrote. 'All in service of kicking tens of millions off health care & food assistance to fund tax cuts for rich people.'
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
GOP senators unveil amendment to shrink Medicaid by another $313B
Florida Sen. Rick Scott (R) and several Republican allies have unveiled an amendment to President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' that would reduce Medicaid spending by another $313 billion by limting the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, also known as ObamaCare. The amendment would prevent new enrollees in Medicaid expansion states from receiving the 9-to-1 enhanced Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) if they are able-bodied and don't have dependent children. The existing population of Medicaid enrollees in expansion states would keep their 9-to-1 FMAP share, even if they temporarily left the program to join the workforce and then returned. The reduced FMAP for new enrollees would go into effect in 2031. A preliminary analysis by the Congressional Budget Office projects the amendment would save $313 billion over ten years, according to Scott's office. Scott and other conservatives, including Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), have made a concerted push Sunday to persuade Republican colleagues to vote for the amendment. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) pledged to Scott Saturday night that he would support the amendment in exchange for Scott's vote on a critical motion to proceed to the bill. 'I think it's going to pass. If you think about it, it's good policy. It gives the states the opportunity to get ready. Nobody gets kicked off,' Scott told The Hill. Asked if he would vote for final passage of the 940-page Senate bill if his amendment doesn't pass, Scott said, 'I'll figure it out then.' 'My goal is to support Trump. I like his agenda,' he said. The amendment is cosponsored by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). Thune told reporters earlier Sunday that he expects the vast majority of his conference to vote for the amendment, but he wasn't sure whether it would pass. 'We think it's really good policy. Yeah, I think a lot of us is going to be supporting it,' he said. Asked if he had promised Scott it would be adopted to the bill, Thune said: I don't think you can ever promise. 'Obviously we're going to do what we can to support the policy,' he said. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) ruled out changes to the FMAP formula in Medicaid expansion states when the House was putting together its reconciliation bill in early May. Johnson, the Wisconsin senator and cosponsor of the amendment, said the proposal would roll back a core piece of ObamaCare. 'People are being called and arms are being twisted,' he said. 'Nobody loses coverage. … It puts all the states on notice that this gravy train … is going to end.' 'We're trying to apply as much pressure as possible to get this amendment passed,' he added.
